You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to derby-dev@db.apache.org by Ol...@Sun.COM on 2007/05/17 03:54:34 UTC
Regression Test Report - tinderbox_trunk16 538750 - Sun DBTG
[Auto-generated mail]
*tinderbox_trunk16* 538750/2007-05-16 23:42:41 CEST
Failed Tests OK Skip Duration Suite
-------------------------------------------------------
*Jvm: 1.6*
SunOS-5.10_i86pc-i386
0 313 313 0 91.34% derbyall
F:69,E:30 8146 8047 0 1626.08% org.apache.derbyTesting.functionTests.suites.All
Details in http://dbtg.thresher.com/derby/test/tinderbox_trunk16/jvm1.6/testing/Limited/testSummary-538750.html
Attempted failure analysis in
http://dbtg.thresher.com/derby/test/tinderbox_trunk16/jvm1.6/FailReports/538750_bySig.html
-------------------------------------------------------
Changes in http://dbtg.thresher.com/derby/test/tinderbox_trunk16/UpdateInfo/538750.txt
( All results in http://dbtg.thresher.com/derby/test/ )
Re: Regression Test Report - tinderbox_trunk16 538750 - Sun DBTG
Posted by Myrna van Lunteren <m....@gmail.com>.
On 17 May 2007 01:54:34 -0000, Ole.Solberg@sun.com <Ol...@sun.com> wrote:
> [Auto-generated mail]
>
> *tinderbox_trunk16* 538750/2007-05-16 23:42:41 CEST
>
> Failed Tests OK Skip Duration Suite
> -------------------------------------------------------
> *Jvm: 1.6*
> SunOS-5.10_i86pc-i386
> 0 313 313 0 91.34% derbyall
> F:69,E:30 8146 8047 0 1626.08% org.apache.derbyTesting.functionTests.suites.All
> Details in http://dbtg.thresher.com/derby/test/tinderbox_trunk16/jvm1.6/testing/Limited/testSummary-538750.html
> Attempted failure analysis in
> http://dbtg.thresher.com/derby/test/tinderbox_trunk16/jvm1.6/FailReports/538750_bySig.html
> -------------------------------------------------------
>
> Changes in http://dbtg.thresher.com/derby/test/tinderbox_trunk16/UpdateInfo/538750.txt
>
> ( All results in http://dbtg.thresher.com/derby/test/ )
>
>
Looks like the encryption tests are throwing a curveball at the
upgrade tests. I didn't see this - apologies for that. However, some
of the errors are similar to some things I have seen in IBM's nightly
tests, see http://people.apache.org/~fuzzylogic/derby_test_results/main/testlog/ibm15/538396-suites.All_diff.txt
- DERBY-2644.
If anyone has a suggestion, please speak up...
Thx,
Myrna