You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@cordova.apache.org by Andrew Grieve <ag...@chromium.org> on 2015/04/09 18:15:55 UTC
[Vote] 4.0.0 Android Release
Please review and vote on this 4.0.0 Android Release.
Release issue: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CB-8833
Repos ready to be released have been published to dist/dev:
https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/cordova/CB-8833
The package was published from its corresponding git tag:
cordova-android: 4.0.0 (f224b1f2d4)
Note that you can test it out via:
cordova platform add https://github.com/apache/cordova-android#4.0.0
Blog post to review is here:
https://github.com/cordova/apache-blog-posts/blob/master/2015-04-10-cordova-android-4.0.0.md
Upon a successful vote I will upload the archive to dist/, publish it to
NPM, and post the corresponding blog post.
Voting guidelines:
https://github.com/apache/cordova-coho/blob/master/docs/release-voting.md
Voting will go on for a minimum of 48 hours.
I vote +1:
* Ran coho audit-license-headers over the relevant repos
* Ran coho check-license to ensure all dependencies and subdependencies
have Apache-compatible licenses
* Ran mobilespec and only expected failures were happening
* Verified contents of archive
Re: [Vote] 4.0.0 Android Release
Posted by Michal Mocny <mm...@chromium.org>.
Certainly doesn't block!
Heres a PR for the plugin docs:
https://github.com/MobileChromeApps/cordova-crosswalk-engine/pull/21
On Thu, Apr 9, 2015 at 1:00 PM, Joe Bowser <bo...@gmail.com> wrote:
> This should probably go to discuss, and I'm not sure blocks the release.
> Sorry to clutter the vote thead, I'll vote once I'm done testing.
>
> On Thu, Apr 9, 2015 at 9:57 AM Michal Mocny <mm...@chromium.org> wrote:
>
> > Also, not directly related to this release,
> > but cordova-plugin-crosswalk-webview README.md instructions list Platform
> > workflow first, then CLI workflow. Should we swap that? Users will go
> > there for install instructions.. I think the platform scripts workflow
> > should perhaps just link out to a separate doc even..
> >
> > -Michal
> >
> > On Thu, Apr 9, 2015 at 12:54 PM, Michal Mocny <mm...@chromium.org>
> wrote:
> >
> > > PR for Blogpost changes, hopefully making it a bit more obvious what
> the
> > > whitelist changes are:
> > > https://github.com/cordova/apache-blog-posts/pull/35
> > >
> > > Possibly we want to link to a more in-depth guide and remove some of my
> > > notes (i.e. specifically what needs adding, which config.xml should
> look
> > > like).
> > >
> > > Question: some of the plugin links are to github, some to npm. Should
> we
> > > document how to add these plugins using the new npm plugin name format?
> > >
> > > On Thu, Apr 9, 2015 at 12:15 PM, Andrew Grieve <ag...@chromium.org>
> > > wrote:
> > >
> > >> Please review and vote on this 4.0.0 Android Release.
> > >>
> > >> Release issue: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CB-8833
> > >>
> > >> Repos ready to be released have been published to dist/dev:
> > >> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/cordova/CB-8833
> > >>
> > >> The package was published from its corresponding git tag:
> > >> cordova-android: 4.0.0 (f224b1f2d4)
> > >>
> > >> Note that you can test it out via:
> > >>
> > >> cordova platform add https://github.com/apache/
> > cordova-android#4.0.0
> > >>
> > >> Blog post to review is here:
> > >>
> > >>
> > >>
> > >> https://github.com/cordova/apache-blog-posts/blob/master/
> > 2015-04-10-cordova-android-4.0.0.md
> > >>
> > >> Upon a successful vote I will upload the archive to dist/, publish it
> to
> > >> NPM, and post the corresponding blog post.
> > >>
> > >> Voting guidelines:
> > >> https://github.com/apache/cordova-coho/blob/master/docs/
> > release-voting.md
> > >>
> > >> Voting will go on for a minimum of 48 hours.
> > >>
> > >> I vote +1:
> > >> * Ran coho audit-license-headers over the relevant repos
> > >> * Ran coho check-license to ensure all dependencies and
> subdependencies
> > >> have Apache-compatible licenses
> > >> * Ran mobilespec and only expected failures were happening
> > >> * Verified contents of archive
> > >>
> > >
> > >
> >
>
Re: [Vote] 4.0.0 Android Release
Posted by Joe Bowser <bo...@gmail.com>.
This should probably go to discuss, and I'm not sure blocks the release.
Sorry to clutter the vote thead, I'll vote once I'm done testing.
On Thu, Apr 9, 2015 at 9:57 AM Michal Mocny <mm...@chromium.org> wrote:
> Also, not directly related to this release,
> but cordova-plugin-crosswalk-webview README.md instructions list Platform
> workflow first, then CLI workflow. Should we swap that? Users will go
> there for install instructions.. I think the platform scripts workflow
> should perhaps just link out to a separate doc even..
>
> -Michal
>
> On Thu, Apr 9, 2015 at 12:54 PM, Michal Mocny <mm...@chromium.org> wrote:
>
> > PR for Blogpost changes, hopefully making it a bit more obvious what the
> > whitelist changes are:
> > https://github.com/cordova/apache-blog-posts/pull/35
> >
> > Possibly we want to link to a more in-depth guide and remove some of my
> > notes (i.e. specifically what needs adding, which config.xml should look
> > like).
> >
> > Question: some of the plugin links are to github, some to npm. Should we
> > document how to add these plugins using the new npm plugin name format?
> >
> > On Thu, Apr 9, 2015 at 12:15 PM, Andrew Grieve <ag...@chromium.org>
> > wrote:
> >
> >> Please review and vote on this 4.0.0 Android Release.
> >>
> >> Release issue: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CB-8833
> >>
> >> Repos ready to be released have been published to dist/dev:
> >> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/cordova/CB-8833
> >>
> >> The package was published from its corresponding git tag:
> >> cordova-android: 4.0.0 (f224b1f2d4)
> >>
> >> Note that you can test it out via:
> >>
> >> cordova platform add https://github.com/apache/
> cordova-android#4.0.0
> >>
> >> Blog post to review is here:
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> https://github.com/cordova/apache-blog-posts/blob/master/
> 2015-04-10-cordova-android-4.0.0.md
> >>
> >> Upon a successful vote I will upload the archive to dist/, publish it to
> >> NPM, and post the corresponding blog post.
> >>
> >> Voting guidelines:
> >> https://github.com/apache/cordova-coho/blob/master/docs/
> release-voting.md
> >>
> >> Voting will go on for a minimum of 48 hours.
> >>
> >> I vote +1:
> >> * Ran coho audit-license-headers over the relevant repos
> >> * Ran coho check-license to ensure all dependencies and subdependencies
> >> have Apache-compatible licenses
> >> * Ran mobilespec and only expected failures were happening
> >> * Verified contents of archive
> >>
> >
> >
>
Re: [Vote] 4.0.0 Android Release
Posted by Michal Mocny <mm...@chromium.org>.
Also, not directly related to this release,
but cordova-plugin-crosswalk-webview README.md instructions list Platform
workflow first, then CLI workflow. Should we swap that? Users will go
there for install instructions.. I think the platform scripts workflow
should perhaps just link out to a separate doc even..
-Michal
On Thu, Apr 9, 2015 at 12:54 PM, Michal Mocny <mm...@chromium.org> wrote:
> PR for Blogpost changes, hopefully making it a bit more obvious what the
> whitelist changes are:
> https://github.com/cordova/apache-blog-posts/pull/35
>
> Possibly we want to link to a more in-depth guide and remove some of my
> notes (i.e. specifically what needs adding, which config.xml should look
> like).
>
> Question: some of the plugin links are to github, some to npm. Should we
> document how to add these plugins using the new npm plugin name format?
>
> On Thu, Apr 9, 2015 at 12:15 PM, Andrew Grieve <ag...@chromium.org>
> wrote:
>
>> Please review and vote on this 4.0.0 Android Release.
>>
>> Release issue: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CB-8833
>>
>> Repos ready to be released have been published to dist/dev:
>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/cordova/CB-8833
>>
>> The package was published from its corresponding git tag:
>> cordova-android: 4.0.0 (f224b1f2d4)
>>
>> Note that you can test it out via:
>>
>> cordova platform add https://github.com/apache/cordova-android#4.0.0
>>
>> Blog post to review is here:
>>
>>
>>
>> https://github.com/cordova/apache-blog-posts/blob/master/2015-04-10-cordova-android-4.0.0.md
>>
>> Upon a successful vote I will upload the archive to dist/, publish it to
>> NPM, and post the corresponding blog post.
>>
>> Voting guidelines:
>> https://github.com/apache/cordova-coho/blob/master/docs/release-voting.md
>>
>> Voting will go on for a minimum of 48 hours.
>>
>> I vote +1:
>> * Ran coho audit-license-headers over the relevant repos
>> * Ran coho check-license to ensure all dependencies and subdependencies
>> have Apache-compatible licenses
>> * Ran mobilespec and only expected failures were happening
>> * Verified contents of archive
>>
>
>
Re: [Vote] 4.0.0 Android Release
Posted by Serge Huijben <s....@gmail.com>.
