You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@flink.apache.org by Till Rohrmann <tr...@apache.org> on 2018/11/20 14:30:23 UTC
[VOTE] Release 1.7.0, release candidate #2
Hi everyone,
Please review and vote on the release candidate #2 for the version 1.7.0,
as follows:
[ ] +1, Approve the release
[ ] -1, Do not approve the release (please provide specific comments)
The complete staging area is available for your review, which includes:
* JIRA release notes [1],
* the official Apache source release and binary convenience releases to be
deployed to dist.apache.org [2], which are signed with the key with
fingerprint 1F302569A96CFFD5 [3],
* all artifacts to be deployed to the Maven Central Repository [4],
* source code tag "release-1.7.0-rc2" [5],
Please use this document for coordinating testing efforts: [6]
The vote will be open for at least 72 hours. It is adopted by majority
approval, with at least 3 PMC affirmative votes.
Thanks,
Till
[1]
https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12315522&version=12343585
[2] https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/flink/flink-1.7.0-rc2/
[3] https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/flink/KEYS
[4] https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheflink-1194
[5] https://github.com/apache/flink/tree/release-1.7.0-rc2
[6]
https://docs.google.com/document/d/18SqvSFQLru0JDkCBZ5356yNmcZgYBEn1ydqg5VFEpiw/edit?usp=sharing
Pro-tip: you can create a settings.xml file with these contents:
<settings>
<activeProfiles>
<activeProfile>flink-1.7.0</activeProfile>
</activeProfiles>
<profiles>
<profile>
<id>flink-1.7.0</id>
<repositories>
<repository>
<id>flink-1.7.0</id>
<url>
https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheflink-1194/
</url>
</repository>
<repository>
<id>archetype</id>
<url>
https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheflink-1194/
</url>
</repository>
</repositories>
</profile>
</profiles>
</settings>
And reference that in you maven commands via --settings
path/to/settings.xml. This is useful for creating a quickstart based on the
staged release and for building against the staged jars.
Re: [VOTE] Release 1.7.0, release candidate #2
Posted by Till Rohrmann <tr...@apache.org>.
I think the oshi-core test dependency in flink-tests is ok because we don't
include the oshi-core binary in any of our published binaries (neither
the flink-tests_2.11-1.8-SNAPSHOT.jar nor the convenience tarballs contain
oshi-core classes). Linking against EPL 1.0 binaries should be ok.
Concerning the out of date LICENSE and NOTICE file, this is indeed a
release blocker which we need to resolve:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-10987.
Due to the LICENSE and NOTICE file problems, I cancel this vote. I will
publish a new release candidate once we have the LICENSE and NOTICE file
problem resolved.
Cheers,
Till
On Thu, Nov 22, 2018 at 10:02 AM jincheng sun <su...@gmail.com>
wrote:
> Hi Hequn,
>
> Thanks for check the test, +1 this not a blocker of the release. and I'll
> merge your PR.
>
> Best,
> Jincheng
>
> Hequn Cheng <ch...@gmail.com> 于2018年11月22日周四 下午4:35写道：
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > I'm trying to check if the source release is building properly. And found
> > that NonHAQueryableStateFsBackendITCase failed when run `mvn install`.
> This
> > should not be a release blocker, however, I ceated a pr[1] to make it
> more
> > stable.
> >
> > Best,
> > Hequn
> >
> > [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-10983
> >
> > On Thu, Nov 22, 2018 at 1:14 AM Till Rohrmann <tr...@apache.org>
> > wrote:
> >
> > > Thanks Chesnay for going through the release notes. I've updated them
> > > accordingly.
> > >
> > > Concerning the test dependency and the LICENSE/NOTICE files, I'm
> looking
> > > into it and will report back.
> > >
> > > Cheers,
> > > Till
> > >
> > > On Wed, Nov 21, 2018 at 3:46 PM Chesnay Schepler <ch...@apache.org>
> > > wrote:
> > >
> > > > Our LICENSE/NOTICE files in the binary distribution may also be
> botched
> > > > (and may have been for quite some time).
> > > >
> > > > As per http://www.apache.org/dev/licensing-howto.html#binary "|[...]
