You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to users@cloudstack.apache.org by Swastik Mittal <mi...@gmail.com> on 2018/04/04 04:37:41 UTC
systemvm
Hey,
I am installing ACS 4.11 (legacy mode), with management and host on same
server and out-of-band management disabled. My host is enabled and up and
ssvm successfully running. Though agent state column shows only '-'.
CPVM is also running successfully but when I open console window I get
unable to connect. Also I din't find check file in SSVM (accessed through
terminal using ssh).
From SSVM I can ssh into management but wget command to management local
host ain't working (is stuck at connecting but is not able to connect.).
Agent log does not show any error, just mentions "trying to fetch storage
pool from libvirt" all the time. I checked my storage pool through "virsh
pool-list" and it shows the storage pool mentioned in local storage under
agent.properties.
Any ideas?
Regards
Swastik
RE: systemvm
Posted by Swastik Mittal <mi...@gmail.com>.
@paul
My cloud.log file:
Thu Apr 5 04:24:51 UTC 2018 enable_fwding = 0
Thu Apr 5 04:24:51 UTC 2018 Enable service haproxy = 0
Thu Apr 5 04:24:51 UTC 2018 Processors = 1 Enable service = 0
Thu Apr 5 04:24:51 UTC 2018 Enable service dnsmasq = 0
Thu Apr 5 04:24:51 UTC 2018 Enable service cloud-passwd-srvr = 0
Thu Apr 5 04:24:51 UTC 2018 Enable service cloud = 1
Thu Apr 5 06:00:04 UTC 2018 Executing cloud-early-config
Thu Apr 5 06:00:04 UTC 2018 Detected that we are running inside kvm guest
Thu Apr 5 06:00:04 UTC 2018 Found a non empty cmdline file. Will now
exit the loop and proceed with configuration.
Thu Apr 5 06:00:04 UTC 2018 Patching cloud service
Thu Apr 5 06:00:05 UTC 2018 Updating log4j-cloud.xml
Thu Apr 5 06:00:05 UTC 2018 Setting up secondary storage system vm
Thu Apr 5 06:00:05 UTC 2018 checking that eth0 has IP
Thu Apr 5 06:00:06 UTC 2018 waiting for eth0 interface setup with ip
timer=0
Thu Apr 5 06:00:06 UTC 2018 checking that eth1 has IP
Thu Apr 5 06:00:06 UTC 2018 checking that eth2 has IP
Thu Apr 5 06:00:15 UTC 2018 Incompleted parameters STORAGE_IP:,
STORAGE_NETMASK:, STORAGE_CIDR:. Cannot setup storage network
Thu Apr 5 06:00:15 UTC 2018 Setting up apache web server
Thu Apr 5 06:00:15 UTC 2018 setting up apache2 for post upload of
volume/template
Thu Apr 5 06:00:15 UTC 2018 rewrite rules already exist in file
/etc/apache2/sites-available/default-ssl
Thu Apr 5 06:00:15 UTC 2018 adding cors rules to file:
/etc/apache2/sites-available/default-ssl
Thu Apr 5 06:00:16 UTC 2018 cloud: disable rp_filter
Thu Apr 5 06:00:16 UTC 2018 disable rpfilter
Thu Apr 5 06:00:16 UTC 2018 cloud: enable_fwding = 0
Thu Apr 5 06:00:16 UTC 2018 enable_fwding = 0
Thu Apr 5 06:00:16 UTC 2018 Enable service haproxy = 0
Thu Apr 5 06:00:16 UTC 2018 Processors = 1 Enable service = 0
Thu Apr 5 06:00:16 UTC 2018 Enable service dnsmasq = 0
Thu Apr 5 06:00:16 UTC 2018 Enable service cloud-passwd-srvr = 0
Thu Apr 5 06:00:16 UTC 2018 Enable service cloud =1
On 5 Apr 2018 12:46 a.m., "Paul Angus" <pa...@shapeblue.com> wrote:
Hi Swastik,
Have you tried running:
sh /usr/local/cloud/systemvm/ssvm-check.sh
on the ssvm? It's (almost) impossible for the script not to be there.
Can you paste the contents of /var/log/cloud.log to pastebin or something.
paul.angus@shapeblue.com
www.shapeblue.com
53 Chandos Place, Covent Garden, London WC2N 4HSUK
@shapeblue
-----Original Message-----
From: Swastik Mittal <mi...@gmail.com>
Sent: 04 April 2018 18:40
To: users@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: RE: systemvm
@Paul
Yes, I explicitly created it like normal nfs share, and gave the path of
the exported directory in cloudstack.
I ain't getting any ssvm-check file in my ssvm. I did try changing the
system vm template from 4.11 to 4.6 but the result was the same.
I was successfully able to launch a vm though with similar configurations
but with ACS 4.6 and 4.4 .
On 4 Apr 2018 11:05 p.m., "Paul Angus" <pa...@shapeblue.com> wrote:
> Did you explicitly create it or just let cloudstack sort itself out?
>
> FYI, ssvm-check is at:
> /usr/local/cloud/systemvm/ssvm-check.sh
>
> In the ssvm itself
>
>
>
> paul.angus@shapeblue.com
> www.shapeblue.com
> 53 Chandos Place, Covent Garden, London WC2N 4HSUK @shapeblue
>
>
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Swastik Mittal <mi...@gmail.com>
> Sent: 04 April 2018 18:25
> To: users@cloudstack.apache.org
> Subject: RE: systemvm
>
> Hey Paul
>
> Yes, I have my management working as the storage as well.
>
> Regards
> Swastik
>
> On 4 Apr 2018 10:39 p.m., "Paul Angus" <pa...@shapeblue.com> wrote:
>
> > Have you configured a storage network on the same subnet as the
> > management network? You have two interfaces on the same subnet.
> >
> > paul.angus@shapeblue.com
> > www.shapeblue.com
> > 53 Chandos Place, Covent Garden, London WC2N 4HSUK @shapeblue
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Swastik Mittal <mi...@gmail.com>
> > Sent: 04 April 2018 11:46
> > To: users@cloudstack.apache.org
> > Subject: Re: systemvm
> >
> > @Stephen
> >
> > "host" in global settings is set to 10.1.0.15 which is the ip address of
> > the management server.
> > Yes, I'll work on getting ssvm-check file.
> >
> > Thanks
> > Swastik
> >
> > On 4/4/18, Swastik Mittal <mi...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > @Stephen
> > >
> > > Request to internal server mentioned in the global sec.storage.. after
> > > registering the iso successfully, get's stuck on HEAD request. As you
> > > mentioned there is an issue in route path from SSVM. Not able to
> > > figure out how do I find it.
> > >
> > > regards
> > > Swastik
> > >
> > > On 4/4/18, Swastik Mittal <mi...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > >> Hey @Stephen
> > >>
> > >> I am able to ping my management from ssvm. Also wget to internal
> > >> server works fine, it took some time to establish connection
> > >> initially.
> > >>
> > >> I don't have any ssvm-check.sh file. I forgot to mention it on this
> > >> thread.
> > >>
> > >> Outputs:
> > >>
> > >> root@s-1-VM:~# ip a s
> > >> 1: lo: <LOOPBACK,UP,LOWER_UP> mtu 16436 qdisc noqueue state UNKNOWN
> > >> link/loopback 00:00:00:00:00:00 brd 00:00:00:00:00:00
> > >> inet 127.0.0.1/8 scope host lo
> > >> 2: eth0: <BROADCAST,MULTICAST,UP,LOWER_UP> mtu 1500 qdisc pfifo_fast
> > >> state UP qlen 1000
> > >> link/ether 0e:00:a9:fe:02:2a brd ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff
> > >> inet 169.254.2.42/16 brd 169.254.255.255 scope global eth0
> > >> 3: eth1: <BROADCAST,MULTICAST,UP,LOWER_UP> mtu 1500 qdisc pfifo_fast
> > >> state UP qlen 1000
> > >> link/ether 1e:00:ce:00:00:0e brd ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff
> > >> inet 10.1.0.43/24 brd 10.1.0.255 scope global eth1
> > >> 4: eth2: <BROADCAST,MULTICAST,UP,LOWER_UP> mtu 1500 qdisc pfifo_fast
> > >> state UP qlen 1000
> > >> link/ether 1e:00:a1:00:00:a2 brd ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff
> > >> inet 10.1.0.191/24 brd 10.1.0.255 scope global eth2
> > >>
> > >>
> > >> root@s-1-VM:~# ip r s
> > >> default via 10.1.0.2 dev eth2
> > >> 10.1.0.0/24 dev eth1 proto kernel scope link src 10.1.0.43
> > >> 10.1.0.0/24 dev eth2 proto kernel scope link src 10.1.0.191
> > >> 169.254.0.0/16 dev eth0 proto kernel scope link src 169.254.2.42
> > >>
> > >> Yes, my storage and management are the same.