But why is the meta csp tag required?
Op do 9 apr. 2015 om 19:36 schreef Ian Clelland <ic...@chromium.org>
> On Thu, Apr 9, 2015 at 1:26 PM, Treggiari, Leo <le...@intel.com>
> wrote:
>
> > Do the whitelist changes mean that current access origin entries in a
> > config.xml file will be ignored the next time that a developer builds
> > their project? If so, that will certainly surprise some developers.
> >
>
> Yes, but it only surprises developers who:
> - Blindly update just their cordova-android platform to a new major
> release, and
> - Don't read any of the docs or release notes.
>
> The solution for them is simple, and loudly spelled out in the docs (or it
> should be) -- install the legacy whitelist plugin. It treats the config
> tags exactly as previous versions of Cordova did.
>
>
> > Or does this just impact newly created projects?
> >
>
> Newly-created projects actually shouldn't see this -- by default, the
> hello-world starter template includes the new whitelist plugin.
>
> Ian
>
>
> > Thanks,
> > Leo
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: mmocny@google.com [mailto:mmocny@google.com] On Behalf Of Michal
> > Mocny
> > Sent: Thursday, April 09, 2015 9:54 AM
> > To: dev
> > Subject: Re: [Vote] 4.0.0 Android Release
> >
> > PR for Blogpost changes, hopefully making it a bit more obvious what the
> > whitelist changes are:
> > https://github.com/cordova/apache-blog-posts/pull/35
> >
> > Possibly we want to link to a more in-depth guide and remove some of my
> > notes (i.e. specifically what needs adding, which config.xml should look
> > like).
> >
> > Question: some of the plugin links are to github, some to npm. Should we
> > document how to add these plugins using the new npm plugin name format?
> >
> > On Thu, Apr 9, 2015 at 12:15 PM, Andrew Grieve <ag...@chromium.org>
> > wrote:
> >
> > > Please review and vote on this 4.0.0 Android Release.
> > >
> > > Release issue: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CB-8833
> > >
> > > Repos ready to be released have been published to dist/dev:
> > > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/cordova/CB-8833
> > >
> > > The package was published from its corresponding git tag:
> > > cordova-android: 4.0.0 (f224b1f2d4)
> > >
> > > Note that you can test it out via:
> > >
> > > cordova platform add https://github.com/apache/
> cordova-android#4.0.0
> > >
> > > Blog post to review is here:
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > https://github.com/cordova/apache-blog-posts/blob/master/
> 2015-04-10-cordova-android-4.0.0.md
> > >
> > > Upon a successful vote I will upload the archive to dist/, publish it
> to
> > > NPM, and post the corresponding blog post.
> > >
> > > Voting guidelines:
> > >
> > https://github.com/apache/cordova-coho/blob/master/docs/
> release-voting.md
> > >
> > > Voting will go on for a minimum of 48 hours.
> > >
> > > I vote +1:
> > > * Ran coho audit-license-headers over the relevant repos
> > > * Ran coho check-license to ensure all dependencies and subdependencies
> > > have Apache-compatible licenses
> > > * Ran mobilespec and only expected failures were happening
> > > * Verified contents of archive
> > >
> >
>
Re: [Vote] 4.0.0 Android Release
Posted by Ian Clelland <ic...@chromium.org>.
On Thu, Apr 9, 2015 at 1:26 PM, Treggiari, Leo <le...@intel.com>
wrote:
> Do the whitelist changes mean that current access origin entries in a
> config.xml file will be ignored the next time that a developer builds
> their project? If so, that will certainly surprise some developers.
>
Yes, but it only surprises developers who:
- Blindly update just their cordova-android platform to a new major
release, and
- Don't read any of the docs or release notes.
The solution for them is simple, and loudly spelled out in the docs (or it
should be) -- install the legacy whitelist plugin. It treats the config
tags exactly as previous versions of Cordova did.
> Or does this just impact newly created projects?
>
Newly-created projects actually shouldn't see this -- by default, the
hello-world starter template includes the new whitelist plugin.
Ian
> Thanks,
> Leo
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: mmocny@google.com [mailto:mmocny@google.com] On Behalf Of Michal
> Mocny
> Sent: Thursday, April 09, 2015 9:54 AM
> To: dev
> Subject: Re: [Vote] 4.0.0 Android Release
>
> PR for Blogpost changes, hopefully making it a bit more obvious what the
> whitelist changes are:
> https://github.com/cordova/apache-blog-posts/pull/35
>
> Possibly we want to link to a more in-depth guide and remove some of my
> notes (i.e. specifically what needs adding, which config.xml should look
> like).
>
> Question: some of the plugin links are to github, some to npm. Should we
> document how to add these plugins using the new npm plugin name format?
>
> On Thu, Apr 9, 2015 at 12:15 PM, Andrew Grieve <ag...@chromium.org>
> wrote:
>
> > Please review and vote on this 4.0.0 Android Release.
> >
> > Release issue: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CB-8833
> >
> > Repos ready to be released have been published to dist/dev:
> > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/cordova/CB-8833
> >
> > The package was published from its corresponding git tag:
> > cordova-android: 4.0.0 (f224b1f2d4)
> >
> > Note that you can test it out via:
> >
> > cordova platform add https://github.com/apache/cordova-android#4.0.0
> >
> > Blog post to review is here:
> >
> >
> >
> >
> https://github.com/cordova/apache-blog-posts/blob/master/2015-04-10-cordova-android-4.0.0.md
> >
> > Upon a successful vote I will upload the archive to dist/, publish it to
> > NPM, and post the corresponding blog post.
> >
> > Voting guidelines:
> >
> https://github.com/apache/cordova-coho/blob/master/docs/release-voting.md
> >
> > Voting will go on for a minimum of 48 hours.
> >
> > I vote +1:
> > * Ran coho audit-license-headers over the relevant repos
> > * Ran coho check-license to ensure all dependencies and subdependencies
> > have Apache-compatible licenses
> > * Ran mobilespec and only expected failures were happening
> > * Verified contents of archive
> >
>
Re: [Vote] 4.0.0 Android Release
Posted by Andrew Grieve <ag...@chromium.org>.
The vote has now closed. The results are:
Positive Binding Votes: 6
Andrew Grieve
Joe Bowser
Brian LeRoux
Simon MacDonald
Sergey Grebnov
Ian Clelland
Negative Binding Votes: 0
The vote has passed.
On Wed, Apr 15, 2015 at 10:15 AM, Ian Clelland <ic...@chromium.org>
wrote:
>
> +1
>
> Verified package integrity against signatures, checksums and public repo
at
> the same commit.
> Successfully built and ran mobilespec.
Re: [Vote] 4.0.0 Android Release
Posted by Ian Clelland <ic...@chromium.org>.
+1
Verified package integrity against signatures, checksums and public repo at
the same commit.
Successfully built and ran mobilespec.
RE: [Vote] 4.0.0 Android Release
Posted by "Sergey Grebnov (Akvelon)" <v-...@microsoft.com>.
I vote +1
Verified platform could be added, built and run
-Sergey
-----Original Message-----
From: Serge Huijben [mailto:s.huijben@gmail.com]
Sent: Tuesday, April 14, 2015 10:02 PM
To: dev@cordova.apache.org
Subject: Re: [Vote] 4.0.0 Android Release
+1
> On 14 Apr 2015, at 20:17, Simon MacDonald <si...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> +1
> Simon Mac Donald
> http://hi.im/simonmacdonald
>
>
> On Tue, Apr 14, 2015 at 2:14 PM, Brian LeRoux <b...@brian.io> wrote:
>> +1
>>
>> On Tue, Apr 14, 2015, 1:07 PM Joe Bowser <bo...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> +1
>>>
>>> - verified archive
>>> - ran mobile-spec
>>> - audited headers.
>>>
>>> On Tue, Apr 14, 2015 at 9:56 AM Andrew Grieve <ag...@chromium.org>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> I don't think we need to re-start since no one's -'ve voted, and
>>>> nothing would be different. Feel free to start voting! :)
>>>>
>>>> On Tue, Apr 14, 2015 at 10:36 AM, Joe Bowser <bo...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> So...since nobody voted on this thread, I think it's safe to say
>>>>> the
>>> vote
>>>>> failed. We should probably re-start this soon.
>>>>>
>>>>> On Thu, Apr 9, 2015 at 11:04 AM Treggiari, Leo <
>>> leo.treggiari@intel.com>
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> Did the DISCUSS thread have a pointer to the release notes about
>>>>> whitelist
>>>>>> support?
>>>>>> Sorry that I missed that.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Leo
>>>>>>
>>>>>> -----Original Message-----
>>>>>> From: Shazron [mailto:shazron@gmail.com]
>>>>>> Sent: Thursday, April 09, 2015 11:00 AM
>>>>>> To: dev@cordova.apache.org
>>>>>> Subject: Re: [Vote] 4.0.0 Android Release
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Why is this on the Vote thread? please take it to the Discuss thread.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Thursday, April 9, 2015, Treggiari, Leo
>>>>>> <le...@intel.com>
>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Another question, based upon my understanding, which must be wrong!
