You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@lucene.apache.org by Michael Busch <bu...@gmail.com> on 2008/01/11 09:34:05 UTC

Lucene 2.3 RC2 available

Hi all,

I just uploaded Lucene 2.3 release candidate 2 to
http://people.apache.org/~buschmi/staging_area/lucene_2_3/rc2.

Changes compared to RC1:
- LUCENE-1125: fix over-zero-filling that was drastically slowing down
small docs w/ term vectors
- LUCENE-1117: fix EnwikiDocMaker to not hang when the producer thread
hits exception

- release files only contain version-specific documentation
- the binary release artifacts include README* files in some contrib
directories
- release filenames consistent with previous releases (2.3.0 instead of 2.3)
- CHANGES.txt contains tentative 2.3 release date


Please switch to RC2 and keep testing!
-Michael

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: java-dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: java-dev-help@lucene.apache.org


Re: Lucene 2.3 RC2 available

Posted by Michael Busch <bu...@gmail.com>.
Good idea! I just sent a mail to java-user.

-Michael

Michael McCandless wrote:
> 
> Michael,
> 
> Do you think we should include java-user in this pre-release testing?
> 
> It seems like it can only help us to ferret out issues, and, keeps our
> users informed/excited about an upcoming release?
> 
> Mike
> 

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: java-dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: java-dev-help@lucene.apache.org


Re: Lucene 2.3 RC2 available

Posted by Michael McCandless <lu...@mikemccandless.com>.
Michael,

Do you think we should include java-user in this pre-release testing?

It seems like it can only help us to ferret out issues, and, keeps  
our users informed/excited about an upcoming release?

Mike

Michael Busch wrote:

> Hi all,
>
> I just uploaded Lucene 2.3 release candidate 2 to
> http://people.apache.org/~buschmi/staging_area/lucene_2_3/rc2.
>
> Changes compared to RC1:
> - LUCENE-1125: fix over-zero-filling that was drastically slowing down
> small docs w/ term vectors
> - LUCENE-1117: fix EnwikiDocMaker to not hang when the producer thread
> hits exception
>
> - release files only contain version-specific documentation
> - the binary release artifacts include README* files in some contrib
> directories
> - release filenames consistent with previous releases (2.3.0  
> instead of 2.3)
> - CHANGES.txt contains tentative 2.3 release date
>
>
> Please switch to RC2 and keep testing!
> -Michael
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: java-dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: java-dev-help@lucene.apache.org
>


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: java-dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: java-dev-help@lucene.apache.org


Re: Lucene 2.3 RC2 available

Posted by Michael McCandless <lu...@mikemccandless.com>.
Hmm ... I'll try to repro this and track it down.

Mike

Steven A Rowe wrote:

> Hi Michael,
>
> On 01/11/2008 at 3:34 AM, Michael Busch wrote:
>> I just uploaded Lucene 2.3 release candidate 2 to
>> http://people.apache.org/~buschmi/staging_area/lucene_2_3/rc2.
>>
>> Please switch to RC2 and keep testing!
>
> (The report below is not about binary release testing, but rather  
> running the tests from the source tree.)
>
> Using the Sun JVM v1.4.2_16, on Windows XP SP2, I'm seeing  
> intermittent failures (roughly 50% failure rate) with  
> TestDeletionPolicy, both from the lucene_2_3 branch and from the  
> trunk (both at r611263).
>
> PROMPT> ant clean test-core -Dtestcase=TestDeletionPolicy
>
> common.test:
>     [mkdir] Created dir: c:\svn\lucene\java\branches\lucene_2_3 
> \build\test
>     [junit] Testsuite: org.apache.lucene.index.TestDeletionPolicy
>     [junit] Tests run: 6, Failures: 1, Errors: 0, Time elapsed:  
> 4.015 sec
>     [junit]
>     [junit] Testcase: testExpirationTimeDeletionPolicy 
> (org.apache.lucene.index.TestDeletionPolicy): FAILED
>     [junit] commit point was older than 2.0 seconds but did not get  
> deleted
>     [junit] junit.framework.AssertionFailedError: commit point was  
> older than 2.0 seconds but did not get deleted
>     [junit]     at  
> org.apache.lucene.index.TestDeletionPolicy.testExpirationTimeDeletionP 
> olicy(TestDeletionPolicy.java:232)
>     [junit]
>     [junit]
>     [junit] Test org.apache.lucene.index.TestDeletionPolicy FAILED
>
> However, using the Sun JVM v1.4.2_04 on Debian Etch (Linux kernel  
> 2.6.20.7), the same test never fails.
>
> Steve
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: java-dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: java-dev-help@lucene.apache.org
>