> > > > LICENSE| and |NOTICE| must *exactly* represent the contents of the
> > > > distribution they reside in.", which also applies to binary
> > > > distributions as "/Any redistribution must obey the licensing
> > > > requirements of the contents."/
> > > >
> > > > My conclusion is that any dependency bundled in the distribution must
> > be
> > > > accounted for in the NOTICE/LICENSE files. Given that we already
> > include
> > > > several MIT licenses in the LICENSE file (exclusively WebUI stuff) it
> > > > thus follows that at the very least all MIT dependencies should be
> > > > listed here.
> > > >
> > > > On 21.11.2018 15:04, Chesnay Schepler wrote:
> > > > > I may have found a potential blocker while looking at dependencies:
> > > > >
> > > > > flink-tests now has a non-optional test dependency on oshi-core,
> > which
> > > > > is licensed under EPL 1.0.
> > > > >
> > > > > As per https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LEGAL-207, test
> > > > > dependencies are not exempt from license restrictions.
> > > > >
> > > > > We thus have to make this dependency optional or provide some other
> > > > > opt-in mechanism for users.
> > > > >
> > > > > On 20.11.2018 15:30, Till Rohrmann wrote:
> > > > >> Hi everyone,
> > > > >> Please review and vote on the release candidate #2 for the version
> > > > >> 1.7.0,
> > > > >> as follows:
> > > > >> [ ] +1, Approve the release
> > > > >> [ ] -1, Do not approve the release (please provide specific
> > comments)
> > > > >>
> > > > >>
> > > > >> The complete staging area is available for your review, which
> > > includes:
> > > > >> * JIRA release notes [1],
> > > > >> * the official Apache source release and binary convenience
> releases
> > > > >> to be
> > > > >> deployed to dist.apache.org [2], which are signed with the key
> with
> > > > >> fingerprint 1F302569A96CFFD5 [3],
> > > > >> * all artifacts to be deployed to the Maven Central Repository
> [4],
> > > > >> * source code tag "release-1.7.0-rc2" [5],
> > > > >>
> > > > >> Please use this document for coordinating testing efforts: [6]
> > > > >>
> > > > >> The vote will be open for at least 72 hours. It is adopted by
> > majority
> > > > >> approval, with at least 3 PMC affirmative votes.
> > > > >>
> > > > >> Thanks,
> > > > >> Till
> > > > >>
> > > > >> [1]
> > > > >>
> > > >
> > >
> >
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12315522&version=12343585
> > > > >>
> > > > >> [2] https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/flink/flink-1.7.0-rc2/
> > > > >> [3] https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/flink/KEYS
> > > > >> [4]
> > > > >>
> > > https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheflink-1194
> > > > >> [5] https://github.com/apache/flink/tree/release-1.7.0-rc2
> > > > >> [6]
> > > > >>
> > > >
> > >
> >
> https://docs.google.com/document/d/18SqvSFQLru0JDkCBZ5356yNmcZgYBEn1ydqg5VFEpiw/edit?usp=sharing
> > > > >>
> > > > >> Pro-tip: you can create a settings.xml file with these contents:
> > > > >>
> > > > >> <settings>
> > > > >> <activeProfiles>
> > > > >> <activeProfile>flink-1.7.0</activeProfile>
> > > > >> </activeProfiles>
> > > > >> <profiles>
> > > > >> <profile>
> > > > >> <id>flink-1.7.0</id>
> > > > >> <repositories>
> > > > >> <repository>
> > > > >> <id>flink-1.7.0</id>
> > > > >> <url>
> > > > >>
> > > > >>
> > >
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheflink-1194/
> > > > >> </url>
> > > > >> </repository>
> > > > >> <repository>
> > > > >> <id>archetype</id>
> > > > >> <url>
> > > > >>
> > > > >>
> > >
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheflink-1194/
> > > > >> </url>
> > > > >> </repository>
> > > > >> </repositories>
> > > > >> </profile>
> > > > >> </profiles>
> > > > >> </settings>
> > > > >>
> > > > >> And reference that in you maven commands via --settings
> > > > >> path/to/settings.xml. This is useful for creating a quickstart
> based
> > > > >> on the
> > > > >> staged release and for building against the staged jars.
