You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to derby-dev@db.apache.org by "Kim Haase (JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org> on 2013/09/11 22:26:54 UTC
[jira] [Assigned] (DERBY-6121) Regularize how we refer to object
names in the Reference Manual sections on GRANT/REVOKE
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-6121?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ]
Kim Haase reassigned DERBY-6121:
--------------------------------
Assignee: Kim Haase
> Regularize how we refer to object names in the Reference Manual sections on GRANT/REVOKE
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: DERBY-6121
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-6121
> Project: Derby
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Components: Documentation
> Affects Versions: 10.10.1.1
> Reporter: Rick Hillegas
> Assignee: Kim Haase
>
> This issue came up during the buddy testing of user-defined aggregates. Here's what Dag discovered:
> identifiers (seen when looking at GRANT USAGE of aggregates): "table-Name" occurences are linked to a section explainig them (rreftablename.html), but UDA names are defined in-lined as
> GRANT USAGE ON DERBY AGGREGATE [ schemaName. ] SQL92Identifier TO grantees
> In a third variant,
> GRANT EXECUTE ON { FUNCTION | PROCEDURE } routine-designator TO grantees
> routine-designator is defined locally as
> routine-designator { function-name | procedure-name }
> without links to what "function-name" or "procedure-name" might look like. It would be good to harmonize the latter two forms to a central definition as for "table-Name".
> Finally, I noted that the definition page for SchemaName doesn't link to the SQL92Identifier page...
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira