You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@subversion.apache.org by "Jostein Chr. Andersen" <jo...@josander.net> on 2004/01/10 15:20:04 UTC
branch 1.0-stabilization: All my tests passed, how about yours? ;-)
Hi,
First: -A big thanks to all of you who replied the similar posting I did
for the 0.35.0 branch:
http://www.contactor.se/~dast/svn/archive-2003-12/index.shtml#829
Tuesday is the release date for 0.36.0 and I'm asking you for a favor:
-Checkout, compile and test the 1.0-stabilization branch now!
It would be nice if you can 'configure', 'make', 'make check', 'make
install', 'make davcheck' and 'make svncheck' on your OS/distro/whatever
with this packages installed:
-Berkeley DB 4.2.52
-A new SSL if possible (ex.: OpenSSL 0.9.7c)
-Apache 2.0.48
-Neon 0.24.4
My system: Linux (LFS) with ReiserFS and all the latest packages above.
All my "make tests" went ok.
Jostein
--
http://www.josander.net/kontakt/ ||
http://www.josander.net/en/contact/
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
Re: branch 1.0-stabilization: All my tests passed, how about yours? ;-)
Posted by John Szakmeister <jo...@szakmeister.net>.
On Sunday 11 January 2004 15:34, kfogel@collab.net wrote:
> "Jostein Chr. Andersen" <jo...@josander.net> writes:
> > Is this three items (r8229, r8230 and the password ting) something that
> > will stop us from making 0.36.0, or will this be fixed and merged into
> > the 1.0-stabilization branch before Tuesday (anyone)?
>
> Yah, the password prompt fix (r8235) is an obvious fix. I've added my
> vote to bliss's, now it just needs one more pair of eyes (anyone?).
Looks good to me, so I voted for it.
-John
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
Re: branch 1.0-stabilization: All my tests passed, how about yours? ;-)
Posted by kf...@collab.net.
"Jostein Chr. Andersen" <jo...@josander.net> writes:
> I'm not allowed to vote for stuff in the STATUS file, but I would say
> that r8229 and r8230 should come straight into the 1.0-stabilization
> branch and the "spurious username prompt" looks like a thing we should
> not have in a 1.0 version. Can someone do a quick decision here?
>
> I don't want to make a 0.xx.1 version 8 hours after a x.xx.0 again (it
> makes me look like a fool) :-)
I'm reviewing changes and doing some voting right now.
But remember there is a 0.37 planned for only a week later anyway, so
there's no need for a 0.36.1 unless it's a really _awful_ bug :-).
-K
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
Re: branch 1.0-stabilization: All my tests passed, how about yours? ;-)
Posted by kf...@collab.net.
"Jostein Chr. Andersen" <jo...@josander.net> writes:
> Is this three items (r8229, r8230 and the password ting) something that
> will stop us from making 0.36.0, or will this be fixed and merged into
> the 1.0-stabilization branch before Tuesday (anyone)?
Yah, the password prompt fix (r8235) is an obvious fix. I've added my
vote to bliss's, now it just needs one more pair of eyes (anyone?).
r8229 and r8230 don't strike me as essential for 1.0 -- having them
fixed on trunk seems enough -- so I haven't added them to the STATUS
file. If someone else really wants to, though, go for it. I'd
probably vote for them, having reviewed them already.
-Karl
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
Re: branch 1.0-stabilization: All my tests passed, how about yours? ;-)
Posted by "Jostein Chr. Andersen" <jo...@josander.net>.
On Sunday 11 January 2004 00.58, Philip Martin wrote:
..
> valgrind testing of the branch has revealed two bugs so far. They
> were also present on the trunk and I have fixed them there with r8229
> and r8230.
>
> Another problem is spurious username prompts:
>
> $ grep ^store ~/.subversion/config
> store-password = no
> store-auth-creds = no
> $ svnadmin create repo
> $ svn mkdir -m "" file://`pwd`/repo/foo
> Authentication realm: 7b19ef9d-98d0-0310-9904-a7f57b3cb904
> Username:
>
> I don't think I should be prompted for a username here; I definitely
> don't get prompted if I use the trunk.
Is this three items (r8229, r8230 and the password ting) something that
will stop us from making 0.36.0, or will this be fixed and merged into
the 1.0-stabilization branch before Tuesday (anyone)?
I'm not allowed to vote for stuff in the STATUS file, but I would say
that r8229 and r8230 should come straight into the 1.0-stabilization
branch and the "spurious username prompt" looks like a thing we should
not have in a 1.0 version. Can someone do a quick decision here?