> > > > >>
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
>
Re: [VOTE] Release 1.7.0, release candidate #2
Posted by jincheng sun <su...@gmail.com>.
Hi Hequn,
Thanks for check the test, +1 this not a blocker of the release. and I'll
merge your PR.
Best,
Jincheng
Hequn Cheng <ch...@gmail.com> 于2018年11月22日周四 下午4:35写道：
> Hi,
>
> I'm trying to check if the source release is building properly. And found
> that NonHAQueryableStateFsBackendITCase failed when run `mvn install`. This
> should not be a release blocker, however, I ceated a pr[1] to make it more
> stable.
>
> Best,
> Hequn
>
> [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-10983
>
> On Thu, Nov 22, 2018 at 1:14 AM Till Rohrmann <tr...@apache.org>
> wrote:
>
> > Thanks Chesnay for going through the release notes. I've updated them
> > accordingly.
> >
> > Concerning the test dependency and the LICENSE/NOTICE files, I'm looking
> > into it and will report back.
> >
> > Cheers,
> > Till
> >
> > On Wed, Nov 21, 2018 at 3:46 PM Chesnay Schepler <ch...@apache.org>
> > wrote:
> >
> > > Our LICENSE/NOTICE files in the binary distribution may also be botched
> > > (and may have been for quite some time).
> > >
> > > As per http://www.apache.org/dev/licensing-howto.html#binary "|[...]
> > > LICENSE| and |NOTICE| must *exactly* represent the contents of the
> > > distribution they reside in.", which also applies to binary
> > > distributions as "/Any redistribution must obey the licensing
> > > requirements of the contents."/
> > >
> > > My conclusion is that any dependency bundled in the distribution must
> be
> > > accounted for in the NOTICE/LICENSE files. Given that we already
> include
> > > several MIT licenses in the LICENSE file (exclusively WebUI stuff) it
> > > thus follows that at the very least all MIT dependencies should be
> > > listed here.
> > >
> > > On 21.11.2018 15:04, Chesnay Schepler wrote:
> > > > I may have found a potential blocker while looking at dependencies:
> > > >
> > > > flink-tests now has a non-optional test dependency on oshi-core,
> which
> > > > is licensed under EPL 1.0.
> > > >
> > > > As per https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LEGAL-207, test
> > > > dependencies are not exempt from license restrictions.
> > > >
> > > > We thus have to make this dependency optional or provide some other
> > > > opt-in mechanism for users.
> > > >
> > > > On 20.11.2018 15:30, Till Rohrmann wrote:
> > > >> Hi everyone,
> > > >> Please review and vote on the release candidate #2 for the version
> > > >> 1.7.0,
> > > >> as follows:
> > > >> [ ] +1, Approve the release
> > > >> [ ] -1, Do not approve the release (please provide specific
> comments)
> > > >>
> > > >>
> > > >> The complete staging area is available for your review, which
> > includes:
> > > >> * JIRA release notes [1],
> > > >> * the official Apache source release and binary convenience releases
> > > >> to be
> > > >> deployed to dist.apache.org [2], which are signed with the key with
> > > >> fingerprint 1F302569A96CFFD5 [3],
> > > >> * all artifacts to be deployed to the Maven Central Repository [4],
> > > >> * source code tag "release-1.7.0-rc2" [5],
> > > >>
> > > >> Please use this document for coordinating testing efforts: [6]
> > > >>
> > > >> The vote will be open for at least 72 hours. It is adopted by
> majority
> > > >> approval, with at least 3 PMC affirmative votes.
