You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@kafka.apache.org by Joe Stein <jo...@stealth.ly> on 2014/02/20 06:34:18 UTC
[DISCUSS] 0.8.1 Release
I wanted to start a thread prior to starting the vote for the 0.8.1 release.
There are 3 open patches still pending
https://issues.apache.org/jira/issues/?jql=project%20%3D%20KAFKA%20AND%20fixVersion%20%3D%20%220.8.1%22%20AND%20status%20%3D%20%22Patch%20Available%22%20ORDER%20BY%20priority%20DESC
One patch is a slight difference between 0.8.0 and 0.8.1 with creation of
topic in the docs and feel we need to still show/support both in some way
in the docs. I just +1 Jay's suggestion so that can move ahead if there
are no objections to what he has planned.
The other I worked on and I don't see it as blocker (the patch can be
applied for the case it resolves as there is some question to what we are
solving and ultimately in 0.9.0 this goes away) so we could move it to
0.8.2 unless folks think it can go in 0.8.1 or should wait.
I don't know anything about the Windows Bat file patch can we move that to
0.8.2 also?
Once these are settled I would like to prepare the artifacts and see if
there are any further issues and if not start the process for calling a
vote of release candidates for 0.8.1.
Thoughts? Questions? Comments? Concerns?
/*******************************************
Joe Stein
Founder, Principal Consultant
Big Data Open Source Security LLC
http://www.stealth.ly
Twitter: @allthingshadoop <http://www.twitter.com/allthingshadoop>
********************************************/
Re: [DISCUSS] 0.8.1 Release
Posted by Joe Stein <jo...@stealth.ly>.
Ok
/*******************************************
Joe Stein
Founder, Principal Consultant
Big Data Open Source Security LLC
http://www.stealth.ly
Twitter: @allthingshadoop
********************************************/
On Feb 25, 2014, at 11:22 AM, Jun Rao <ju...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi, Joe,
>
> Both KAFKA-1271 and KAFKA-930 have been checked into the 0.8.1. branch. The
> only remaining thing is to update the doc. We can start the release vote
> and prepare the doc change in parallel.
>
> Thanks,
>
> Jun
>
>
> On Wed, Feb 19, 2014 at 10:38 PM, Joe Stein <jo...@stealth.ly> wrote:
>
>> sounds good, I updated JIRA to reflect the below
>>
>> On Thu, Feb 20, 2014 at 1:17 AM, Jun Rao <ju...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> Hi, Joe,
>>>
>>> I agree with you that KAFKA-1180 and KAFKA-1210 are not blockers and can
>> be
>>> moved to 0.8.2.
>>>
>>> I'd like to check in KAFKA-1271. It's a simple fix and improves the
>>> logging.
>>>
>>> Sriram has a delta patch in KAFKA-930 that was waiting for the delete
>> topic
>>> patch to be checked in.
>>>
>>> I think once the above fixes are checked in, we can cut the release
>>> candidate for 0.8.1.
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>>
>>> Jun
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On Wed, Feb 19, 2014 at 9:34 PM, Joe Stein <jo...@stealth.ly> wrote:
>>>
>>>> I wanted to start a thread prior to starting the vote for the 0.8.1
>>>> release.
>>>>
>>>> There are 3 open patches still pending
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/issues/?jql=project%20%3D%20KAFKA%20AND%20fixVersion%20%3D%20%220.8.1%22%20AND%20status%20%3D%20%22Patch%20Available%22%20ORDER%20BY%20priority%20DESC
>>>>
>>>> One patch is a slight difference between 0.8.0 and 0.8.1 with creation
>> of
>>>> topic in the docs and feel we need to still show/support both in some
>> way
>>>> in the docs. I just +1 Jay's suggestion so that can move ahead if
>> there
>>>> are no objections to what he has planned.
>>>>
>>>> The other I worked on and I don't see it as blocker (the patch can be
>>>> applied for the case it resolves as there is some question to what we
>> are
>>>> solving and ultimately in 0.9.0 this goes away) so we could move it to
>>>> 0.8.2 unless folks think it can go in 0.8.1 or should wait.