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: java-dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: java-dev-help@lucene.apache.org


Re: Lucene 2.3 RC2 available

Posted by Michael McCandless <lu...@mikemccandless.com>.
OK, done.

Thanks for finding this Steve!

Mike

On Jan 11, 2008, at 4:33 PM, Michael Busch wrote:

> Sure, go ahead!
>
> Michael McCandless wrote:
>>
>> OK, phew :)
>>
>> I'll commit to trunk.
>>
>> Michael, is it OK to commit to 2.3 too?
>>
>> Mike
>>
>> On Jan 11, 2008, at 3:27 PM, Steven A Rowe wrote:
>>
>>> Hi Mike,
>>>
>>> I couldn't get the patch to apply (word wrapping/line
>>> endings/whatever), so I just manually pasted in the added line after
>>> deleting the corresponding removed line.
>>>
>>> With the patched version, I got 0 failures out of 20 runs.
>>>
>>> After I reverted back to the original version, I got 10 failures out
>>> of 20 runs.
>>>
>>> I'd say your patch wins!
>>>
>>> Steve
>>>
>>> On 01/11/2008 at 2:57 PM, Michael McCandless wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Alas, so far I cannot repro this.
>>>>
>>>> But I did see one off-by-one error in an assert the test.  Steve,
>>>> could you try applying this patch and see if the failure still
>>>> happens?  Thanks:
>>>>
>>>> Index: src/test/org/apache/lucene/index/TestDeletionPolicy.java
>>>> =================================================================== 
>>>>  ---
>>>> src/test/org/apache/lucene/index/TestDeletionPolicy.java      
>>>> (revision
>>>> 610858) +++ src/test/org/apache/lucene/index/ 
>>>> TestDeletionPolicy.java
>>>> (working copy) @@ -229,7 +229,7 @@
>>>>                                                            "",
>>>>                                                            gen);
>>>>           long modTime = dir.fileModified(fileName);
>>>> -        assertTrue("commit point was older than " + SECONDS + "  
>>>> seconds
>>>> but did not get deleted", lastDeleteTime - modTime <  
>>>> (SECONDS*1000)); +
>>>>       assertTrue("commit point was older than " + SECONDS + "  
>>>> seconds ("
>>>> + (lastDeleteTime - modTime) + " msec) but did not get deleted",
>>>> lastDeleteTime - modTime <= (SECONDS*1000));
>>>>         } catch (IOException e) {
>>>>           // OK
>>>>           break;
>>>>
>>>> Mike
>>>>
>>>> Steven A Rowe wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Hi Michael,
>>>>>
>>>>> On 01/11/2008 at 3:34 AM, Michael Busch wrote:
>>>>>> I just uploaded Lucene 2.3 release candidate 2 to
>>>>>> http://people.apache.org/~buschmi/staging_area/lucene_2_3/rc2.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Please switch to RC2 and keep testing!
>>>>>
>>>>> (The report below is not about binary release testing, but rather