> > > >>
> > > >> Thanks,
> > > >> Till
> > > >>
> > > >> [1]
> > > >>
> > >
> >
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12315522&version=12343585
> > > >>
> > > >> [2] https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/flink/flink-1.7.0-rc2/
> > > >> [3] https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/flink/KEYS
> > > >> [4]
> > > >>
> > https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheflink-1194
> > > >> [5] https://github.com/apache/flink/tree/release-1.7.0-rc2
> > > >> [6]
> > > >>
> > >
> >
> https://docs.google.com/document/d/18SqvSFQLru0JDkCBZ5356yNmcZgYBEn1ydqg5VFEpiw/edit?usp=sharing
> > > >>
> > > >> Pro-tip: you can create a settings.xml file with these contents:
> > > >>
> > > >> <settings>
> > > >> <activeProfiles>
> > > >> <activeProfile>flink-1.7.0</activeProfile>
> > > >> </activeProfiles>
> > > >> <profiles>
> > > >> <profile>
> > > >> <id>flink-1.7.0</id>
> > > >> <repositories>
> > > >> <repository>
> > > >> <id>flink-1.7.0</id>
> > > >> <url>
> > > >>
> > > >>
> > https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheflink-1194/
> > > >> </url>
> > > >> </repository>
> > > >> <repository>
> > > >> <id>archetype</id>
> > > >> <url>
> > > >>
> > > >>
> > https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheflink-1194/
> > > >> </url>
> > > >> </repository>
> > > >> </repositories>
> > > >> </profile>
> > > >> </profiles>
> > > >> </settings>
> > > >>
> > > >> And reference that in you maven commands via --settings
> > > >> path/to/settings.xml. This is useful for creating a quickstart based
> > > >> on the
> > > >> staged release and for building against the staged jars.
> > > >>
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> >
>
Re: [VOTE] Release 1.7.0, release candidate #2
Posted by Hequn Cheng <ch...@gmail.com>.
Hi,
I'm trying to check if the source release is building properly. And found
that NonHAQueryableStateFsBackendITCase failed when run `mvn install`. This
should not be a release blocker, however, I ceated a pr[1] to make it more
stable.
Best,
Hequn
[1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-10983
On Thu, Nov 22, 2018 at 1:14 AM Till Rohrmann <tr...@apache.org> wrote:
> Thanks Chesnay for going through the release notes. I've updated them
> accordingly.
>
> Concerning the test dependency and the LICENSE/NOTICE files, I'm looking
> into it and will report back.
>
> Cheers,
> Till
>
> On Wed, Nov 21, 2018 at 3:46 PM Chesnay Schepler <ch...@apache.org>
> wrote:
>
> > Our LICENSE/NOTICE files in the binary distribution may also be botched
> > (and may have been for quite some time).
> >
> > As per http://www.apache.org/dev/licensing-howto.html#binary "|[...]
> > LICENSE| and |NOTICE| must *exactly* represent the contents of the
> > distribution they reside in.", which also applies to binary
> > distributions as "/Any redistribution must obey the licensing
> > requirements of the contents."/
> >
> > My conclusion is that any dependency bundled in the distribution must be
> > accounted for in the NOTICE/LICENSE files. Given that we already include
> > several MIT licenses in the LICENSE file (exclusively WebUI stuff) it
> > thus follows that at the very least all MIT dependencies should be
> > listed here.
> >
> > On 21.11.2018 15:04, Chesnay Schepler wrote:
> > > I may have found a potential blocker while looking at dependencies:
> > >
> > > flink-tests now has a non-optional test dependency on oshi-core, which
> > > is licensed under EPL 1.0.
> > >
> > > As per https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LEGAL-207, test
> > > dependencies are not exempt from license restrictions.
> > >
> > > We thus have to make this dependency optional or provide some other
> > > opt-in mechanism for users.
> > >
> > > On 20.11.2018 15:30, Till Rohrmann wrote:
> > >> Hi everyone,
> > >> Please review and vote on the release candidate #2 for the version
> > >> 1.7.0,
> > >> as follows:
> > >> [ ] +1, Approve the release
> > >> [ ] -1, Do not approve the release (please provide specific comments)
> > >>
> > >>
> > >> The complete staging area is available for your review, which
> includes:
> > >> * JIRA release notes [1],
> > >> * the official Apache source release and binary convenience releases
> > >> to be
> > >> deployed to dist.apache.org [2], which are signed with the key with
> > >> fingerprint 1F302569A96CFFD5 [3],
> > >> * all artifacts to be deployed to the Maven Central Repository [4],
> > >> * source code tag "release-1.7.0-rc2" [5],
> > >>
> > >> Please use this document for coordinating testing efforts: [6]
> > >>
> > >> The vote will be open for at least 72 hours. It is adopted by majority
> > >> approval, with at least 3 PMC affirmative votes.
