You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@flex.apache.org by OmPrakash Muppirala <bi...@gmail.com> on 2014/07/07 20:06:11 UTC
Mustella issues
I am trying to beat Mustella back into shape. There are two issues
currently. One is git related (i am trying to fix it), the other one seems
real:
In Mustella_sdk, this test is broken:
Managers/StyleManager/AdvancedCSS/descendantSelectors/AdvancedCSS_descendantSelectors_RuntimeCSS
descendantSelector_basic_noMatch_style_runtimecss Failed
CompareBitmap(body:step 2) compare returned[object BitmapData]
Here are the related pngs:
Baseline:
http://flex-mustella.cloudapp.net/job/flex-sdk_mustella/ws/mustella/tests/Managers/StyleManager/AdvancedCSS/descendantSelectors/baselines/descendantSelector_basic_noMatch_style_runtimecss@win.png
Broken:
http://flex-mustella.cloudapp.net/job/flex-sdk_mustella/ws/mustella/tests/Managers/StyleManager/AdvancedCSS/descendantSelectors/baselines/descendantSelector_basic_noMatch_style_runtimecss@win.png.bad.png
Nothing serious here. If no one has a suggestion on how to 'fix' this
issue, I will be creating a new baseline and checking it in.
Thanks,
Om
Re: Mustella issues
Posted by Erik de Bruin <er...@ixsoftware.nl>.
If we escalate all issues to the original architect, no-one else will
become familiar with Mustella. Let someone make a mistake (or two), we can
always revert or redo. No harm done, and lesson learned.
EdB
On Mon, Jul 7, 2014 at 8:43 PM, Alex Harui <ah...@adobe.com> wrote:
> Isn't this the test that only fails on 14.0? Just changing the baseline
> may make it fail on 11.1 and earlier. I'll take a look at it shortly.
>
> On 7/7/14 11:37 AM, "Erik de Bruin" <er...@ixsoftware.nl> wrote:
>
> >Actually, my image editor can't find any difference between them... So
> >from
> >where I'm standing, there is no harm in setting the new baseline.
> >
> >EdB
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >On Mon, Jul 7, 2014 at 8:06 PM, OmPrakash Muppirala <bigosmallm@gmail.com
> >
> >wrote:
> >
> >> I am trying to beat Mustella back into shape. There are two issues
> >> currently. One is git related (i am trying to fix it), the other one
> >>seems
> >> real:
> >>
> >> In Mustella_sdk, this test is broken:
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>Managers/StyleManager/AdvancedCSS/descendantSelectors/AdvancedCSS_descend
> >>antSelectors_RuntimeCSS
> >> descendantSelector_basic_noMatch_style_runtimecss Failed
> >> CompareBitmap(body:step 2) compare returned[object BitmapData]
> >>
> >> Here are the related pngs:
> >>
> >> Baseline:
> >>
> >>
> >>
> http://flex-mustella.cloudapp.net/job/flex-sdk_mustella/ws/mustella/tests
> >>/Managers/StyleManager/AdvancedCSS/descendantSelectors/baselines/descenda
> >>ntSelector_basic_noMatch_style_runtimecss@win.png
> >>
> >> Broken:
> >>
> >>
> >>
> http://flex-mustella.cloudapp.net/job/flex-sdk_mustella/ws/mustella/tests
> >>/Managers/StyleManager/AdvancedCSS/descendantSelectors/baselines/descenda
> >>ntSelector_basic_noMatch_style_runtimecss@win.png.bad.png
> >>
> >> Nothing serious here. If no one has a suggestion on how to 'fix' this
> >> issue, I will be creating a new baseline and checking it in.
> >>
> >> Thanks,
> >> Om
> >>
> >
> >
> >
> >--
> >Ix Multimedia Software
> >
> >Jan Luykenstraat 27
> >3521 VB Utrecht
> >
> >T. 06-51952295
> >I. www.ixsoftware.nl
>
>
--
Ix Multimedia Software
Jan Luykenstraat 27
3521 VB Utrecht
T. 06-51952295
I. www.ixsoftware.nl
Re: Mustella issues
Posted by OmPrakash Muppirala <bi...@gmail.com>.
