You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@tomcat.apache.org by re...@apache.org on 2003/12/10 13:38:01 UTC
cvs commit: jakarta-tomcat-catalina/webapps/docs/config jk.xml project.xml jk2.xml
remm 2003/12/10 04:38:01
Modified: webapps/docs/config project.xml
Added: webapps/docs/config jk.xml
Removed: webapps/docs/config jk2.xml
Log:
- Remove confusion: all references to JK 2 are gone, and replaced with JK.
This should clear some confusion (hopefully, and we can focus on mod_jk 1
vs mod_jk2).
Revision Changes Path
1.3 +1 -1 jakarta-tomcat-catalina/webapps/docs/config/project.xml
Index: project.xml
===================================================================
RCS file: /home/cvs/jakarta-tomcat-catalina/webapps/docs/config/project.xml,v
retrieving revision 1.2
retrieving revision 1.3
diff -u -r1.2 -r1.3
--- project.xml 16 Nov 2002 14:59:07 -0000 1.2
+++ project.xml 10 Dec 2003 12:38:01 -0000 1.3
@@ -23,7 +23,7 @@
<menu name="Connectors">
<item name="HTTP/1.1" href="coyote.html"/>
- <item name="JK" href="jk2.html"/>
+ <item name="JK" href="jk.html"/>
</menu>
<menu name="Containers">
1.4 +28 -746 jakarta-tomcat-catalina/webapps/docs/config/jk.xml
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: tomcat-dev-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: tomcat-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org
Re: cvs commit: jakarta-tomcat-catalina/webapps/docs/config jk.xml project.xml jk2.xml
Posted by Kyle VanderBeek <ky...@kylev.com>.
On Wed, Dec 10, 2003 at 01:47:59PM +0100, Remy Maucherat wrote:
> Tim Funk wrote:
> > Does this pretty much says that jk2 is now not recommended? (At least
> > until it gets more cleanup) So I can update the FAQ.
>
> No, this means there's one connector on the Java side, so the number was
> useless.
>
> We could rename that to AJP connector, BTW. I almost did it, but left JK
> as the name in the end.
> I believe it would be better to use the protocol name (AJP) as the
> connector name, so that it is not tied to any native code or another
> subproject's name. I can make the change.
Please do the rename. I think there is considerable confusion in the
community about the status of mod_jk[2], and this name overlap doesn't
help. If you spend any time in #tomcat, you'll notice that all the
questions are either 1) I'm doing something really dumb and hope
everyone here will write my app for me and 2) problems with mod_jk/jk2.
And from the mod_jk2 pages, it looks like mod_jk2 is the preferred code.
It's clear from lurking tomcat-dev that it isn't.
(BTW, lurk #tomcat sometime. It's "educating".)
--
kylev@kylev.com
Some people have a way with words, while others... erm... thingy.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: tomcat-dev-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: tomcat-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org
Re: cvs commit: jakarta-tomcat-catalina/webapps/docs/config jk.xml
project.xml jk2.xml
Posted by Remy Maucherat <re...@apache.org>.
Tim Funk wrote:
> Does this pretty much says that jk2 is now not recommended? (At least
> until it gets more cleanup) So I can update the FAQ.
No, this means there's one connector on the Java side, so the number was
useless.
We could rename that to AJP connector, BTW. I almost did it, but left JK
as the name in the end.
I believe it would be better to use the protocol name (AJP) as the
connector name, so that it is not tied to any native code or another
subproject's name. I can make the change.
Rémy
> remm@apache.org wrote:
>
>> remm 2003/12/10 04:38:01
>>
>> Modified: webapps/docs/config project.xml
>> Added: webapps/docs/config jk.xml
>> Removed: webapps/docs/config jk2.xml
>> Log:
>> - Remove confusion: all references to JK 2 are gone, and replaced
>> with JK.
>> This should clear some confusion (hopefully, and we can focus on
>> mod_jk 1
>> vs mod_jk2).
>
>
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: tomcat-dev-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: tomcat-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org
>
>
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: tomcat-dev-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: tomcat-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org
Re: cvs commit: jakarta-tomcat-catalina/webapps/docs/config jk.xml
project.xml jk2.xml
Posted by Tim Funk <fu...@joedog.org>.
Does this pretty much says that jk2 is now not recommended? (At least until
it gets more cleanup) So I can update the FAQ.
-Tim
remm@apache.org wrote:
> remm 2003/12/10 04:38:01
>
> Modified: webapps/docs/config project.xml
> Added: webapps/docs/config jk.xml
> Removed: webapps/docs/config jk2.xml
> Log:
> - Remove confusion: all references to JK 2 are gone, and replaced with JK.
> This should clear some confusion (hopefully, and we can focus on mod_jk 1
> vs mod_jk2).
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: tomcat-dev-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: tomcat-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org