> > >>
> > >> Thanks,
> > >> Till
> > >>
> > >> [1]
> > >>
> >
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12315522&version=12343585
> > >>
> > >> [2] https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/flink/flink-1.7.0-rc2/
> > >> [3] https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/flink/KEYS
> > >> [4]
> > >>
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheflink-1194
> > >> [5] https://github.com/apache/flink/tree/release-1.7.0-rc2
> > >> [6]
> > >>
> >
> https://docs.google.com/document/d/18SqvSFQLru0JDkCBZ5356yNmcZgYBEn1ydqg5VFEpiw/edit?usp=sharing
> > >>
> > >> Pro-tip: you can create a settings.xml file with these contents:
> > >>
> > >> <settings>
> > >> <activeProfiles>
> > >> <activeProfile>flink-1.7.0</activeProfile>
> > >> </activeProfiles>
> > >> <profiles>
> > >> <profile>
> > >> <id>flink-1.7.0</id>
> > >> <repositories>
> > >> <repository>
> > >> <id>flink-1.7.0</id>
> > >> <url>
> > >>
> > >>
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheflink-1194/
> > >> </url>
> > >> </repository>
> > >> <repository>
> > >> <id>archetype</id>
> > >> <url>
> > >>
> > >>
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheflink-1194/
> > >> </url>
> > >> </repository>
> > >> </repositories>
> > >> </profile>
> > >> </profiles>
> > >> </settings>
> > >>
> > >> And reference that in you maven commands via --settings
> > >> path/to/settings.xml. This is useful for creating a quickstart based
> > >> on the
> > >> staged release and for building against the staged jars.
> > >>
> > >
> > >
> >
> >
>
Re: [VOTE] Release 1.7.0, release candidate #2
Posted by Till Rohrmann <tr...@apache.org>.
Thanks Chesnay for going through the release notes. I've updated them
accordingly.
Concerning the test dependency and the LICENSE/NOTICE files, I'm looking
into it and will report back.
Cheers,
Till
On Wed, Nov 21, 2018 at 3:46 PM Chesnay Schepler <ch...@apache.org> wrote:
> Our LICENSE/NOTICE files in the binary distribution may also be botched
> (and may have been for quite some time).
>
> As per http://www.apache.org/dev/licensing-howto.html#binary "|[...]
> LICENSE| and |NOTICE| must *exactly* represent the contents of the
> distribution they reside in.", which also applies to binary
> distributions as "/Any redistribution must obey the licensing
> requirements of the contents."/
>
> My conclusion is that any dependency bundled in the distribution must be
> accounted for in the NOTICE/LICENSE files. Given that we already include
> several MIT licenses in the LICENSE file (exclusively WebUI stuff) it
> thus follows that at the very least all MIT dependencies should be
> listed here.
>
> On 21.11.2018 15:04, Chesnay Schepler wrote:
> > I may have found a potential blocker while looking at dependencies:
> >
> > flink-tests now has a non-optional test dependency on oshi-core, which
> > is licensed under EPL 1.0.
> >
> > As per https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LEGAL-207, test
> > dependencies are not exempt from license restrictions.
> >
> > We thus have to make this dependency optional or provide some other
> > opt-in mechanism for users.
> >
> > On 20.11.2018 15:30, Till Rohrmann wrote:
> >> Hi everyone,
> >> Please review and vote on the release candidate #2 for the version
> >> 1.7.0,
> >> as follows:
> >> [ ] +1, Approve the release
> >> [ ] -1, Do not approve the release (please provide specific comments)
> >>
> >>
> >> The complete staging area is available for your review, which includes:
> >> * JIRA release notes [1],
> >> * the official Apache source release and binary convenience releases
> >> to be
> >> deployed to dist.apache.org [2], which are signed with the key with
> >> fingerprint 1F302569A96CFFD5 [3],
> >> * all artifacts to be deployed to the Maven Central Repository [4],
> >> * source code tag "release-1.7.0-rc2" [5],
> >>
> >> Please use this document for coordinating testing efforts: [6]
> >>
> >> The vote will be open for at least 72 hours. It is adopted by majority
> >> approval, with at least 3 PMC affirmative votes.
