APR with upcomming win32 build of svn1.4

[john <js...@ecclescollege.ac.uk>]

Is there a requirement to build SVN 1.4 (when it's released) with a newer
version of APR, and hence run on Apache 2.2?

We're currently on Apache 2.0.x and I'm planning the upgrade to SVN 1.4 - will I
need a Apache upgrade too?

All win32 installs - using the standard binaries.

Thanks,

John

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@subversion.tigris.org

Re: APR with upcomming win32 build of svn1.4

[Garrett Rooney <ro...@electricjellyfish.net>]

On 8/1/06, eg <eg...@gmail.com> wrote:

> So to build and run Subversion 1.4 with Apache 2.2x, we need to wait
> until the next APR 1.2x release comes out with the necessary fixes in it
> as well.  Then we can build from the sources with the matching libraries.
>
> Correct?

Yes.

-garrett

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@subversion.tigris.org

Re: APR with upcomming win32 build of svn1.4

[eg <eg...@gmail.com>]

Garrett Rooney wrote:
> On 7/31/06, D.J. Heap <dj...@gmail.com> wrote:
> 
>> On Subversion's side, yes, 1.4 has all the fixes in.  APR has had the
>> necessary fixes committed and backported but I don't believe any
>> release of APR has them yet -- the next release (that is not a
>> security-fix-only) should have them, AFAIK.
> 
> Correct.
> 
> -garrett

Sounds good.

So to build and run Subversion 1.4 with Apache 2.2x, we need to wait 
until the next APR 1.2x release comes out with the necessary fixes in it 
as well.  Then we can build from the sources with the matching libraries.

Correct?


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@subversion.tigris.org

Re: APR with upcomming win32 build of svn1.4

[Garrett Rooney <ro...@electricjellyfish.net>]

On 7/31/06, D.J. Heap <dj...@gmail.com> wrote:

> On Subversion's side, yes, 1.4 has all the fixes in.  APR has had the
> necessary fixes committed and backported but I don't believe any
> release of APR has them yet -- the next release (that is not a
> security-fix-only) should have them, AFAIK.

Correct.

-garrett

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@subversion.tigris.org

Re: APR with upcomming win32 build of svn1.4

["D.J. Heap" <dj...@gmail.com>]

On 7/31/06, eg <eg...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Lieven Govaerts wrote:
> >> -----Original Message-----
> >> From: news [mailto:news@sea.gmane.org] On Behalf Of john
> >> Sent: dinsdag 1 augustus 2006 0:15
> >>
> >> If Branko builds with apr 1.x, does that mean running against
> >> Apache 2.2 is essential (even though I guess apr is
> >> statically linked to svn?)
> >
> > Yep, those apr versions should match, they aren't binary compatible. The
> > Subversion modules won't even load in apache 2.2 (I think, never tested it).
> >
> > My guess is that the Windows binaries of 1.4 will still be built against
> > apache 2.0.x, as the support for apache 2.2 in Subversion was only finished
> > very recently.
> >
> > Lieven.
>
> Have the issues mentioned in the following thread been resolved for 1.4
> now?
>
> http://svn.haxx.se/users/archive-2006-05/0688.shtml
>


On Subversion's side, yes, 1.4 has all the fixes in.  APR has had the
necessary fixes committed and backported but I don't believe any
release of APR has them yet -- the next release (that is not a
security-fix-only) should have them, AFAIK.

DJ

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@subversion.tigris.org

Re: APR with upcomming win32 build of svn1.4

[eg <eg...@gmail.com>]

Lieven Govaerts wrote:
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: news [mailto:news@sea.gmane.org] On Behalf Of john
>> Sent: dinsdag 1 augustus 2006 0:15
>>
>> If Branko builds with apr 1.x, does that mean running against 
>> Apache 2.2 is essential (even though I guess apr is 
>> statically linked to svn?)
> 
> Yep, those apr versions should match, they aren't binary compatible. The
> Subversion modules won't even load in apache 2.2 (I think, never tested it).
> 
> My guess is that the Windows binaries of 1.4 will still be built against
> apache 2.0.x, as the support for apache 2.2 in Subversion was only finished
> very recently.
> 
> Lieven.

Have the issues mentioned in the following thread been resolved for 1.4 
now?

http://svn.haxx.se/users/archive-2006-05/0688.shtml



---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@subversion.tigris.org

RE: APR with upcomming win32 build of svn1.4

[Lieven Govaerts <lg...@mobsol.be>]

> -----Original Message-----
> From: news [mailto:news@sea.gmane.org] On Behalf Of john
> Sent: dinsdag 1 augustus 2006 0:15
> 
> If Branko builds with apr 1.x, does that mean running against 
> Apache 2.2 is essential (even though I guess apr is 
> statically linked to svn?)

Yep, those apr versions should match, they aren't binary compatible. The
Subversion modules won't even load in apache 2.2 (I think, never tested it).

My guess is that the Windows binaries of 1.4 will still be built against
apache 2.0.x, as the support for apache 2.2 in Subversion was only finished
very recently.

Lieven.







---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@subversion.tigris.org

Re: APR with upcomming win32 build of svn1.4

[john <js...@ecclescollege.ac.uk>]

Lieven Govaerts <lgo <at> mobsol.be> writes:

> The 'standard' binaries for Windows you're referring to are probably the 
> ones created by Branko Čibej, who (atleast 'till now) volunteered to 
> build and package each new Subversion release for Windows. Whether or 
> not his 1.4 binaries will be build with apr 0.9.x or 1.x is his choice.

Thanks for the help.

If Branko builds with apr 1.x, does that mean running against Apache 2.2 is
essential (even though I guess apr is statically linked to svn?)

John

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@subversion.tigris.org

Re: APR with upcomming win32 build of svn1.4

[Lieven Govaerts <lg...@mobsol.be>]

john wrote:
> Is there a requirement to build SVN 1.4 (when it's released) with a newer
> version of APR, and hence run on Apache 2.2?
> 
> We're currently on Apache 2.0.x and I'm planning the upgrade to SVN 1.4 - will I
> need a Apache upgrade too?
> 
> All win32 installs - using the standard binaries.
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> John

John,

svn 1.4 still supports apr 0.9.x which is included in apache 2.0.x, so 
there'll be no need to upgrade to apache 2.2.x.

Note: I'm talking about the source code here. The Subversion project 
doesn't release binaries themselves.

The 'standard' binaries for Windows you're referring to are probably the 
ones created by Branko Čibej, who (atleast 'till now) volunteered to 
build and package each new Subversion release for Windows. Whether or 
not his 1.4 binaries will be build with apr 0.9.x or 1.x is his choice.

If you want to be completely sure and start testing svn 1.4 before 
Branko or another volunteer releases the package for Windows, I advise 
you to build Subversion from source yourself.

hope this helps,

Lieven.

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@subversion.tigris.org