You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to users@httpd.apache.org by Boyle Owen <Ow...@swx.com> on 2008/04/04 11:52:15 UTC
RE: [users@httpd] Return of bug 14219 in version 2.2.8? (too many SSL VHs causes fopen to fail) - UNDERSTOOD (?)
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Eric Covener [mailto:covener@gmail.com]
> Sent: Thursday, April 03, 2008 3:35 PM
> To: users@httpd.apache.org
> Subject: Re: [users@httpd] Return of bug 14219 in version
> 2.2.8? (too many SSL VHs causes fopen to fail)
>
>
> Sun has some relatively recent changes in this area:
>
> http://developers.sun.com/solaris/articles/stdio_256.html
I implemented the extendedFILE facility, as recommended in the article,
and the server started without the fopen error :-)
Once I got a working instance of 2.2.8, I was able to peek inside and
discovered that, for an identical config file, 2.2.6 requires 195 file
handles, whereas 2.2.8 needs 328. So that was why 2.2.8 was tripping the
fopen limitation.
As an aside, our apache listens on 88 ports and has 102 piped log files
to write to. Add on STDIN/OUT/ERR and the Pid and Lock files and that's
how we get to 195. Comparing the two versions, we see the only
difference is in the number of pipes - 102 in 2.2.6 and 235 in 2.2.8.
So something is doubling up the number of pipes (and then some...)
I then trawled the code to see what has changed and found that there is
a recent addition to server/log.c
(http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/httpd/httpd/tags/2.2.8/server/log.c?view=d
iff&r1=602466&r2=602467) that seems to redirect SDTOUT and STDERR to the
access and error logs. Would this have the effect of doubling the number
of pipes?
I am now faced with two ways forward;
1) Start using the extendedFILE facility. Probably a good idea since the
255 limit is an accident waiting to happen - we are already at 80%
capacity, even with 2.2.6 and so a few more sites could push us over
anyway. However, there are two caveats in the article; namely that
apache should not directly dereference the _file member of the FILE
structure or use the fileno() macro. I grep'd the code for '_file' and
'fileno()' and it seems clean so we should be OK...
2) Be a nuisance and question *why* apache needs to duplicate the pipes
like this. Can we be the only users that this is causing problems for?
Incidentally, I will be at apachecon in Amsterdam next week so if anyone
wants to discuss this, look me up - beer's on me :-)
Rgds,
Owen Boyle
Disclaimer: Any disclaimer attached to this message may be ignored.
>
> --
> Eric Covener
> covener@gmail.com
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> The official User-To-User support forum of the Apache HTTP
> Server Project.
> See <URL:http://httpd.apache.org/userslist.html> for more info.
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@httpd.apache.org
> " from the digest: users-digest-unsubscribe@httpd.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@httpd.apache.org
>
This message is for the named person's use only. It may contain confidential, proprietary or legally privileged information. If you receive this message in error, please notify the sender urgently and then immediately delete the message and any copies of it from your system. Please also immediately destroy any hardcopies of the message. The sender's company reserves the right to monitor all e-mail communications through their networks.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
The official User-To-User support forum of the Apache HTTP Server Project.
See <URL:http://httpd.apache.org/userslist.html> for more info.
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@httpd.apache.org
" from the digest: users-digest-unsubscribe@httpd.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@httpd.apache.org
RE: [users@httpd] Return of bug 14219 in version 2.2.8? (too manySSL VHs causes fopen to fail) - UNDERSTOOD (?)
Posted by Boyle Owen <Ow...@swx.com>.
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Joe Orton [mailto:jorton@redhat.com]
> Sent: Friday, April 04, 2008 12:28 PM
> To: Boyle Owen
> Cc: users@httpd.apache.org
> Subject: Re: [users@httpd] Return of bug 14219 in version
> 2.2.8? (too manySSL VHs causes fopen to fail) - UNDERSTOOD (?)
>
>
> Can you capture truss output ("truss -o foo bin/httpd" or something
> similar) and file a bug? It sounds like a regression in the piped
> logger code, it shouldn't be leaving any more open fds in the parent
> AFAIK.
Done (https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44755)
Warmest thanks to all for contributing to this issue!
Rgds,
Owen Boyle
Disclaimer: Any disclaimer attached to this message may be ignored.
>
> joe
>
This message is for the named person's use only. It may contain confidential, proprietary or legally privileged information. If you receive this message in error, please notify the sender urgently and then immediately delete the message and any copies of it from your system. Please also immediately destroy any hardcopies of the message. The sender's company reserves the right to monitor all e-mail communications through their networks.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
The official User-To-User support forum of the Apache HTTP Server Project.
See <URL:http://httpd.apache.org/userslist.html> for more info.
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@httpd.apache.org
" from the digest: users-digest-unsubscribe@httpd.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@httpd.apache.org
Re: [users@httpd] Return of bug 14219 in version 2.2.8? (too many
SSL VHs causes fopen to fail) - UNDERSTOOD (?)
Posted by Joe Orton <jo...@redhat.com>.
On Fri, Apr 04, 2008 at 11:52:15AM +0200, Boyle Owen wrote:
...
> As an aside, our apache listens on 88 ports and has 102 piped log files
> to write to. Add on STDIN/OUT/ERR and the Pid and Lock files and that's
> how we get to 195. Comparing the two versions, we see the only
> difference is in the number of pipes - 102 in 2.2.6 and 235 in 2.2.8.
> So something is doubling up the number of pipes (and then some...)
>
> I then trawled the code to see what has changed and found that there is
> a recent addition to server/log.c
> (http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/httpd/httpd/tags/2.2.8/server/log.c?view=d
> iff&r1=602466&r2=602467) that seems to redirect SDTOUT and STDERR to the
> access and error logs. Would this have the effect of doubling the number
> of pipes?
...
Can you capture truss output ("truss -o foo bin/httpd" or something
similar) and file a bug? It sounds like a regression in the piped
logger code, it shouldn't be leaving any more open fds in the parent
AFAIK.
joe
---------------------------------------------------------------------
The official User-To-User support forum of the Apache HTTP Server Project.
See <URL:http://httpd.apache.org/userslist.html> for more info.
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@httpd.apache.org
" from the digest: users-digest-unsubscribe@httpd.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@httpd.apache.org