Re: ActiveMQ Console - moving toward a solution (starting with brainstorming)

[artnaseef <ar...@artnaseef.com>]

> This sounds mostly like documentation things.   That definitely brings up
> the point that the docs at:
>
> http://activemq.apache.org/web-console.html
>
> need some major updates.  I’d certainly start with removing all the
> references to ActiveMQ 4.  :-)

Good point - I updated the PROBLEM STATEMENT document on google+

>
> I’m happy to help as well.   I’ll start by getting the issues Tim
> brought up assigned to the we console component.
>

Awesome!

> Does everyone have access to assign themselves issues in JIRA?  If not,
> let me know and I can help out making sure people can do so.
>

I don't think I have access to do so right now?

Double-checking just now, I don't see the usual "ASSIGN" or "EDIT"
controls on the Jira site.  My username is "artnaseef".

>
> I also would prefer a very stream lined ActiveMQ specific interface as
> well.   I’m certainly OK with just a simple facelift if we fell thats
> needed, but I’m not even sure that is needed.
>

Cool.

Looking at the discussion started by zmhassan (here:
http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/Node-JS-Client-Library-for-Accessing-Apache-ActiveMQ-td4677269.html),
I like that he's innovating and the point that the newer technologies
could attract more folks.

How do we hash this out?  Perhaps we work with zmhassan to get prototypes
built, try them out, and provide feedback that way?





--
View this message in context: http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/Re-ActiveMQ-Console-moving-toward-a-solution-starting-with-brainstorming-tp4677428.html
Sent from the ActiveMQ - Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.