>>>>> running the tests from the source tree.)
>>>>>
>>>>> Using the Sun JVM v1.4.2_16, on Windows XP SP2, I'm seeing
>>>>> intermittent failures (roughly 50% failure rate) with
>>>>> TestDeletionPolicy, both from the lucene_2_3 branch and from the
>>>>> trunk (both at r611263).
>>>>>
>>>>> PROMPT> ant clean test-core -Dtestcase=TestDeletionPolicy
>>>>>
>>>>> common.test:
>>>>>     [mkdir] Created dir: c:\svn\lucene\java\branches\lucene_2_3
>>>>>     \build\test [junit] Testsuite:
>>>>>     org.apache.lucene.index.TestDeletionPolicy [junit] Tests  
>>>>> run: 6,
>>>>>     Failures: 1, Errors: 0, Time elapsed: 4.015 sec [junit]  
>>>>> [junit]
>>>>>     Testcase: testExpirationTimeDeletionPolicy
>>>>>     (org.apache.lucene.index.TestDeletionPolicy): FAILED  
>>>>> [junit] commit
>>>>>     point was older than 2.0 seconds but did
>>>> not get
>>>>> deleted
>>>>>     [junit] junit.framework.AssertionFailedError: commit point was
>>>>>     older than 2.0 seconds but did not get deleted [junit]     at
>>>>>
>>>> org.apache.lucene.index.TestDeletionPolicy.testExpirationTimeD
>>>> eletionP
>>>>> olicy(TestDeletionPolicy.java:232)
>>>>>     [junit]
>>>>>     [junit]
>>>>>     [junit] Test org.apache.lucene.index.TestDeletionPolicy FAILED
>>>>>
>>>>> However, using the Sun JVM v1.4.2_04 on Debian Etch (Linux kernel
>>>>> 2.6.20.7), the same test never fails.
>>>>>
>>>>> Steve
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> ------------------------------------------------------------------ 
>>>>> ---
>>>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: java-dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org For
>>>>> additional commands, e-mail: java-dev-help@lucene.apache.org
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> ------------------------------------------------------------------- 
>>>> -- To
>>>> unsubscribe, e-mail: java-dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org For
>>>> additional commands, e-mail: java-dev-help@lucene.apache.org
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> -------------------------------------------------------------------- 
>>> -
>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: java-dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org
>>> For additional commands, e-mail: java-dev-help@lucene.apache.org
>>>
>>
>>
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: java-dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org
>> For additional commands, e-mail: java-dev-help@lucene.apache.org
>>
>>
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: java-dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: java-dev-help@lucene.apache.org
>


