You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to issues@storm.apache.org by "Jungtaek Lim (JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org> on 2018/04/05 13:13:00 UTC

[jira] [Resolved] (STORM-2983) Some topologies not working properly

     [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/STORM-2983?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ]

Jungtaek Lim resolved STORM-2983.
---------------------------------
       Resolution: Fixed
    Fix Version/s: 2.0.0

Thanks [~ethanli], I merged into master.

[~roshan_naik] [~revans2]

Please note that [https://github.com/apache/storm/pull/2614] fixed the issue via proposed way (even better) : it can also cover multiple all-in-one workers use case as well.

We can continue discussion, but maybe better to move to dev. list or file issue(s) since the topic(s) are out of topic for this issue.

> Some topologies not working properly 
> -------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: STORM-2983
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/STORM-2983
>             Project: Apache Storm
>          Issue Type: Bug
>            Reporter: Ethan Li
>            Assignee: Ethan Li
>            Priority: Major
>              Labels: pull-request-available
>             Fix For: 2.0.0
>
>          Time Spent: 0.5h
>  Remaining Estimate: 0h
>
> For example,
> {code:java}
> bin/storm jar storm-loadgen-*.jar org.apache.storm.loadgen.ThroughputVsLatency --spouts 1 --splitters 2 --counters 1 -c topology.debug=true
> {code}
> on ResourceAwareScheduler not working properly.
> With default cluster settings, there will be only one __acker-executor and it will be on a separate worker. And it looks like the __acker-executor was not able to receive messages from spouts and bolts. And spouts and bolts continued to retry sending messages to acker. It then led to another problem:
> STORM-2970
> I tried to run on storm right before [https://github.com/apache/storm/pull/2502] and right after and confirmed that this bug should be related to it



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.6.3#76005)