> >>
> >> Thanks,
> >> Till
> >>
> >> [1]
> >>
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12315522&version=12343585
> >>
> >> [2] https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/flink/flink-1.7.0-rc2/
> >> [3] https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/flink/KEYS
> >> [4]
> >> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheflink-1194
> >> [5] https://github.com/apache/flink/tree/release-1.7.0-rc2
> >> [6]
> >>
> https://docs.google.com/document/d/18SqvSFQLru0JDkCBZ5356yNmcZgYBEn1ydqg5VFEpiw/edit?usp=sharing
> >>
> >> Pro-tip: you can create a settings.xml file with these contents:
> >>
> >> <settings>
> >> <activeProfiles>
> >> <activeProfile>flink-1.7.0</activeProfile>
> >> </activeProfiles>
> >> <profiles>
> >> <profile>
> >> <id>flink-1.7.0</id>
> >> <repositories>
> >> <repository>
> >> <id>flink-1.7.0</id>
> >> <url>
> >>
> >> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheflink-1194/
> >> </url>
> >> </repository>
> >> <repository>
> >> <id>archetype</id>
> >> <url>
> >>
> >> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheflink-1194/
> >> </url>
> >> </repository>
> >> </repositories>
> >> </profile>
> >> </profiles>
> >> </settings>
> >>
> >> And reference that in you maven commands via --settings
> >> path/to/settings.xml. This is useful for creating a quickstart based
> >> on the
> >> staged release and for building against the staged jars.
> >>
> >
> >
>
>
Re: [VOTE] Release 1.7.0, release candidate #2
Posted by Chesnay Schepler <ch...@apache.org>.
Our LICENSE/NOTICE files in the binary distribution may also be botched
(and may have been for quite some time).
As per http://www.apache.org/dev/licensing-howto.html#binary "|[...]
LICENSE| and |NOTICE| must *exactly* represent the contents of the
distribution they reside in.", which also applies to binary
distributions as "/Any redistribution must obey the licensing
requirements of the contents."/
My conclusion is that any dependency bundled in the distribution must be
accounted for in the NOTICE/LICENSE files. Given that we already include
several MIT licenses in the LICENSE file (exclusively WebUI stuff) it
thus follows that at the very least all MIT dependencies should be
listed here.
On 21.11.2018 15:04, Chesnay Schepler wrote:
> I may have found a potential blocker while looking at dependencies:
>
> flink-tests now has a non-optional test dependency on oshi-core, which
> is licensed under EPL 1.0.
>
> As per https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LEGAL-207, test
> dependencies are not exempt from license restrictions.
>
> We thus have to make this dependency optional or provide some other
> opt-in mechanism for users.
>
> On 20.11.2018 15:30, Till Rohrmann wrote:
>> Hi everyone,
>> Please review and vote on the release candidate #2 for the version
>> 1.7.0,
>> as follows:
>> [ ] +1, Approve the release
>> [ ] -1, Do not approve the release (please provide specific comments)
>>
>>
>> The complete staging area is available for your review, which includes:
>> * JIRA release notes [1],
>> * the official Apache source release and binary convenience releases
>> to be
>> deployed to dist.apache.org [2], which are signed with the key with
>> fingerprint 1F302569A96CFFD5 [3],
>> * all artifacts to be deployed to the Maven Central Repository [4],
>> * source code tag "release-1.7.0-rc2" [5],
>>
>> Please use this document for coordinating testing efforts: [6]
>>
>> The vote will be open for at least 72 hours. It is adopted by majority
>> approval, with at least 3 PMC affirmative votes.
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Till
>>
>> [1]
>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12315522&version=12343585
>>
>> [2] https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/flink/flink-1.7.0-rc2/
>> [3] https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/flink/KEYS
>> [4]
>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheflink-1194
>> [5] https://github.com/apache/flink/tree/release-1.7.0-rc2
>> [6]
>> https://docs.google.com/document/d/18SqvSFQLru0JDkCBZ5356yNmcZgYBEn1ydqg5VFEpiw/edit?usp=sharing
>>
>> Pro-tip: you can create a settings.xml file with these contents:
>>
>> <settings>
>> <activeProfiles>
>> <activeProfile>flink-1.7.0</activeProfile>
>> </activeProfiles>
>> <profiles>
>> <profile>
>> <id>flink-1.7.0</id>
>> <repositories>
>> <repository>
>> <id>flink-1.7.0</id>
>> <url>
>>
>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheflink-1194/
>> </url>
>> </repository>
>> <repository>
>> <id>archetype</id>
>> <url>
>>
>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheflink-1194/
>> </url>
>> </repository>
>> </repositories>
>> </profile>
>> </profiles>
>> </settings>
>>
>> And reference that in you maven commands via --settings
>> path/to/settings.xml. This is useful for creating a quickstart based
>> on the
>> staged release and for building against the staged jars.