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: java-dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: java-dev-help@lucene.apache.org


Re: Lucene 2.3 RC2 available

Posted by Michael Busch <bu...@gmail.com>.
Sure, go ahead!

Michael McCandless wrote:
> 
> OK, phew :)
> 
> I'll commit to trunk.
> 
> Michael, is it OK to commit to 2.3 too?
> 
> Mike
> 
> On Jan 11, 2008, at 3:27 PM, Steven A Rowe wrote:
> 
>> Hi Mike,
>>
>> I couldn't get the patch to apply (word wrapping/line
>> endings/whatever), so I just manually pasted in the added line after
>> deleting the corresponding removed line.
>>
>> With the patched version, I got 0 failures out of 20 runs.
>>
>> After I reverted back to the original version, I got 10 failures out
>> of 20 runs.
>>
>> I'd say your patch wins!
>>
>> Steve
>>
>> On 01/11/2008 at 2:57 PM, Michael McCandless wrote:
>>>
>>> Alas, so far I cannot repro this.
>>>
>>> But I did see one off-by-one error in an assert the test.  Steve,
>>> could you try applying this patch and see if the failure still
>>> happens?  Thanks:
>>>
>>> Index: src/test/org/apache/lucene/index/TestDeletionPolicy.java
>>> =================================================================== ---
>>> src/test/org/apache/lucene/index/TestDeletionPolicy.java     (revision
>>> 610858) +++ src/test/org/apache/lucene/index/TestDeletionPolicy.java   
>>> (working copy) @@ -229,7 +229,7 @@
>>>                                                            "",
>>>                                                            gen);
>>>           long modTime = dir.fileModified(fileName);
>>> -        assertTrue("commit point was older than " + SECONDS + " seconds
>>> but did not get deleted", lastDeleteTime - modTime < (SECONDS*1000)); +
>>>       assertTrue("commit point was older than " + SECONDS + " seconds ("
>>> + (lastDeleteTime - modTime) + " msec) but did not get deleted",
>>> lastDeleteTime - modTime <= (SECONDS*1000));
>>>         } catch (IOException e) {
>>>           // OK
>>>           break;
>>>
>>> Mike
>>>
>>> Steven A Rowe wrote:
>>>
>>>> Hi Michael,
>>>>
>>>> On 01/11/2008 at 3:34 AM, Michael Busch wrote:
>>>>> I just uploaded Lucene 2.3 release candidate 2 to
>>>>> http://people.apache.org/~buschmi/staging_area/lucene_2_3/rc2.
>>>>>
>>>>> Please switch to RC2 and keep testing!
>>>>
>>>> (The report below is not about binary release testing, but rather
>>>> running the tests from the source tree.)
>>>>
>>>> Using the Sun JVM v1.4.2_16, on Windows XP SP2, I'm seeing
>>>> intermittent failures (roughly 50% failure rate) with
>>>> TestDeletionPolicy, both from the lucene_2_3 branch and from the
>>>> trunk (both at r611263).
>>>>
>>>> PROMPT> ant clean test-core -Dtestcase=TestDeletionPolicy
>>>>
>>>> common.test:
>>>>     [mkdir] Created dir: c:\svn\lucene\java\branches\lucene_2_3
>>>>     \build\test [junit] Testsuite:
>>>>     org.apache.lucene.index.TestDeletionPolicy [junit] Tests run: 6,
>>>>     Failures: 1, Errors: 0, Time elapsed: 4.015 sec [junit] [junit]
>>>>     Testcase: testExpirationTimeDeletionPolicy
>>>>     (org.apache.lucene.index.TestDeletionPolicy): FAILED [junit] commit
>>>>     point was older than 2.0 seconds but did
>>> not get
>>>> deleted
>>>>     [junit] junit.framework.AssertionFailedError: commit point was
>>>>     older than 2.0 seconds but did not get deleted [junit]     at
>>>>
>>> org.apache.lucene.index.TestDeletionPolicy.testExpirationTimeD
>>> eletionP
>>>> olicy(TestDeletionPolicy.java:232)
>>>>     [junit]
>>>>     [junit]
>>>>     [junit] Test org.apache.lucene.index.TestDeletionPolicy FAILED
>>>>
>>>> However, using the Sun JVM v1.4.2_04 on Debian Etch (Linux kernel
>>>> 2.6.20.7), the same test never fails.
>>>>
>>>> Steve
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: java-dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org For
>>>> additional commands, e-mail: java-dev-help@lucene.apache.org
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> --------------------------------------------------------------------- To
>>> unsubscribe, e-mail: java-dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org For
>>> additional commands, e-mail: java-dev-help@lucene.apache.org
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: java-dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org
>> For additional commands, e-mail: java-dev-help@lucene.apache.org
>>
> 
> 
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: java-dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: java-dev-help@lucene.apache.org
> 
> 


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: java-dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: java-dev-help@lucene.apache.org


Re: Lucene 2.3 RC2 available

Posted by Michael McCandless <lu...@mikemccandless.com>.
OK, phew :)

I'll commit to trunk.

Michael, is it OK to commit to 2.3 too?

Mike

On Jan 11, 2008, at 3:27 PM, Steven A Rowe wrote:

