You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@geronimo.apache.org by "David Jencks (JIRA)" <de...@geronimo.apache.org> on 2006/05/13 00:36:09 UTC
[jira] Commented: (GERONIMO-2017) MEJB should not extend Management
because it extends EJBObject pulling in requirements for the ejb-spec
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-2017?page=comments#action_12383311 ]
David Jencks commented on GERONIMO-2017:
----------------------------------------
This is all true but unfortunately rmi-naming has to include the j2ee management and ejb specs anyway since the thread pool requires (theoretically anyway) the Stats class from management.
> MEJB should not extend Management because it extends EJBObject pulling in requirements for the ejb-spec
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: GERONIMO-2017
> URL: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-2017
> Project: Geronimo
> Type: Bug
> Security: public(Regular issues)
> Components: management
> Versions: 1.1
> Environment: all
> Reporter: Joe Bohn
> Assignee: David Jencks
> Fix For: 1.1
>
> Attempting to remove the open-ejb spec dependency from the config\rmi-naming I received a ClassDefNotFound error on EJBObject.
> David Jencks dug into this and figured the problem was due to the fact that MEJB had a requirement on EJBObject because it was implementing the Management interface which extends EJBObject. IIUC this was making it a requirement that we include the EJBObject class from the ejb spec in j2ee-server. There is no need for MEJB to implement management since anyone using it as a gbean isn't likely to have ejbs available.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators:
http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/Administrators.jspa
-
For more information on JIRA, see:
http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira