You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to commits@subversion.apache.org by iv...@apache.org on 2026/04/20 16:19:49 UTC
svn commit: r1933188 - subversion/branches/1.15.x
Author: ivan
Date: Mon Apr 20 16:19:49 2026
New Revision: 1933188
Log:
* STATUS: Vote for r1931549. Approving.
Modified:
subversion/branches/1.15.x/STATUS
Modified: subversion/branches/1.15.x/STATUS
==============================================================================
--- subversion/branches/1.15.x/STATUS Mon Apr 20 16:12:02 2026 (r1933187)
+++ subversion/branches/1.15.x/STATUS Mon Apr 20 16:19:49 2026 (r1933188)
@@ -49,17 +49,6 @@ Candidate changes:
Votes:
+1 (not binding): brane
- * r1931549
- Use bytewise content comparison in the "is the file modified?" working copy
- checks if we have the pristine file content.
- Justification:
- Avoid changing the file comparison characteristics for working copies with
- pristine contents.
- Notes:
- Discussed in https://lists.apache.org/thread/128rgf7ozn72ljfzn7o18gfhb9l43y26
- Votes:
- +1: kotkov, rinrab
-
Veto-blocked changes:
=====================
@@ -76,3 +65,14 @@ Approved changes:
+0: hartmannathan
+1 (not binding): brane
+1: dsahlberg, rinrab, ivan
+
+ * r1931549
+ Use bytewise content comparison in the "is the file modified?" working copy
+ checks if we have the pristine file content.
+ Justification:
+ Avoid changing the file comparison characteristics for working copies with
+ pristine contents.
+ Notes:
+ Discussed in https://lists.apache.org/thread/128rgf7ozn72ljfzn7o18gfhb9l43y26
+ Votes:
+ +1: kotkov, rinrab, ivan
Re: svn commit: r1933188 - subversion/branches/1.15.x
Posted by Daniel Sahlberg <da...@gmail.com>.
Den tis 21 apr. 2026 kl 12:32 skrev Daniel Sahlberg
<da...@gmail.com>:
>
> I expected the svn-role script to commit this backport last night but it seems something is wrong. I hope to take a look at it tonight.
After checking on the new svn-qavm machine I found a mistake from my
side setting up the password for the svn-role account on our new
svn-qavm machine. Much of the setup of svn-qavm is in Puppet but this
specific bit can't be automated (it would be a bad idea to put the
password of svn-role in a public git repo...).
r1933214 was an interactive commit (just to verify I had the right
password for svn-role) and r1933215 and r1933218 were done "hands off"
(just running the backport script as if run by cron).
I plan to leave r1931266 approved for the automatic backport tomorrow morning.
/Daniel
>
> /Daniel
>
> mån 20 apr. 2026 kl. 18:19 skrev <iv...@apache.org>:
>>
>> Author: ivan
>> Date: Mon Apr 20 16:19:49 2026
>> New Revision: 1933188
>>
>> Log:
>> * STATUS: Vote for r1931549. Approving.
>>
>> Modified:
>> subversion/branches/1.15.x/STATUS
>>
>> Modified: subversion/branches/1.15.x/STATUS
>> ==============================================================================
>> --- subversion/branches/1.15.x/STATUS Mon Apr 20 16:12:02 2026 (r1933187)
>> +++ subversion/branches/1.15.x/STATUS Mon Apr 20 16:19:49 2026 (r1933188)
>> @@ -49,17 +49,6 @@ Candidate changes:
>> Votes:
>> +1 (not binding): brane
>>
>> - * r1931549
>> - Use bytewise content comparison in the "is the file modified?" working copy
>> - checks if we have the pristine file content.
>> - Justification:
>> - Avoid changing the file comparison characteristics for working copies with
>> - pristine contents.