I don't want to make a 0.xx.1 version 8 hours after a x.xx.0 again (it
makes me look like a fool) :-)
Jostein
--
http://www.josander.net/kontakt/ ||
http://www.josander.net/en/contact/
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
Re: branch 1.0-stabilization: All my tests passed, how about yours?
;-)
Posted by Tobias Ringstrom <to...@ringstrom.mine.nu>.
Tobias Ringstrom wrote:
> Absolutely correct, and it's my fault. It does not happen on trunk
> because r8139 (which is not included in 1.0) "accidently" fixed this as
Fixed is not the word I was looking for. The word "hid" describes it
better.
> order. I'll put this is an issue so we can vote for it.
s/an issue/the STATUS file/
...awake now...
/Tobias
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
Re: branch 1.0-stabilization: All my tests passed, how about yours?
;-)
Posted by Tobias Ringstrom <to...@ringstrom.mine.nu>.
Philip Martin wrote:
> Another problem is spurious username prompts:
>
> $ grep ^store ~/.subversion/config
> store-password = no
> store-auth-creds = no
> $ svnadmin create repo
> $ svn mkdir -m "" file://`pwd`/repo/foo
> Authentication realm: 7b19ef9d-98d0-0310-9904-a7f57b3cb904
> Username:
>
> I don't think I should be prompted for a username here; I definitely
> don't get prompted if I use the trunk.
Absolutely correct, and it's my fault. It does not happen on trunk
because r8139 (which is not included in 1.0) "accidently" fixed this
as well. The following patch fixes it:
Index: subversion/libsvn_client/username_providers.c
===================================================================
--- subversion/libsvn_client/username_providers.c (revision 8233)
+++ subversion/libsvn_client/username_providers.c (working copy)
@@ -312,7 +312,7 @@
SVN_ERR (prompt_for_username_creds
((svn_auth_cred_username_t **) credentials_p, pb,
- parameters, realmstring, ! no_auth_cache, TRUE, pool));
+ parameters, realmstring, TRUE, ! no_auth_cache, pool));
ibaton->retries = 0;
ibaton->pb = pb;
Things works a lot better when you pass the parameters in the right
order. I'll put this is an issue so we can vote for it.
/Tobias
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
Re: branch 1.0-stabilization: All my tests passed, how about yours?
;-)
Posted by Philip Martin <ph...@codematters.co.uk>.
"Jostein Chr. Andersen" <jo...@josander.net> writes:
> Tuesday is the release date for 0.36.0 and I'm asking you for a favor:
> -Checkout, compile and test the 1.0-stabilization branch now!
valgrind testing of the branch has revealed two bugs so far. They
were also present on the trunk and I have fixed them there with r8229
and r8230.
Another problem is spurious username prompts:
$ grep ^store ~/.subversion/config
store-password = no
store-auth-creds = no
$ svnadmin create repo
$ svn mkdir -m "" file://`pwd`/repo/foo
Authentication realm: 7b19ef9d-98d0-0310-9904-a7f57b3cb904
Username:
I don't think I should be prompted for a username here; I definitely
don't get prompted if I use the trunk.
--
Philip Martin
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
Re: branch 1.0-stabilization: All my tests passed, how about yours? ;-)
Posted by Ben Reser <be...@reser.org>.
On Sun, Jan 11, 2004 at 09:44:56AM -0600, Ron Bieber wrote:
> The 1.0-stabilization branch builds for me aside from the python
> bindings. I am receiving the following error when trying to execute a
> make swig-py:
>
>
> /bin/sh /home/rbieber/SVN/subversion/libtool --silent --mode=compile gcc
> -pthread -DNDEBUG -D_FILE_OFFSET_BITS=64 -DHAVE_LARGEFILE_SUPPORT -O2
> -march=i586 -mcpu=i686 -fmessage-length=0 -fPIC -Wall -fPIC -DLINUX=2
> -D_REENTRANT -D_XOPEN_SOURCE=500 -D_BSD_SOURCE -D_SVID_SOURCE
> -D_GNU_SOURCE -I/home/rbieber/SVN/subversion/subversion/bindings/swig
> -I/home/rbieber/SVN/subversion/subversion/include
> -I/home/rbieber/SVN/subversion/apr/include -I/usr/include/python2.3
> -prefer-pic -c -o subversion/bindings/swig/python/core.lo
> subversion/bindings/swig/python/core.c
> In file included from /usr/include/python2.3/Python.h:8,
> from subversion/bindings/swig/python/core.c:14:
> /usr/include/python2.3/pyconfig.h:856:1: warning: "_XOPEN_SOURCE"
> redefined
> <command line>:10:1: warning: this is the location of the previous
> definition
> In file included from subversion/bindings/swig/python/core.c:765:
> /home/rbieber/SVN/subversion/subversion/include/svn_md5.h:26:21:
> apr_md5.h: No such file or directory
> subversion/bindings/swig/python/core.c: In function
> `_wrap_svn_error_t_apr_err_set':
> subversion/bindings/swig/python/core.c:791: warning: dereferencing
> type-punned pointer will break strict-aliasing rules
> subversion/bindings/swig/python/core.c: In function
> `_wrap_svn_error_t_apr_err_get':
>
> The configure command I used for this build is the following:
>
> ./configure --with-berkeley-db=/usr/local/BerkeleyDB.4.2
> --with-apr=$PWD/apr --with-apr-util=$PWD/apr-util
>
> The --with-apr and --with-apr-util are called out explicitly just as a
> test. I am running Suse 9. The odd thing is that the build runs
> fine, including swig bindings, on my Redhat 7.3 server.
