You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to users@myfaces.apache.org by Henry Eduardo Iguaro <he...@gmail.com> on 2008/03/03 15:14:33 UTC
[Trinidad] Calendar with Tobago style... Possible?
Hi, just want to comment that the
org.apache.myfaces.trinidad.ENABLE_LIGHTWEIGHT_DIALOGS parameter is really
nice, but the modal appearance of Tobago dialogs (dark background that
blinks on user actions) looks better from the user point of view
I know Tobago is a very different thing, but is there a way to integrate
some of its controls with Trinidad?
Is there a possibility that the next release of Trinidad incorporates some
of the Tobago GUI features? (For example, the calendar is far away better
that the Trinidad's one)
Thanks in advance
--
-----BEGIN GEEK CODE BLOCK-----
Version: 3.1
GCS/O G++@ s-:+>:+ a25 tv+ d++> t+ C+++>+ U++>+++ P+ L++>+++ W+++ E---- w++$
5 X R-@ b+>++ D+ e>++ o? O? h--@ r+ y++ K? M PS+
------END GEEK CODE BLOCK------
Re: [Trinidad] subform defaultCommand
Posted by Gerhard Petracek <ge...@gmail.com>.
hello mathias,
please have a look at [1].
regards,
gerhard
[1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TRINIDAD-996
2008/3/4, Mathias Walter <ma...@gmx.net>:
>
> Hi Gerhard,
>
> i implemented a javascript which is much more powerful.
> i've to check if it makes sense to provide this implementation as an
> alternative.
>
> That would be great!
>
> --
> Regards,
> Mathias
>
> 2008/3/4, Andrew Robinson <an...@gmail.com>:
>
> > Perhaps the code can still be in the form and the form can have
> > knowledge of the subform's defaultCommand so the form needs only to
> > determine if the component is in a subform or just in the form?
> >
> >
> > On Tue, Mar 4, 2008 at 5:35 AM, Martin Marinschek
> > <ma...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > Hi Matthias,
> > >
> > > it would certainly make sense, but the way the defaultCommand
> > > currently works, it exchanges the onkeypress-handler of the form. In
> > > the case of subforms, there is no HTML-element for which the
> > > default-command can be registered.
> > >
> > > regards,
> > >
> > > Martin
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > On 3/3/08, Mathias Walter <ma...@gmx.net> wrote:
> > > > Hi,
> > > >
> > > > does it make sense to have a defaultCommand attribute on a
> > tr:subform?
> > > >
> > > > For the subforms, I'm using PPR only.
> > > >
> > > > --
> > > > Kind regards,
> > > > Mathias
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> > > --
> > >
> > > http://www.irian.at
> > >
> > > Your JSF powerhouse -
> > > JSF Consulting, Development and
> > > Courses in English and German
> > >
> > > Professional Support for Apache MyFaces
> > >
> >
>
>
>
> --
>
> http://www.irian.at
>
> Your JSF powerhouse -
> JSF Consulting, Development and
> Courses in English and German
>
> Professional Support for Apache MyFaces
>
>
--
http://www.irian.at
Your JSF powerhouse -
JSF Consulting, Development and
Courses in English and German
Professional Support for Apache MyFaces
RE: [Trinidad] subform defaultCommand
Posted by Mathias Walter <ma...@gmx.net>.
Hi Gerhard,
i implemented a javascript which is much more powerful.
i've to check if it makes sense to provide this implementation as an
alternative.
That would be great!
--
Regards,
Mathias
2008/3/4, Andrew Robinson <an...@gmail.com>:
Perhaps the code can still be in the form and the form can have
knowledge of the subform's defaultCommand so the form needs only to
determine if the component is in a subform or just in the form?
On Tue, Mar 4, 2008 at 5:35 AM, Martin Marinschek
<ma...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi Matthias,
>
> it would certainly make sense, but the way the defaultCommand
> currently works, it exchanges the onkeypress-handler of the form. In
> the case of subforms, there is no HTML-element for which the
> default-command can be registered.
>
> regards,
>
> Martin
>
>
>
> On 3/3/08, Mathias Walter <ma...@gmx.net> wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > does it make sense to have a defaultCommand attribute on a tr:subform?
> >
> > For the subforms, I'm using PPR only.
> >
> > --
> > Kind regards,
> > Mathias
> >
> >
>
>
> --
>
> http://www.irian.at
>
> Your JSF powerhouse -
> JSF Consulting, Development and
> Courses in English and German
>
> Professional Support for Apache MyFaces
>
--
http://www.irian.at
Your JSF powerhouse -
JSF Consulting, Development and
Courses in English and German
Professional Support for Apache MyFaces
Re: [Trinidad] subform defaultCommand
Posted by Gerhard Petracek <ge...@gmail.com>.
hello mathias,
i implemented a javascript which is much more powerful.
i've to check if it makes sense to provide this implementation as an
alternative.
regards,
gerhard
2008/3/4, Andrew Robinson <an...@gmail.com>:
>
> Perhaps the code can still be in the form and the form can have
> knowledge of the subform's defaultCommand so the form needs only to
> determine if the component is in a subform or just in the form?
>
>
> On Tue, Mar 4, 2008 at 5:35 AM, Martin Marinschek
> <ma...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > Hi Matthias,
> >
> > it would certainly make sense, but the way the defaultCommand
> > currently works, it exchanges the onkeypress-handler of the form. In
> > the case of subforms, there is no HTML-element for which the
> > default-command can be registered.