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> The 4.0.0 Android Release will require the
>>>>>>> cordova-plugin-whitelist
>>>> in
>>>>>>> order
>>>>>>> to get a whitelist implemented correctly.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Given its name (dash-style) it is only available as an node
>>>> component.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> The is no released CLI that knows how to fetch from npm?
>>>>>>> Or does 4.3, even though I don't see it in the release notes?
>>>>>>> Even so, there are many previous CLI releases which will not work?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> It would be good for the release notes to explain the situation.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Leo
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> -----Original Message-----
>>>>>>> From: Treggiari, Leo [mailto:leo.treggiari@intel.com
>>> <javascript:;>]
>>>>>>> Sent: Thursday, April 09, 2015 10:27 AM
>>>>>>> To: dev@cordova.apache.org <javascript:;>
>>>>>>> Subject: RE: [Vote] 4.0.0 Android Release
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Do the whitelist changes mean that current access origin entries
>>> in a
>>>>>>> config.xml file will be ignored the next time that a developer
>>> builds
>>>>>>> their project? If so, that will certainly surprise some
>>> developers.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Or does this just impact newly created projects?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>>>> Leo
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> -----Original Message-----
>>>>>>> From: mmocny@google.com <javascript:;> [mailto:mmocny@google.com
>>>>>>> <javascript:;>] On Behalf Of Michal Mocny
>>>>>>> Sent: Thursday, April 09, 2015 9:54 AM
>>>>>>> To: dev
>>>>>>> Subject: Re: [Vote] 4.0.0 Android Release
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> PR for Blogpost changes, hopefully making it a bit more obvious
>>> what
>>>>> the
>>>>>>> whitelist changes are:
>>>>>>> https://github.com/cordova/apache-blog-posts/pull/35
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Possibly we want to link to a more in-depth guide and remove
>>>>>>> some
>>> of
>>>> my
>>>>>>> notes (i.e. specifically what needs adding, which config.xml
>>>>>>> should
>>>>> look
>>>>>>> like).
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Question: some of the plugin links are to github, some to npm.
>>>> Should
>>>>> we
>>>>>>> document how to add these plugins using the new npm plugin name
>>>> format?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On Thu, Apr 9, 2015 at 12:15 PM, Andrew Grieve <
>>> agrieve@chromium.org
>>>>>>> <javascript:;>> wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Please review and vote on this 4.0.0 Android Release.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Release issue: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CB-8833
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Repos ready to be released have been published to dist/dev:
>>>>>>>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/cordova/CB-8833
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> The package was published from its corresponding git tag:
>>>>>>>> cordova-android: 4.0.0 (f224b1f2d4)
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Note that you can test it out via:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> cordova platform add
>>>>>> https://github.com/apache/cordova-android#4.0.0
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Blog post to review is here:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>> https://github.com/cordova/apache-blog-posts/blob/master/2015-04-10-
>>> cordova-android-4.0.0.md
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Upon a successful vote I will upload the archive to dist/,
>>> publish
>>>> it
>>>>>> to
>>>>>>>> NPM, and post the corresponding blog post.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Voting guidelines:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>> https://github.com/apache/cordova-coho/blob/master/docs/release-voti
>>> ng.md
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Voting will go on for a minimum of 48 hours.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> I vote +1:
>>>>>>>> * Ran coho audit-license-headers over the relevant repos
>>>>>>>> * Ran coho check-license to ensure all dependencies and
>>>>> subdependencies
>>>>>>>> have Apache-compatible licenses
>>>>>>>> * Ran mobilespec and only expected failures were happening
>>>>>>>> * Verified contents of archive
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>> B KKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKK
>>>> KKKCB
>>>>>>> [ X ܚX K K[XZ[
>>>>>>> ] ][ X ܚX P ܙ ݘK \ X K ܙ B ܈ Y ] [ۘ[ [X[ K[XZ[
>>>>>>> ] Z [ ܙ ݘK \ X K ܙ B
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@cordova.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@cordova.apache.org
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@cordova.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@cordova.apache.org
Re: [Vote] 4.0.0 Android Release
Posted by Serge Huijben <s....@gmail.com>.
+1
> On 14 Apr 2015, at 20:17, Simon MacDonald <si...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> +1
> Simon Mac Donald
> http://hi.im/simonmacdonald
>
>
> On Tue, Apr 14, 2015 at 2:14 PM, Brian LeRoux <b...@brian.io> wrote:
>> +1
>>
>> On Tue, Apr 14, 2015, 1:07 PM Joe Bowser <bo...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> +1
>>>
>>> - verified archive
>>> - ran mobile-spec
>>> - audited headers.
>>>
>>> On Tue, Apr 14, 2015 at 9:56 AM Andrew Grieve <ag...@chromium.org>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> I don't think we need to re-start since no one's -'ve voted, and nothing
>>>> would be different. Feel free to start voting! :)
>>>>
>>>> On Tue, Apr 14, 2015 at 10:36 AM, Joe Bowser <bo...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> So...since nobody voted on this thread, I think it's safe to say the
>>> vote
>>>>> failed. We should probably re-start this soon.
>>>>>
>>>>> On Thu, Apr 9, 2015 at 11:04 AM Treggiari, Leo <
>>> leo.treggiari@intel.com>
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> Did the DISCUSS thread have a pointer to the release notes about
>>>>> whitelist
>>>>>> support?
>>>>>> Sorry that I missed that.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Leo
>>>>>>
>>>>>> -----Original Message-----
>>>>>> From: Shazron [mailto:shazron@gmail.com]
>>>>>> Sent: Thursday, April 09, 2015 11:00 AM
>>>>>> To: dev@cordova.apache.org
>>>>>> Subject: Re: [Vote] 4.0.0 Android Release
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Why is this on the Vote thread? please take it to the Discuss thread.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Thursday, April 9, 2015, Treggiari, Leo <le...@intel.com>
>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Another question, based upon my understanding, which must be wrong!
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> The 4.0.0 Android Release will require the cordova-plugin-whitelist
>>>> in
>>>>>>> order
>>>>>>> to get a whitelist implemented correctly.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Given its name (dash-style) it is only available as an node
>>>> component.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> The is no released CLI that knows how to fetch from npm?
>>>>>>> Or does 4.3, even though I don't see it in the release notes?
>>>>>>> Even so, there are many previous CLI releases which will not work?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> It would be good for the release notes to explain the situation.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Leo
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> -----Original Message-----
>>>>>>> From: Treggiari, Leo [mailto:leo.treggiari@intel.com
>>> <javascript:;>]
>>>>>>> Sent: Thursday, April 09, 2015 10:27 AM
>>>>>>> To: dev@cordova.apache.org <javascript:;>
>>>>>>> Subject: RE: [Vote] 4.0.0 Android Release
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Do the whitelist changes mean that current access origin entries
>>> in a
>>>>>>> config.xml file will be ignored the next time that a developer
>>> builds
>>>>>>> their project? If so, that will certainly surprise some
>>> developers.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Or does this just impact newly created projects?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>>>> Leo
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> -----Original Message-----
>>>>>>> From: mmocny@google.com <javascript:;> [mailto:mmocny@google.com
>>>>>>> <javascript:;>] On Behalf Of Michal Mocny
>>>>>>> Sent: Thursday, April 09, 2015 9:54 AM
>>>>>>> To: dev
>>>>>>> Subject: Re: [Vote] 4.0.0 Android Release
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> PR for Blogpost changes, hopefully making it a bit more obvious
>>> what
>>>>> the
>>>>>>> whitelist changes are:
>>>>>>> https://github.com/cordova/apache-blog-posts/pull/35
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Possibly we want to link to a more in-depth guide and remove some
>>> of
>>>> my
>>>>>>> notes (i.e. specifically what needs adding, which config.xml should
>>>>> look
>>>>>>> like).
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Question: some of the plugin links are to github, some to npm.
>>>> Should
>>>>> we
>>>>>>> document how to add these plugins using the new npm plugin name
>>>> format?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On Thu, Apr 9, 2015 at 12:15 PM, Andrew Grieve <
>>> agrieve@chromium.org
>>>>>>> <javascript:;>> wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Please review and vote on this 4.0.0 Android Release.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Release issue: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CB-8833
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Repos ready to be released have been published to dist/dev:
>>>>>>>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/cordova/CB-8833
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> The package was published from its corresponding git tag:
>>>>>>>> cordova-android: 4.0.0 (f224b1f2d4)
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Note that you can test it out via:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> cordova platform add
>>>>>> https://github.com/apache/cordova-android#4.0.0
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Blog post to review is here:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>> https://github.com/cordova/apache-blog-posts/blob/master/2015-04-10-cordova-android-4.0.0.md
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Upon a successful vote I will upload the archive to dist/,
>>> publish
>>>> it
>>>>>> to
>>>>>>>> NPM, and post the corresponding blog post.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Voting guidelines:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>> https://github.com/apache/cordova-coho/blob/master/docs/release-voting.md
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Voting will go on for a minimum of 48 hours.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> I vote +1:
>>>>>>>> * Ran coho audit-license-headers over the relevant repos
>>>>>>>> * Ran coho check-license to ensure all dependencies and
>>>>> subdependencies
>>>>>>>> have Apache-compatible licenses
>>>>>>>> * Ran mobilespec and only expected failures were happening
>>>>>>>> * Verified contents of archive
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>> B�KKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKCB�
>>>>>>> � [��X��ܚX�K K[XZ[
>>>>>>> � ]�][��X��ܚX�P �ܙ ݘK�\ X� K�ܙ�B��܈ Y ] [ۘ[ ��[X[� � K[XZ[
>>>>>>> � ]�Z [ �ܙ ݘK�\ X� K�ܙ�B
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@cordova.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@cordova.apache.org
>
Re: [Vote] 4.0.0 Android Release
Posted by Simon MacDonald <si...@gmail.com>.
