Re: Freshmeat page is still not updated

[Jimisola Laursen <li...@jimisola.com>]

Great.

I assume that the 2.0 branch is your "streaming branch" (prefer to see it as 
3.0-dev) and HEAD is 2.0..?
Any plans on when the next release will be of 2.0 will be? How much is left on 
2.0-streaming before beta stage?

Regards,
Jimisola

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Jochen Wiedmann" <jo...@gmail.com>
To: <xm...@ws.apache.org>
Sent: Wednesday, November 30, 2005 9:32 PM
Subject: Re: Freshmeat page is still not updated


> Jimisola Laursen wrote:
>
>> The only interesting addition is the 
>> CommonsHttpClientXmlRpcTransportFactory.java, since Henri Gomez already has 
>> submitted the same patch for CommonsXmlRpcTransport as I did.
>
> Looking into the test class for CommonsXmlRpcTransport, I see that it is 
> indeed not as easy to use the transport. Thus, an additional factory seems 
> worth, and I added a slightly modified version of your patch to the 2.0 branch 
> and the HEAD.
>
>
> Jochen
> 

Re: Requests for 2.0.1 release

[Henri Gomez <he...@gmail.com>]

Well any commiters can act as release manager.

I don't have time right now, and delaying xml-rpc 2.0.1 is not a good idea.

You're welcome

2005/12/7, Jimisola Laursen <li...@jimisola.com>:
> Well, I remember that post. And the reason for me making an official request was
> because of this reply from Henri when I contacted him:
>
> "Well I didn't officially agreed on being Release Manager.
>
> Could you post the release request on dev list ?"
>
> Anyway, there is not much more I can do I guess.
>
> Jimisola
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Jochen Wiedmann" <jo...@gmail.com>
> To: <xm...@ws.apache.org>
> Sent: Wednesday, December 07, 2005 6:38 PM
> Subject: Re: Requests for 2.0.1 release
>
>
> On 12/7/05, Jimisola Laursen <li...@jimisola.com> wrote:
>
> > I've been asked to do an official request for the 2.0.1 release, so here it is
> > :)
>
> See
>
> http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=xmlrpc-dev&m=113341270102599&w=2
>
>
> --
> Often it does seem a pity that Noah and his party did not miss the
> boat. (Mark Twain)
>
>
>

Re: Requests for 2.0.1 release

[Jimisola Laursen <li...@jimisola.com>]

Well, I remember that post. And the reason for me making an official request was 
because of this reply from Henri when I contacted him:

"Well I didn't officially agreed on being Release Manager.

Could you post the release request on dev list ?"

Anyway, there is not much more I can do I guess.

Jimisola

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Jochen Wiedmann" <jo...@gmail.com>
To: <xm...@ws.apache.org>
Sent: Wednesday, December 07, 2005 6:38 PM
Subject: Re: Requests for 2.0.1 release


On 12/7/05, Jimisola Laursen <li...@jimisola.com> wrote:

> I've been asked to do an official request for the 2.0.1 release, so here it is
> :)

See

http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=xmlrpc-dev&m=113341270102599&w=2


--
Often it does seem a pity that Noah and his party did not miss the
boat. (Mark Twain)

Re: Requests for 2.0.1 release

[Jochen Wiedmann <jo...@gmail.com>]

On 12/7/05, Jimisola Laursen <li...@jimisola.com> wrote:

> I've been asked to do an official request for the 2.0.1 release, so here it is
> :)

See

http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=xmlrpc-dev&m=113341270102599&w=2


--
Often it does seem a pity that Noah and his party did not miss the
boat. (Mark Twain)

Requests for 2.0.1 release

[Jimisola Laursen <li...@jimisola.com>]

Hi,

I've been asked to do an official request for the 2.0.1 release, so here it is 
:)

Regards,
Jimisola 

Re: Freshmeat page is still not updated

[Jochen Wiedmann <jo...@gmail.com>]

Jimisola Laursen wrote:

> I assume that the 2.0 branch is your "streaming branch" (prefer to see 
> it as 3.0-dev) and HEAD is 2.0..?

No. The 2.0 branch is the current production branch, out of which we 
should be able to create a 2.0.1 or 2.1 release at any time. The 
currrent HEAD is the official development branch. The streaming branch 
and the HEAD are completely unrelated. If the community decides to 
promote the former at any time, then it could become the new HEAD.


> Any plans on when the next release will be of 2.0 will be? How much is 
> left on 2.0-streaming before beta stage?

Henri has recently proposed a version 2.0.1. The only reply was mine: 
"Very well, if you do the release."


Jochen