On Mon, Jul 7, 2014 at 11:56 AM, OmPrakash Muppirala <bi...@gmail.com>
wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 7, 2014 at 11:43 AM, Alex Harui <ah...@adobe.com> wrote:
>
>> Isn't this the test that only fails on 14.0? Just changing the baseline
>> may make it fail on 11.1 and earlier. I'll take a look at it shortly.
>>
>
> Oh well, it looks like Mustella has passed with no failures now. This was
> with FP 14.0 btw.
> Lets see if it fails again.
>
> I have put in a fix for the flex-sdk_air job as well. We will know by the
> end of the day.
>
>
The git issue has been fixed. Lets if all tests pass.
> Thanks,
> Om
>
>
>
>
>>
>> On 7/7/14 11:37 AM, "Erik de Bruin" <er...@ixsoftware.nl> wrote:
>>
>> >Actually, my image editor can't find any difference between them... So
>> >from
>> >where I'm standing, there is no harm in setting the new baseline.
>> >
>> >EdB
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >On Mon, Jul 7, 2014 at 8:06 PM, OmPrakash Muppirala <
>> bigosmallm@gmail.com>
>> >wrote:
>> >
>> >> I am trying to beat Mustella back into shape. There are two issues
>> >> currently. One is git related (i am trying to fix it), the other one
>> >>seems
>> >> real:
>> >>
>> >> In Mustella_sdk, this test is broken:
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>
>>
>> >>Managers/StyleManager/AdvancedCSS/descendantSelectors/AdvancedCSS_descend
>> >>antSelectors_RuntimeCSS
>> >> descendantSelector_basic_noMatch_style_runtimecss Failed
>> >> CompareBitmap(body:step 2) compare returned[object BitmapData]
>> >>
>> >> Here are the related pngs:
>> >>
>> >> Baseline:
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>
>> http://flex-mustella.cloudapp.net/job/flex-sdk_mustella/ws/mustella/tests
>>
>> >>/Managers/StyleManager/AdvancedCSS/descendantSelectors/baselines/descenda
>> >>ntSelector_basic_noMatch_style_runtimecss@win.png
>> >>
>> >> Broken:
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>
>> http://flex-mustella.cloudapp.net/job/flex-sdk_mustella/ws/mustella/tests
>>
>> >>/Managers/StyleManager/AdvancedCSS/descendantSelectors/baselines/descenda
>> >>ntSelector_basic_noMatch_style_runtimecss@win.png.bad.png
>> >>
>> >> Nothing serious here. If no one has a suggestion on how to 'fix' this
>> >> issue, I will be creating a new baseline and checking it in.
>> >>
>> >> Thanks,
>> >> Om
>> >>
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >--
>> >Ix Multimedia Software
>> >
>> >Jan Luykenstraat 27
>> >3521 VB Utrecht
>> >
>> >T. 06-51952295
>> >I. www.ixsoftware.nl
>>
>>
>
Re: Mustella issues
Posted by OmPrakash Muppirala <bi...@gmail.com>.
On Mon, Jul 7, 2014 at 11:43 AM, Alex Harui <ah...@adobe.com> wrote:
> Isn't this the test that only fails on 14.0? Just changing the baseline
> may make it fail on 11.1 and earlier. I'll take a look at it shortly.
>
Oh well, it looks like Mustella has passed with no failures now. This was
with FP 14.0 btw.
Lets see if it fails again.
I have put in a fix for the flex-sdk_air job as well. We will know by the
end of the day.
Thanks,
Om
>
> On 7/7/14 11:37 AM, "Erik de Bruin" <er...@ixsoftware.nl> wrote:
>
> >Actually, my image editor can't find any difference between them... So
> >from
> >where I'm standing, there is no harm in setting the new baseline.