> > >>
> > >> root@s-1-VM:~# route -n
> > >> Kernel IP routing table
> > >> Destination Gateway Genmask Flags Metric Ref
> Use
> > >> Iface
> > >> 0.0.0.0 10.1.0.2 0.0.0.0 UG 0
> > >> 0 0 eth2
> > >> 10.1.0.0 0.0.0.0 255.255.255.0 U 0 0
> > >> 0 eth1
> > >> 10.1.0.0 0.0.0.0 255.255.255.0 U 0 0
> > >> 0 eth2
> > >> 169.254.0.0 0.0.0.0 255.255.0.0 U 0 0
> > >> 0 eth0
> > >>
> > >>
> > >>
> > >>
> > >>
> > >>
> > >>
> > >> On 4/4/18, Stephan Seitz <s....@heinlein-support.de> wrote:
> > >>> Hu!
> > >>>
> > >>> I'ld recommend to log in to your ssvm and check if everything is
> > >>> able to connect.
> > >>>
> > >>> I second dag's suggestion to double check your network setup.
> > >>>
> > >>> Inside your ssvm I'ld run
> > >>>
> > >>> /usr/local/cloud/systemvm/ssvm-check.sh
> > >>>
> > >>> also
> > >>>
> > >>> ip a s
> > >>> ip r s
> > >>>
> > >>>
> > >>> As an educated guess: did you setup your storage-network to the same
> > >>> cidr as your management-network?
> > >>>
> > >>> if yes, maybe the default route inside your ssvm is setup wrong (on
> > >>> the wrong NIC or errenously set up twice on two NICs)
> > >>>
> > >>>
> > >>> cheers,
> > >>>
> > >>> - Stephan
> > >>>
> > >>>
> > >>>
> > >>>
> > >>> Am Mittwoch, den 04.04.2018, 13:53 +0530 schrieb Swastik Mittal:
> > >>>> @Dag
> > >>>>
> > >>>> By legacy I meant one way ssl. I have set ca strictness for client
> > >>>> as false.
> > >>>>
> > >>>> I am using 1 nic common for all the network, that is one bridge
> > >>>> serving both public and private network.
> > >>>>
> > >>>> I am setting up a basic zone so I set my management within ip range
> > >>>> of 10 and guest within a range of 100, and my statement vms get ip
> > >>>> assigned within those ranges successfully.
> > >>>>
> > >>>> I used these similar configuration with ACL 4.6 and was able to run
> > >>>> vm's successfully.
> > >>>>
> > >>>> Regards
> > >>>> Swastik
> > >>>>
> > >>>> On 4 Apr 2018 1:44 p.m., "Dag Sonstebo"
> > >>>> <Da...@shapeblue.com>
> > >>>> wrote:
> > >>>>
> > >>>> >
> > >>>> > Swastik,
> > >>>> >
> > >>>> > Your issue is most likely with your network configuration rather
> > >>>> > than anything to do with firewalls or system VM templates.
> > >>>> >
> > >>>> > First of all – what do you mean by legacy mode? Are you referring
> > >>>> > to advanced or basic zone?
> > >>>> >
> > >>>> > Secondly – can you tell us how you have configured your
> networking?
> > >>>> >
> > >>>> > - How many NICs you are using and how have you configured them
> > >>>> > - What management vs public IP ranges you are using
> > >>>> > - How you have mapped your networking in CloudStack against the
> > >>>> > underlying hardware NICs
> > >>>> > - Can you also check what your “host” global setting is set to
> > >>>> >
> > >>>> > Regards,
> > >>>> > Dag Sonstebo
> > >>>> > Cloud Architect
> > >>>> > ShapeBlue
> > >>>> >
> > >>>> > On 04/04/2018, 09:07, "Swastik Mittal" <mi...@gmail.com>
> > >>>> > wrote:
> > >>>> >
> > >>>> > @jagdish
> > >>>> >
> > >>>> > Yes I was using the same link.
> > >>>> >
> > >>>> >
> > >>>> > Dag.Sonstebo@shapeblue.com
> > >>>> > www.shapeblue.com
> > >>>> > 53 Chandos Place, Covent Garden, London WC2N 4HSUK @shapeblue
> > >>>> >
> > >>>> >
> > >>>> >
> > >>>> > On 4 Apr 2018 1:07 p.m., "Jagdish Patil" <
> jagdishpatil316@gmail.com
> > >>>> > >
> > >>>> > wrote:
> > >>>> >
> > >>>> > > Hey Swastik,
> > >>>> > >
> > >>>> > > download.cloudstack.org link doesn't look like an issue,
> but
> > >>>> > which
> > >>>> > version
> > >>>> > > and which hypervisor are you using?
> > >>>> > >
> > >>>> > > For KVM, download this:
> > >>>> > > http://download.cloudstack.org/systemvm/4.11/
> systemvmtemplat
> > >>>> > e-4.11.0-kvm.
> > >>>> > > qcow2.bz2
> > >>>> > >
> > >>>> > > Regards,
> > >>>> > > Jagdish Patil
> > >>>> > >
> > >>>> > > On Wed, Apr 4, 2018 at 1:00 PM Swastik Mittal <
> > >>>> > mittal.swastik@gmail.com>
> > >>>> > > wrote:
> > >>>> > >
> > >>>> > > > Hey @jagdish
> > >>>> > > >
> > >>>> > > > I was using download.cloudstack.org to download systemVM.
> > >>>> > Is
> > >>>> > there any
> > >>>> > > > bug within the template uploaded here?
> > >>>> > > >
> > >>>> > > > @Soundar
> > >>>> > > >
> > >>>> > > > I did disable firewall services but din't work. I'll
check
> > >>>> > it again
> > >>>> > > though.
> > >>>> > > >
> > >>>> > > > On 4/4/18, soundar rajan <bs...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > >>>> > > > > disabled firewalld service on the hostname and check.
> you
> > >>>> > should
> > >>>> > able
> > >>>> > > to
> > >>>> > > > > access using console window.
> > >>>> > > > >
> > >>>> > > > > On Wed, Apr 4, 2018 at 10:07 AM, Swastik Mittal <
> > >>>> > > > mittal.swastik@gmail.com>
> > >>>> > > > > wrote:
> > >>>> > > > >
> > >>>> > > > >> Hey,
> > >>>> > > > >>
> > >>>> > > > >> I am installing ACS 4.11 (legacy mode), with
management
> > >>>> > and
> > >>>> > host on
> > >>>> > > same
> > >>>> > > > >> server and out-of-band management disabled. My host is
> > >>>> > enabled
> > >>>> > and up
> > >>>> > > > and
> > >>>> > > > >> ssvm successfully running. Though agent state column
> > >>>> > shows only
> > >>>> > '-'.
> > >>>> > > > >>
> > >>>> > > > >> CPVM is also running successfully but when I open
> > >>>> > console
> > >>>> > window I get
> > >>>> > > > >> unable to connect. Also I din't find check file in
SSVM
> > >>>> > (accessed
> > >>>> > > > through
> > >>>> > > > >> terminal using ssh).
> > >>>> > > > >>
> > >>>> > > > >> From SSVM I can ssh into management but wget command
to
> > >>>> > management
> > >>>> > > local
> > >>>> > > > >> host ain't working (is stuck at connecting but is not
> > >>>> > able to
> > >>>> > > connect.).
> > >>>> > > > >>
> > >>>> > > > >> Agent log does not show any error, just mentions
> "trying
> > >>>> > to
> > >>>> > fetch
> > >>>> > > > storage
> > >>>> > > > >> pool from libvirt" all the time. I checked my storage
> > >>>> > pool
> > >>>> > through
> > >>>> > > > "virsh
> > >>>> > > > >> pool-list" and it shows the storage pool mentioned in
> > >>>> > local
> > >>>> > storage
> > >>>> > > > under
> > >>>> > > > >> agent.properties.
> > >>>> > > > >>
> > >>>> > > > >> Any ideas?
> > >>>> > > > >>
> > >>>> > > > >> Regards
> > >>>> > > > >> Swastik
> > >>>> > > > >>
> > >>>> > > > >
> > >>>> > > >
> > >>>> > >
> > >>>> >
> > >>>> >
> > >>>> >
> > >>> --
> > >>>
> > >>> Heinlein Support GmbH
> > >>> Schwedter Str. 8/9b, 10119 Berlin
> > >>>
> > >>> http://www.heinlein-support.de
> > >>>
> > >>> Tel: 030 / 405051-44
> > >>> Fax: 030 / 405051-19
> > >>>
> > >>> Zwangsangaben lt. §35a GmbHG: HRB 93818 B / Amtsgericht
> > >>> Berlin-Charlottenburg,
> > >>> Geschäftsführer: Peer Heinlein -- Sitz: Berlin
> > >>>
> > >>>
> > >>
> > >
> >
>
RE: systemvm
Posted by Paul Angus <pa...@shapeblue.com>.
Hi Swastik,
Have you tried running:
sh /usr/local/cloud/systemvm/ssvm-check.sh
on the ssvm? It's (almost) impossible for the script not to be there.
