Re: [VOTE] Approve the release of apache-esme-incubating-1.0 - (Yes Again :->)

[Anne Kathrine Petterøe <yo...@gmail.com>]

It displayed correctly on my machine...


On 17. feb. 2010, at 20.14, Richard Hirsch wrote:

> On Wed, Feb 17, 2010 at 8:03 PM, Richard Hirsch <hi...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> 
>> Hi,
>> 
>> I have posted our candidate for the first Apache release developed
>> within the ESME podling.
>> 
>> The candidate can be found at
>> 
>>  http://people.apache.org/~rhirsch/esme/
>> 
>> See the CHANGES.txt file for details on release contents. The release
>> candidate is a tar archive of the sources in
>> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/esme/tags/apache-esme-1-0-0-incubating/
> 
> The URL behind this element is incorrect if displayed in rich
> formatting: it should be
> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/esme/tags/apache-esme-1-0-0-incubating/
> . Another reason to use text-only when writing emails.
>> 
>> The MD5 checksum of the apache-esme-incubating-1.0-
>> src.tar.gz release package is
>> 
>> 8E 43 0D DF F8 FE 15 9B  22 47 C2 C0 CC 30 21 2C
>> 
>> Please vote on releasing this package as Apache ESME 1.0-incubating.
>> The vote is open for the next 72 hours and passes if
>> a majority of at least three +1  ESME PPMC votes is reached. Assuming
>> the vote passes, I will ask the Incubator PMC to approve the release.
>> 
>>   [ ] +1 Release this package as Apache ESME 1.0-incubating
>>   [ ] -1 Do not release this package because...
>> 
>> Here's my +1.
>> 
>> Since the last release attempt, the following changes have been made
>> * Updated README to indicate that ESME currently just supports JDK 1.6
>> * Removed license reference from the README
>> * Removed GPL-licensed and other unused dependencies from pom.xml.  (Thanks Ethan)
>>   Perform "mvn site" to see the current dependencies. The only dependencies
>>   only license information are the com.twitter.* jars and I was unabled to find
>>   licensing info. Although newer versions in github are licensed with Apache
>>   License
>> * Pom.xml no longer refers to lift snapshot but to the "1.1-M8" version
>> * Changed version in pom.xml to <version>apache-esme-1.0-incubating</version>
>> * removed svn files from release
>> * directory created by release is no longer called "trunk"
>> * Checked SHA signature on signed release but this should be a diff between SHA1
>>   and SHA512
>> 
>> 
>> Dick Hirsch