+1
Simon Mac Donald
http://hi.im/simonmacdonald
On Tue, Apr 14, 2015 at 2:14 PM, Brian LeRoux <b...@brian.io> wrote:
> +1
>
> On Tue, Apr 14, 2015, 1:07 PM Joe Bowser <bo...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> +1
>>
>> - verified archive
>> - ran mobile-spec
>> - audited headers.
>>
>> On Tue, Apr 14, 2015 at 9:56 AM Andrew Grieve <ag...@chromium.org>
>> wrote:
>>
>> > I don't think we need to re-start since no one's -'ve voted, and nothing
>> > would be different. Feel free to start voting! :)
>> >
>> > On Tue, Apr 14, 2015 at 10:36 AM, Joe Bowser <bo...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> >
>> > > So...since nobody voted on this thread, I think it's safe to say the
>> vote
>> > > failed. We should probably re-start this soon.
>> > >
>> > > On Thu, Apr 9, 2015 at 11:04 AM Treggiari, Leo <
>> leo.treggiari@intel.com>
>> > > wrote:
>> > >
>> > > > Did the DISCUSS thread have a pointer to the release notes about
>> > > whitelist
>> > > > support?
>> > > > Sorry that I missed that.
>> > > >
>> > > > Leo
>> > > >
>> > > > -----Original Message-----
>> > > > From: Shazron [mailto:shazron@gmail.com]
>> > > > Sent: Thursday, April 09, 2015 11:00 AM
>> > > > To: dev@cordova.apache.org
>> > > > Subject: Re: [Vote] 4.0.0 Android Release
>> > > >
>> > > > Why is this on the Vote thread? please take it to the Discuss thread.
>> > > >
>> > > > On Thursday, April 9, 2015, Treggiari, Leo <le...@intel.com>
>> > > > wrote:
>> > > >
>> > > > > Another question, based upon my understanding, which must be wrong!
>> > > > >
>> > > > > The 4.0.0 Android Release will require the cordova-plugin-whitelist
>> > in
>> > > > > order
>> > > > > to get a whitelist implemented correctly.
>> > > > >
>> > > > > Given its name (dash-style) it is only available as an node
>> > component.
>> > > > >
>> > > > > The is no released CLI that knows how to fetch from npm?
>> > > > > Or does 4.3, even though I don't see it in the release notes?
>> > > > > Even so, there are many previous CLI releases which will not work?
>> > > > >
>> > > > > It would be good for the release notes to explain the situation.
>> > > > >
>> > > > > Leo
>> > > > >
>> > > > > -----Original Message-----
>> > > > > From: Treggiari, Leo [mailto:leo.treggiari@intel.com
>> <javascript:;>]
>> > > > > Sent: Thursday, April 09, 2015 10:27 AM
>> > > > > To: dev@cordova.apache.org <javascript:;>
>> > > > > Subject: RE: [Vote] 4.0.0 Android Release
>> > > > >
>> > > > > Do the whitelist changes mean that current access origin entries
>> in a
>> > > > > config.xml file will be ignored the next time that a developer
>> builds
>> > > > > their project? If so, that will certainly surprise some
>> developers.
>> > > > >
>> > > > > Or does this just impact newly created projects?
>> > > > >
>> > > > > Thanks,
>> > > > > Leo
>> > > > >
>> > > > > -----Original Message-----
>> > > > > From: mmocny@google.com <javascript:;> [mailto:mmocny@google.com
>> > > > > <javascript:;>] On Behalf Of Michal Mocny
>> > > > > Sent: Thursday, April 09, 2015 9:54 AM
>> > > > > To: dev
>> > > > > Subject: Re: [Vote] 4.0.0 Android Release
>> > > > >
>> > > > > PR for Blogpost changes, hopefully making it a bit more obvious
>> what
>> > > the
>> > > > > whitelist changes are:
>> > > > > https://github.com/cordova/apache-blog-posts/pull/35
>> > > > >
>> > > > > Possibly we want to link to a more in-depth guide and remove some
>> of
>> > my
>> > > > > notes (i.e. specifically what needs adding, which config.xml should
>> > > look
>> > > > > like).
>> > > > >
>> > > > > Question: some of the plugin links are to github, some to npm.
>> > Should
>> > > we
>> > > > > document how to add these plugins using the new npm plugin name
>> > format?
>> > > > >
>> > > > > On Thu, Apr 9, 2015 at 12:15 PM, Andrew Grieve <
>> agrieve@chromium.org
>> > > > > <javascript:;>> wrote:
>> > > > >
>> > > > > > Please review and vote on this 4.0.0 Android Release.
>> > > > > >
>> > > > > > Release issue: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CB-8833
>> > > > > >
>> > > > > > Repos ready to be released have been published to dist/dev:
>> > > > > > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/cordova/CB-8833
>> > > > > >
>> > > > > > The package was published from its corresponding git tag:
>> > > > > > cordova-android: 4.0.0 (f224b1f2d4)
>> > > > > >
>> > > > > > Note that you can test it out via:
>> > > > > >
>> > > > > > cordova platform add
>> > > > https://github.com/apache/cordova-android#4.0.0
>> > > > > >
>> > > > > > Blog post to review is here:
>> > > > > >
>> > > > > >
>> > > > > >
>> > > > > >
>> > > > >
>> > > >
>> > >
>> >
>> https://github.com/cordova/apache-blog-posts/blob/master/2015-04-10-cordova-android-4.0.0.md
>> > > > > >
>> > > > > > Upon a successful vote I will upload the archive to dist/,
>> publish
>> > it
>> > > > to
>> > > > > > NPM, and post the corresponding blog post.
>> > > > > >
>> > > > > > Voting guidelines:
>> > > > > >
>> > > > >
>> > > >
>> > >
>> >
>> https://github.com/apache/cordova-coho/blob/master/docs/release-voting.md
>> > > > > >
>> > > > > > Voting will go on for a minimum of 48 hours.
>> > > > > >
>> > > > > > I vote +1:
>> > > > > > * Ran coho audit-license-headers over the relevant repos
>> > > > > > * Ran coho check-license to ensure all dependencies and
>> > > subdependencies
>> > > > > > have Apache-compatible licenses
>> > > > > > * Ran mobilespec and only expected failures were happening
>> > > > > > * Verified contents of archive
>> > > > > >
>> > > > >
>> > > >
>> > B�KKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKCB�
>> > > > > � [��X��ܚX�K K[XZ[
>> > > > > � ]�][��X��ܚX�P �ܙ ݘK�\ X� K�ܙ�B��܈ Y ] [ۘ[ ��[X[� � K[XZ[
>> > > > > � ]�Z [ �ܙ ݘK�\ X� K�ܙ�B
>> > > > >
>> > > >
>> > >
>> >
>>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@cordova.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@cordova.apache.org
Re: [Vote] 4.0.0 Android Release
Posted by Brian LeRoux <b...@brian.io>.
+1
On Tue, Apr 14, 2015, 1:07 PM Joe Bowser <bo...@gmail.com> wrote:
> +1
>
> - verified archive
> - ran mobile-spec
> - audited headers.
>
> On Tue, Apr 14, 2015 at 9:56 AM Andrew Grieve <ag...@chromium.org>
> wrote:
>
> > I don't think we need to re-start since no one's -'ve voted, and nothing
> > would be different. Feel free to start voting! :)
> >
> > On Tue, Apr 14, 2015 at 10:36 AM, Joe Bowser <bo...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > > So...since nobody voted on this thread, I think it's safe to say the
> vote
> > > failed. We should probably re-start this soon.
> > >
> > > On Thu, Apr 9, 2015 at 11:04 AM Treggiari, Leo <
> leo.treggiari@intel.com>
> > > wrote:
> > >
> > > > Did the DISCUSS thread have a pointer to the release notes about
> > > whitelist
> > > > support?
> > > > Sorry that I missed that.
> > > >
> > > > Leo
> > > >
> > > > -----Original Message-----
> > > > From: Shazron [mailto:shazron@gmail.com]
> > > > Sent: Thursday, April 09, 2015 11:00 AM
> > > > To: dev@cordova.apache.org
> > > > Subject: Re: [Vote] 4.0.0 Android Release
> > > >
> > > > Why is this on the Vote thread? please take it to the Discuss thread.
> > > >
> > > > On Thursday, April 9, 2015, Treggiari, Leo <le...@intel.com>
> > > > wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > Another question, based upon my understanding, which must be wrong!
> > > > >
> > > > > The 4.0.0 Android Release will require the cordova-plugin-whitelist
> > in
> > > > > order
> > > > > to get a whitelist implemented correctly.