> >
> >EdB
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >On Mon, Jul 7, 2014 at 8:06 PM, OmPrakash Muppirala <bigosmallm@gmail.com
> >
> >wrote:
> >
> >> I am trying to beat Mustella back into shape. There are two issues
> >> currently. One is git related (i am trying to fix it), the other one
> >>seems
> >> real:
> >>
> >> In Mustella_sdk, this test is broken:
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>Managers/StyleManager/AdvancedCSS/descendantSelectors/AdvancedCSS_descend
> >>antSelectors_RuntimeCSS
> >> descendantSelector_basic_noMatch_style_runtimecss Failed
> >> CompareBitmap(body:step 2) compare returned[object BitmapData]
> >>
> >> Here are the related pngs:
> >>
> >> Baseline:
> >>
> >>
> >>
> http://flex-mustella.cloudapp.net/job/flex-sdk_mustella/ws/mustella/tests
> >>/Managers/StyleManager/AdvancedCSS/descendantSelectors/baselines/descenda
> >>ntSelector_basic_noMatch_style_runtimecss@win.png
> >>
> >> Broken:
> >>
> >>
> >>
> http://flex-mustella.cloudapp.net/job/flex-sdk_mustella/ws/mustella/tests
> >>/Managers/StyleManager/AdvancedCSS/descendantSelectors/baselines/descenda
> >>ntSelector_basic_noMatch_style_runtimecss@win.png.bad.png
> >>
> >> Nothing serious here. If no one has a suggestion on how to 'fix' this
> >> issue, I will be creating a new baseline and checking it in.
> >>
> >> Thanks,
> >> Om
> >>
> >
> >
> >
> >--
> >Ix Multimedia Software
> >
> >Jan Luykenstraat 27
> >3521 VB Utrecht
> >
> >T. 06-51952295
> >I. www.ixsoftware.nl
>
>
Re: Mustella issues
Posted by OmPrakash Muppirala <bi...@gmail.com>.
On Mon, Jul 7, 2014 at 12:23 PM, Alex Harui <ah...@adobe.com> wrote:
>
>
> On 7/7/14 12:07 PM, "OmPrakash Muppirala" <bi...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> >On Mon, Jul 7, 2014 at 12:05 PM, Alex Harui <ah...@adobe.com> wrote:
> >
> >> Either the mailing list ate it, or Adobe email ate it, but I got a box
> >> with a question mark in it. Can others see it?
> >>
> >>
> >I did not see it. But I think the issue is fixed now. Don't spend time
> >on
> >it unless it fails again. Could have been a temporary issue.
> Well, it was pretty consistent recently. If it fails, please grab the
> bad.png and attach it to an email to me directly.
>
>
OK. Will do.
Thanks,
Om
> Thanks,
> -Alex
>
>
Re: Mustella issues
Posted by Alex Harui <ah...@adobe.com>.
On 7/7/14 12:07 PM, "OmPrakash Muppirala" <bi...@gmail.com> wrote:
>On Mon, Jul 7, 2014 at 12:05 PM, Alex Harui <ah...@adobe.com> wrote:
>
>> Either the mailing list ate it, or Adobe email ate it, but I got a box
>> with a question mark in it. Can others see it?
>>
>>
>I did not see it. But I think the issue is fixed now. Don't spend time
>on
>it unless it fails again. Could have been a temporary issue.
Well, it was pretty consistent recently. If it fails, please grab the
bad.png and attach it to an email to me directly.
Thanks,
-Alex
Re: Mustella issues
Posted by OmPrakash Muppirala <bi...@gmail.com>.
On Mon, Jul 7, 2014 at 12:05 PM, Alex Harui <ah...@adobe.com> wrote:
> Either the mailing list ate it, or Adobe email ate it, but I got a box
> with a question mark in it. Can others see it?
>
>
I did not see it. But I think the issue is fixed now. Don't spend time on
it unless it fails again. Could have been a temporary issue.
Thanks,
Om
> -Alex
>
> From: Erik de Bruin <er...@ixsoftware.nl>>
> Reply-To: "dev@flex.apache.org<ma...@flex.apache.org>" <
> dev@flex.apache.org<ma...@flex.apache.org>>
> Date: Monday, July 7, 2014 11:58 AM
> To: "dev@flex.apache.org<ma...@flex.apache.org>" <dev@flex.apache.org
> <ma...@flex.apache.org>>
> Subject: Re: Mustella issues
>
> [Inline image 1]
>
> Here you go.