Can you paste the contents of /var/log/cloud.log to pastebin or something.
paul.angus@shapeblue.com
www.shapeblue.com
53 Chandos Place, Covent Garden, London WC2N 4HSUK
@shapeblue
-----Original Message-----
From: Swastik Mittal <mi...@gmail.com>
Sent: 04 April 2018 18:40
To: users@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: RE: systemvm
@Paul
Yes, I explicitly created it like normal nfs share, and gave the path of the exported directory in cloudstack.
I ain't getting any ssvm-check file in my ssvm. I did try changing the system vm template from 4.11 to 4.6 but the result was the same.
I was successfully able to launch a vm though with similar configurations but with ACS 4.6 and 4.4 .
On 4 Apr 2018 11:05 p.m., "Paul Angus" <pa...@shapeblue.com> wrote:
> Did you explicitly create it or just let cloudstack sort itself out?
>
> FYI, ssvm-check is at:
> /usr/local/cloud/systemvm/ssvm-check.sh
>
> In the ssvm itself
>
>
>
> paul.angus@shapeblue.com
> www.shapeblue.com
> 53 Chandos Place, Covent Garden, London WC2N 4HSUK @shapeblue
>
>
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Swastik Mittal <mi...@gmail.com>
> Sent: 04 April 2018 18:25
> To: users@cloudstack.apache.org
> Subject: RE: systemvm
>
> Hey Paul
>
> Yes, I have my management working as the storage as well.
>
> Regards
> Swastik
>
> On 4 Apr 2018 10:39 p.m., "Paul Angus" <pa...@shapeblue.com> wrote:
>
> > Have you configured a storage network on the same subnet as the
> > management network? You have two interfaces on the same subnet.
> >
> > paul.angus@shapeblue.com
> > www.shapeblue.com
> > 53 Chandos Place, Covent Garden, London WC2N 4HSUK @shapeblue
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Swastik Mittal <mi...@gmail.com>
> > Sent: 04 April 2018 11:46
> > To: users@cloudstack.apache.org
> > Subject: Re: systemvm
> >
> > @Stephen
> >
> > "host" in global settings is set to 10.1.0.15 which is the ip address of
> > the management server.
> > Yes, I'll work on getting ssvm-check file.
> >
> > Thanks
> > Swastik
> >
> > On 4/4/18, Swastik Mittal <mi...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > @Stephen
> > >
> > > Request to internal server mentioned in the global sec.storage.. after
> > > registering the iso successfully, get's stuck on HEAD request. As you
> > > mentioned there is an issue in route path from SSVM. Not able to
> > > figure out how do I find it.
> > >
> > > regards
> > > Swastik
> > >
> > > On 4/4/18, Swastik Mittal <mi...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > >> Hey @Stephen
> > >>
> > >> I am able to ping my management from ssvm. Also wget to internal
> > >> server works fine, it took some time to establish connection
> > >> initially.
> > >>
> > >> I don't have any ssvm-check.sh file. I forgot to mention it on this
> > >> thread.
> > >>
> > >> Outputs:
> > >>
> > >> root@s-1-VM:~# ip a s
> > >> 1: lo: <LOOPBACK,UP,LOWER_UP> mtu 16436 qdisc noqueue state UNKNOWN
> > >> link/loopback 00:00:00:00:00:00 brd 00:00:00:00:00:00
> > >> inet 127.0.0.1/8 scope host lo
> > >> 2: eth0: <BROADCAST,MULTICAST,UP,LOWER_UP> mtu 1500 qdisc pfifo_fast
> > >> state UP qlen 1000
> > >> link/ether 0e:00:a9:fe:02:2a brd ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff
> > >> inet 169.254.2.42/16 brd 169.254.255.255 scope global eth0
> > >> 3: eth1: <BROADCAST,MULTICAST,UP,LOWER_UP> mtu 1500 qdisc pfifo_fast
> > >> state UP qlen 1000
> > >> link/ether 1e:00:ce:00:00:0e brd ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff
> > >> inet 10.1.0.43/24 brd 10.1.0.255 scope global eth1
> > >> 4: eth2: <BROADCAST,MULTICAST,UP,LOWER_UP> mtu 1500 qdisc pfifo_fast
> > >> state UP qlen 1000
> > >> link/ether 1e:00:a1:00:00:a2 brd ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff
> > >> inet 10.1.0.191/24 brd 10.1.0.255 scope global eth2
> > >>
> > >>
> > >> root@s-1-VM:~# ip r s
> > >> default via 10.1.0.2 dev eth2
> > >> 10.1.0.0/24 dev eth1 proto kernel scope link src 10.1.0.43
> > >> 10.1.0.0/24 dev eth2 proto kernel scope link src 10.1.0.191
> > >> 169.254.0.0/16 dev eth0 proto kernel scope link src 169.254.2.42
> > >>
> > >> Yes, my storage and management are the same.
> > >>
> > >> root@s-1-VM:~# route -n
> > >> Kernel IP routing table
> > >> Destination Gateway Genmask Flags Metric Ref
> Use
> > >> Iface
> > >> 0.0.0.0 10.1.0.2 0.0.0.0 UG 0
> > >> 0 0 eth2
> > >> 10.1.0.0 0.0.0.0 255.255.255.0 U 0 0
> > >> 0 eth1
> > >> 10.1.0.0 0.0.0.0 255.255.255.0 U 0 0
> > >> 0 eth2
> > >> 169.254.0.0 0.0.0.0 255.255.0.0 U 0 0
> > >> 0 eth0
> > >>
> > >>
> > >>
> > >>
> > >>
> > >>
> > >>
> > >> On 4/4/18, Stephan Seitz <s....@heinlein-support.de> wrote:
> > >>> Hu!
> > >>>
> > >>> I'ld recommend to log in to your ssvm and check if everything is
> > >>> able to connect.
> > >>>
> > >>> I second dag's suggestion to double check your network setup.
> > >>>
> > >>> Inside your ssvm I'ld run
> > >>>
> > >>> /usr/local/cloud/systemvm/ssvm-check.sh
> > >>>
> > >>> also
> > >>>
> > >>> ip a s
> > >>> ip r s
> > >>>
> > >>>
> > >>> As an educated guess: did you setup your storage-network to the same
> > >>> cidr as your management-network?
> > >>>
> > >>> if yes, maybe the default route inside your ssvm is setup wrong (on
> > >>> the wrong NIC or errenously set up twice on two NICs)
> > >>>
> > >>>
> > >>> cheers,
> > >>>
> > >>> - Stephan
> > >>>
> > >>>
> > >>>
> > >>>
> > >>> Am Mittwoch, den 04.04.2018, 13:53 +0530 schrieb Swastik Mittal:
> > >>>> @Dag
> > >>>>
> > >>>> By legacy I meant one way ssl. I have set ca strictness for client
> > >>>> as false.
> > >>>>
> > >>>> I am using 1 nic common for all the network, that is one bridge
> > >>>> serving both public and private network.
> > >>>>
> > >>>> I am setting up a basic zone so I set my management within ip range
> > >>>> of 10 and guest within a range of 100, and my statement vms get ip
> > >>>> assigned within those ranges successfully.
> > >>>>
> > >>>> I used these similar configuration with ACL 4.6 and was able to run
> > >>>> vm's successfully.
> > >>>>
> > >>>> Regards
> > >>>> Swastik
> > >>>>
> > >>>> On 4 Apr 2018 1:44 p.m., "Dag Sonstebo"
> > >>>> <Da...@shapeblue.com>
> > >>>> wrote:
> > >>>>
> > >>>> >
> > >>>> > Swastik,
> > >>>> >
> > >>>> > Your issue is most likely with your network configuration rather
> > >>>> > than anything to do with firewalls or system VM templates.
> > >>>> >
> > >>>> > First of all – what do you mean by legacy mode? Are you referring
> > >>>> > to advanced or basic zone?
> > >>>> >
> > >>>> > Secondly – can you tell us how you have configured your
> networking?
> > >>>> >
> > >>>> > - How many NICs you are using and how have you configured them
> > >>>> > - What management vs public IP ranges you are using
> > >>>> > - How you have mapped your networking in CloudStack against the
> > >>>> > underlying hardware NICs
> > >>>> > - Can you also check what your “host” global setting is set to
> > >>>> >
> > >>>> > Regards,
> > >>>> > Dag Sonstebo
> > >>>> > Cloud Architect
> > >>>> > ShapeBlue
> > >>>> >
> > >>>> > On 04/04/2018, 09:07, "Swastik Mittal" <mi...@gmail.com>
> > >>>> > wrote:
> > >>>> >
> > >>>> > @jagdish
> > >>>> >
> > >>>> > Yes I was using the same link.
> > >>>> >
> > >>>> >
> > >>>> > Dag.Sonstebo@shapeblue.com
> > >>>> > www.shapeblue.com
> > >>>> > 53 Chandos Place, Covent Garden, London WC2N 4HSUK @shapeblue
> > >>>> >
> > >>>> >
> > >>>> >
> > >>>> > On 4 Apr 2018 1:07 p.m., "Jagdish Patil" <
> jagdishpatil316@gmail.com
> > >>>> > >
> > >>>> > wrote:
> > >>>> >
> > >>>> > > Hey Swastik,
> > >>>> > >
> > >>>> > > download.cloudstack.org link doesn't look like an issue,
> but
> > >>>> > which
> > >>>> > version
> > >>>> > > and which hypervisor are you using?