> > > > >
> > > > > Given its name (dash-style) it is only available as an node
> > component.
> > > > >
> > > > > The is no released CLI that knows how to fetch from npm?
> > > > > Or does 4.3, even though I don't see it in the release notes?
> > > > > Even so, there are many previous CLI releases which will not work?
> > > > >
> > > > > It would be good for the release notes to explain the situation.
> > > > >
> > > > > Leo
> > > > >
> > > > > -----Original Message-----
> > > > > From: Treggiari, Leo [mailto:leo.treggiari@intel.com
> <javascript:;>]
> > > > > Sent: Thursday, April 09, 2015 10:27 AM
> > > > > To: dev@cordova.apache.org <javascript:;>
> > > > > Subject: RE: [Vote] 4.0.0 Android Release
> > > > >
> > > > > Do the whitelist changes mean that current access origin entries
> in a
> > > > > config.xml file will be ignored the next time that a developer
> builds
> > > > > their project? If so, that will certainly surprise some
> developers.
> > > > >
> > > > > Or does this just impact newly created projects?
> > > > >
> > > > > Thanks,
> > > > > Leo
> > > > >
> > > > > -----Original Message-----
> > > > > From: mmocny@google.com <javascript:;> [mailto:mmocny@google.com
> > > > > <javascript:;>] On Behalf Of Michal Mocny
> > > > > Sent: Thursday, April 09, 2015 9:54 AM
> > > > > To: dev
> > > > > Subject: Re: [Vote] 4.0.0 Android Release
> > > > >
> > > > > PR for Blogpost changes, hopefully making it a bit more obvious
> what
> > > the
> > > > > whitelist changes are:
> > > > > https://github.com/cordova/apache-blog-posts/pull/35
> > > > >
> > > > > Possibly we want to link to a more in-depth guide and remove some
> of
> > my
> > > > > notes (i.e. specifically what needs adding, which config.xml should
> > > look
> > > > > like).
> > > > >
> > > > > Question: some of the plugin links are to github, some to npm.
> > Should
> > > we
> > > > > document how to add these plugins using the new npm plugin name
> > format?
> > > > >
> > > > > On Thu, Apr 9, 2015 at 12:15 PM, Andrew Grieve <
> agrieve@chromium.org
> > > > > <javascript:;>> wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > > Please review and vote on this 4.0.0 Android Release.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Release issue: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CB-8833
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Repos ready to be released have been published to dist/dev:
> > > > > > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/cordova/CB-8833
> > > > > >
> > > > > > The package was published from its corresponding git tag:
> > > > > > cordova-android: 4.0.0 (f224b1f2d4)
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Note that you can test it out via:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > cordova platform add
> > > > https://github.com/apache/cordova-android#4.0.0
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Blog post to review is here:
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
> https://github.com/cordova/apache-blog-posts/blob/master/2015-04-10-cordova-android-4.0.0.md
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Upon a successful vote I will upload the archive to dist/,
> publish
> > it
> > > > to
> > > > > > NPM, and post the corresponding blog post.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Voting guidelines:
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
> https://github.com/apache/cordova-coho/blob/master/docs/release-voting.md
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Voting will go on for a minimum of 48 hours.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > I vote +1:
> > > > > > * Ran coho audit-license-headers over the relevant repos
> > > > > > * Ran coho check-license to ensure all dependencies and
> > > subdependencies
> > > > > > have Apache-compatible licenses
> > > > > > * Ran mobilespec and only expected failures were happening
> > > > > > * Verified contents of archive
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > B�KKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKCB�
> > > > > � [��X��ܚX�K K[XZ[
> > > > > � ]�][��X��ܚX�P �ܙ ݘK�\ X� K�ܙ�B��܈ Y ] [ۘ[ ��[X[� � K[XZ[
> > > > > � ]�Z [ �ܙ ݘK�\ X� K�ܙ�B
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
>
Re: [Vote] 4.0.0 Android Release
Posted by Joe Bowser <bo...@gmail.com>.
+1
- verified archive
- ran mobile-spec
- audited headers.
On Tue, Apr 14, 2015 at 9:56 AM Andrew Grieve <ag...@chromium.org> wrote:
> I don't think we need to re-start since no one's -'ve voted, and nothing
> would be different. Feel free to start voting! :)
>
> On Tue, Apr 14, 2015 at 10:36 AM, Joe Bowser <bo...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > So...since nobody voted on this thread, I think it's safe to say the vote
> > failed. We should probably re-start this soon.
> >
> > On Thu, Apr 9, 2015 at 11:04 AM Treggiari, Leo <le...@intel.com>
> > wrote:
> >
> > > Did the DISCUSS thread have a pointer to the release notes about
> > whitelist
> > > support?
> > > Sorry that I missed that.
> > >
> > > Leo
> > >
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: Shazron [mailto:shazron@gmail.com]
> > > Sent: Thursday, April 09, 2015 11:00 AM
> > > To: dev@cordova.apache.org
> > > Subject: Re: [Vote] 4.0.0 Android Release
> > >
> > > Why is this on the Vote thread? please take it to the Discuss thread.
> > >
> > > On Thursday, April 9, 2015, Treggiari, Leo <le...@intel.com>
> > > wrote:
> > >
> > > > Another question, based upon my understanding, which must be wrong!
> > > >
> > > > The 4.0.0 Android Release will require the cordova-plugin-whitelist
> in
> > > > order
> > > > to get a whitelist implemented correctly.
> > > >
> > > > Given its name (dash-style) it is only available as an node
> component.
> > > >
> > > > The is no released CLI that knows how to fetch from npm?
> > > > Or does 4.3, even though I don't see it in the release notes?
> > > > Even so, there are many previous CLI releases which will not work?
> > > >
> > > > It would be good for the release notes to explain the situation.
> > > >
> > > > Leo
> > > >
> > > > -----Original Message-----
> > > > From: Treggiari, Leo [mailto:leo.treggiari@intel.com <javascript:;>]
> > > > Sent: Thursday, April 09, 2015 10:27 AM
> > > > To: dev@cordova.apache.org <javascript:;>
> > > > Subject: RE: [Vote] 4.0.0 Android Release
> > > >
> > > > Do the whitelist changes mean that current access origin entries in a
> > > > config.xml file will be ignored the next time that a developer builds
> > > > their project? If so, that will certainly surprise some developers.
> > > >
> > > > Or does this just impact newly created projects?
> > > >
> > > > Thanks,
> > > > Leo
> > > >
> > > > -----Original Message-----
> > > > From: mmocny@google.com <javascript:;> [mailto:mmocny@google.com
> > > > <javascript:;>] On Behalf Of Michal Mocny
> > > > Sent: Thursday, April 09, 2015 9:54 AM
> > > > To: dev
> > > > Subject: Re: [Vote] 4.0.0 Android Release
> > > >
> > > > PR for Blogpost changes, hopefully making it a bit more obvious what
> > the
> > > > whitelist changes are:
> > > > https://github.com/cordova/apache-blog-posts/pull/35
> > > >
> > > > Possibly we want to link to a more in-depth guide and remove some of
> my
> > > > notes (i.e. specifically what needs adding, which config.xml should
> > look
> > > > like).
> > > >
> > > > Question: some of the plugin links are to github, some to npm.
> Should
> > we
> > > > document how to add these plugins using the new npm plugin name
> format?
> > > >
> > > > On Thu, Apr 9, 2015 at 12:15 PM, Andrew Grieve <agrieve@chromium.org
> > > > <javascript:;>> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > Please review and vote on this 4.0.0 Android Release.
> > > > >
> > > > > Release issue: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CB-8833
> > > > >
> > > > > Repos ready to be released have been published to dist/dev:
> > > > > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/cordova/CB-8833
> > > > >
> > > > > The package was published from its corresponding git tag:
> > > > > cordova-android: 4.0.0 (f224b1f2d4)
> > > > >
> > > > > Note that you can test it out via:
> > > > >
> > > > > cordova platform add
> > > https://github.com/apache/cordova-android#4.0.0
> > > > >
> > > > > Blog post to review is here:
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
> https://github.com/cordova/apache-blog-posts/blob/master/2015-04-10-cordova-android-4.0.0.md
> > > > >
> > > > > Upon a successful vote I will upload the archive to dist/, publish
> it
> > > to
> > > > > NPM, and post the corresponding blog post.
> > > > >
> > > > > Voting guidelines:
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
> https://github.com/apache/cordova-coho/blob/master/docs/release-voting.md
> > > > >
> > > > > Voting will go on for a minimum of 48 hours.
> > > > >
> > > > > I vote +1:
> > > > > * Ran coho audit-license-headers over the relevant repos
> > > > > * Ran coho check-license to ensure all dependencies and
> > subdependencies
> > > > > have Apache-compatible licenses
> > > > > * Ran mobilespec and only expected failures were happening
> > > > > * Verified contents of archive
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> B�KKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKCB�
> > > > � [��X��ܚX�K K[XZ[
> > > > � ]�][��X��ܚX�P �ܙ ݘK�\ X� K�ܙ�B��܈ Y ] [ۘ[ ��[X[� � K[XZ[
> > > > � ]�Z [ �ܙ ݘK�\ X� K�ܙ�B
> > > >
> > >
> >
>
Re: [Vote] 4.0.0 Android Release
Posted by Andrew Grieve <ag...@chromium.org>.
