[jira] [Resolved] (JENA-1093) jena-text query doesn't return all matching literals

["Osma Suominen (JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org>]

     [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JENA-1093?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ]

Osma Suominen resolved JENA-1093.
---------------------------------
    Resolution: Fixed

Merged PR #112, closing the issue.

> jena-text query doesn't return all matching literals
> ----------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: JENA-1093
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JENA-1093
>             Project: Apache Jena
>          Issue Type: Bug
>          Components: Text
>    Affects Versions: Jena 3.0.1
>            Reporter: Osma Suominen
>            Assignee: Osma Suominen
>
> After the optimizations in JENA-999, the text:query property function, when asked for stored literal values, no longer returns all matching literals. Instead, each subject is returned with a random TextHit (i.e. score+literal pair). This is a problem for me because I want to show to the user the most relevant reason why the search matched a particular SKOS concept (there may be many matching labels in various languages), or in some cases all the reasons. 
> Also the returned match may not have the highest score, which could be a problem if one is interested in the score (I'm not).
> For example, with storeLiterals enabled and this data:
> {noformat}
> ex:subject rdfs:label "one reason", "another reason" .
> {noformat}
> this query
> {noformat}
> (?s ?score ?literal) text:query "reason" .
> {noformat}
> will return a single binding where ?literal is bound to either "one reason" or "another reason".
> Before JENA-999 it returned two bindings, one per literal.
> The culprit is the post-JENA-999 code in the TextQueryPF.exec method, particularly around this line that suppresses subsequent hits with the same subject URI:
> https://github.com/apache/jena/blob/master/jena-text/src/main/java/org/apache/jena/query/text/TextQueryPF.java#L188
> I already have a failing unit test that shows what I'd like to accomplish. I will try to make a PR at some point.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)