You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.

Posted to dev@turbine.apache.org by Yuemei Sun <su...@engr.orst.edu> on 2003/01/22 20:11:23 UTC

Core Schema

There is a table Turbine_Role_Permission, which, according to the
documenation, allows several Roles to share a Permission.  Any
particualr reason why the relationship between Role and Permision
is designed as many-to-one, instead of one-to-one?

Thanks


--
To unsubscribe, e-mail:   <ma...@jakarta.apache.org>
For additional commands, e-mail: <ma...@jakarta.apache.org>

Re: Core Schema

Posted by Scott Eade <se...@backstagetech.com.au>.

On 23/01/2003 6:11 AM, "Yuemei Sun" <su...@engr.orst.edu> wrote:

> There is a table Turbine_Role_Permission, which, according to the
> documenation, allows several Roles to share a Permission.  Any
> particualr reason why the relationship between Role and Permision
> is designed as many-to-one, instead of one-to-one?

Because a role can include several permissions.

Cheers,

Scott
-- 
Scott Eade
Backstage Technologies Pty. Ltd.
http://www.backstagetech.com.au
.Mac Chat/AIM: seade at mac dot com


--
To unsubscribe, e-mail:   <ma...@jakarta.apache.org>
For additional commands, e-mail: <ma...@jakarta.apache.org>