You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to commits@airflow.apache.org by GitBox <gi...@apache.org> on 2021/03/11 23:45:52 UTC
[GitHub] [airflow] potiuk opened a new pull request #14734: Update documentation for broken package releases
potiuk opened a new pull request #14734:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/14734
This is a documentation generated for provider packages
that have been broken in releae 2020.10.29. As explained in
the #14673, some whl packages were broken in 2020.10.29 release
and we need to regenerate those packages even if they were not
updated.
<!--
Thank you for contributing! Please make sure that your code changes
are covered with tests. And in case of new features or big changes
remember to adjust the documentation.
Feel free to ping committers for the review!
In case of existing issue, reference it using one of the following:
closes: #ISSUE
related: #ISSUE
How to write a good git commit message:
http://chris.beams.io/posts/git-commit/
-->
---
**^ Add meaningful description above**
Read the **[Pull Request Guidelines](https://github.com/apache/airflow/blob/master/CONTRIBUTING.rst#pull-request-guidelines)** for more information.
In case of fundamental code change, Airflow Improvement Proposal ([AIP](https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/AIRFLOW/Airflow+Improvements+Proposals)) is needed.
In case of a new dependency, check compliance with the [ASF 3rd Party License Policy](https://www.apache.org/legal/resolved.html#category-x).
In case of backwards incompatible changes please leave a note in [UPDATING.md](https://github.com/apache/airflow/blob/master/UPDATING.md).
----------------------------------------------------------------
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
users@infra.apache.org
[GitHub] [airflow] potiuk merged pull request #14734: Update documentation for broken package releases
Posted by GitBox <gi...@apache.org>.
potiuk merged pull request #14734:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/14734
----------------------------------------------------------------
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
users@infra.apache.org
[GitHub] [airflow] potiuk edited a comment on pull request #14734: Update documentation for broken package releases
Posted by GitBox <gi...@apache.org>.
potiuk edited a comment on pull request #14734:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/14734#issuecomment-798701521
I've just reviewed all the changes in all the 30 providers and none of the changes is "dangerous" - I made sure to list all such changes in the ADDITIONAL_INFO section. I'd love to release it quickly so that the users will not have any problems when installing the old, broken packages. I't's not critical to update the packages asap but it is rather important as more people will attempt to migrate to 2.0.*
----------------------------------------------------------------
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
users@infra.apache.org
[GitHub] [airflow] potiuk commented on pull request #14734: Update documentation for broken package releases
Posted by GitBox <gi...@apache.org>.
potiuk commented on pull request #14734:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/14734#issuecomment-798701521
I've just reviewed all the changes in all the 30 providers and none of the changes is "dangerous" - I made sure to list all such changes in the ADDITIONAAL_INFO section. I'd love to release it quickly so that the users will not have any problems when installing the old, broken packages. I't's not critical to update the packages asap but it is rather important as more people will attempt to migrate to 2.0.*
----------------------------------------------------------------
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
users@infra.apache.org
[GitHub] [airflow] potiuk commented on pull request #14734: Update documentation for broken package releases
Posted by GitBox <gi...@apache.org>.
potiuk commented on pull request #14734:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/14734#issuecomment-798636893
I'd love to merge that one to be able to re-release the broken backport packages. This should be the one-before-last release of backports ever.
----------------------------------------------------------------
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
users@infra.apache.org
[GitHub] [airflow] github-actions[bot] commented on pull request #14734: Update documentation for broken package releases
Posted by GitBox <gi...@apache.org>.
github-actions[bot] commented on pull request #14734:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/14734#issuecomment-798781342
The PR is likely OK to be merged with just subset of tests for default Python and Database versions without running the full matrix of tests, because it does not modify the core of Airflow. If the committers decide that the full tests matrix is needed, they will add the label 'full tests needed'. Then you should rebase to the latest master or amend the last commit of the PR, and push it with --force-with-lease.
----------------------------------------------------------------
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
users@infra.apache.org