You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@flex.apache.org by OmPrakash Muppirala <bi...@gmail.com> on 2015/07/31 20:58:49 UTC

[FlexJS] Installation error

I just tried the nightly and it failed on the Google closure library step.
Did they change the files again?

Thanks,
Om

On Thu, Jul 30, 2015 at 4:45 PM, Alex Harui <ah...@adobe.com> wrote:

> OK, Installing FlexJS Nightly seems to be working again.
>
> -Alex
>
> On 7/30/15, 1:51 PM, "Alex Harui" <ah...@adobe.com> wrote:
>
> >Well, Peter found an issue with the install script so hold off before
> >having others try it.
> >
> >-Alex
> >
> >On 7/30/15, 6:25 AM, "Alex Harui" <ah...@adobe.com> wrote:
> >
> >>I have wired a build from Tuesday into the Installer as the “FlexJS
> >>Nightly Build”.  You have to right-click and select “Show Dev Builds” to
> >>see it in the list.   I will update those builds on occasion but not
> >>always “nightly”.  Please try it and see if all of the externs stuff got
> >>in there, and the latest FDB, and if it still works in IJ.
> >>
> >>Still no word from the MSDN folks so the CI server is still asleep.  What
> >>form did others use to apply for Apache MSDN?  Maybe I’m using the wrong
> >>form.
> >>
> >>-Alex
> >>
> >>On 7/29/15, 3:37 PM, "Michael Schmalle" <te...@gmail.com>
> >>wrote:
> >>
> >>>Alex, you know I was being sarcastic. :) I agree with showing things
> >>>that
> >>>work. BUT I am hearing stories of "pioneers" that want to try it right
> >>>now
> >>>and one, have know idea what it is or how to start, two, don't know
> >>>where
> >>>to start and three, ask people like me that is a developer and I have to
> >>>tell them I don't even know how to get a nightly right now.
> >>>
> >>>So... I guess it would be nice, just to get something in a stable
> >>>release
> >>>so we have STEP ONE, I know Carlos wants step 10 but we have to get to
> >>>step
> >>>one right now or else it's going to fail.
> >>>
> >>>Mike
> >>>
> >>>On Wed, Jul 29, 2015 at 6:32 PM, Alex Harui <ah...@adobe.com> wrote:
> >>>
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>> On 7/29/15, 3:24 PM, "Michael Schmalle" <te...@gmail.com>
> >>>>wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>> >On Wed, Jul 29, 2015 at 6:02 PM, OmPrakash Muppirala
> >>>> ><bi...@gmail.com>
> >>>> >wrote:
> >>>> >
> >>>> >> +1 for a release of FlexJS.  It would be great to highlight and
> >>>>talk
> >>>> >>about
> >>>> >> the new version of FlexJS at ApacheCon Europe on Oct 1st, 2015.
> >>>> >>
> >>>> >> I have been talking to various folks (outside of Apache) about
> >>>>FlexJS.
> >>>> >>One
> >>>> >> feedback I've received is that the version number of 0.02 makes
> >>>>folks
> >>>> >>think
> >>>> >> that it is not ready to be taken seriously.  It is hard to convince
> >>>> >>folks
> >>>> >> to start using it if it has an 'alpha only' sheen to it.  I really
> >>>>think
> >>>> >> that the next version should be at a 1.0 release.  Even if it is
> >>>>not
> >>>> >> perfect, the FlexJS already has a lot of strong things going for
> >>>>it.
> >>>> I
> >>>> >> don't think we should keep it under the covers anymore, i.e.
> >>>>keeping
> >>>>it
> >>>> >>at
> >>>> >> a sub 1.0 release version.
> >>>> >>
> >>>> >> Thoughts?
> >>>> >>
> >>>> >
> >>>> >Or at least 0.5 or 1.0 alpha. :) I know there are 1000's of hours
> >>>>into
> >>>>the
> >>>> >compiler/transpiler/eternc side so having it at 0.0.2 really sucks.
> >>>> >
> >>>> >I know what Carlos is saying but the damn thing need to just have a
> >>>> >release, then release again, and again adding things. This isn't a
> >>>>fashion
> >>>> >show where you get one walk down the ile, it's iterative. Haha
> >>>>
> >>>> My philosophy is to set expectations low and exceed them.  Once I hear
> >>>> that folks on this list are actually building things that work with
> >>>>FlexJS
> >>>> then I’d say we are ready to tell more folks about it by giving it a
> >>>>1.0
> >>>> version.  My goal after this release is to try to get something useful
> >>>> running.  I’m sort of leaning toward this still being 0.0.3 and then
> >>>> trying to get that something running and call it 0.5 or 0.9 and then
> >>>>if
> >>>> someone else is successful that can be 1.0.
> >>>>
> >>>> I am going to spend a bit of time this week on some polish and trying
> >>>>to
> >>>> make the Windows side work better out of the box but yes, it should be
> >>>> more iterative than once a year going forward.
> >>>>
> >>>> -Alex
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>
> >
>
>

Re: [FlexJS] Installation error

Posted by OmPrakash Muppirala <bi...@gmail.com>.
I tried after your fix.  It installed fine.

Thanks much!
Om

On Fri, Jul 31, 2015 at 12:57 PM, Alex Harui <ah...@adobe.com> wrote:

>
>
> On 7/31/15, 11:58 AM, "omuppi1@gmail.com on behalf of OmPrakash Muppirala"
> <omuppi1@gmail.com on behalf of bigosmallm@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> >I just tried the nightly and it failed on the Google closure library step.
> >Did they change the files again?
>
> Yes.  They’ve changed it way more often than usual of the last day or so.
> I don’t know why they don’t cut releases.
>
> -Alex
>
>

Re: [FlexJS] Installation error

Posted by Alex Harui <ah...@adobe.com>.

On 7/31/15, 11:58 AM, "omuppi1@gmail.com on behalf of OmPrakash Muppirala"
<omuppi1@gmail.com on behalf of bigosmallm@gmail.com> wrote:

>I just tried the nightly and it failed on the Google closure library step.
>Did they change the files again?

Yes.  They’ve changed it way more often than usual of the last day or so.
I don’t know why they don’t cut releases.

-Alex