You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@climate.apache.org by Lewis John Mcgibbney <le...@gmail.com> on 2014/05/09 00:10:56 UTC

[DISCUSS] Roadmap for 0.4 OCW Release

Hi Folks,
Any ideas about establishing a roadmap?
There are some 108 issues marked for 0.4... this is a very large number of
issues for a project not long out of the incubator.
Possible to set a realistic time frame?
Thanks
Lewis

-- 
*Lewis*

Re: [DISCUSS] Roadmap for 0.4 OCW Release

Posted by Cameron Goodale <si...@gmail.com>.
Hey Folks,

I think this sounds like a good plan.  I would like to also suggest a plan
of what needs to be accomplished to call 0.5 done.  Trying to nail down the
direction for v0.5 based on delivered functionality.

I humbly suggest migrating all of the 'rcmet' metrics over into ocw as a
good goal for v0.5.

Best Regards,


Cameron


On Thu, May 15, 2014 at 7:34 AM, Michael Joyce <jo...@apache.org> wrote:

> I envision mid to late-ish June. At the minimum CLIMATE-342 will need to be
> resolved first as well.
>
> Thoughts?
>
>
> -- Joyce
>
>
> On Thu, May 8, 2014 at 3:10 PM, Lewis John Mcgibbney <
> lewis.mcgibbney@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > Hi Folks,
> > Any ideas about establishing a roadmap?
> > There are some 108 issues marked for 0.4... this is a very large number
> of
> > issues for a project not long out of the incubator.
> > Possible to set a realistic time frame?
> > Thanks
> > Lewis
> >
> > --
> > *Lewis*
> >
>



-- 

Sent from a Tin Can attached to a String

Re: [DISCUSS] Roadmap for 0.4 OCW Release

Posted by Michael Joyce <jo...@apache.org>.
I envision mid to late-ish June. At the minimum CLIMATE-342 will need to be
resolved first as well.

Thoughts?


-- Joyce


On Thu, May 8, 2014 at 3:10 PM, Lewis John Mcgibbney <
lewis.mcgibbney@gmail.com> wrote:

> Hi Folks,
> Any ideas about establishing a roadmap?
> There are some 108 issues marked for 0.4... this is a very large number of
> issues for a project not long out of the incubator.
> Possible to set a realistic time frame?
> Thanks
> Lewis
>
> --
> *Lewis*
>