You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to cvs@httpd.apache.org by mi...@apache.org on 2012/10/03 17:49:17 UTC
svn commit: r1393564 - /httpd/httpd/trunk/server/mpm/event/event.c
Author: minfrin
Date: Wed Oct 3 15:49:17 2012
New Revision: 1393564
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1393564&view=rev
Log:
Fix spelling mistakes.
Modified:
httpd/httpd/trunk/server/mpm/event/event.c
Modified: httpd/httpd/trunk/server/mpm/event/event.c
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/httpd/httpd/trunk/server/mpm/event/event.c?rev=1393564&r1=1393563&r2=1393564&view=diff
==============================================================================
--- httpd/httpd/trunk/server/mpm/event/event.c (original)
+++ httpd/httpd/trunk/server/mpm/event/event.c Wed Oct 3 15:49:17 2012
@@ -19,10 +19,10 @@
*
* After a client completes the first request, the client can keep the
* connection open to send more requests with the same socket. This can save
- * signifigant overhead in creating TCP connections. However, the major
+ * significant overhead in creating TCP connections. However, the major
* disadvantage is that Apache traditionally keeps an entire child
* process/thread waiting for data from the client. To solve this problem,
- * this MPM has a dedicated thread for handling both the Listenting sockets,
+ * this MPM has a dedicated thread for handling both the Listening sockets,
* and all sockets that are in a Keep Alive status.
*
* The MPM assumes the underlying apr_pollset implementation is somewhat
@@ -30,7 +30,7 @@
* enables the MPM to avoid extra high level locking or having to wake up the
* listener thread when a keep-alive socket needs to be sent to it.
*
- * This MPM not preform well on older platforms that do not have very good
+ * This MPM does not perform well on older platforms that do not have very good
* threading, like Linux with a 2.4 kernel, but this does not matter, since we
* require EPoll or KQueue.
*
Re: svn commit: r1393564 - /httpd/httpd/trunk/server/mpm/event/event.c
Posted by Jeff Trawick <tr...@gmail.com>.
On Wed, Oct 3, 2012 at 11:53 AM, Graham Leggett <mi...@apache.org> wrote:
> On 03 Oct 2012, at 5:49 PM, minfrin@apache.org wrote:
>
>> Author: minfrin
>> Date: Wed Oct 3 15:49:17 2012
>> New Revision: 1393564
>>
>> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1393564&view=rev
>> Log:
>> Fix spelling mistakes.
>
> I understand that fixing spelling mistakes doesn't need to be voted on for back port, is this correct?
correct
> If no objections, will back port this to v2.4.
>
> Regards,
> Graham
> --
>
--
Born in Roswell... married an alien...
http://emptyhammock.com/
Re: svn commit: r1393564 - /httpd/httpd/trunk/server/mpm/event/event.c
Posted by Graham Leggett <mi...@apache.org>.
On 03 Oct 2012, at 5:49 PM, minfrin@apache.org wrote:
> Author: minfrin
> Date: Wed Oct 3 15:49:17 2012
> New Revision: 1393564
>
> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1393564&view=rev
> Log:
> Fix spelling mistakes.
I understand that fixing spelling mistakes doesn't need to be voted on for back port, is this correct? If no objections, will back port this to v2.4.
Regards,
Graham
--