> >
> > regards,
> >
> > Martin
> >
> >
> >
> > On 3/3/08, Mathias Walter <ma...@gmx.net> wrote:
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > does it make sense to have a defaultCommand attribute on a
> tr:subform?
> > >
> > > For the subforms, I'm using PPR only.
> > >
> > > --
> > > Kind regards,
> > > Mathias
> > >
> > >
> >
> >
> > --
> >
> > http://www.irian.at
> >
> > Your JSF powerhouse -
> > JSF Consulting, Development and
> > Courses in English and German
> >
> > Professional Support for Apache MyFaces
> >
>
--
http://www.irian.at
Your JSF powerhouse -
JSF Consulting, Development and
Courses in English and German
Professional Support for Apache MyFaces
Re: [Trinidad] subform defaultCommand
Posted by Andrew Robinson <an...@gmail.com>.
Perhaps the code can still be in the form and the form can have
knowledge of the subform's defaultCommand so the form needs only to
determine if the component is in a subform or just in the form?
On Tue, Mar 4, 2008 at 5:35 AM, Martin Marinschek
<ma...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi Matthias,
>
> it would certainly make sense, but the way the defaultCommand
> currently works, it exchanges the onkeypress-handler of the form. In
> the case of subforms, there is no HTML-element for which the
> default-command can be registered.
>
> regards,
>
> Martin
>
>
>
> On 3/3/08, Mathias Walter <ma...@gmx.net> wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > does it make sense to have a defaultCommand attribute on a tr:subform?
> >
> > For the subforms, I'm using PPR only.
> >
> > --
> > Kind regards,
> > Mathias
> >
> >
>
>
> --
>
> http://www.irian.at
>
> Your JSF powerhouse -
> JSF Consulting, Development and
> Courses in English and German
>
> Professional Support for Apache MyFaces
>
Re: [Trinidad] How to PPR with tree using nodeStamp facet and tr:commandLink ?
Posted by Andrew Robinson <an...@gmail.com>.
Why do you need to set the ID of the link? If you need what link was
clicked, use f:setPropertyActionListener.
2008/3/4 <wo...@pta.de>:
>
>
>
>
> Hi,
>
> We use a tr:tree outlined as follows:
>
> <tr:tree value="#{treeController.tree.tree}" var="var">
> <f:facet name="nodeStamp">
> <ui:fragment>
> <tr:commandLink id="#{var.action}" action="jump"
> text="#{var.label}" partialSubmit="true" />
> </ui:fragment>
> </f:facet>
> </tr:tree>
>
> However, this does not work because this approach assumes an EL-enabled id
> attribut of tr:commandLink,
> which is not the case.
>
> So my question is how could I do this with tr:commandLink? Is this possible
> anyway? Could I probably approach
> the problem with jstl?
>
> Thanks,
> Wolfgang.
>
> PTA Programmier-Technische Arbeiten GmbH
> Seckenheimer Str. 65-67, 68165 Mannheim
> Amtsgericht Mannheim, HRB 1139
> USt-IdNr.: DE 143 839 368
> Geschäftsführer:
> Dipl.-Ing. Peter Fischer
> Dr. Harald W. Busch
> Dipl.-Kfm. Knut Fischer
>
> **********************************************************************
> http://www.pta.de
> Mit 1554 Erfahrungsberichten aus 39 Jahren erfolgreicher Projektarbeit!
> **********************************************************************
[Trinidad] How to PPR with tree using nodeStamp facet and tr:commandLink ?
Posted by wo...@pta.de.
Hi,
We use a tr:tree outlined as follows:
<tr:tree value="#{treeController.tree.tree}" var="var">
<f:facet name="nodeStamp">
<ui:fragment>
<tr:commandLink id="#{var.action}" action="jump"
text="#{var.label}" partialSubmit="true" />
</ui:fragment>
</f:facet>
</tr:tree>
However, this does not work because this approach assumes an EL-enabled id
attribut of tr:commandLink,
which is not the case.
So my question is how could I do this with tr:commandLink? Is this possible
anyway? Could I probably approach
the problem with jstl?
Thanks,
Wolfgang.
PTA Programmier-Technische Arbeiten GmbH
Seckenheimer Str. 65-67, 68165 Mannheim
Amtsgericht Mannheim, HRB 1139
USt-IdNr.: DE 143 839 368
Geschäftsführer:
Dipl.-Ing. Peter Fischer
Dr. Harald W. Busch
Dipl.-Kfm. Knut Fischer
**********************************************************************
http://www.pta.de
Mit 1554 Erfahrungsberichten aus 39 Jahren erfolgreicher Projektarbeit!
**********************************************************************
Re: [Trinidad] subform defaultCommand
Posted by Martin Marinschek <ma...@gmail.com>.
Hi Matthias,
it would certainly make sense, but the way the defaultCommand
currently works, it exchanges the onkeypress-handler of the form. In
the case of subforms, there is no HTML-element for which the
default-command can be registered.
regards,
Martin
On 3/3/08, Mathias Walter <ma...@gmx.net> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> does it make sense to have a defaultCommand attribute on a tr:subform?
>
> For the subforms, I'm using PPR only.
>
> --
> Kind regards,
> Mathias
>
>
--
http://www.irian.at
Your JSF powerhouse -
JSF Consulting, Development and
Courses in English and German
Professional Support for Apache MyFaces
[Trinidad] subform defaultCommand
Posted by Mathias Walter <ma...@gmx.net>.
Hi,
does it make sense to have a defaultCommand attribute on a tr:subform?
For the subforms, I'm using PPR only.
--
Kind regards,
Mathias