>
> EdB
>
>
>
>
> On Mon, Jul 7, 2014 at 8:55 PM, Alex Harui <aharui@adobe.com<mailto:
> aharui@adobe.com>> wrote:
> Got a "not found" trying to access the bad.png. Maybe a new job started
> and cleaned it? If not, can you send me the bad.png?
>
> On 7/7/14 11:43 AM, "Alex Harui" <ah...@adobe.com>>
> wrote:
>
> >Isn't this the test that only fails on 14.0? Just changing the baseline
> >may make it fail on 11.1 and earlier. I'll take a look at it shortly.
> >
> >On 7/7/14 11:37 AM, "Erik de Bruin" <erik@ixsoftware.nl<mailto:
> erik@ixsoftware.nl>> wrote:
> >
> >>Actually, my image editor can't find any difference between them... So
> >>from
> >>where I'm standing, there is no harm in setting the new baseline.
> >>
> >>EdB
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>On Mon, Jul 7, 2014 at 8:06 PM, OmPrakash Muppirala
> >><bi...@gmail.com>>
> >>wrote:
> >>
> >>> I am trying to beat Mustella back into shape. There are two issues
> >>> currently. One is git related (i am trying to fix it), the other one
> >>>seems
> >>> real:
> >>>
> >>> In Mustella_sdk, this test is broken:
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>Managers/StyleManager/AdvancedCSS/descendantSelectors/AdvancedCSS_descen
> >>>d
> >>>antSelectors_RuntimeCSS
> >>> descendantSelector_basic_noMatch_style_runtimecss Failed
> >>> CompareBitmap(body:step 2) compare returned[object BitmapData]
> >>>
> >>> Here are the related pngs:
> >>>
> >>> Baseline:
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> http://flex-mustella.cloudapp.net/job/flex-sdk_mustella/ws/mustella/test
> >>>s
> >>>/Managers/StyleManager/AdvancedCSS/descendantSelectors/baselines/descend
> >>>a
> >>>ntSelector_basic_noMatch_style_runtimecss@win.png<mailto:
> ntSelector_basic_noMatch_style_runtimecss@win.png>
> >>>
> >>> Broken:
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> http://flex-mustella.cloudapp.net/job/flex-sdk_mustella/ws/mustella/test
> >>>s
> >>>/Managers/StyleManager/AdvancedCSS/descendantSelectors/baselines/descend
> >>>a
> >>>ntSelector_basic_noMatch_style_runtimecss@win.png.bad.png<mailto:
> ntSelector_basic_noMatch_style_runtimecss@win.png.bad.png>
> >>>
> >>> Nothing serious here. If no one has a suggestion on how to 'fix' this
> >>> issue, I will be creating a new baseline and checking it in.
> >>>
> >>> Thanks,
> >>> Om
> >>>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>--
> >>Ix Multimedia Software
> >>
> >>Jan Luykenstraat 27
> >>3521 VB Utrecht
> >>
> >>T. 06-51952295<tel:06-51952295>
> >>I. www.ixsoftware.nl<http://www.ixsoftware.nl>
> >
>
>
>
>
> --
> Ix Multimedia Software
>
> Jan Luykenstraat 27
> 3521 VB Utrecht
>
> T. 06-51952295
> I. www.ixsoftware.nl<http://www.ixsoftware.nl>
>
Re: Mustella issues
Posted by Alex Harui <ah...@adobe.com>.
Either the mailing list ate it, or Adobe email ate it, but I got a box with a question mark in it. Can others see it?
-Alex
From: Erik de Bruin <er...@ixsoftware.nl>>
Reply-To: "dev@flex.apache.org<ma...@flex.apache.org>" <de...@flex.apache.org>>
Date: Monday, July 7, 2014 11:58 AM
To: "dev@flex.apache.org<ma...@flex.apache.org>" <de...@flex.apache.org>>
Subject: Re: Mustella issues
[Inline image 1]
Here you go.