>
> I'm still trying to figure out what is causing this error, however, my
> autoconf/automake skills are not really that great.
Looks like issue #1666.
--
Ben Reser <be...@reser.org>
http://ben.reser.org
"Conscience is the inner voice which warns us somebody may be looking."
- H.L. Mencken
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
Re: branch 1.0-stabilization: All my tests passed, how about
yours? ;-)
Posted by Ron Bieber <ro...@bieberlabs.com>.
The 1.0-stabilization branch builds for me aside from the python
bindings. I am receiving the following error when trying to execute a
make swig-py:
/bin/sh /home/rbieber/SVN/subversion/libtool --silent --mode=compile gcc
-pthread -DNDEBUG -D_FILE_OFFSET_BITS=64 -DHAVE_LARGEFILE_SUPPORT -O2
-march=i586 -mcpu=i686 -fmessage-length=0 -fPIC -Wall -fPIC -DLINUX=2
-D_REENTRANT -D_XOPEN_SOURCE=500 -D_BSD_SOURCE -D_SVID_SOURCE
-D_GNU_SOURCE -I/home/rbieber/SVN/subversion/subversion/bindings/swig
-I/home/rbieber/SVN/subversion/subversion/include
-I/home/rbieber/SVN/subversion/apr/include -I/usr/include/python2.3
-prefer-pic -c -o subversion/bindings/swig/python/core.lo
subversion/bindings/swig/python/core.c
In file included from /usr/include/python2.3/Python.h:8,
from subversion/bindings/swig/python/core.c:14:
/usr/include/python2.3/pyconfig.h:856:1: warning: "_XOPEN_SOURCE"
redefined
<command line>:10:1: warning: this is the location of the previous
definition
In file included from subversion/bindings/swig/python/core.c:765:
/home/rbieber/SVN/subversion/subversion/include/svn_md5.h:26:21:
apr_md5.h: No such file or directory
subversion/bindings/swig/python/core.c: In function
`_wrap_svn_error_t_apr_err_set':
subversion/bindings/swig/python/core.c:791: warning: dereferencing
type-punned pointer will break strict-aliasing rules
subversion/bindings/swig/python/core.c: In function
`_wrap_svn_error_t_apr_err_get':
The configure command I used for this build is the following:
./configure --with-berkeley-db=/usr/local/BerkeleyDB.4.2
--with-apr=$PWD/apr --with-apr-util=$PWD/apr-util
The --with-apr and --with-apr-util are called out explicitly just as a
test. I am running Suse 9. The odd thing is that the build runs
fine, including swig bindings, on my Redhat 7.3 server.
I'm still trying to figure out what is causing this error, however, my
autoconf/automake skills are not really that great.
-- Ron
On Sat, 2004-01-10 at 09:20, Jostein Chr. Andersen wrote:
> Hi,
>
> First: -A big thanks to all of you who replied the similar posting I did
> for the 0.35.0 branch:
> http://www.contactor.se/~dast/svn/archive-2003-12/index.shtml#829
>
> Tuesday is the release date for 0.36.0 and I'm asking you for a favor:
> -Checkout, compile and test the 1.0-stabilization branch now!
>
> It would be nice if you can 'configure', 'make', 'make check', 'make
> install', 'make davcheck' and 'make svncheck' on your OS/distro/whatever
> with this packages installed:
> -Berkeley DB 4.2.52
> -A new SSL if possible (ex.: OpenSSL 0.9.7c)
> -Apache 2.0.48
> -Neon 0.24.4
>
> My system: Linux (LFS) with ReiserFS and all the latest packages above.
> All my "make tests" went ok.
>
> Jostein
Re: branch 1.0-stabilization: All my tests passed, how about yours? ;-)
Posted by "Jostein (on behalf of Alex Besogonov <cyberax@scb.udsu.ru>)" <jo...@josander.net>.