> Hi Mike,
>
> I couldn't get the patch to apply (word wrapping/line endings/ 
> whatever), so I just manually pasted in the added line after  
> deleting the corresponding removed line.
>
> With the patched version, I got 0 failures out of 20 runs.
>
> After I reverted back to the original version, I got 10 failures  
> out of 20 runs.
>
> I'd say your patch wins!
>
> Steve
>
> On 01/11/2008 at 2:57 PM, Michael McCandless wrote:
>>
>> Alas, so far I cannot repro this.
>>
>> But I did see one off-by-one error in an assert the test.  Steve,
>> could you try applying this patch and see if the failure still
>> happens?  Thanks:
>>
>> Index: src/test/org/apache/lucene/index/TestDeletionPolicy.java
>> =================================================================== - 
>> --
>> src/test/org/apache/lucene/index/TestDeletionPolicy.java	 (revision
>> 610858) +++ src/test/org/apache/lucene/index/TestDeletionPolicy.java	
>> (working copy) @@ -229,7 +229,7 @@
>>                                                            "",
>>                                                            gen);
>>           long modTime = dir.fileModified(fileName);
>> -        assertTrue("commit point was older than " + SECONDS + "  
>> seconds
>> but did not get deleted", lastDeleteTime - modTime <  
>> (SECONDS*1000)); +
>>       assertTrue("commit point was older than " + SECONDS + "  
>> seconds ("
>> + (lastDeleteTime - modTime) + " msec) but did not get deleted",
>> lastDeleteTime - modTime <= (SECONDS*1000));
>>         } catch (IOException e) {
>>           // OK
>>           break;
>>
>> Mike
>>
>> Steven A Rowe wrote:
>>
>>> Hi Michael,
>>>
>>> On 01/11/2008 at 3:34 AM, Michael Busch wrote:
>>>> I just uploaded Lucene 2.3 release candidate 2 to
>>>> http://people.apache.org/~buschmi/staging_area/lucene_2_3/rc2.
>>>>
>>>> Please switch to RC2 and keep testing!
>>>
>>> (The report below is not about binary release testing, but rather
>>> running the tests from the source tree.)
>>>
>>> Using the Sun JVM v1.4.2_16, on Windows XP SP2, I'm seeing
>>> intermittent failures (roughly 50% failure rate) with
>>> TestDeletionPolicy, both from the lucene_2_3 branch and from the
>>> trunk (both at r611263).
>>>
>>> PROMPT> ant clean test-core -Dtestcase=TestDeletionPolicy
>>>
>>> common.test:
>>>     [mkdir] Created dir: c:\svn\lucene\java\branches\lucene_2_3
>>>     \build\test [junit] Testsuite:
>>>     org.apache.lucene.index.TestDeletionPolicy [junit] Tests run: 6,
>>>     Failures: 1, Errors: 0, Time elapsed: 4.015 sec [junit] [junit]
>>>     Testcase: testExpirationTimeDeletionPolicy
>>>     (org.apache.lucene.index.TestDeletionPolicy): FAILED [junit]  
>>> commit
>>>     point was older than 2.0 seconds but did
>> not get
>>> deleted
>>>     [junit] junit.framework.AssertionFailedError: commit point was
>>>     older than 2.0 seconds but did not get deleted [junit]     at
>>>
>> org.apache.lucene.index.TestDeletionPolicy.testExpirationTimeD
>> eletionP
>>> olicy(TestDeletionPolicy.java:232)
>>>     [junit]
>>>     [junit]
>>>     [junit] Test org.apache.lucene.index.TestDeletionPolicy FAILED
>>>
>>> However, using the Sun JVM v1.4.2_04 on Debian Etch (Linux kernel
>>> 2.6.20.7), the same test never fails.
>>>
>>> Steve
>>>
>>>
>>> -------------------------------------------------------------------- 
>>> -
>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: java-dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org For
>>> additional commands, e-mail: java-dev-help@lucene.apache.org
>>>
>>
>>
>> --------------------------------------------------------------------- 
>>  To
>> unsubscribe, e-mail: java-dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org For
>> additional commands, e-mail: java-dev-help@lucene.apache.org
>>
>>
>
>
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: java-dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: java-dev-help@lucene.apache.org
>


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: java-dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: java-dev-help@lucene.apache.org


RE: Lucene 2.3 RC2 available

Posted by Steven A Rowe <sa...@syr.edu>.
Hi Mike,

I couldn't get the patch to apply (word wrapping/line endings/whatever), so I just manually pasted in the added line after deleting the corresponding removed line.

With the patched version, I got 0 failures out of 20 runs.

After I reverted back to the original version, I got 10 failures out of 20 runs.

I'd say your patch wins!