> > >>>> > >
> > >>>> > > For KVM, download this:
> > >>>> > > http://download.cloudstack.org/systemvm/4.11/
> systemvmtemplat
> > >>>> > e-4.11.0-kvm.
> > >>>> > > qcow2.bz2
> > >>>> > >
> > >>>> > > Regards,
> > >>>> > > Jagdish Patil
> > >>>> > >
> > >>>> > > On Wed, Apr 4, 2018 at 1:00 PM Swastik Mittal <
> > >>>> > mittal.swastik@gmail.com>
> > >>>> > > wrote:
> > >>>> > >
> > >>>> > > > Hey @jagdish
> > >>>> > > >
> > >>>> > > > I was using download.cloudstack.org to download systemVM.
> > >>>> > Is
> > >>>> > there any
> > >>>> > > > bug within the template uploaded here?
> > >>>> > > >
> > >>>> > > > @Soundar
> > >>>> > > >
> > >>>> > > > I did disable firewall services but din't work. I'll check
> > >>>> > it again
> > >>>> > > though.
> > >>>> > > >
> > >>>> > > > On 4/4/18, soundar rajan <bs...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > >>>> > > > > disabled firewalld service on the hostname and check.
> you
> > >>>> > should
> > >>>> > able
> > >>>> > > to
> > >>>> > > > > access using console window.
> > >>>> > > > >
> > >>>> > > > > On Wed, Apr 4, 2018 at 10:07 AM, Swastik Mittal <
> > >>>> > > > mittal.swastik@gmail.com>
> > >>>> > > > > wrote:
> > >>>> > > > >
> > >>>> > > > >> Hey,
> > >>>> > > > >>
> > >>>> > > > >> I am installing ACS 4.11 (legacy mode), with management
> > >>>> > and
> > >>>> > host on
> > >>>> > > same
> > >>>> > > > >> server and out-of-band management disabled. My host is
> > >>>> > enabled
> > >>>> > and up
> > >>>> > > > and
> > >>>> > > > >> ssvm successfully running. Though agent state column
> > >>>> > shows only
> > >>>> > '-'.
> > >>>> > > > >>
> > >>>> > > > >> CPVM is also running successfully but when I open
> > >>>> > console
> > >>>> > window I get
> > >>>> > > > >> unable to connect. Also I din't find check file in SSVM
> > >>>> > (accessed
> > >>>> > > > through
> > >>>> > > > >> terminal using ssh).
> > >>>> > > > >>
> > >>>> > > > >> From SSVM I can ssh into management but wget command to
> > >>>> > management
> > >>>> > > local
> > >>>> > > > >> host ain't working (is stuck at connecting but is not
> > >>>> > able to
> > >>>> > > connect.).
> > >>>> > > > >>
> > >>>> > > > >> Agent log does not show any error, just mentions
> "trying
> > >>>> > to
> > >>>> > fetch
> > >>>> > > > storage
> > >>>> > > > >> pool from libvirt" all the time. I checked my storage
> > >>>> > pool
> > >>>> > through
> > >>>> > > > "virsh
> > >>>> > > > >> pool-list" and it shows the storage pool mentioned in
> > >>>> > local
> > >>>> > storage
> > >>>> > > > under
> > >>>> > > > >> agent.properties.
> > >>>> > > > >>
> > >>>> > > > >> Any ideas?
> > >>>> > > > >>
> > >>>> > > > >> Regards
> > >>>> > > > >> Swastik
> > >>>> > > > >>
> > >>>> > > > >
> > >>>> > > >
> > >>>> > >
> > >>>> >
> > >>>> >
> > >>>> >
> > >>> --
> > >>>
> > >>> Heinlein Support GmbH
> > >>> Schwedter Str. 8/9b, 10119 Berlin
> > >>>
> > >>> http://www.heinlein-support.de
> > >>>
> > >>> Tel: 030 / 405051-44
> > >>> Fax: 030 / 405051-19
> > >>>
> > >>> Zwangsangaben lt. §35a GmbHG: HRB 93818 B / Amtsgericht
> > >>> Berlin-Charlottenburg,
> > >>> Geschäftsführer: Peer Heinlein -- Sitz: Berlin
> > >>>
> > >>>
> > >>
> > >
> >
>
RE: systemvm
Posted by Swastik Mittal <mi...@gmail.com>.
@Paul
Yes, I explicitly created it like normal nfs share, and gave the path of
the exported directory in cloudstack.
I ain't getting any ssvm-check file in my ssvm. I did try changing the
system vm template from 4.11 to 4.6 but the result was the same.
I was successfully able to launch a vm though with similar configurations
but with ACS 4.6 and 4.4 .
On 4 Apr 2018 11:05 p.m., "Paul Angus" <pa...@shapeblue.com> wrote:
> Did you explicitly create it or just let cloudstack sort itself out?
>
> FYI, ssvm-check is at:
> /usr/local/cloud/systemvm/ssvm-check.sh
>
> In the ssvm itself
>
>
>
> paul.angus@shapeblue.com
> www.shapeblue.com
> 53 Chandos Place, Covent Garden, London WC2N 4HSUK
> @shapeblue
>
>
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Swastik Mittal <mi...@gmail.com>
> Sent: 04 April 2018 18:25
> To: users@cloudstack.apache.org
> Subject: RE: systemvm
>
> Hey Paul
>
> Yes, I have my management working as the storage as well.
>
> Regards
> Swastik
>
> On 4 Apr 2018 10:39 p.m., "Paul Angus" <pa...@shapeblue.com> wrote:
>
> > Have you configured a storage network on the same subnet as the
> > management network? You have two interfaces on the same subnet.
> >
> > paul.angus@shapeblue.com
> > www.shapeblue.com
> > 53 Chandos Place, Covent Garden, London WC2N 4HSUK @shapeblue
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Swastik Mittal <mi...@gmail.com>
> > Sent: 04 April 2018 11:46
> > To: users@cloudstack.apache.org
> > Subject: Re: systemvm
> >
> > @Stephen
> >
> > "host" in global settings is set to 10.1.0.15 which is the ip address of
> > the management server.
> > Yes, I'll work on getting ssvm-check file.
> >
> > Thanks
> > Swastik
> >
> > On 4/4/18, Swastik Mittal <mi...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > @Stephen
> > >
> > > Request to internal server mentioned in the global sec.storage.. after
> > > registering the iso successfully, get's stuck on HEAD request. As you
> > > mentioned there is an issue in route path from SSVM. Not able to
> > > figure out how do I find it.
> > >
> > > regards
> > > Swastik
> > >
> > > On 4/4/18, Swastik Mittal <mi...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > >> Hey @Stephen
> > >>
> > >> I am able to ping my management from ssvm. Also wget to internal
> > >> server works fine, it took some time to establish connection
> > >> initially.
> > >>
> > >> I don't have any ssvm-check.sh file. I forgot to mention it on this
> > >> thread.
> > >>
> > >> Outputs:
> > >>
> > >> root@s-1-VM:~# ip a s
> > >> 1: lo: <LOOPBACK,UP,LOWER_UP> mtu 16436 qdisc noqueue state UNKNOWN
> > >> link/loopback 00:00:00:00:00:00 brd 00:00:00:00:00:00
> > >> inet 127.0.0.1/8 scope host lo
> > >> 2: eth0: <BROADCAST,MULTICAST,UP,LOWER_UP> mtu 1500 qdisc pfifo_fast
> > >> state UP qlen 1000
> > >> link/ether 0e:00:a9:fe:02:2a brd ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff
> > >> inet 169.254.2.42/16 brd 169.254.255.255 scope global eth0
> > >> 3: eth1: <BROADCAST,MULTICAST,UP,LOWER_UP> mtu 1500 qdisc pfifo_fast
> > >> state UP qlen 1000
> > >> link/ether 1e:00:ce:00:00:0e brd ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff
> > >> inet 10.1.0.43/24 brd 10.1.0.255 scope global eth1
> > >> 4: eth2: <BROADCAST,MULTICAST,UP,LOWER_UP> mtu 1500 qdisc pfifo_fast
> > >> state UP qlen 1000
> > >> link/ether 1e:00:a1:00:00:a2 brd ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff
> > >> inet 10.1.0.191/24 brd 10.1.0.255 scope global eth2
> > >>
> > >>
> > >> root@s-1-VM:~# ip r s
> > >> default via 10.1.0.2 dev eth2
> > >> 10.1.0.0/24 dev eth1 proto kernel scope link src 10.1.0.43
> > >> 10.1.0.0/24 dev eth2 proto kernel scope link src 10.1.0.191
> > >> 169.254.0.0/16 dev eth0 proto kernel scope link src 169.254.2.42
> > >>
> > >> Yes, my storage and management are the same.
