You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@spamassassin.apache.org by Justin Mason <jm...@jmason.org> on 2007/02/06 18:07:58 UTC
Re: mass-check results ready?
Michael Parker writes:
> Justin Mason wrote:
> > hey everyone --
> >
> > don't forget to submit your mass-check results -- if they're not
> > quite finished, I suggest either CTRL-C'ing and submitting what you've
> > got, ASAP, or replying to this mail, as the deadline is imminent (like
> > in an hour or so).
>
> I'd like to request an extension. For some reason I had in my head this
> coming up Friday as the deadline so got started way too late. I've got
> about 500k ham and 700k spam from fairly diverse sources running at the
> moment.
>
> Can we delay at least a day, if not longer, so they could finish up?
> Plus the list of contributors thus far is surprisingly short! Maybe in
> general we should just send out another announcement and get other folks
> who have requested rsync access a chance to respond.
alright, let's go for extending it +1 day... (it means we can check out
the logs we have so far, in the meantime, anyway.)
--j.
> Thanks
> Michael
>
> >
> > Here's what we have so far right now...
> >
> > -rw-r--r-- 1 rsync rsync 289200405 Feb 6 05:01 spam-bayes-net-dos.log
> > -rw-r--r-- 1 rsync rsync 21838312 Feb 6 04:57 ham-bayes-net-dos.log
> > -rw-r--r-- 1 rsync rsync 336689117 Feb 4 22:42 spam-bayes-net-theo.log
> > -rw-r--r-- 1 rsync rsync 31129768 Feb 4 22:40 ham-bayes-net-theo.log
> > -rw-r--r-- 1 rsync rsync 180098678 Feb 2 17:04 spam-bayes-net-doc.log
> > -rw-r--r-- 1 rsync rsync 58819451 Feb 2 16:59 ham-bayes-net-doc.log
> > -rw-r--r-- 1 rsync rsync 484077594 Jan 31 14:58 spam-bayes-net-jm.log
> > -rw-r--r-- 1 rsync rsync 240818122 Jan 31 14:43 ham-bayes-net-jm.log
> > -rw-r--r-- 1 rsync rsync 31702299 Jan 29 23:14 spam-bayes-net-fredt.log
> > -rw-r--r-- 1 rsync rsync 5835644 Jan 29 23:13 ham-bayes-net-fredt.log
> >
> >
> > that's a little short on contributors, unfortunately :(
> > might have to supplement it with weekly-mass-check results.
> >
> > --j.
> >