Steve

On 01/11/2008 at 2:57 PM, Michael McCandless wrote:
> 
> Alas, so far I cannot repro this.
> 
> But I did see one off-by-one error in an assert the test.  Steve,
> could you try applying this patch and see if the failure still
> happens?  Thanks:
> 
> Index: src/test/org/apache/lucene/index/TestDeletionPolicy.java
> =================================================================== ---
> src/test/org/apache/lucene/index/TestDeletionPolicy.java	 (revision
> 610858) +++ src/test/org/apache/lucene/index/TestDeletionPolicy.java	
> (working copy) @@ -229,7 +229,7 @@
>                                                            "",
>                                                            gen);
>           long modTime = dir.fileModified(fileName);
> -        assertTrue("commit point was older than " + SECONDS + " seconds
> but did not get deleted", lastDeleteTime - modTime < (SECONDS*1000)); + 
>       assertTrue("commit point was older than " + SECONDS + " seconds ("
> + (lastDeleteTime - modTime) + " msec) but did not get deleted",
> lastDeleteTime - modTime <= (SECONDS*1000));
>         } catch (IOException e) {
>           // OK
>           break;
> 
> Mike
> 
> Steven A Rowe wrote:
> 
> > Hi Michael,
> > 
> > On 01/11/2008 at 3:34 AM, Michael Busch wrote:
> > > I just uploaded Lucene 2.3 release candidate 2 to
> > > http://people.apache.org/~buschmi/staging_area/lucene_2_3/rc2.
> > > 
> > > Please switch to RC2 and keep testing!
> > 
> > (The report below is not about binary release testing, but rather
> > running the tests from the source tree.)
> > 
> > Using the Sun JVM v1.4.2_16, on Windows XP SP2, I'm seeing
> > intermittent failures (roughly 50% failure rate) with
> > TestDeletionPolicy, both from the lucene_2_3 branch and from the
> > trunk (both at r611263).
> > 
> > PROMPT> ant clean test-core -Dtestcase=TestDeletionPolicy
> > 
> > common.test:
> >     [mkdir] Created dir: c:\svn\lucene\java\branches\lucene_2_3
> >     \build\test [junit] Testsuite:
> >     org.apache.lucene.index.TestDeletionPolicy [junit] Tests run: 6,
> >     Failures: 1, Errors: 0, Time elapsed: 4.015 sec [junit] [junit]
> >     Testcase: testExpirationTimeDeletionPolicy
> >     (org.apache.lucene.index.TestDeletionPolicy): FAILED [junit] commit
> >     point was older than 2.0 seconds but did
> not get
> > deleted
> >     [junit] junit.framework.AssertionFailedError: commit point was
> >     older than 2.0 seconds but did not get deleted [junit]     at
> > 
> org.apache.lucene.index.TestDeletionPolicy.testExpirationTimeD
> eletionP
> > olicy(TestDeletionPolicy.java:232)
> >     [junit]
> >     [junit]
> >     [junit] Test org.apache.lucene.index.TestDeletionPolicy FAILED
> > 
> > However, using the Sun JVM v1.4.2_04 on Debian Etch (Linux kernel
> > 2.6.20.7), the same test never fails.
> > 
> > Steve
> > 
> > 
> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: java-dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org For
> > additional commands, e-mail: java-dev-help@lucene.apache.org
> > 
> 
> 
> --------------------------------------------------------------------- To
> unsubscribe, e-mail: java-dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org For
> additional commands, e-mail: java-dev-help@lucene.apache.org
> 
>

 


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: java-dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: java-dev-help@lucene.apache.org


Re: Lucene 2.3 RC2 available

Posted by Michael McCandless <lu...@mikemccandless.com>.
Alas, so far I cannot repro this.

But I did see one off-by-one error in an assert the test.  Steve,  
could you try applying this patch and see if the failure still  
happens?  Thanks:

Index: src/test/org/apache/lucene/index/TestDeletionPolicy.java
===================================================================
--- src/test/org/apache/lucene/index/TestDeletionPolicy.java	 
(revision 610858)
+++ src/test/org/apache/lucene/index/TestDeletionPolicy.java	(working  
copy)
@@ -229,7 +229,7 @@
                                                           "",
                                                           gen);
          long modTime = dir.fileModified(fileName);
-        assertTrue("commit point was older than " + SECONDS + "  
seconds but did not get deleted", lastDeleteTime - modTime <  
(SECONDS*1000));
+        assertTrue("commit point was older than " + SECONDS + "  
seconds (" + (lastDeleteTime - modTime) + " msec) but did not get  
deleted", lastDeleteTime - modTime <= (SECONDS*1000));
        } catch (IOException e) {
          // OK
          break;

