Re: [I] Add Option To Coerce List Type on Parquet Write [arrow-rs]

["ggreco (via GitHub)" <gi...@apache.org>]

ggreco commented on issue #6733:
URL: https://github.com/apache/arrow-rs/issues/6733#issuecomment-2482499632

   BTW I tried to generate an arrow document in C++ and:
    - use the C interface to write the parquet file with zero-copy with rust
    - simply publish the parquet file with c++
    
    In the first path the lists contain struct objects called `item`, while in the second path the lists contain struct objects called `element`, so the C++ parquet writing logic already does this conversion to better support the parquet standard.
    
   I've found that at least a major parquet reader created following the parquet specs and not the arrow ones ( https://aloneguid.github.io/parquet-dotnet/starter-topic.html ) cannot properly read the **nested** parquet files created with `arrow-rs`, so I think the bug label should probably stay.


-- 
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

To unsubscribe, e-mail: github-unsubscribe@arrow.apache.org

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
users@infra.apache.org