You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to github@beam.apache.org by GitBox <gi...@apache.org> on 2022/06/03 16:07:23 UTC

[GitHub] [beam] kennknowles opened a new issue, #17996: Need serialized form and serialVersionUID for user-facing superclasses

kennknowles opened a new issue, #17996:
URL: https://github.com/apache/beam/issues/17996

   When a class does not have an explicit `serialVersionUID`, it should be considered an unstable value based on the exact version of the code. This is fine for transmission most of the time, but never acceptable for persistence where backwards compatibility matters.
   
   There are two use cases that require explicit serialized form and `serialVersionUID` even just for transmission. They are required for user-facing superclasses such as DoFn, WindowFn, etc, to support the following:
   
   - Encoding a pipeline with a JDK and decoding with a JDK that computes defaults differently.
   - Encoding a pipeline against a version of the Beam SDK and decoding with a different version.
   
   The first situation should be rare since there is a deterministic spec, but we have unfortunately seen it.
   
   The second situation is very reasonable; a runner might want to run with additional security fixes in the SDK, etc. Given a correct semantic version for the SDK, the pipeline author and runner author may reasonably expect it to work.
   
   So we should add explicit serialization to superclasses that are necessarily encoded as part of a user's pipeline.
   
   Imported from Jira [BEAM-169](https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BEAM-169). Original Jira may contain additional context.
   Reported by: kenn.


-- 
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

To unsubscribe, e-mail: github-unsubscribe@beam.apache.org.apache.org

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
users@infra.apache.org