EdB
On Mon, Jul 7, 2014 at 8:55 PM, Alex Harui <ah...@adobe.com>> wrote:
Got a "not found" trying to access the bad.png. Maybe a new job started
and cleaned it? If not, can you send me the bad.png?
On 7/7/14 11:43 AM, "Alex Harui" <ah...@adobe.com>> wrote:
>Isn't this the test that only fails on 14.0? Just changing the baseline
>may make it fail on 11.1 and earlier. I'll take a look at it shortly.
>
>On 7/7/14 11:37 AM, "Erik de Bruin" <er...@ixsoftware.nl>> wrote:
>
>>Actually, my image editor can't find any difference between them... So
>>from
>>where I'm standing, there is no harm in setting the new baseline.
>>
>>EdB
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>On Mon, Jul 7, 2014 at 8:06 PM, OmPrakash Muppirala
>><bi...@gmail.com>>
>>wrote:
>>
>>> I am trying to beat Mustella back into shape. There are two issues
>>> currently. One is git related (i am trying to fix it), the other one
>>>seems
>>> real:
>>>
>>> In Mustella_sdk, this test is broken:
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>Managers/StyleManager/AdvancedCSS/descendantSelectors/AdvancedCSS_descen
>>>d
>>>antSelectors_RuntimeCSS
>>> descendantSelector_basic_noMatch_style_runtimecss Failed
>>> CompareBitmap(body:step 2) compare returned[object BitmapData]
>>>
>>> Here are the related pngs:
>>>
>>> Baseline:
>>>
>>>
>>>http://flex-mustella.cloudapp.net/job/flex-sdk_mustella/ws/mustella/test
>>>s
>>>/Managers/StyleManager/AdvancedCSS/descendantSelectors/baselines/descend
>>>a
>>>ntSelector_basic_noMatch_style_runtimecss@win.png<ma...@win.png>
>>>
>>> Broken:
>>>
>>>
>>>http://flex-mustella.cloudapp.net/job/flex-sdk_mustella/ws/mustella/test
>>>s
>>>/Managers/StyleManager/AdvancedCSS/descendantSelectors/baselines/descend
>>>a
>>>ntSelector_basic_noMatch_style_runtimecss@win.png.bad.png<ma...@win.png.bad.png>
>>>
>>> Nothing serious here. If no one has a suggestion on how to 'fix' this
>>> issue, I will be creating a new baseline and checking it in.
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>> Om
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>>--
>>Ix Multimedia Software
>>
>>Jan Luykenstraat 27
>>3521 VB Utrecht
>>
>>T. 06-51952295<tel:06-51952295>
>>I. www.ixsoftware.nl<http://www.ixsoftware.nl>
>
--
Ix Multimedia Software
Jan Luykenstraat 27
3521 VB Utrecht
T. 06-51952295
I. www.ixsoftware.nl<http://www.ixsoftware.nl>
Re: Mustella issues
Posted by Erik de Bruin <er...@ixsoftware.nl>.
[image: Inline image 1]
Here you go.
EdB
On Mon, Jul 7, 2014 at 8:55 PM, Alex Harui <ah...@adobe.com> wrote:
> Got a "not found" trying to access the bad.png. Maybe a new job started
> and cleaned it? If not, can you send me the bad.png?
>
> On 7/7/14 11:43 AM, "Alex Harui" <ah...@adobe.com> wrote:
>
> >Isn't this the test that only fails on 14.0? Just changing the baseline
> >may make it fail on 11.1 and earlier. I'll take a look at it shortly.
> >
> >On 7/7/14 11:37 AM, "Erik de Bruin" <er...@ixsoftware.nl> wrote:
> >
> >>Actually, my image editor can't find any difference between them... So
> >>from
> >>where I'm standing, there is no harm in setting the new baseline.