>>
>
>
Re: [VOTE] Release 1.7.0, release candidate #2
Posted by Chesnay Schepler <ch...@apache.org>.
I may have found a potential blocker while looking at dependencies:
flink-tests now has a non-optional test dependency on oshi-core, which
is licensed under EPL 1.0.
As per https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LEGAL-207, test
dependencies are not exempt from license restrictions.
We thus have to make this dependency optional or provide some other
opt-in mechanism for users.
On 20.11.2018 15:30, Till Rohrmann wrote:
> Hi everyone,
> Please review and vote on the release candidate #2 for the version 1.7.0,
> as follows:
> [ ] +1, Approve the release
> [ ] -1, Do not approve the release (please provide specific comments)
>
>
> The complete staging area is available for your review, which includes:
> * JIRA release notes [1],
> * the official Apache source release and binary convenience releases to be
> deployed to dist.apache.org [2], which are signed with the key with
> fingerprint 1F302569A96CFFD5 [3],
> * all artifacts to be deployed to the Maven Central Repository [4],
> * source code tag "release-1.7.0-rc2" [5],
>
> Please use this document for coordinating testing efforts: [6]
>
> The vote will be open for at least 72 hours. It is adopted by majority
> approval, with at least 3 PMC affirmative votes.
>
> Thanks,
> Till
>
> [1]
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12315522&version=12343585
> [2] https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/flink/flink-1.7.0-rc2/
> [3] https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/flink/KEYS
> [4] https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheflink-1194
> [5] https://github.com/apache/flink/tree/release-1.7.0-rc2
> [6]
> https://docs.google.com/document/d/18SqvSFQLru0JDkCBZ5356yNmcZgYBEn1ydqg5VFEpiw/edit?usp=sharing
> Pro-tip: you can create a settings.xml file with these contents:
>
> <settings>
> <activeProfiles>
> <activeProfile>flink-1.7.0</activeProfile>
> </activeProfiles>
> <profiles>
> <profile>
> <id>flink-1.7.0</id>
> <repositories>
> <repository>
> <id>flink-1.7.0</id>
> <url>
>
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheflink-1194/
> </url>
> </repository>
> <repository>
> <id>archetype</id>
> <url>
>
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheflink-1194/
> </url>
> </repository>
> </repositories>
> </profile>
> </profiles>
> </settings>
>
> And reference that in you maven commands via --settings
> path/to/settings.xml. This is useful for creating a quickstart based on the
> staged release and for building against the staged jars.
>
Re: [VOTE] Release 1.7.0, release candidate #2
Posted by Chesnay Schepler <ch...@apache.org>.
