You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to apache-bugdb@apache.org by Tom Vaughan <tv...@aventail.com> on 1999/04/06 02:05:16 UTC
general/4197: FYI - inodes in etags will not be the same in _replicated_ content.
>Number: 4197
>Category: general
>Synopsis: FYI - inodes in etags will not be the same in _replicated_ content.
>Confidential: no
>Severity: non-critical
>Priority: medium
>Responsible: apache
>State: open
>Class: sw-bug
>Submitter-Id: apache
>Arrival-Date: Mon Apr 5 17:10:01 PDT 1999
>Last-Modified:
>Originator: tvaughan@aventail.com
>Organization:
apache
>Release: 1.3
>Environment:
n/a
>Description:
I attended WCW'99, http://www.ircache.net/Cache/Workshop99/, last week.
During which, Craig Willis, http://www.cs.wpi.edu/~cew/, gave a presentation,
http://www.ircache.net/Cache/Workshop99/Papers/wills-abstract.html,
on the cachability of web resources.
He mentioned that _identical_ resources which are replicated on more than one
server will have different etags, because a resource's inode is used to
calculate its etag. This will be a problem when these servers sit behing a
reverse proxy. Not sure how much of a problem though.
>How-To-Repeat:
>Fix:
>Audit-Trail:
>Unformatted:
[In order for any reply to be added to the PR database, ]
[you need to include <ap...@Apache.Org> in the Cc line ]
[and leave the subject line UNCHANGED. This is not done]
[automatically because of the potential for mail loops. ]
[If you do not include this Cc, your reply may be ig- ]
[nored unless you are responding to an explicit request ]
[from a developer. ]
[Reply only with text; DO NOT SEND ATTACHMENTS! ]