I don't think we need to re-start since no one's -'ve voted, and nothing
would be different. Feel free to start voting! :)
On Tue, Apr 14, 2015 at 10:36 AM, Joe Bowser <bo...@gmail.com> wrote:
> So...since nobody voted on this thread, I think it's safe to say the vote
> failed. We should probably re-start this soon.
>
> On Thu, Apr 9, 2015 at 11:04 AM Treggiari, Leo <le...@intel.com>
> wrote:
>
> > Did the DISCUSS thread have a pointer to the release notes about
> whitelist
> > support?
> > Sorry that I missed that.
> >
> > Leo
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Shazron [mailto:shazron@gmail.com]
> > Sent: Thursday, April 09, 2015 11:00 AM
> > To: dev@cordova.apache.org
> > Subject: Re: [Vote] 4.0.0 Android Release
> >
> > Why is this on the Vote thread? please take it to the Discuss thread.
> >
> > On Thursday, April 9, 2015, Treggiari, Leo <le...@intel.com>
> > wrote:
> >
> > > Another question, based upon my understanding, which must be wrong!
> > >
> > > The 4.0.0 Android Release will require the cordova-plugin-whitelist in
> > > order
> > > to get a whitelist implemented correctly.
> > >
> > > Given its name (dash-style) it is only available as an node component.
> > >
> > > The is no released CLI that knows how to fetch from npm?
> > > Or does 4.3, even though I don't see it in the release notes?
> > > Even so, there are many previous CLI releases which will not work?
> > >
> > > It would be good for the release notes to explain the situation.
> > >
> > > Leo
> > >
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: Treggiari, Leo [mailto:leo.treggiari@intel.com <javascript:;>]
> > > Sent: Thursday, April 09, 2015 10:27 AM
> > > To: dev@cordova.apache.org <javascript:;>
> > > Subject: RE: [Vote] 4.0.0 Android Release
> > >
> > > Do the whitelist changes mean that current access origin entries in a
> > > config.xml file will be ignored the next time that a developer builds
> > > their project? If so, that will certainly surprise some developers.
> > >
> > > Or does this just impact newly created projects?
> > >
> > > Thanks,
> > > Leo
> > >
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: mmocny@google.com <javascript:;> [mailto:mmocny@google.com
> > > <javascript:;>] On Behalf Of Michal Mocny
> > > Sent: Thursday, April 09, 2015 9:54 AM
> > > To: dev
> > > Subject: Re: [Vote] 4.0.0 Android Release
> > >
> > > PR for Blogpost changes, hopefully making it a bit more obvious what
> the
> > > whitelist changes are:
> > > https://github.com/cordova/apache-blog-posts/pull/35
> > >
> > > Possibly we want to link to a more in-depth guide and remove some of my
> > > notes (i.e. specifically what needs adding, which config.xml should
> look
> > > like).
> > >
> > > Question: some of the plugin links are to github, some to npm. Should
> we
> > > document how to add these plugins using the new npm plugin name format?
> > >
> > > On Thu, Apr 9, 2015 at 12:15 PM, Andrew Grieve <agrieve@chromium.org
> > > <javascript:;>> wrote:
> > >
> > > > Please review and vote on this 4.0.0 Android Release.
> > > >
> > > > Release issue: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CB-8833
> > > >
> > > > Repos ready to be released have been published to dist/dev:
> > > > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/cordova/CB-8833
> > > >
> > > > The package was published from its corresponding git tag:
> > > > cordova-android: 4.0.0 (f224b1f2d4)
> > > >
> > > > Note that you can test it out via:
> > > >
> > > > cordova platform add
> > https://github.com/apache/cordova-android#4.0.0
> > > >
> > > > Blog post to review is here:
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
> https://github.com/cordova/apache-blog-posts/blob/master/2015-04-10-cordova-android-4.0.0.md
> > > >
> > > > Upon a successful vote I will upload the archive to dist/, publish it
> > to
> > > > NPM, and post the corresponding blog post.
> > > >
> > > > Voting guidelines:
> > > >
> > >
> >
> https://github.com/apache/cordova-coho/blob/master/docs/release-voting.md
> > > >
> > > > Voting will go on for a minimum of 48 hours.
> > > >
> > > > I vote +1:
> > > > * Ran coho audit-license-headers over the relevant repos
> > > > * Ran coho check-license to ensure all dependencies and
> subdependencies
> > > > have Apache-compatible licenses
> > > > * Ran mobilespec and only expected failures were happening
> > > > * Verified contents of archive
> > > >
> > >
> > B�KKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKCB�
> > > � [��X��ܚX�K K[XZ[
> > > � ]�][��X��ܚX�P �ܙ ݘK�\ X� K�ܙ�B��܈ Y ] [ۘ[ ��[X[� � K[XZ[
> > > � ]�Z [ �ܙ ݘK�\ X� K�ܙ�B
> > >
> >
>
Re: [Vote] 4.0.0 Android Release
Posted by Joe Bowser <bo...@gmail.com>.
So...since nobody voted on this thread, I think it's safe to say the vote
failed. We should probably re-start this soon.
On Thu, Apr 9, 2015 at 11:04 AM Treggiari, Leo <le...@intel.com>
wrote:
> Did the DISCUSS thread have a pointer to the release notes about whitelist
> support?
> Sorry that I missed that.
>
> Leo
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Shazron [mailto:shazron@gmail.com]
> Sent: Thursday, April 09, 2015 11:00 AM
> To: dev@cordova.apache.org
> Subject: Re: [Vote] 4.0.0 Android Release
>
> Why is this on the Vote thread? please take it to the Discuss thread.
>
> On Thursday, April 9, 2015, Treggiari, Leo <le...@intel.com>
> wrote:
>
> > Another question, based upon my understanding, which must be wrong!
> >
> > The 4.0.0 Android Release will require the cordova-plugin-whitelist in
> > order
> > to get a whitelist implemented correctly.
> >
> > Given its name (dash-style) it is only available as an node component.
> >
> > The is no released CLI that knows how to fetch from npm?
> > Or does 4.3, even though I don't see it in the release notes?
> > Even so, there are many previous CLI releases which will not work?
> >
> > It would be good for the release notes to explain the situation.
> >
> > Leo
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Treggiari, Leo [mailto:leo.treggiari@intel.com <javascript:;>]
> > Sent: Thursday, April 09, 2015 10:27 AM
> > To: dev@cordova.apache.org <javascript:;>
> > Subject: RE: [Vote] 4.0.0 Android Release
> >
> > Do the whitelist changes mean that current access origin entries in a
> > config.xml file will be ignored the next time that a developer builds
> > their project? If so, that will certainly surprise some developers.
> >
> > Or does this just impact newly created projects?
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Leo
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: mmocny@google.com <javascript:;> [mailto:mmocny@google.com
> > <javascript:;>] On Behalf Of Michal Mocny
> > Sent: Thursday, April 09, 2015 9:54 AM
> > To: dev
> > Subject: Re: [Vote] 4.0.0 Android Release
> >
> > PR for Blogpost changes, hopefully making it a bit more obvious what the
> > whitelist changes are:
> > https://github.com/cordova/apache-blog-posts/pull/35
> >
> > Possibly we want to link to a more in-depth guide and remove some of my
> > notes (i.e. specifically what needs adding, which config.xml should look
> > like).
> >
> > Question: some of the plugin links are to github, some to npm. Should we
> > document how to add these plugins using the new npm plugin name format?
> >
> > On Thu, Apr 9, 2015 at 12:15 PM, Andrew Grieve <agrieve@chromium.org
> > <javascript:;>> wrote:
> >
> > > Please review and vote on this 4.0.0 Android Release.
> > >
> > > Release issue: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CB-8833
> > >
> > > Repos ready to be released have been published to dist/dev:
> > > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/cordova/CB-8833
> > >
> > > The package was published from its corresponding git tag:
> > > cordova-android: 4.0.0 (f224b1f2d4)
> > >
> > > Note that you can test it out via:
> > >
> > > cordova platform add
> https://github.com/apache/cordova-android#4.0.0
> > >
> > > Blog post to review is here:
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> >
> https://github.com/cordova/apache-blog-posts/blob/master/2015-04-10-cordova-android-4.0.0.md
> > >
> > > Upon a successful vote I will upload the archive to dist/, publish it
> to
> > > NPM, and post the corresponding blog post.
> > >
> > > Voting guidelines:
> > >
> >
> https://github.com/apache/cordova-coho/blob/master/docs/release-voting.md
> > >
> > > Voting will go on for a minimum of 48 hours.
> > >
> > > I vote +1:
> > > * Ran coho audit-license-headers over the relevant repos
> > > * Ran coho check-license to ensure all dependencies and subdependencies
> > > have Apache-compatible licenses
> > > * Ran mobilespec and only expected failures were happening
> > > * Verified contents of archive
> > >
> >
> B�KKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKCB�
> > � [��X��ܚX�K K[XZ[
> > � ]�][��X��ܚX�P �ܙ ݘK�\ X� K�ܙ�B��܈ Y ] [ۘ[ ��[X[� � K[XZ[
> > � ]�Z [ �ܙ ݘK�\ X� K�ܙ�B
> >
>
RE: [Vote] 4.0.0 Android Release
Posted by "Treggiari, Leo" <le...@intel.com>.