Mike

Steven A Rowe wrote:

> Hi Michael,
>
> On 01/11/2008 at 3:34 AM, Michael Busch wrote:
>> I just uploaded Lucene 2.3 release candidate 2 to
>> http://people.apache.org/~buschmi/staging_area/lucene_2_3/rc2.
>>
>> Please switch to RC2 and keep testing!
>
> (The report below is not about binary release testing, but rather  
> running the tests from the source tree.)
>
> Using the Sun JVM v1.4.2_16, on Windows XP SP2, I'm seeing  
> intermittent failures (roughly 50% failure rate) with  
> TestDeletionPolicy, both from the lucene_2_3 branch and from the  
> trunk (both at r611263).
>
> PROMPT> ant clean test-core -Dtestcase=TestDeletionPolicy
>
> common.test:
>     [mkdir] Created dir: c:\svn\lucene\java\branches\lucene_2_3 
> \build\test
>     [junit] Testsuite: org.apache.lucene.index.TestDeletionPolicy
>     [junit] Tests run: 6, Failures: 1, Errors: 0, Time elapsed:  
> 4.015 sec
>     [junit]
>     [junit] Testcase: testExpirationTimeDeletionPolicy 
> (org.apache.lucene.index.TestDeletionPolicy): FAILED
>     [junit] commit point was older than 2.0 seconds but did not get  
> deleted
>     [junit] junit.framework.AssertionFailedError: commit point was  
> older than 2.0 seconds but did not get deleted
>     [junit]     at  
> org.apache.lucene.index.TestDeletionPolicy.testExpirationTimeDeletionP 
> olicy(TestDeletionPolicy.java:232)
>     [junit]
>     [junit]
>     [junit] Test org.apache.lucene.index.TestDeletionPolicy FAILED
>
> However, using the Sun JVM v1.4.2_04 on Debian Etch (Linux kernel  
> 2.6.20.7), the same test never fails.
>
> Steve
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: java-dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: java-dev-help@lucene.apache.org
>


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: java-dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: java-dev-help@lucene.apache.org


RE: Lucene 2.3 RC2 available

Posted by Steven A Rowe <sa...@syr.edu>.
Hi Michael,

On 01/11/2008 at 3:34 AM, Michael Busch wrote:
> I just uploaded Lucene 2.3 release candidate 2 to
> http://people.apache.org/~buschmi/staging_area/lucene_2_3/rc2.
>
> Please switch to RC2 and keep testing!

(The report below is not about binary release testing, but rather running the tests from the source tree.)

Using the Sun JVM v1.4.2_16, on Windows XP SP2, I'm seeing intermittent failures (roughly 50% failure rate) with TestDeletionPolicy, both from the lucene_2_3 branch and from the trunk (both at r611263).

PROMPT> ant clean test-core -Dtestcase=TestDeletionPolicy

common.test:
    [mkdir] Created dir: c:\svn\lucene\java\branches\lucene_2_3\build\test
    [junit] Testsuite: org.apache.lucene.index.TestDeletionPolicy
    [junit] Tests run: 6, Failures: 1, Errors: 0, Time elapsed: 4.015 sec
    [junit] 
    [junit] Testcase: testExpirationTimeDeletionPolicy(org.apache.lucene.index.TestDeletionPolicy): FAILED
    [junit] commit point was older than 2.0 seconds but did not get deleted
    [junit] junit.framework.AssertionFailedError: commit point was older than 2.0 seconds but did not get deleted
    [junit]     at org.apache.lucene.index.TestDeletionPolicy.testExpirationTimeDeletionPolicy(TestDeletionPolicy.java:232)
    [junit] 
    [junit] 
    [junit] Test org.apache.lucene.index.TestDeletionPolicy FAILED

However, using the Sun JVM v1.4.2_04 on Debian Etch (Linux kernel 2.6.20.7), the same test never fails.

Steve

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: java-dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: java-dev-help@lucene.apache.org