You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to issues@flink.apache.org by GitBox <gi...@apache.org> on 2020/10/28 11:41:07 UTC

[GitHub] [flink] leonardBang opened a new pull request #13823: [hot-fix][table-planner-blink] Fix TableScanTest which used temporal …

leonardBang opened a new pull request #13823:
URL: https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/13823


   ## What is the purpose of the change
   
   * This pull hot-fix table plan test TableScanTest.testTemporalJoinOnUpsertSource() .
   
   
   ## Brief change log
   
     - Update TableScanTest.testTemporalJoinOnUpsertSource() using right temporal join order
   
   
   ## Verifying this change
   
   This change is a trivial rework / code cleanup without any test coverage.
   
   ## Does this pull request potentially affect one of the following parts:
   
     - Dependencies (does it add or upgrade a dependency): (no)
     - The public API, i.e., is any changed class annotated with `@Public(Evolving)`: (no)
     - The serializers: (no)
     - The runtime per-record code paths (performance sensitive): ( no)
     - Anything that affects deployment or recovery: JobManager (and its components), Checkpointing, Yarn/Mesos, ZooKeeper: (no)
     - The S3 file system connector: (no)
   
   ## Documentation
   
     - Does this pull request introduce a new feature? (no)
     - If yes, how is the feature documented? (not applicable / docs / JavaDocs / not documented)
   


----------------------------------------------------------------
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
users@infra.apache.org



[GitHub] [flink] leonardBang commented on pull request #13823: [hot-fix][table-planner-blink] Fix TableScanTest which used temporal …

Posted by GitBox <gi...@apache.org>.
leonardBang commented on pull request #13823:
URL: https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/13823#issuecomment-717878191


   cc @wuchong Could you have a quick look ? thanks 


----------------------------------------------------------------
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
users@infra.apache.org



[GitHub] [flink] wuchong merged pull request #13823: [hot-fix][table-planner-blink] Fix TableScanTest which used temporal …

Posted by GitBox <gi...@apache.org>.
wuchong merged pull request #13823:
URL: https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/13823


   


----------------------------------------------------------------
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
users@infra.apache.org



[GitHub] [flink] wuchong commented on pull request #13823: [hot-fix][table-planner-blink] Fix TableScanTest which used temporal …

Posted by GitBox <gi...@apache.org>.
wuchong commented on pull request #13823:
URL: https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/13823#issuecomment-717879422


   Verified in the local machine. Merge it as it blocks builds.


----------------------------------------------------------------
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
users@infra.apache.org



[GitHub] [flink] flinkbot commented on pull request #13823: [hot-fix][table-planner-blink] Fix TableScanTest which used temporal …

Posted by GitBox <gi...@apache.org>.
flinkbot commented on pull request #13823:
URL: https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/13823#issuecomment-717879581


   Thanks a lot for your contribution to the Apache Flink project. I'm the @flinkbot. I help the community
   to review your pull request. We will use this comment to track the progress of the review.
   
   
   ## Automated Checks
   Last check on commit 521fc89541a33024db75670cfc93051857bba357 (Wed Oct 28 11:44:41 UTC 2020)
   
   **Warnings:**
    * No documentation files were touched! Remember to keep the Flink docs up to date!
    * **Invalid pull request title: No valid Jira ID provided**
   
   
   <sub>Mention the bot in a comment to re-run the automated checks.</sub>
   ## Review Progress
   
   * ❓ 1. The [description] looks good.
   * ❓ 2. There is [consensus] that the contribution should go into to Flink.
   * ❓ 3. Needs [attention] from.
   * ❓ 4. The change fits into the overall [architecture].
   * ❓ 5. Overall code [quality] is good.
   
   Please see the [Pull Request Review Guide](https://flink.apache.org/contributing/reviewing-prs.html) for a full explanation of the review process.<details>
    The Bot is tracking the review progress through labels. Labels are applied according to the order of the review items. For consensus, approval by a Flink committer of PMC member is required <summary>Bot commands</summary>
     The @flinkbot bot supports the following commands:
   
    - `@flinkbot approve description` to approve one or more aspects (aspects: `description`, `consensus`, `architecture` and `quality`)
    - `@flinkbot approve all` to approve all aspects
    - `@flinkbot approve-until architecture` to approve everything until `architecture`
    - `@flinkbot attention @username1 [@username2 ..]` to require somebody's attention
    - `@flinkbot disapprove architecture` to remove an approval you gave earlier
   </details>


----------------------------------------------------------------
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
users@infra.apache.org