Alex allowed me to forward this to to dev list (he forgot to cc it).
Look at this, he tested it on 4 machines! I'm, impressed! :-)
---------- Forwarded Message ----------
Subject: Re: branch 1.0-stabilization: All my tests passed, how about
yours? ;-)
Date: Saturday 10 January 2004 17.23
From: Alex Besogonov <cy...@scb.udsu.ru>
To: "Jostein Chr. Andersen" <jo...@josander.net>
Hello Jostein,
JCA> First: -A big thanks to all of you who replied the similar posting
I did JCA> for the 0.35.0 branch:
JCA> http://www.contactor.se/~dast/svn/archive-2003-12/index.shtml#829
JCA> Tuesday is the release date for 0.36.0 and I'm asking you for a
favor: JCA> -Checkout, compile and test the 1.0-stabilization branch
now! Intel Pentium 4 2Ghz, Linux 2.4.22, ext2 - everything is fine
(compiles, passes tests and works :) ).
AMD Athlon 1800+, Windows XP SP1, NTFS - everything is fine.
Intel Pentium 4 2Ghz, Windows Server 2003, NTFS - everything is fine.
Dual Sun Sparc64, Linux 2.4.18, ReiserFS - everything is fine.
--
Best regards,
Alex Besogonov mailto:cyberax@scb.udsu.ru
-------------------------------------------------------
Jostein
--
http://www.josander.net/kontakt/ ||
http://www.josander.net/en/contact/
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
Re: branch 1.0-stabilization: All my tests passed, how about yours? ;-)
Posted by "Jostein Chr. Andersen" <jo...@josander.net>.
On Sunday 11 January 2004 15.15, Chia-Liang Kao wrote:
> On Sun, Jan 11, 2004 at 03:08:46PM +0100, Jostein Chr. Andersen wrote:
> > The 0.36.0 release branch will be copied from the 1.0-stabilization
> > branch, it will therefore be included.
>
> uh, but my fixes went into trunk only. I suppose someone will have to
> help merging it to the 1.0-stabilization branch.
Oh, sorry. I did not read the r8234 commit good enought.
Jostein
--
http://www.josander.net/kontakt/ ||
http://www.josander.net/en/contact/
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
Re: branch 1.0-stabilization: All my tests passed, how about yours? ;-)
Posted by kf...@collab.net.
Chia-Liang Kao <cl...@clkao.org> writes:
> On Sun, Jan 11, 2004 at 03:08:46PM +0100, Jostein Chr. Andersen wrote:
> > The 0.36.0 release branch will be copied from the 1.0-stabilization
> > branch, it will therefore be included.
>
> uh, but my fixes went into trunk only. I suppose someone will have to
> help merging it to the 1.0-stabilization branch.
It's got three votes now. Just waiting until Monday to merge, to give
others a little more time for review.
-K
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
Re: branch 1.0-stabilization: All my tests passed, how about yours? ;-)
Posted by Chia-Liang Kao <cl...@clkao.org>.
On Sun, Jan 11, 2004 at 03:08:46PM +0100, Jostein Chr. Andersen wrote:
> The 0.36.0 release branch will be copied from the 1.0-stabilization
> branch, it will therefore be included.
uh, but my fixes went into trunk only. I suppose someone will have to
help merging it to the 1.0-stabilization branch.
Cheers,
CLK
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
Re: branch 1.0-stabilization: All my tests passed, how about yours? ;-)
Posted by "Jostein Chr. Andersen" <jo...@josander.net>.
On Sunday 11 January 2004 14.44, Chia-Liang Kao wrote:
> I just fixed a problem in swig caused by authz_func renaming, please
> have 0.36.0 include this, if not all the other nominated perl bindings
> changes to date.
The 0.36.0 release branch will be copied from the 1.0-stabilization
branch, it will therefore be included.
J.
--
http://www.josander.net/kontakt/ ||
http://www.josander.net/en/contact/
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
Re: branch 1.0-stabilization: All my tests passed, how about yours? ;-)
Posted by Chia-Liang Kao <cl...@clkao.org>.
I just fixed a problem in swig caused by authz_func renaming, please
have 0.36.0 include this, if not all the other nominated perl bindings
changes to date.
Cheers,
CLK
On Sat, Jan 10, 2004 at 04:20:04PM +0100, Jostein Chr. Andersen wrote:
> First: -A big thanks to all of you who replied the similar posting I did
> for the 0.35.0 branch:
> http://www.contactor.se/~dast/svn/archive-2003-12/index.shtml#829
>
> Tuesday is the release date for 0.36.0 and I'm asking you for a favor:
> -Checkout, compile and test the 1.0-stabilization branch now!
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org