> > >>
> > >> root@s-1-VM:~# route -n
> > >> Kernel IP routing table
> > >> Destination Gateway Genmask Flags Metric Ref
> Use
> > >> Iface
> > >> 0.0.0.0 10.1.0.2 0.0.0.0 UG 0
> > >> 0 0 eth2
> > >> 10.1.0.0 0.0.0.0 255.255.255.0 U 0 0
> > >> 0 eth1
> > >> 10.1.0.0 0.0.0.0 255.255.255.0 U 0 0
> > >> 0 eth2
> > >> 169.254.0.0 0.0.0.0 255.255.0.0 U 0 0
> > >> 0 eth0
> > >>
> > >>
> > >>
> > >>
> > >>
> > >>
> > >>
> > >> On 4/4/18, Stephan Seitz <s....@heinlein-support.de> wrote:
> > >>> Hu!
> > >>>
> > >>> I'ld recommend to log in to your ssvm and check if everything is
> > >>> able to connect.
> > >>>
> > >>> I second dag's suggestion to double check your network setup.
> > >>>
> > >>> Inside your ssvm I'ld run
> > >>>
> > >>> /usr/local/cloud/systemvm/ssvm-check.sh
> > >>>
> > >>> also
> > >>>
> > >>> ip a s
> > >>> ip r s
> > >>>
> > >>>
> > >>> As an educated guess: did you setup your storage-network to the same
> > >>> cidr as your management-network?
> > >>>
> > >>> if yes, maybe the default route inside your ssvm is setup wrong (on
> > >>> the wrong NIC or errenously set up twice on two NICs)
> > >>>
> > >>>
> > >>> cheers,
> > >>>
> > >>> - Stephan
> > >>>
> > >>>
> > >>>
> > >>>
> > >>> Am Mittwoch, den 04.04.2018, 13:53 +0530 schrieb Swastik Mittal:
> > >>>> @Dag
> > >>>>
> > >>>> By legacy I meant one way ssl. I have set ca strictness for client
> > >>>> as false.
> > >>>>
> > >>>> I am using 1 nic common for all the network, that is one bridge
> > >>>> serving both public and private network.
> > >>>>
> > >>>> I am setting up a basic zone so I set my management within ip range
> > >>>> of 10 and guest within a range of 100, and my statement vms get ip
> > >>>> assigned within those ranges successfully.
> > >>>>
> > >>>> I used these similar configuration with ACL 4.6 and was able to run
> > >>>> vm's successfully.
> > >>>>
> > >>>> Regards
> > >>>> Swastik
> > >>>>
> > >>>> On 4 Apr 2018 1:44 p.m., "Dag Sonstebo"
> > >>>> <Da...@shapeblue.com>
> > >>>> wrote:
> > >>>>
> > >>>> >
> > >>>> > Swastik,
> > >>>> >
> > >>>> > Your issue is most likely with your network configuration rather
> > >>>> > than anything to do with firewalls or system VM templates.
> > >>>> >
> > >>>> > First of all – what do you mean by legacy mode? Are you referring
> > >>>> > to advanced or basic zone?
> > >>>> >
> > >>>> > Secondly – can you tell us how you have configured your
> networking?
> > >>>> >
> > >>>> > - How many NICs you are using and how have you configured them
> > >>>> > - What management vs public IP ranges you are using
> > >>>> > - How you have mapped your networking in CloudStack against the
> > >>>> > underlying hardware NICs
> > >>>> > - Can you also check what your “host” global setting is set to
> > >>>> >
> > >>>> > Regards,
> > >>>> > Dag Sonstebo
> > >>>> > Cloud Architect
> > >>>> > ShapeBlue
> > >>>> >
> > >>>> > On 04/04/2018, 09:07, "Swastik Mittal" <mi...@gmail.com>
> > >>>> > wrote:
> > >>>> >
> > >>>> > @jagdish
> > >>>> >
> > >>>> > Yes I was using the same link.
> > >>>> >
> > >>>> >
> > >>>> > Dag.Sonstebo@shapeblue.com
> > >>>> > www.shapeblue.com
> > >>>> > 53 Chandos Place, Covent Garden, London WC2N 4HSUK @shapeblue
> > >>>> >
> > >>>> >
> > >>>> >
> > >>>> > On 4 Apr 2018 1:07 p.m., "Jagdish Patil" <
> jagdishpatil316@gmail.com
> > >>>> > >
> > >>>> > wrote:
> > >>>> >
> > >>>> > > Hey Swastik,
> > >>>> > >
> > >>>> > > download.cloudstack.org link doesn't look like an issue,
> but
> > >>>> > which
> > >>>> > version
> > >>>> > > and which hypervisor are you using?
> > >>>> > >
> > >>>> > > For KVM, download this:
> > >>>> > > http://download.cloudstack.org/systemvm/4.11/
> systemvmtemplat
> > >>>> > e-4.11.0-kvm.
> > >>>> > > qcow2.bz2
> > >>>> > >
> > >>>> > > Regards,
> > >>>> > > Jagdish Patil
> > >>>> > >
> > >>>> > > On Wed, Apr 4, 2018 at 1:00 PM Swastik Mittal <
> > >>>> > mittal.swastik@gmail.com>
> > >>>> > > wrote:
> > >>>> > >
> > >>>> > > > Hey @jagdish
> > >>>> > > >
> > >>>> > > > I was using download.cloudstack.org to download systemVM.
> > >>>> > Is
> > >>>> > there any
> > >>>> > > > bug within the template uploaded here?
> > >>>> > > >
> > >>>> > > > @Soundar
> > >>>> > > >
> > >>>> > > > I did disable firewall services but din't work. I'll check
> > >>>> > it again
> > >>>> > > though.
> > >>>> > > >
> > >>>> > > > On 4/4/18, soundar rajan <bs...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > >>>> > > > > disabled firewalld service on the hostname and check.
> you
> > >>>> > should
> > >>>> > able
> > >>>> > > to
> > >>>> > > > > access using console window.
> > >>>> > > > >
> > >>>> > > > > On Wed, Apr 4, 2018 at 10:07 AM, Swastik Mittal <
> > >>>> > > > mittal.swastik@gmail.com>
> > >>>> > > > > wrote:
> > >>>> > > > >
> > >>>> > > > >> Hey,
> > >>>> > > > >>
> > >>>> > > > >> I am installing ACS 4.11 (legacy mode), with management
> > >>>> > and
> > >>>> > host on
> > >>>> > > same
> > >>>> > > > >> server and out-of-band management disabled. My host is
> > >>>> > enabled
> > >>>> > and up
> > >>>> > > > and
> > >>>> > > > >> ssvm successfully running. Though agent state column
> > >>>> > shows only
> > >>>> > '-'.
> > >>>> > > > >>
> > >>>> > > > >> CPVM is also running successfully but when I open
> > >>>> > console
> > >>>> > window I get
> > >>>> > > > >> unable to connect. Also I din't find check file in SSVM
> > >>>> > (accessed
> > >>>> > > > through
> > >>>> > > > >> terminal using ssh).
> > >>>> > > > >>
> > >>>> > > > >> From SSVM I can ssh into management but wget command to
> > >>>> > management
> > >>>> > > local
> > >>>> > > > >> host ain't working (is stuck at connecting but is not
> > >>>> > able to
> > >>>> > > connect.).
> > >>>> > > > >>
> > >>>> > > > >> Agent log does not show any error, just mentions
> "trying
> > >>>> > to
> > >>>> > fetch
> > >>>> > > > storage
> > >>>> > > > >> pool from libvirt" all the time. I checked my storage
> > >>>> > pool
> > >>>> > through
> > >>>> > > > "virsh
> > >>>> > > > >> pool-list" and it shows the storage pool mentioned in
> > >>>> > local
> > >>>> > storage
> > >>>> > > > under
> > >>>> > > > >> agent.properties.
> > >>>> > > > >>
> > >>>> > > > >> Any ideas?
> > >>>> > > > >>
> > >>>> > > > >> Regards
> > >>>> > > > >> Swastik
> > >>>> > > > >>
> > >>>> > > > >
> > >>>> > > >
> > >>>> > >
> > >>>> >
> > >>>> >
> > >>>> >
> > >>> --
> > >>>
> > >>> Heinlein Support GmbH
> > >>> Schwedter Str. 8/9b, 10119 Berlin
> > >>>
> > >>> http://www.heinlein-support.de
> > >>>
> > >>> Tel: 030 / 405051-44
> > >>> Fax: 030 / 405051-19
> > >>>
> > >>> Zwangsangaben lt. §35a GmbHG: HRB 93818 B / Amtsgericht
> > >>> Berlin-Charlottenburg,
> > >>> Geschäftsführer: Peer Heinlein -- Sitz: Berlin
> > >>>
> > >>>
> > >>
> > >
> >
>
RE: systemvm
Posted by Paul Angus <pa...@shapeblue.com>.
Did you explicitly create it or just let cloudstack sort itself out?