>> - Notes:
>> - Discussed in https://lists.apache.org/thread/128rgf7ozn72ljfzn7o18gfhb9l43y26
>> - Votes:
>> - +1: kotkov, rinrab
>> -
>> Veto-blocked changes:
>> =====================
>>
>> @@ -76,3 +65,14 @@ Approved changes:
>> +0: hartmannathan
>> +1 (not binding): brane
>> +1: dsahlberg, rinrab, ivan
>> +
>> + * r1931549
>> + Use bytewise content comparison in the "is the file modified?" working copy
>> + checks if we have the pristine file content.
>> + Justification:
>> + Avoid changing the file comparison characteristics for working copies with
>> + pristine contents.
>> + Notes:
>> + Discussed in https://lists.apache.org/thread/128rgf7ozn72ljfzn7o18gfhb9l43y26
>> + Votes:
>> + +1: kotkov, rinrab, ivan
>>
Re: svn commit: r1933188 - subversion/branches/1.15.x
Posted by Daniel Sahlberg <da...@gmail.com>.
Den tis 21 apr. 2026 kl 12:32 skrev Daniel Sahlberg
<da...@gmail.com>:
>
> I expected the svn-role script to commit this backport last night but it seems something is wrong. I hope to take a look at it tonight.
After checking on the new svn-qavm machine I found a mistake from my
side setting up the password for the svn-role account on our new
svn-qavm machine. Much of the setup of svn-qavm is in Puppet but this
specific bit can't be automated (it would be a bad idea to put the
password of svn-role in a public git repo...).
r1933214 was an interactive commit (just to verify I had the right
password for svn-role) and r1933215 and r1933218 were done "hands off"
(just running the backport script as if run by cron).
I plan to leave r1931266 approved for the automatic backport tomorrow morning.
/Daniel
>
> /Daniel
>
> mån 20 apr. 2026 kl. 18:19 skrev <iv...@apache.org>:
>>
>> Author: ivan
>> Date: Mon Apr 20 16:19:49 2026
>> New Revision: 1933188
>>
>> Log:
>> * STATUS: Vote for r1931549. Approving.
>>
>> Modified:
>> subversion/branches/1.15.x/STATUS
>>
>> Modified: subversion/branches/1.15.x/STATUS
>> ==============================================================================
>> --- subversion/branches/1.15.x/STATUS Mon Apr 20 16:12:02 2026 (r1933187)
>> +++ subversion/branches/1.15.x/STATUS Mon Apr 20 16:19:49 2026 (r1933188)
>> @@ -49,17 +49,6 @@ Candidate changes:
>> Votes:
>> +1 (not binding): brane
>>
>> - * r1931549
>> - Use bytewise content comparison in the "is the file modified?" working copy
>> - checks if we have the pristine file content.
>> - Justification:
>> - Avoid changing the file comparison characteristics for working copies with
>> - pristine contents.
>> - Notes:
>> - Discussed in https://lists.apache.org/thread/128rgf7ozn72ljfzn7o18gfhb9l43y26
>> - Votes:
>> - +1: kotkov, rinrab
>> -
>> Veto-blocked changes:
>> =====================
>>
>> @@ -76,3 +65,14 @@ Approved changes:
>> +0: hartmannathan
>> +1 (not binding): brane
>> +1: dsahlberg, rinrab, ivan
>> +
>> + * r1931549
>> + Use bytewise content comparison in the "is the file modified?" working copy
>> + checks if we have the pristine file content.
>> + Justification:
>> + Avoid changing the file comparison characteristics for working copies with
>> + pristine contents.
>> + Notes:
>> + Discussed in https://lists.apache.org/thread/128rgf7ozn72ljfzn7o18gfhb9l43y26
>> + Votes:
>> + +1: kotkov, rinrab, ivan
>>
Re: svn commit: r1933188 - subversion/branches/1.15.x
Posted by Daniel Sahlberg <da...@gmail.com>.
I expected the svn-role script to commit this backport last night but it
seems something is wrong. I hope to take a look at it tonight.
