You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@jackrabbit.apache.org by "Julian Reschke (JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org> on 2008/01/22 12:22:34 UTC

[jira] Resolved: (JCR-1335) bad assumptions on QueryResult.getIterator() semantics in QueryResultNodeIteratorTest.testSkip()

     [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCR-1335?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ]

Julian Reschke resolved JCR-1335.
---------------------------------

    Resolution: Fixed

Fixed with revision 614177.


> bad assumptions on QueryResult.getIterator() semantics in QueryResultNodeIteratorTest.testSkip()
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: JCR-1335
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCR-1335
>             Project: Jackrabbit
>          Issue Type: Bug
>          Components: jackrabbit-jcr-tests
>            Reporter: Julian Reschke
>            Assignee: Julian Reschke
>            Priority: Minor
>         Attachments: JCR-1335.patch.txt
>
>
> testSkip() assumes that calling getIterator() a second time will return a new iterator of the same size. JSR-170 is silent on this. Forcing a server to implement this essantially means that the query result must be cached until there's no reference to QueryResult anymore.
> As this is a test of skip(), not getIterator(), the test should really refetch a new QueryResult in order to obtain a new iterator.
> (Note: The issue of the semantics of QueryResult.getIterator should be discussed by the JCR EG.)

-- 
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.