FYI, ssvm-check is at:
/usr/local/cloud/systemvm/ssvm-check.sh
In the ssvm itself
paul.angus@shapeblue.com
www.shapeblue.com
53 Chandos Place, Covent Garden, London WC2N 4HSUK
@shapeblue
-----Original Message-----
From: Swastik Mittal <mi...@gmail.com>
Sent: 04 April 2018 18:25
To: users@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: RE: systemvm
Hey Paul
Yes, I have my management working as the storage as well.
Regards
Swastik
On 4 Apr 2018 10:39 p.m., "Paul Angus" <pa...@shapeblue.com> wrote:
> Have you configured a storage network on the same subnet as the
> management network? You have two interfaces on the same subnet.
>
> paul.angus@shapeblue.com
> www.shapeblue.com
> 53 Chandos Place, Covent Garden, London WC2N 4HSUK @shapeblue
>
>
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Swastik Mittal <mi...@gmail.com>
> Sent: 04 April 2018 11:46
> To: users@cloudstack.apache.org
> Subject: Re: systemvm
>
> @Stephen
>
> "host" in global settings is set to 10.1.0.15 which is the ip address of
> the management server.
> Yes, I'll work on getting ssvm-check file.
>
> Thanks
> Swastik
>
> On 4/4/18, Swastik Mittal <mi...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > @Stephen
> >
> > Request to internal server mentioned in the global sec.storage.. after
> > registering the iso successfully, get's stuck on HEAD request. As you
> > mentioned there is an issue in route path from SSVM. Not able to
> > figure out how do I find it.
> >
> > regards
> > Swastik
> >
> > On 4/4/18, Swastik Mittal <mi...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >> Hey @Stephen
> >>
> >> I am able to ping my management from ssvm. Also wget to internal
> >> server works fine, it took some time to establish connection
> >> initially.
> >>
> >> I don't have any ssvm-check.sh file. I forgot to mention it on this
> >> thread.
> >>
> >> Outputs:
> >>
> >> root@s-1-VM:~# ip a s
> >> 1: lo: <LOOPBACK,UP,LOWER_UP> mtu 16436 qdisc noqueue state UNKNOWN
> >> link/loopback 00:00:00:00:00:00 brd 00:00:00:00:00:00
> >> inet 127.0.0.1/8 scope host lo
> >> 2: eth0: <BROADCAST,MULTICAST,UP,LOWER_UP> mtu 1500 qdisc pfifo_fast
> >> state UP qlen 1000
> >> link/ether 0e:00:a9:fe:02:2a brd ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff
> >> inet 169.254.2.42/16 brd 169.254.255.255 scope global eth0
> >> 3: eth1: <BROADCAST,MULTICAST,UP,LOWER_UP> mtu 1500 qdisc pfifo_fast
> >> state UP qlen 1000
> >> link/ether 1e:00:ce:00:00:0e brd ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff
> >> inet 10.1.0.43/24 brd 10.1.0.255 scope global eth1
> >> 4: eth2: <BROADCAST,MULTICAST,UP,LOWER_UP> mtu 1500 qdisc pfifo_fast
> >> state UP qlen 1000
> >> link/ether 1e:00:a1:00:00:a2 brd ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff
> >> inet 10.1.0.191/24 brd 10.1.0.255 scope global eth2
> >>
> >>
> >> root@s-1-VM:~# ip r s
> >> default via 10.1.0.2 dev eth2
> >> 10.1.0.0/24 dev eth1 proto kernel scope link src 10.1.0.43
> >> 10.1.0.0/24 dev eth2 proto kernel scope link src 10.1.0.191
> >> 169.254.0.0/16 dev eth0 proto kernel scope link src 169.254.2.42
> >>
> >> Yes, my storage and management are the same.
> >>
> >> root@s-1-VM:~# route -n
> >> Kernel IP routing table
> >> Destination Gateway Genmask Flags Metric Ref Use
> >> Iface
> >> 0.0.0.0 10.1.0.2 0.0.0.0 UG 0
> >> 0 0 eth2
> >> 10.1.0.0 0.0.0.0 255.255.255.0 U 0 0
> >> 0 eth1
> >> 10.1.0.0 0.0.0.0 255.255.255.0 U 0 0
> >> 0 eth2
> >> 169.254.0.0 0.0.0.0 255.255.0.0 U 0 0
> >> 0 eth0
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> On 4/4/18, Stephan Seitz <s....@heinlein-support.de> wrote:
> >>> Hu!
> >>>
> >>> I'ld recommend to log in to your ssvm and check if everything is
> >>> able to connect.
> >>>
> >>> I second dag's suggestion to double check your network setup.
> >>>
> >>> Inside your ssvm I'ld run
> >>>
> >>> /usr/local/cloud/systemvm/ssvm-check.sh
> >>>
> >>> also
> >>>
> >>> ip a s
> >>> ip r s
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> As an educated guess: did you setup your storage-network to the same
> >>> cidr as your management-network?
> >>>
> >>> if yes, maybe the default route inside your ssvm is setup wrong (on
> >>> the wrong NIC or errenously set up twice on two NICs)
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> cheers,
> >>>
> >>> - Stephan
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> Am Mittwoch, den 04.04.2018, 13:53 +0530 schrieb Swastik Mittal:
> >>>> @Dag
> >>>>
> >>>> By legacy I meant one way ssl. I have set ca strictness for client
> >>>> as false.
> >>>>
> >>>> I am using 1 nic common for all the network, that is one bridge
> >>>> serving both public and private network.
> >>>>
> >>>> I am setting up a basic zone so I set my management within ip range
> >>>> of 10 and guest within a range of 100, and my statement vms get ip
> >>>> assigned within those ranges successfully.
> >>>>
> >>>> I used these similar configuration with ACL 4.6 and was able to run
> >>>> vm's successfully.
> >>>>
> >>>> Regards
> >>>> Swastik
> >>>>
> >>>> On 4 Apr 2018 1:44 p.m., "Dag Sonstebo"
> >>>> <Da...@shapeblue.com>
> >>>> wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>> >
> >>>> > Swastik,
> >>>> >
> >>>> > Your issue is most likely with your network configuration rather
> >>>> > than anything to do with firewalls or system VM templates.
> >>>> >
> >>>> > First of all – what do you mean by legacy mode? Are you referring
> >>>> > to advanced or basic zone?
> >>>> >
> >>>> > Secondly – can you tell us how you have configured your networking?
> >>>> >
> >>>> > - How many NICs you are using and how have you configured them
> >>>> > - What management vs public IP ranges you are using
> >>>> > - How you have mapped your networking in CloudStack against the
> >>>> > underlying hardware NICs
> >>>> > - Can you also check what your “host” global setting is set to
> >>>> >
> >>>> > Regards,
> >>>> > Dag Sonstebo
> >>>> > Cloud Architect
> >>>> > ShapeBlue
> >>>> >
> >>>> > On 04/04/2018, 09:07, "Swastik Mittal" <mi...@gmail.com>
> >>>> > wrote:
> >>>> >
> >>>> > @jagdish
> >>>> >
> >>>> > Yes I was using the same link.
> >>>> >
> >>>> >
> >>>> > Dag.Sonstebo@shapeblue.com
> >>>> > www.shapeblue.com
> >>>> > 53 Chandos Place, Covent Garden, London WC2N 4HSUK @shapeblue
> >>>> >
> >>>> >
> >>>> >
> >>>> > On 4 Apr 2018 1:07 p.m., "Jagdish Patil" <jagdishpatil316@gmail.com
> >>>> > >
> >>>> > wrote:
> >>>> >
> >>>> > > Hey Swastik,
> >>>> > >
> >>>> > > download.cloudstack.org link doesn't look like an issue, but
> >>>> > which
> >>>> > version
> >>>> > > and which hypervisor are you using?
> >>>> > >
> >>>> > > For KVM, download this:
> >>>> > > http://download.cloudstack.org/systemvm/4.11/systemvmtemplat
> >>>> > e-4.11.0-kvm.
> >>>> > > qcow2.bz2
> >>>> > >
> >>>> > > Regards,
> >>>> > > Jagdish Patil
> >>>> > >
> >>>> > > On Wed, Apr 4, 2018 at 1:00 PM Swastik Mittal <
> >>>> > mittal.swastik@gmail.com>
> >>>> > > wrote:
> >>>> > >
> >>>> > > > Hey @jagdish
> >>>> > > >
> >>>> > > > I was using download.cloudstack.org to download systemVM.
> >>>> > Is
> >>>> > there any
> >>>> > > > bug within the template uploaded here?
> >>>> > > >
> >>>> > > > @Soundar
> >>>> > > >
> >>>> > > > I did disable firewall services but din't work. I'll check
> >>>> > it again
> >>>> > > though.
> >>>> > > >
> >>>> > > > On 4/4/18, soundar rajan <bs...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >>>> > > > > disabled firewalld service on the hostname and check. you
> >>>> > should
> >>>> > able
> >>>> > > to
> >>>> > > > > access using console window.