/Daniel
mån 20 apr. 2026 kl. 18:19 skrev <iv...@apache.org>:
> Author: ivan
> Date: Mon Apr 20 16:19:49 2026
> New Revision: 1933188
>
> Log:
> * STATUS: Vote for r1931549. Approving.
>
> Modified:
> subversion/branches/1.15.x/STATUS
>
> Modified: subversion/branches/1.15.x/STATUS
>
> ==============================================================================
> --- subversion/branches/1.15.x/STATUS Mon Apr 20 16:12:02 2026
> (r1933187)
> +++ subversion/branches/1.15.x/STATUS Mon Apr 20 16:19:49 2026
> (r1933188)
> @@ -49,17 +49,6 @@ Candidate changes:
> Votes:
> +1 (not binding): brane
>
> - * r1931549
> - Use bytewise content comparison in the "is the file modified?" working
> copy
> - checks if we have the pristine file content.
> - Justification:
> - Avoid changing the file comparison characteristics for working
> copies with
> - pristine contents.
> - Notes:
> - Discussed in
> https://lists.apache.org/thread/128rgf7ozn72ljfzn7o18gfhb9l43y26
> - Votes:
> - +1: kotkov, rinrab
> -
> Veto-blocked changes:
> =====================
>
> @@ -76,3 +65,14 @@ Approved changes:
> +0: hartmannathan
> +1 (not binding): brane
> +1: dsahlberg, rinrab, ivan
> +
> + * r1931549
> + Use bytewise content comparison in the "is the file modified?" working
> copy
> + checks if we have the pristine file content.
> + Justification:
> + Avoid changing the file comparison characteristics for working
> copies with
> + pristine contents.
> + Notes:
> + Discussed in
> https://lists.apache.org/thread/128rgf7ozn72ljfzn7o18gfhb9l43y26
> + Votes:
> + +1: kotkov, rinrab, ivan
>
>
Re: svn commit: r1933188 - subversion/branches/1.15.x
Posted by Daniel Sahlberg <da...@gmail.com>.
I expected the svn-role script to commit this backport last night but it
seems something is wrong. I hope to take a look at it tonight.
/Daniel
mån 20 apr. 2026 kl. 18:19 skrev <iv...@apache.org>:
> Author: ivan
> Date: Mon Apr 20 16:19:49 2026
> New Revision: 1933188
>
> Log:
> * STATUS: Vote for r1931549. Approving.
>
> Modified:
> subversion/branches/1.15.x/STATUS
>
> Modified: subversion/branches/1.15.x/STATUS
>
> ==============================================================================
> --- subversion/branches/1.15.x/STATUS Mon Apr 20 16:12:02 2026
> (r1933187)
> +++ subversion/branches/1.15.x/STATUS Mon Apr 20 16:19:49 2026
> (r1933188)
> @@ -49,17 +49,6 @@ Candidate changes:
> Votes:
> +1 (not binding): brane
>
> - * r1931549
> - Use bytewise content comparison in the "is the file modified?" working
> copy
> - checks if we have the pristine file content.
> - Justification:
> - Avoid changing the file comparison characteristics for working
> copies with
> - pristine contents.
> - Notes:
> - Discussed in
> https://lists.apache.org/thread/128rgf7ozn72ljfzn7o18gfhb9l43y26
> - Votes:
> - +1: kotkov, rinrab
> -
> Veto-blocked changes:
> =====================
>
> @@ -76,3 +65,14 @@ Approved changes:
> +0: hartmannathan
> +1 (not binding): brane
> +1: dsahlberg, rinrab, ivan
> +
> + * r1931549
> + Use bytewise content comparison in the "is the file modified?" working
> copy
> + checks if we have the pristine file content.
> + Justification:
> + Avoid changing the file comparison characteristics for working
> copies with
> + pristine contents.
> + Notes:
> + Discussed in
> https://lists.apache.org/thread/128rgf7ozn72ljfzn7o18gfhb9l43y26
> + Votes:
> + +1: kotkov, rinrab, ivan
>
>