Did the DISCUSS thread have a pointer to the release notes about whitelist support?
Sorry that I missed that.
Leo
-----Original Message-----
From: Shazron [mailto:shazron@gmail.com]
Sent: Thursday, April 09, 2015 11:00 AM
To: dev@cordova.apache.org
Subject: Re: [Vote] 4.0.0 Android Release
Why is this on the Vote thread? please take it to the Discuss thread.
On Thursday, April 9, 2015, Treggiari, Leo <le...@intel.com> wrote:
> Another question, based upon my understanding, which must be wrong!
>
> The 4.0.0 Android Release will require the cordova-plugin-whitelist in
> order
> to get a whitelist implemented correctly.
>
> Given its name (dash-style) it is only available as an node component.
>
> The is no released CLI that knows how to fetch from npm?
> Or does 4.3, even though I don't see it in the release notes?
> Even so, there are many previous CLI releases which will not work?
>
> It would be good for the release notes to explain the situation.
>
> Leo
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Treggiari, Leo [mailto:leo.treggiari@intel.com <javascript:;>]
> Sent: Thursday, April 09, 2015 10:27 AM
> To: dev@cordova.apache.org <javascript:;>
> Subject: RE: [Vote] 4.0.0 Android Release
>
> Do the whitelist changes mean that current access origin entries in a
> config.xml file will be ignored the next time that a developer builds
> their project? If so, that will certainly surprise some developers.
>
> Or does this just impact newly created projects?
>
> Thanks,
> Leo
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: mmocny@google.com <javascript:;> [mailto:mmocny@google.com
> <javascript:;>] On Behalf Of Michal Mocny
> Sent: Thursday, April 09, 2015 9:54 AM
> To: dev
> Subject: Re: [Vote] 4.0.0 Android Release
>
> PR for Blogpost changes, hopefully making it a bit more obvious what the
> whitelist changes are:
> https://github.com/cordova/apache-blog-posts/pull/35
>
> Possibly we want to link to a more in-depth guide and remove some of my
> notes (i.e. specifically what needs adding, which config.xml should look
> like).
>
> Question: some of the plugin links are to github, some to npm. Should we
> document how to add these plugins using the new npm plugin name format?
>
> On Thu, Apr 9, 2015 at 12:15 PM, Andrew Grieve <agrieve@chromium.org
> <javascript:;>> wrote:
>
> > Please review and vote on this 4.0.0 Android Release.
> >
> > Release issue: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CB-8833
> >
> > Repos ready to be released have been published to dist/dev:
> > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/cordova/CB-8833
> >
> > The package was published from its corresponding git tag:
> > cordova-android: 4.0.0 (f224b1f2d4)
> >
> > Note that you can test it out via:
> >
> > cordova platform add https://github.com/apache/cordova-android#4.0.0
> >
> > Blog post to review is here:
> >
> >
> >
> >
> https://github.com/cordova/apache-blog-posts/blob/master/2015-04-10-cordova-android-4.0.0.md
> >
> > Upon a successful vote I will upload the archive to dist/, publish it to
> > NPM, and post the corresponding blog post.
> >
> > Voting guidelines:
> >
> https://github.com/apache/cordova-coho/blob/master/docs/release-voting.md
> >
> > Voting will go on for a minimum of 48 hours.
> >
> > I vote +1:
> > * Ran coho audit-license-headers over the relevant repos
> > * Ran coho check-license to ensure all dependencies and subdependencies
> > have Apache-compatible licenses
> > * Ran mobilespec and only expected failures were happening
> > * Verified contents of archive
> >
> B�KKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKCB�
> � [��X��ܚX�K K[XZ[
> � ]�][��X��ܚX�P �ܙ ݘK�\ X� K�ܙ�B��܈ Y ] [ۘ[ ��[X[� � K[XZ[
> � ]�Z [ �ܙ ݘK�\ X� K�ܙ�B
>
Re: [Vote] 4.0.0 Android Release
Posted by Shazron <sh...@gmail.com>.
Why is this on the Vote thread? please take it to the Discuss thread.
On Thursday, April 9, 2015, Treggiari, Leo <le...@intel.com> wrote:
> Another question, based upon my understanding, which must be wrong!
>
> The 4.0.0 Android Release will require the cordova-plugin-whitelist in
> order
> to get a whitelist implemented correctly.
>
> Given its name (dash-style) it is only available as an node component.
>
> The is no released CLI that knows how to fetch from npm?
> Or does 4.3, even though I don't see it in the release notes?
> Even so, there are many previous CLI releases which will not work?
>
> It would be good for the release notes to explain the situation.
>
> Leo
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Treggiari, Leo [mailto:leo.treggiari@intel.com <javascript:;>]
> Sent: Thursday, April 09, 2015 10:27 AM
> To: dev@cordova.apache.org <javascript:;>
> Subject: RE: [Vote] 4.0.0 Android Release
>
> Do the whitelist changes mean that current access origin entries in a
> config.xml file will be ignored the next time that a developer builds
> their project? If so, that will certainly surprise some developers.
>
> Or does this just impact newly created projects?
>
> Thanks,
> Leo
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: mmocny@google.com <javascript:;> [mailto:mmocny@google.com
> <javascript:;>] On Behalf Of Michal Mocny
> Sent: Thursday, April 09, 2015 9:54 AM
> To: dev
> Subject: Re: [Vote] 4.0.0 Android Release
>
> PR for Blogpost changes, hopefully making it a bit more obvious what the
> whitelist changes are:
> https://github.com/cordova/apache-blog-posts/pull/35
>
> Possibly we want to link to a more in-depth guide and remove some of my
> notes (i.e. specifically what needs adding, which config.xml should look
> like).
>
> Question: some of the plugin links are to github, some to npm. Should we
> document how to add these plugins using the new npm plugin name format?
>
> On Thu, Apr 9, 2015 at 12:15 PM, Andrew Grieve <agrieve@chromium.org
> <javascript:;>> wrote:
>
> > Please review and vote on this 4.0.0 Android Release.
> >
> > Release issue: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CB-8833
> >
> > Repos ready to be released have been published to dist/dev:
> > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/cordova/CB-8833
> >
> > The package was published from its corresponding git tag:
> > cordova-android: 4.0.0 (f224b1f2d4)
> >
> > Note that you can test it out via:
> >
> > cordova platform add https://github.com/apache/cordova-android#4.0.0
> >
> > Blog post to review is here:
> >
> >
> >
> >
> https://github.com/cordova/apache-blog-posts/blob/master/2015-04-10-cordova-android-4.0.0.md
> >
> > Upon a successful vote I will upload the archive to dist/, publish it to
> > NPM, and post the corresponding blog post.
> >
> > Voting guidelines:
> >
> https://github.com/apache/cordova-coho/blob/master/docs/release-voting.md
> >
> > Voting will go on for a minimum of 48 hours.
> >
> > I vote +1:
> > * Ran coho audit-license-headers over the relevant repos
> > * Ran coho check-license to ensure all dependencies and subdependencies
> > have Apache-compatible licenses
> > * Ran mobilespec and only expected failures were happening
> > * Verified contents of archive
> >
> B�KKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKCB�
> � [��X��ܚX�K K[XZ[
> � ]�][��X��ܚX�P �ܙ ݘK�\ X� K�ܙ�B��܈ Y ] [ۘ[ ��[X[� � K[XZ[
> � ]�Z [ �ܙ ݘK�\ X� K�ܙ�B
>
Re: [Vote] 4.0.0 Android Release
Posted by Joe Bowser <bo...@gmail.com>.
OK, I think that we need to re-start or delay the vote thread. It's
getting too cluttered with discuss topics. Please keep it down to +1, -1 or
0 with a reason for that vote.
On Thu, Apr 9, 2015 at 10:45 AM Treggiari, Leo <le...@intel.com>
wrote:
> Another question, based upon my understanding, which must be wrong!
>
> The 4.0.0 Android Release will require the cordova-plugin-whitelist in
> order
> to get a whitelist implemented correctly.
>
> Given its name (dash-style) it is only available as an node component.
>
> The is no released CLI that knows how to fetch from npm?
> Or does 4.3, even though I don't see it in the release notes?
> Even so, there are many previous CLI releases which will not work?
>
> It would be good for the release notes to explain the situation.
>
> Leo
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Treggiari, Leo [mailto:leo.treggiari@intel.com]
> Sent: Thursday, April 09, 2015 10:27 AM
> To: dev@cordova.apache.org
> Subject: RE: [Vote] 4.0.0 Android Release
>
> Do the whitelist changes mean that current access origin entries in a
> config.xml file will be ignored the next time that a developer builds
> their project? If so, that will certainly surprise some developers.
>
> Or does this just impact newly created projects?