> >>>> > > > >
> >>>> > > > > On Wed, Apr 4, 2018 at 10:07 AM, Swastik Mittal <
> >>>> > > > mittal.swastik@gmail.com>
> >>>> > > > > wrote:
> >>>> > > > >
> >>>> > > > >> Hey,
> >>>> > > > >>
> >>>> > > > >> I am installing ACS 4.11 (legacy mode), with management
> >>>> > and
> >>>> > host on
> >>>> > > same
> >>>> > > > >> server and out-of-band management disabled. My host is
> >>>> > enabled
> >>>> > and up
> >>>> > > > and
> >>>> > > > >> ssvm successfully running. Though agent state column
> >>>> > shows only
> >>>> > '-'.
> >>>> > > > >>
> >>>> > > > >> CPVM is also running successfully but when I open
> >>>> > console
> >>>> > window I get
> >>>> > > > >> unable to connect. Also I din't find check file in SSVM
> >>>> > (accessed
> >>>> > > > through
> >>>> > > > >> terminal using ssh).
> >>>> > > > >>
> >>>> > > > >> From SSVM I can ssh into management but wget command to
> >>>> > management
> >>>> > > local
> >>>> > > > >> host ain't working (is stuck at connecting but is not
> >>>> > able to
> >>>> > > connect.).
> >>>> > > > >>
> >>>> > > > >> Agent log does not show any error, just mentions "trying
> >>>> > to
> >>>> > fetch
> >>>> > > > storage
> >>>> > > > >> pool from libvirt" all the time. I checked my storage
> >>>> > pool
> >>>> > through
> >>>> > > > "virsh
> >>>> > > > >> pool-list" and it shows the storage pool mentioned in
> >>>> > local
> >>>> > storage
> >>>> > > > under
> >>>> > > > >> agent.properties.
> >>>> > > > >>
> >>>> > > > >> Any ideas?
> >>>> > > > >>
> >>>> > > > >> Regards
> >>>> > > > >> Swastik
> >>>> > > > >>
> >>>> > > > >
> >>>> > > >
> >>>> > >
> >>>> >
> >>>> >
> >>>> >
> >>> --
> >>>
> >>> Heinlein Support GmbH
> >>> Schwedter Str. 8/9b, 10119 Berlin
> >>>
> >>> http://www.heinlein-support.de
> >>>
> >>> Tel: 030 / 405051-44
> >>> Fax: 030 / 405051-19
> >>>
> >>> Zwangsangaben lt. §35a GmbHG: HRB 93818 B / Amtsgericht
> >>> Berlin-Charlottenburg,
> >>> Geschäftsführer: Peer Heinlein -- Sitz: Berlin
> >>>
> >>>
> >>
> >
>
RE: systemvm
Posted by Swastik Mittal <mi...@gmail.com>.
Hey Paul
Yes, I have my management working as the storage as well.
Regards
Swastik
On 4 Apr 2018 10:39 p.m., "Paul Angus" <pa...@shapeblue.com> wrote:
> Have you configured a storage network on the same subnet as the management
> network? You have two interfaces on the same subnet.
>
> paul.angus@shapeblue.com
> www.shapeblue.com
> 53 Chandos Place, Covent Garden, London WC2N 4HSUK
> @shapeblue
>
>
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Swastik Mittal <mi...@gmail.com>
> Sent: 04 April 2018 11:46
> To: users@cloudstack.apache.org
> Subject: Re: systemvm
>
> @Stephen
>
> "host" in global settings is set to 10.1.0.15 which is the ip address of
> the management server.
> Yes, I'll work on getting ssvm-check file.
>
> Thanks
> Swastik
>
> On 4/4/18, Swastik Mittal <mi...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > @Stephen
> >
> > Request to internal server mentioned in the global sec.storage.. after
> > registering the iso successfully, get's stuck on HEAD request. As you
> > mentioned there is an issue in route path from SSVM. Not able to
> > figure out how do I find it.
> >
> > regards
> > Swastik
> >
> > On 4/4/18, Swastik Mittal <mi...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >> Hey @Stephen
> >>
> >> I am able to ping my management from ssvm. Also wget to internal
> >> server works fine, it took some time to establish connection
> >> initially.
> >>
> >> I don't have any ssvm-check.sh file. I forgot to mention it on this
> >> thread.
> >>
> >> Outputs:
> >>
> >> root@s-1-VM:~# ip a s
> >> 1: lo: <LOOPBACK,UP,LOWER_UP> mtu 16436 qdisc noqueue state UNKNOWN
> >> link/loopback 00:00:00:00:00:00 brd 00:00:00:00:00:00
> >> inet 127.0.0.1/8 scope host lo
> >> 2: eth0: <BROADCAST,MULTICAST,UP,LOWER_UP> mtu 1500 qdisc pfifo_fast
> >> state UP qlen 1000
> >> link/ether 0e:00:a9:fe:02:2a brd ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff
> >> inet 169.254.2.42/16 brd 169.254.255.255 scope global eth0
> >> 3: eth1: <BROADCAST,MULTICAST,UP,LOWER_UP> mtu 1500 qdisc pfifo_fast
> >> state UP qlen 1000
> >> link/ether 1e:00:ce:00:00:0e brd ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff
> >> inet 10.1.0.43/24 brd 10.1.0.255 scope global eth1
> >> 4: eth2: <BROADCAST,MULTICAST,UP,LOWER_UP> mtu 1500 qdisc pfifo_fast
> >> state UP qlen 1000
> >> link/ether 1e:00:a1:00:00:a2 brd ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff
> >> inet 10.1.0.191/24 brd 10.1.0.255 scope global eth2
> >>
> >>
> >> root@s-1-VM:~# ip r s
> >> default via 10.1.0.2 dev eth2
> >> 10.1.0.0/24 dev eth1 proto kernel scope link src 10.1.0.43
> >> 10.1.0.0/24 dev eth2 proto kernel scope link src 10.1.0.191
> >> 169.254.0.0/16 dev eth0 proto kernel scope link src 169.254.2.42
> >>
> >> Yes, my storage and management are the same.
> >>
> >> root@s-1-VM:~# route -n
> >> Kernel IP routing table
> >> Destination Gateway Genmask Flags Metric Ref Use
> >> Iface
> >> 0.0.0.0 10.1.0.2 0.0.0.0 UG 0
> >> 0 0 eth2
> >> 10.1.0.0 0.0.0.0 255.255.255.0 U 0 0
> >> 0 eth1
> >> 10.1.0.0 0.0.0.0 255.255.255.0 U 0 0
> >> 0 eth2
> >> 169.254.0.0 0.0.0.0 255.255.0.0 U 0 0
> >> 0 eth0
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> On 4/4/18, Stephan Seitz <s....@heinlein-support.de> wrote:
> >>> Hu!
> >>>
> >>> I'ld recommend to log in to your ssvm and check if everything is
> >>> able to connect.
> >>>
> >>> I second dag's suggestion to double check your network setup.
> >>>
> >>> Inside your ssvm I'ld run
> >>>
> >>> /usr/local/cloud/systemvm/ssvm-check.sh
> >>>
> >>> also
> >>>
> >>> ip a s
> >>> ip r s
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> As an educated guess: did you setup your storage-network to the same
> >>> cidr as your management-network?
> >>>
> >>> if yes, maybe the default route inside your ssvm is setup wrong (on
> >>> the wrong NIC or errenously set up twice on two NICs)
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> cheers,
> >>>
> >>> - Stephan
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> Am Mittwoch, den 04.04.2018, 13:53 +0530 schrieb Swastik Mittal:
> >>>> @Dag
> >>>>
> >>>> By legacy I meant one way ssl. I have set ca strictness for client
> >>>> as false.
> >>>>
> >>>> I am using 1 nic common for all the network, that is one bridge
> >>>> serving both public and private network.
> >>>>
> >>>> I am setting up a basic zone so I set my management within ip range
> >>>> of 10 and guest within a range of 100, and my statement vms get ip
> >>>> assigned within those ranges successfully.
> >>>>
> >>>> I used these similar configuration with ACL 4.6 and was able to run
> >>>> vm's successfully.
> >>>>
> >>>> Regards
> >>>> Swastik
> >>>>
> >>>> On 4 Apr 2018 1:44 p.m., "Dag Sonstebo"
> >>>> <Da...@shapeblue.com>
> >>>> wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>> >
> >>>> > Swastik,
> >>>> >
> >>>> > Your issue is most likely with your network configuration rather
> >>>> > than anything to do with firewalls or system VM templates.
> >>>> >
> >>>> > First of all – what do you mean by legacy mode? Are you referring
> >>>> > to advanced or basic zone?
> >>>> >
> >>>> > Secondly – can you tell us how you have configured your networking?
