You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to derby-dev@db.apache.org by Myrna van Lunteren <m....@gmail.com> on 2007/10/09 18:59:51 UTC
jvm crash in OnlineBackupTest4.sql with jdk 1.5?
Hi,
Now that the failures in suites.All for windows/vista are fixed (Thx
Knut Anders!) I noticed that there's been a failure reported - almost
every day - in store/OnlineBackupTest4.sql with jdk 1.5, mostly for
linux but also on other operating systems...
I did some clicking on histories, and it seems this first occurred on
9/21/2007.
And it looks like the jvm plays possum?
Anyone have any ideas on this?
See: http://dbtg.thresher.com/derby/test/Daily/jvm1.5/testing/testlog/lin/578187-derbyall_diff.txt
and the most recent one:
http://dbtg.thresher.com/derby/test/Daily/jvm1.5/testing/Limited/testSummary-582856.html
Myrna
Re: jvm crash in OnlineBackupTest4.sql with jdk 1.5?
Posted by Myrna van Lunteren <m....@gmail.com>.
On 10/11/07, Knut Anders Hatlen <Kn...@sun.com> wrote:
> Knut Anders Hatlen <Kn...@Sun.COM> writes:
>
> > Myrna van Lunteren <m....@gmail.com> writes:
> >
> >> Hi,
> >>
> >> Now that the failures in suites.All for windows/vista are fixed (Thx
> >> Knut Anders!) I noticed that there's been a failure reported - almost
> >> every day - in store/OnlineBackupTest4.sql with jdk 1.5, mostly for
> >> linux but also on other operating systems...
> >>
> >> I did some clicking on histories, and it seems this first occurred on
> >> 9/21/2007.
> >>
> >> And it looks like the jvm plays possum?
> >
> > Hi Myrna,
> >
> > Yes, I think this is a JVM problem. It seems like the first failure
> > coincides with the JRE on the test machines being updated from
> > 1.5.0_07-b03 to 1.5.0_12-b04. I'll take a look at it and see if I can
> > reproduce it. I'll also test it with the newest 1.5.0 release (1.5.0_13,
> > I think) and file a bug report against the JVM if it still fails.
>
> I managed to reproduce it on both 1.5.0_12 and 1.5.0_13 on Linux. Looks
> like HotSpot fails when it's optimizing some of the methods in
> LockControl. The good news is that it has already been logged and is
> supposed to be fixed in the next update release (1.5.0_14).
>
> http://bugs.sun.com/view_bug.do?bug_id=6519085
>
> --
> Knut Anders
>
Thx for the analysis & info!
Myrna
Re: jvm crash in OnlineBackupTest4.sql with jdk 1.5?
Posted by Knut Anders Hatlen <Kn...@Sun.COM>.
Knut Anders Hatlen <Kn...@Sun.COM> writes:
> Myrna van Lunteren <m....@gmail.com> writes:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> Now that the failures in suites.All for windows/vista are fixed (Thx
>> Knut Anders!) I noticed that there's been a failure reported - almost
>> every day - in store/OnlineBackupTest4.sql with jdk 1.5, mostly for
>> linux but also on other operating systems...
>>
>> I did some clicking on histories, and it seems this first occurred on
>> 9/21/2007.
>>
>> And it looks like the jvm plays possum?
>
> Hi Myrna,
>
> Yes, I think this is a JVM problem. It seems like the first failure
> coincides with the JRE on the test machines being updated from
> 1.5.0_07-b03 to 1.5.0_12-b04. I'll take a look at it and see if I can
> reproduce it. I'll also test it with the newest 1.5.0 release (1.5.0_13,
> I think) and file a bug report against the JVM if it still fails.
I managed to reproduce it on both 1.5.0_12 and 1.5.0_13 on Linux. Looks
like HotSpot fails when it's optimizing some of the methods in
LockControl. The good news is that it has already been logged and is
supposed to be fixed in the next update release (1.5.0_14).
http://bugs.sun.com/view_bug.do?bug_id=6519085
--
Knut Anders
Re: jvm crash in OnlineBackupTest4.sql with jdk 1.5?
Posted by Knut Anders Hatlen <Kn...@Sun.COM>.
Myrna van Lunteren <m....@gmail.com> writes:
> Hi,
>
> Now that the failures in suites.All for windows/vista are fixed (Thx
> Knut Anders!) I noticed that there's been a failure reported - almost
> every day - in store/OnlineBackupTest4.sql with jdk 1.5, mostly for
> linux but also on other operating systems...
>
> I did some clicking on histories, and it seems this first occurred on
> 9/21/2007.
>
> And it looks like the jvm plays possum?
Hi Myrna,
Yes, I think this is a JVM problem. It seems like the first failure
coincides with the JRE on the test machines being updated from
1.5.0_07-b03 to 1.5.0_12-b04. I'll take a look at it and see if I can
reproduce it. I'll also test it with the newest 1.5.0 release (1.5.0_13,
I think) and file a bug report against the JVM if it still fails.
--
Knut Anders