>
> Thanks,
> Leo
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: mmocny@google.com [mailto:mmocny@google.com] On Behalf Of Michal
> Mocny
> Sent: Thursday, April 09, 2015 9:54 AM
> To: dev
> Subject: Re: [Vote] 4.0.0 Android Release
>
> PR for Blogpost changes, hopefully making it a bit more obvious what the
> whitelist changes are: https://github.com/cordova/
> apache-blog-posts/pull/35
>
> Possibly we want to link to a more in-depth guide and remove some of my
> notes (i.e. specifically what needs adding, which config.xml should look
> like).
>
> Question: some of the plugin links are to github, some to npm. Should we
> document how to add these plugins using the new npm plugin name format?
>
> On Thu, Apr 9, 2015 at 12:15 PM, Andrew Grieve <ag...@chromium.org>
> wrote:
>
> > Please review and vote on this 4.0.0 Android Release.
> >
> > Release issue: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CB-8833
> >
> > Repos ready to be released have been published to dist/dev:
> > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/cordova/CB-8833
> >
> > The package was published from its corresponding git tag:
> > cordova-android: 4.0.0 (f224b1f2d4)
> >
> > Note that you can test it out via:
> >
> > cordova platform add https://github.com/apache/cordova-android#4.0.0
> >
> > Blog post to review is here:
> >
> >
> >
> > https://github.com/cordova/apache-blog-posts/blob/master/
> 2015-04-10-cordova-android-4.0.0.md
> >
> > Upon a successful vote I will upload the archive to dist/, publish it to
> > NPM, and post the corresponding blog post.
> >
> > Voting guidelines:
> > https://github.com/apache/cordova-coho/blob/master/docs/
> release-voting.md
> >
> > Voting will go on for a minimum of 48 hours.
> >
> > I vote +1:
> > * Ran coho audit-license-headers over the relevant repos
> > * Ran coho check-license to ensure all dependencies and subdependencies
> > have Apache-compatible licenses
> > * Ran mobilespec and only expected failures were happening
> > * Verified contents of archive
> >
> B�KKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKCB�
> � [��X��ܚX�K K[XZ[
> � ]�][��X��ܚX�P �ܙ ݘK�\ X� K�ܙ�B��܈ Y ] [ۘ[ ��[X[� � K[XZ[
> � ]�Z [ �ܙ ݘK�\ X� K�ܙ�B
>
RE: [Vote] 4.0.0 Android Release
Posted by "Treggiari, Leo" <le...@intel.com>.
Another question, based upon my understanding, which must be wrong!
The 4.0.0 Android Release will require the cordova-plugin-whitelist in order
to get a whitelist implemented correctly.
Given its name (dash-style) it is only available as an node component.
The is no released CLI that knows how to fetch from npm?
Or does 4.3, even though I don't see it in the release notes?
Even so, there are many previous CLI releases which will not work?
It would be good for the release notes to explain the situation.
Leo
-----Original Message-----
From: Treggiari, Leo [mailto:leo.treggiari@intel.com]
Sent: Thursday, April 09, 2015 10:27 AM
To: dev@cordova.apache.org
Subject: RE: [Vote] 4.0.0 Android Release
Do the whitelist changes mean that current access origin entries in a
config.xml file will be ignored the next time that a developer builds
their project? If so, that will certainly surprise some developers.
Or does this just impact newly created projects?
Thanks,
Leo
-----Original Message-----
From: mmocny@google.com [mailto:mmocny@google.com] On Behalf Of Michal Mocny
Sent: Thursday, April 09, 2015 9:54 AM
To: dev
Subject: Re: [Vote] 4.0.0 Android Release
PR for Blogpost changes, hopefully making it a bit more obvious what the
whitelist changes are: https://github.com/cordova/apache-blog-posts/pull/35
Possibly we want to link to a more in-depth guide and remove some of my
notes (i.e. specifically what needs adding, which config.xml should look
like).
Question: some of the plugin links are to github, some to npm. Should we
document how to add these plugins using the new npm plugin name format?
On Thu, Apr 9, 2015 at 12:15 PM, Andrew Grieve <ag...@chromium.org> wrote:
> Please review and vote on this 4.0.0 Android Release.
>
> Release issue: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CB-8833
>
> Repos ready to be released have been published to dist/dev:
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/cordova/CB-8833
>
> The package was published from its corresponding git tag:
> cordova-android: 4.0.0 (f224b1f2d4)
>
> Note that you can test it out via:
>
> cordova platform add https://github.com/apache/cordova-android#4.0.0
>
> Blog post to review is here:
>
>
>
> https://github.com/cordova/apache-blog-posts/blob/master/2015-04-10-cordova-android-4.0.0.md
>
> Upon a successful vote I will upload the archive to dist/, publish it to
> NPM, and post the corresponding blog post.
>
> Voting guidelines:
> https://github.com/apache/cordova-coho/blob/master/docs/release-voting.md
>
> Voting will go on for a minimum of 48 hours.
>
> I vote +1:
> * Ran coho audit-license-headers over the relevant repos
> * Ran coho check-license to ensure all dependencies and subdependencies
> have Apache-compatible licenses
> * Ran mobilespec and only expected failures were happening
> * Verified contents of archive
>
B�KKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKCB�� [��X��ܚX�KK[XZ[
�]�][��X��ܚX�P�ܙݘK�\X�K�ܙ�B��܈Y][ۘ[��[X[� �K[XZ[
�]�Z[ �ܙݘK�\X�K�ܙ�B
RE: [Vote] 4.0.0 Android Release
Posted by "Treggiari, Leo" <le...@intel.com>.
Do the whitelist changes mean that current access origin entries in a
config.xml file will be ignored the next time that a developer builds
their project? If so, that will certainly surprise some developers.
Or does this just impact newly created projects?
Thanks,
Leo
-----Original Message-----
From: mmocny@google.com [mailto:mmocny@google.com] On Behalf Of Michal Mocny
Sent: Thursday, April 09, 2015 9:54 AM
To: dev
Subject: Re: [Vote] 4.0.0 Android Release
PR for Blogpost changes, hopefully making it a bit more obvious what the
whitelist changes are: https://github.com/cordova/apache-blog-posts/pull/35
Possibly we want to link to a more in-depth guide and remove some of my
notes (i.e. specifically what needs adding, which config.xml should look
like).
Question: some of the plugin links are to github, some to npm. Should we
document how to add these plugins using the new npm plugin name format?
On Thu, Apr 9, 2015 at 12:15 PM, Andrew Grieve <ag...@chromium.org> wrote:
> Please review and vote on this 4.0.0 Android Release.
>
> Release issue: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CB-8833
>
> Repos ready to be released have been published to dist/dev:
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/cordova/CB-8833
>
> The package was published from its corresponding git tag:
> cordova-android: 4.0.0 (f224b1f2d4)
>
> Note that you can test it out via:
>
> cordova platform add https://github.com/apache/cordova-android#4.0.0
>
> Blog post to review is here:
>
>
>
> https://github.com/cordova/apache-blog-posts/blob/master/2015-04-10-cordova-android-4.0.0.md
>
> Upon a successful vote I will upload the archive to dist/, publish it to
> NPM, and post the corresponding blog post.
>
> Voting guidelines:
> https://github.com/apache/cordova-coho/blob/master/docs/release-voting.md
>
> Voting will go on for a minimum of 48 hours.
>
> I vote +1:
> * Ran coho audit-license-headers over the relevant repos
> * Ran coho check-license to ensure all dependencies and subdependencies
> have Apache-compatible licenses
> * Ran mobilespec and only expected failures were happening
> * Verified contents of archive
>
Re: [Vote] 4.0.0 Android Release
Posted by Michal Mocny <mm...@chromium.org>.
PR for Blogpost changes, hopefully making it a bit more obvious what the
whitelist changes are: https://github.com/cordova/apache-blog-posts/pull/35
Possibly we want to link to a more in-depth guide and remove some of my
notes (i.e. specifically what needs adding, which config.xml should look
like).
Question: some of the plugin links are to github, some to npm. Should we
document how to add these plugins using the new npm plugin name format?
On Thu, Apr 9, 2015 at 12:15 PM, Andrew Grieve <ag...@chromium.org> wrote:
> Please review and vote on this 4.0.0 Android Release.
>
> Release issue: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CB-8833
>
> Repos ready to be released have been published to dist/dev:
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/cordova/CB-8833
>
> The package was published from its corresponding git tag:
> cordova-android: 4.0.0 (f224b1f2d4)
>
> Note that you can test it out via:
>
> cordova platform add https://github.com/apache/cordova-android#4.0.0
>
> Blog post to review is here:
>
>
>
> https://github.com/cordova/apache-blog-posts/blob/master/2015-04-10-cordova-android-4.0.0.md
>
> Upon a successful vote I will upload the archive to dist/, publish it to
> NPM, and post the corresponding blog post.
>
> Voting guidelines:
> https://github.com/apache/cordova-coho/blob/master/docs/release-voting.md
>
> Voting will go on for a minimum of 48 hours.
>
> I vote +1:
> * Ran coho audit-license-headers over the relevant repos
> * Ran coho check-license to ensure all dependencies and subdependencies
> have Apache-compatible licenses
> * Ran mobilespec and only expected failures were happening
> * Verified contents of archive
>