> >>
> >>EdB
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>On Mon, Jul 7, 2014 at 8:06 PM, OmPrakash Muppirala
> >><bi...@gmail.com>
> >>wrote:
> >>
> >>> I am trying to beat Mustella back into shape. There are two issues
> >>> currently. One is git related (i am trying to fix it), the other one
> >>>seems
> >>> real:
> >>>
> >>> In Mustella_sdk, this test is broken:
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>Managers/StyleManager/AdvancedCSS/descendantSelectors/AdvancedCSS_descen
> >>>d
> >>>antSelectors_RuntimeCSS
> >>> descendantSelector_basic_noMatch_style_runtimecss Failed
> >>> CompareBitmap(body:step 2) compare returned[object BitmapData]
> >>>
> >>> Here are the related pngs:
> >>>
> >>> Baseline:
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> http://flex-mustella.cloudapp.net/job/flex-sdk_mustella/ws/mustella/test
> >>>s
> >>>/Managers/StyleManager/AdvancedCSS/descendantSelectors/baselines/descend
> >>>a
> >>>ntSelector_basic_noMatch_style_runtimecss@win.png
> >>>
> >>> Broken:
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> http://flex-mustella.cloudapp.net/job/flex-sdk_mustella/ws/mustella/test
> >>>s
> >>>/Managers/StyleManager/AdvancedCSS/descendantSelectors/baselines/descend
> >>>a
> >>>ntSelector_basic_noMatch_style_runtimecss@win.png.bad.png
> >>>
> >>> Nothing serious here. If no one has a suggestion on how to 'fix' this
> >>> issue, I will be creating a new baseline and checking it in.
> >>>
> >>> Thanks,
> >>> Om
> >>>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>--
> >>Ix Multimedia Software
> >>
> >>Jan Luykenstraat 27
> >>3521 VB Utrecht
> >>
> >>T. 06-51952295
> >>I. www.ixsoftware.nl
> >
>
>
--
Ix Multimedia Software
Jan Luykenstraat 27
3521 VB Utrecht
T. 06-51952295
I. www.ixsoftware.nl
Re: Mustella issues
Posted by Alex Harui <ah...@adobe.com>.
Got a "not found" trying to access the bad.png. Maybe a new job started
and cleaned it? If not, can you send me the bad.png?
On 7/7/14 11:43 AM, "Alex Harui" <ah...@adobe.com> wrote:
>Isn't this the test that only fails on 14.0? Just changing the baseline
>may make it fail on 11.1 and earlier. I'll take a look at it shortly.
>
>On 7/7/14 11:37 AM, "Erik de Bruin" <er...@ixsoftware.nl> wrote:
>
>>Actually, my image editor can't find any difference between them... So
>>from
>>where I'm standing, there is no harm in setting the new baseline.
>>
>>EdB
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>On Mon, Jul 7, 2014 at 8:06 PM, OmPrakash Muppirala
>><bi...@gmail.com>
>>wrote:
>>
>>> I am trying to beat Mustella back into shape. There are two issues
>>> currently. One is git related (i am trying to fix it), the other one
>>>seems
>>> real:
>>>
>>> In Mustella_sdk, this test is broken:
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>Managers/StyleManager/AdvancedCSS/descendantSelectors/AdvancedCSS_descen
>>>d
>>>antSelectors_RuntimeCSS
>>> descendantSelector_basic_noMatch_style_runtimecss Failed
>>> CompareBitmap(body:step 2) compare returned[object BitmapData]
>>>
>>> Here are the related pngs:
>>>
>>> Baseline:
>>>
>>>
>>>http://flex-mustella.cloudapp.net/job/flex-sdk_mustella/ws/mustella/test
>>>s
>>>/Managers/StyleManager/AdvancedCSS/descendantSelectors/baselines/descend
>>>a
>>>ntSelector_basic_noMatch_style_runtimecss@win.png
>>>
>>> Broken:
>>>
>>>
>>>http://flex-mustella.cloudapp.net/job/flex-sdk_mustella/ws/mustella/test
>>>s
>>>/Managers/StyleManager/AdvancedCSS/descendantSelectors/baselines/descend
>>>a
>>>ntSelector_basic_noMatch_style_runtimecss@win.png.bad.png
>>>
>>> Nothing serious here. If no one has a suggestion on how to 'fix' this
>>> issue, I will be creating a new baseline and checking it in.