I looked through the release notes:
Entries that shouldn't be included:
* [FLINK-9983] - Savepoints should count as checkpoints when recovering
o duplicate of FLINK-1035
* [FLINK-10714] - java.lang.IndexOutOfBoundsException when creating a
heap backend snapshot
o closed as "Not a problem"
* [FLINK-10191] -
WindowCheckpointingITCase.testAggregatingSlidingProcessingTimeWindow
o closed as "Cannot reproduce"
* [FLINK-10668] - Streaming File Sink E2E test fails because not all
legitimate exceptions are excluded
o duplicate of FLINK-10678
* [FLINK-10622] - Add end-to-end test for temporal table joins
o closed as "Wont fix"
* [FLINK-9764] - Failure in LocalRecoveryRocksDBFullITCase
o closed as "Cannot reproduce"
* [FLINK-9587] - ContinuousFileMonitoringFunction crashes on short
living files
o closed as "Not a problem"
* [FLINK-10349] - Unify stopActor utils
o closed as "Wont do"
* [FLINK-7470] - Acquire RM leadership before registering with Mesos
o duplicate of FLINK-9936
Wrong categorization:
* [FLINK-10010] - Deprecate unused BaseAlignedWindowAssigner related
components
o => Improvement
* [FLINK-10142] - Reduce synchronization overhead for credit notifications
o => Improvement
* [FLINK-10389] - TaskManagerServicesConfiguration ctor contains self
assignment
o wondering if removing an unused variables is considered a bug-fix
* [FLINK-10412] - toString field in AbstractID should be transient to
avoid been serialized
o => Improvement
* [FLINK-10513] - Replace TaskManagerActions#notifyFinalState with
#updateTaskExecutionState
o => Improvement
* [FLINK-10678] - Add a switch to run_test to configure if logs should
be checked for errors/excepions
o => Improvement
* [FLINK-10803] - Add documentation about S3 support by the
StreamingFileSink
o => Improvement
* [FLINK-5005] - Remove Scala 2.10 support; add Scala 2.12 support
o => Feature (or change FLINK-7811 from subtask to feature;
FLINK-5005 is quite weird in that sense anyway)
* [FLINK-7551] - Add VERSION to the REST urls.
o => Feature
* [FLINK-9697] - Provide connector for modern Kafka
o => Feature
* [FLINK-10050] - Support 'allowedLateness' in CoGroupedStreams
o => Feature
* [FLINK-10073] - Allow setting a restart strategy in SQL Client
o => Feature
* [FLINK-10310] - Cassandra Sink - Handling failing requests
o => Feature
* [FLINK-10371] - Allow to enable SSL mutual authentication on REST
endpoints by configuration
o => Feature
Naming issues:
* [FLINK-10172] - Inconsistentcy in ExpressionParser and ExpressionDsl
for order by asc/desc
o typo "Inconsistentc
* [FLINK-10309] - Cancel flink job occurs java.net.ConnectException
o name could be improved
* [FLINK-9126] - Creation of the CassandraPojoInputFormat class to
output data into a Custom Cassandra Annotated Pojo
o rename to "Add CassandraPojoInputForma
* [FLINK-10056] - Add testRequestNextInputSplit
o name provides little value
* [FLINK-10355] - The order of the column should start from 1.
o name provides no value
On 20.11.2018 15:30, Till Rohrmann wrote:
> Hi everyone,
> Please review and vote on the release candidate #2 for the version 1.7.0,
> as follows:
> [ ] +1, Approve the release
> [ ] -1, Do not approve the release (please provide specific comments)
>
>
> The complete staging area is available for your review, which includes:
> * JIRA release notes [1],
> * the official Apache source release and binary convenience releases to be
> deployed to dist.apache.org [2], which are signed with the key with
> fingerprint 1F302569A96CFFD5 [3],
> * all artifacts to be deployed to the Maven Central Repository [4],
> * source code tag "release-1.7.0-rc2" [5],
>
> Please use this document for coordinating testing efforts: [6]
>
> The vote will be open for at least 72 hours. It is adopted by majority
> approval, with at least 3 PMC affirmative votes.
>
> Thanks,
> Till
>
> [1]
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12315522&version=12343585
> [2] https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/flink/flink-1.7.0-rc2/
> [3] https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/flink/KEYS
> [4] https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheflink-1194
> [5] https://github.com/apache/flink/tree/release-1.7.0-rc2
> [6]
> https://docs.google.com/document/d/18SqvSFQLru0JDkCBZ5356yNmcZgYBEn1ydqg5VFEpiw/edit?usp=sharing
> Pro-tip: you can create a settings.xml file with these contents:
>
> <settings>
> <activeProfiles>
> <activeProfile>flink-1.7.0</activeProfile>
> </activeProfiles>
> <profiles>
> <profile>
> <id>flink-1.7.0</id>
> <repositories>
> <repository>
> <id>flink-1.7.0</id>
> <url>
>
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheflink-1194/
> </url>
> </repository>
> <repository>
> <id>archetype</id>
> <url>
>
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheflink-1194/
> </url>
> </repository>
> </repositories>
> </profile>
> </profiles>
> </settings>
>
> And reference that in you maven commands via --settings
> path/to/settings.xml. This is useful for creating a quickstart based on the
> staged release and for building against the staged jars.
>