You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@cocoon.apache.org by Ralph Goers <Ra...@dslextreme.com> on 2004/07/01 18:40:45 UTC

Cocoon is not maven! (was Cocoon is not gump)

I took a look at maven's mailing list. Their approach to this is to have a
POM (Project Object Model) for each jar.  From this a maven goal could be
used to get the source from the correct CVS directly into your own
repository.  This would, in fact, solve the problem where it should be
solved.  Unfortunately, I can't find any POMs that seem to have the
information needed to actually make this work.

Interestingly enough, www.ibiblio.org/maven/cocoon only has builds for
2.1.3 and 2.1.4 but not 2.1.5 and doesn't have POMs.  Anyone know who
builds this stuff?

As for what is in ibiblio or a Cocoon repository, it only has to contain
stuff that is currently supported.  If I "formally" built something I will
have a copy of the source in the global repository at my site.

Ralph


Vadim Gritsenko said:
> Ralph Goers wrote:
>
>> What do you mean by maintain?
>
>
> Just compare content of the http://www.ibiblio.org/maven/tomcat/jars/
> with http://archive.apache.org/dist/jakarta/tomcat-4/archive/. Maven has
> single 4.0 release, and single 4.1 release even now. What will it have
> several years from now? Nothing?
>
>
>> As for who will put the source in, it would be whoever puts the binary
>> jar in - they should come in and go out together.
>
>
> So your answer is "nobody" :-)
> If somebody steps forward (like you, for example) and creates a
> repository of software cocoon release depends on, there is at least some
> guarantee that this repository will happen and will be complete. And if
> you just sit and wait when source code will be put in by corresponding
> team, there is no much chance this will happen at all - simply because
> other teams do not have reasons or motivation to do so.
>
> Vadim


Re: Cocoon is not maven! (was Cocoon is not gump)

Posted by Stefano Mazzocchi <st...@apache.org>.
Ralph Goers wrote:

> I took a look at maven's mailing list. Their approach to this is to have a
> POM (Project Object Model) for each jar.  From this a maven goal could be
> used to get the source from the correct CVS directly into your own
> repository.  This would, in fact, solve the problem where it should be
> solved.  Unfortunately, I can't find any POMs that seem to have the
> information needed to actually make this work.
> 
> Interestingly enough, www.ibiblio.org/maven/cocoon only has builds for
> 2.1.3 and 2.1.4 but not 2.1.5 and doesn't have POMs.  Anyone know who
> builds this stuff?
> 
> As for what is in ibiblio or a Cocoon repository, it only has to contain
> stuff that is currently supported.  If I "formally" built something I will
> have a copy of the source in the global repository at my site.

I do agree with one thing, though: it is naive to expect that all 
projects will care for proper long-term source availability of all the 
artifacts they depend on.

Even if Cocoon does, this is something that we should address at the 
foundation level, since it's a much bigger concern.

Hmmm.

-- 
Stefano.