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>> Om
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>>--
>>Ix Multimedia Software
>>
>>Jan Luykenstraat 27
>>3521 VB Utrecht
>>
>>T. 06-51952295
>>I. www.ixsoftware.nl
>
Re: Mustella issues
Posted by Alex Harui <ah...@adobe.com>.
Isn't this the test that only fails on 14.0? Just changing the baseline
may make it fail on 11.1 and earlier. I'll take a look at it shortly.
On 7/7/14 11:37 AM, "Erik de Bruin" <er...@ixsoftware.nl> wrote:
>Actually, my image editor can't find any difference between them... So
>from
>where I'm standing, there is no harm in setting the new baseline.
>
>EdB
>
>
>
>
>On Mon, Jul 7, 2014 at 8:06 PM, OmPrakash Muppirala <bi...@gmail.com>
>wrote:
>
>> I am trying to beat Mustella back into shape. There are two issues
>> currently. One is git related (i am trying to fix it), the other one
>>seems
>> real:
>>
>> In Mustella_sdk, this test is broken:
>>
>>
>>
>>Managers/StyleManager/AdvancedCSS/descendantSelectors/AdvancedCSS_descend
>>antSelectors_RuntimeCSS
>> descendantSelector_basic_noMatch_style_runtimecss Failed
>> CompareBitmap(body:step 2) compare returned[object BitmapData]
>>
>> Here are the related pngs:
>>
>> Baseline:
>>
>>
>>http://flex-mustella.cloudapp.net/job/flex-sdk_mustella/ws/mustella/tests
>>/Managers/StyleManager/AdvancedCSS/descendantSelectors/baselines/descenda
>>ntSelector_basic_noMatch_style_runtimecss@win.png
>>
>> Broken:
>>
>>
>>http://flex-mustella.cloudapp.net/job/flex-sdk_mustella/ws/mustella/tests
>>/Managers/StyleManager/AdvancedCSS/descendantSelectors/baselines/descenda
>>ntSelector_basic_noMatch_style_runtimecss@win.png.bad.png
>>
>> Nothing serious here. If no one has a suggestion on how to 'fix' this
>> issue, I will be creating a new baseline and checking it in.
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Om
>>
>
>
>
>--
>Ix Multimedia Software
>
>Jan Luykenstraat 27
>3521 VB Utrecht
>
>T. 06-51952295
>I. www.ixsoftware.nl
Re: Mustella issues
Posted by Erik de Bruin <er...@ixsoftware.nl>.
Actually, my image editor can't find any difference between them... So from
where I'm standing, there is no harm in setting the new baseline.
EdB
On Mon, Jul 7, 2014 at 8:06 PM, OmPrakash Muppirala <bi...@gmail.com>
wrote:
> I am trying to beat Mustella back into shape. There are two issues
> currently. One is git related (i am trying to fix it), the other one seems
> real:
>
> In Mustella_sdk, this test is broken:
>
>
> Managers/StyleManager/AdvancedCSS/descendantSelectors/AdvancedCSS_descendantSelectors_RuntimeCSS
> descendantSelector_basic_noMatch_style_runtimecss Failed
> CompareBitmap(body:step 2) compare returned[object BitmapData]
>
> Here are the related pngs:
>
> Baseline:
>
> http://flex-mustella.cloudapp.net/job/flex-sdk_mustella/ws/mustella/tests/Managers/StyleManager/AdvancedCSS/descendantSelectors/baselines/descendantSelector_basic_noMatch_style_runtimecss@win.png
>
> Broken:
>
> http://flex-mustella.cloudapp.net/job/flex-sdk_mustella/ws/mustella/tests/Managers/StyleManager/AdvancedCSS/descendantSelectors/baselines/descendantSelector_basic_noMatch_style_runtimecss@win.png.bad.png
>
> Nothing serious here. If no one has a suggestion on how to 'fix' this
> issue, I will be creating a new baseline and checking it in.
>
> Thanks,
> Om
>
--
Ix Multimedia Software
Jan Luykenstraat 27
3521 VB Utrecht
T. 06-51952295
I. www.ixsoftware.nl