>>>>
>>>> I don't know anything about the Windows Bat file patch can we move that
>>> to
>>>> 0.8.2 also?
>>>>
>>>> Once these are settled I would like to prepare the artifacts and see if
>>>> there are any further issues and if not start the process for calling a
>>>> vote of release candidates for 0.8.1.
>>>>
>>>> Thoughts? Questions? Comments? Concerns?
>>>>
>>>> /*******************************************
>>>> Joe Stein
>>>> Founder, Principal Consultant
>>>> Big Data Open Source Security LLC
>>>> http://www.stealth.ly
>>>> Twitter: @allthingshadoop <http://www.twitter.com/allthingshadoop>
>>>> ********************************************/
>>>>
>>>
>>
Re: [DISCUSS] 0.8.1 Release
Posted by Jun Rao <ju...@gmail.com>.
Hi, Joe,
Both KAFKA-1271 and KAFKA-930 have been checked into the 0.8.1. branch. The
only remaining thing is to update the doc. We can start the release vote
and prepare the doc change in parallel.
Thanks,
Jun
On Wed, Feb 19, 2014 at 10:38 PM, Joe Stein <jo...@stealth.ly> wrote:
> sounds good, I updated JIRA to reflect the below
>
> On Thu, Feb 20, 2014 at 1:17 AM, Jun Rao <ju...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > Hi, Joe,
> >
> > I agree with you that KAFKA-1180 and KAFKA-1210 are not blockers and can
> be
> > moved to 0.8.2.
> >
> > I'd like to check in KAFKA-1271. It's a simple fix and improves the
> > logging.
> >
> > Sriram has a delta patch in KAFKA-930 that was waiting for the delete
> topic
> > patch to be checked in.
> >
> > I think once the above fixes are checked in, we can cut the release
> > candidate for 0.8.1.
> >
> > Thanks,
> >
> > Jun
> >
> >
> >
> > On Wed, Feb 19, 2014 at 9:34 PM, Joe Stein <jo...@stealth.ly> wrote:
> >
> > > I wanted to start a thread prior to starting the vote for the 0.8.1
> > > release.
> > >
> > > There are 3 open patches still pending
> > >
> > >
> >
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/issues/?jql=project%20%3D%20KAFKA%20AND%20fixVersion%20%3D%20%220.8.1%22%20AND%20status%20%3D%20%22Patch%20Available%22%20ORDER%20BY%20priority%20DESC
> > >
> > > One patch is a slight difference between 0.8.0 and 0.8.1 with creation
> of
> > > topic in the docs and feel we need to still show/support both in some
> way
> > > in the docs. I just +1 Jay's suggestion so that can move ahead if
> there
> > > are no objections to what he has planned.
> > >
> > > The other I worked on and I don't see it as blocker (the patch can be
> > > applied for the case it resolves as there is some question to what we
> are
> > > solving and ultimately in 0.9.0 this goes away) so we could move it to
> > > 0.8.2 unless folks think it can go in 0.8.1 or should wait.
> > >
> > > I don't know anything about the Windows Bat file patch can we move that
> > to
> > > 0.8.2 also?
> > >
> > > Once these are settled I would like to prepare the artifacts and see if
> > > there are any further issues and if not start the process for calling a
> > > vote of release candidates for 0.8.1.
> > >
> > > Thoughts? Questions? Comments? Concerns?
> > >
> > > /*******************************************
> > > Joe Stein
> > > Founder, Principal Consultant
> > > Big Data Open Source Security LLC
> > > http://www.stealth.ly
> > > Twitter: @allthingshadoop <http://www.twitter.com/allthingshadoop>
> > > ********************************************/
> > >
> >
>
Re: [DISCUSS] 0.8.1 Release
Posted by Joe Stein <jo...@stealth.ly>.
sounds good, I updated JIRA to reflect the below
On Thu, Feb 20, 2014 at 1:17 AM, Jun Rao <ju...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi, Joe,
>
> I agree with you that KAFKA-1180 and KAFKA-1210 are not blockers and can be
> moved to 0.8.2.
>
> I'd like to check in KAFKA-1271. It's a simple fix and improves the
> logging.
>
> Sriram has a delta patch in KAFKA-930 that was waiting for the delete topic
> patch to be checked in.
>
> I think once the above fixes are checked in, we can cut the release
> candidate for 0.8.1.
>
> Thanks,
>
> Jun
>
>
>
> On Wed, Feb 19, 2014 at 9:34 PM, Joe Stein <jo...@stealth.ly> wrote:
>
> > I wanted to start a thread prior to starting the vote for the 0.8.1
> > release.
> >
> > There are 3 open patches still pending
> >
> >
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/issues/?jql=project%20%3D%20KAFKA%20AND%20fixVersion%20%3D%20%220.8.1%22%20AND%20status%20%3D%20%22Patch%20Available%22%20ORDER%20BY%20priority%20DESC
> >
> > One patch is a slight difference between 0.8.0 and 0.8.1 with creation of
> > topic in the docs and feel we need to still show/support both in some way
> > in the docs. I just +1 Jay's suggestion so that can move ahead if there
> > are no objections to what he has planned.
> >
> > The other I worked on and I don't see it as blocker (the patch can be
> > applied for the case it resolves as there is some question to what we are
> > solving and ultimately in 0.9.0 this goes away) so we could move it to
> > 0.8.2 unless folks think it can go in 0.8.1 or should wait.
> >
> > I don't know anything about the Windows Bat file patch can we move that
> to
> > 0.8.2 also?
> >
> > Once these are settled I would like to prepare the artifacts and see if
> > there are any further issues and if not start the process for calling a
> > vote of release candidates for 0.8.1.
> >
> > Thoughts? Questions? Comments? Concerns?
> >
> > /*******************************************
> > Joe Stein
> > Founder, Principal Consultant
> > Big Data Open Source Security LLC
> > http://www.stealth.ly
> > Twitter: @allthingshadoop <http://www.twitter.com/allthingshadoop>
> > ********************************************/
> >
>
Re: [DISCUSS] 0.8.1 Release
Posted by Jun Rao <ju...@gmail.com>.
Hi, Joe,
I agree with you that KAFKA-1180 and KAFKA-1210 are not blockers and can be
moved to 0.8.2.
I'd like to check in KAFKA-1271. It's a simple fix and improves the logging.
Sriram has a delta patch in KAFKA-930 that was waiting for the delete topic
patch to be checked in.
I think once the above fixes are checked in, we can cut the release
candidate for 0.8.1.
Thanks,
Jun
On Wed, Feb 19, 2014 at 9:34 PM, Joe Stein <jo...@stealth.ly> wrote:
> I wanted to start a thread prior to starting the vote for the 0.8.1
> release.
>
> There are 3 open patches still pending
>
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/issues/?jql=project%20%3D%20KAFKA%20AND%20fixVersion%20%3D%20%220.8.1%22%20AND%20status%20%3D%20%22Patch%20Available%22%20ORDER%20BY%20priority%20DESC
>
> One patch is a slight difference between 0.8.0 and 0.8.1 with creation of
> topic in the docs and feel we need to still show/support both in some way
> in the docs. I just +1 Jay's suggestion so that can move ahead if there
> are no objections to what he has planned.
>
> The other I worked on and I don't see it as blocker (the patch can be
> applied for the case it resolves as there is some question to what we are
> solving and ultimately in 0.9.0 this goes away) so we could move it to
> 0.8.2 unless folks think it can go in 0.8.1 or should wait.
>
> I don't know anything about the Windows Bat file patch can we move that to
> 0.8.2 also?
>
> Once these are settled I would like to prepare the artifacts and see if
> there are any further issues and if not start the process for calling a
> vote of release candidates for 0.8.1.
>
> Thoughts? Questions? Comments? Concerns?
>
> /*******************************************
> Joe Stein
> Founder, Principal Consultant
> Big Data Open Source Security LLC
> http://www.stealth.ly
> Twitter: @allthingshadoop <http://www.twitter.com/allthingshadoop>
> ********************************************/
>