> >>>> >
> >>>> > - How many NICs you are using and how have you configured them
> >>>> > - What management vs public IP ranges you are using
> >>>> > - How you have mapped your networking in CloudStack against the
> >>>> > underlying hardware NICs
> >>>> > - Can you also check what your “host” global setting is set to
> >>>> >
> >>>> > Regards,
> >>>> > Dag Sonstebo
> >>>> > Cloud Architect
> >>>> > ShapeBlue
> >>>> >
> >>>> > On 04/04/2018, 09:07, "Swastik Mittal" <mi...@gmail.com>
> >>>> > wrote:
> >>>> >
> >>>> > @jagdish
> >>>> >
> >>>> > Yes I was using the same link.
> >>>> >
> >>>> >
> >>>> > Dag.Sonstebo@shapeblue.com
> >>>> > www.shapeblue.com
> >>>> > 53 Chandos Place, Covent Garden, London WC2N 4HSUK @shapeblue
> >>>> >
> >>>> >
> >>>> >
> >>>> > On 4 Apr 2018 1:07 p.m., "Jagdish Patil" <jagdishpatil316@gmail.com
> >>>> > >
> >>>> > wrote:
> >>>> >
> >>>> > > Hey Swastik,
> >>>> > >
> >>>> > > download.cloudstack.org link doesn't look like an issue, but
> >>>> > which
> >>>> > version
> >>>> > > and which hypervisor are you using?
> >>>> > >
> >>>> > > For KVM, download this:
> >>>> > > http://download.cloudstack.org/systemvm/4.11/systemvmtemplat
> >>>> > e-4.11.0-kvm.
> >>>> > > qcow2.bz2
> >>>> > >
> >>>> > > Regards,
> >>>> > > Jagdish Patil
> >>>> > >
> >>>> > > On Wed, Apr 4, 2018 at 1:00 PM Swastik Mittal <
> >>>> > mittal.swastik@gmail.com>
> >>>> > > wrote:
> >>>> > >
> >>>> > > > Hey @jagdish
> >>>> > > >
> >>>> > > > I was using download.cloudstack.org to download systemVM.
> >>>> > Is
> >>>> > there any
> >>>> > > > bug within the template uploaded here?
> >>>> > > >
> >>>> > > > @Soundar
> >>>> > > >
> >>>> > > > I did disable firewall services but din't work. I'll check
> >>>> > it again
> >>>> > > though.
> >>>> > > >
> >>>> > > > On 4/4/18, soundar rajan <bs...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >>>> > > > > disabled firewalld service on the hostname and check. you
> >>>> > should
> >>>> > able
> >>>> > > to
> >>>> > > > > access using console window.
> >>>> > > > >
> >>>> > > > > On Wed, Apr 4, 2018 at 10:07 AM, Swastik Mittal <
> >>>> > > > mittal.swastik@gmail.com>
> >>>> > > > > wrote:
> >>>> > > > >
> >>>> > > > >> Hey,
> >>>> > > > >>
> >>>> > > > >> I am installing ACS 4.11 (legacy mode), with management
> >>>> > and
> >>>> > host on
> >>>> > > same
> >>>> > > > >> server and out-of-band management disabled. My host is
> >>>> > enabled
> >>>> > and up
> >>>> > > > and
> >>>> > > > >> ssvm successfully running. Though agent state column
> >>>> > shows only
> >>>> > '-'.
> >>>> > > > >>
> >>>> > > > >> CPVM is also running successfully but when I open
> >>>> > console
> >>>> > window I get
> >>>> > > > >> unable to connect. Also I din't find check file in SSVM
> >>>> > (accessed
> >>>> > > > through
> >>>> > > > >> terminal using ssh).
> >>>> > > > >>
> >>>> > > > >> From SSVM I can ssh into management but wget command to
> >>>> > management
> >>>> > > local
> >>>> > > > >> host ain't working (is stuck at connecting but is not
> >>>> > able to
> >>>> > > connect.).
> >>>> > > > >>
> >>>> > > > >> Agent log does not show any error, just mentions "trying
> >>>> > to
> >>>> > fetch
> >>>> > > > storage
> >>>> > > > >> pool from libvirt" all the time. I checked my storage
> >>>> > pool
> >>>> > through
> >>>> > > > "virsh
> >>>> > > > >> pool-list" and it shows the storage pool mentioned in
> >>>> > local
> >>>> > storage
> >>>> > > > under
> >>>> > > > >> agent.properties.
> >>>> > > > >>
> >>>> > > > >> Any ideas?
> >>>> > > > >>
> >>>> > > > >> Regards
> >>>> > > > >> Swastik
> >>>> > > > >>
> >>>> > > > >
> >>>> > > >
> >>>> > >
> >>>> >
> >>>> >
> >>>> >
> >>> --
> >>>
> >>> Heinlein Support GmbH
> >>> Schwedter Str. 8/9b, 10119 Berlin
> >>>
> >>> http://www.heinlein-support.de
> >>>
> >>> Tel: 030 / 405051-44
> >>> Fax: 030 / 405051-19
> >>>
> >>> Zwangsangaben lt. §35a GmbHG: HRB 93818 B / Amtsgericht
> >>> Berlin-Charlottenburg,
> >>> Geschäftsführer: Peer Heinlein -- Sitz: Berlin
> >>>
> >>>
> >>
> >
>
RE: systemvm
Posted by Paul Angus <pa...@shapeblue.com>.
Have you configured a storage network on the same subnet as the management network? You have two interfaces on the same subnet.
paul.angus@shapeblue.com
www.shapeblue.com
53 Chandos Place, Covent Garden, London WC2N 4HSUK
@shapeblue
-----Original Message-----
From: Swastik Mittal <mi...@gmail.com>
Sent: 04 April 2018 11:46
To: users@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: Re: systemvm
@Stephen
"host" in global settings is set to 10.1.0.15 which is the ip address of the management server.
Yes, I'll work on getting ssvm-check file.
Thanks
Swastik
On 4/4/18, Swastik Mittal <mi...@gmail.com> wrote:
> @Stephen
>
> Request to internal server mentioned in the global sec.storage.. after
> registering the iso successfully, get's stuck on HEAD request. As you
> mentioned there is an issue in route path from SSVM. Not able to
> figure out how do I find it.
>
> regards
> Swastik
>
> On 4/4/18, Swastik Mittal <mi...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> Hey @Stephen
>>
>> I am able to ping my management from ssvm. Also wget to internal
>> server works fine, it took some time to establish connection
>> initially.
>>
>> I don't have any ssvm-check.sh file. I forgot to mention it on this
>> thread.
>>
>> Outputs:
>>
>> root@s-1-VM:~# ip a s
>> 1: lo: <LOOPBACK,UP,LOWER_UP> mtu 16436 qdisc noqueue state UNKNOWN
>> link/loopback 00:00:00:00:00:00 brd 00:00:00:00:00:00
>> inet 127.0.0.1/8 scope host lo
>> 2: eth0: <BROADCAST,MULTICAST,UP,LOWER_UP> mtu 1500 qdisc pfifo_fast
>> state UP qlen 1000
>> link/ether 0e:00:a9:fe:02:2a brd ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff
>> inet 169.254.2.42/16 brd 169.254.255.255 scope global eth0
>> 3: eth1: <BROADCAST,MULTICAST,UP,LOWER_UP> mtu 1500 qdisc pfifo_fast
>> state UP qlen 1000
>> link/ether 1e:00:ce:00:00:0e brd ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff
>> inet 10.1.0.43/24 brd 10.1.0.255 scope global eth1
>> 4: eth2: <BROADCAST,MULTICAST,UP,LOWER_UP> mtu 1500 qdisc pfifo_fast
>> state UP qlen 1000
>> link/ether 1e:00:a1:00:00:a2 brd ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff
>> inet 10.1.0.191/24 brd 10.1.0.255 scope global eth2
>>
>>
>> root@s-1-VM:~# ip r s
>> default via 10.1.0.2 dev eth2
>> 10.1.0.0/24 dev eth1 proto kernel scope link src 10.1.0.43
>> 10.1.0.0/24 dev eth2 proto kernel scope link src 10.1.0.191
>> 169.254.0.0/16 dev eth0 proto kernel scope link src 169.254.2.42
>>
>> Yes, my storage and management are the same.
>>
>> root@s-1-VM:~# route -n
>> Kernel IP routing table
>> Destination Gateway Genmask Flags Metric Ref Use
>> Iface
>> 0.0.0.0 10.1.0.2 0.0.0.0 UG 0
>> 0 0 eth2
>> 10.1.0.0 0.0.0.0 255.255.255.0 U 0 0
>> 0 eth1
>> 10.1.0.0 0.0.0.0 255.255.255.0 U 0 0
>> 0 eth2
>> 169.254.0.0 0.0.0.0 255.255.0.0 U 0 0
>> 0 eth0
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> On 4/4/18, Stephan Seitz <s....@heinlein-support.de> wrote:
>>> Hu!
>>>
>>> I'ld recommend to log in to your ssvm and check if everything is
>>> able to connect.
>>>
>>> I second dag's suggestion to double check your network setup.
>>>
>>> Inside your ssvm I'ld run
>>>
>>> /usr/local/cloud/systemvm/ssvm-check.sh
>>>
>>> also
>>>
>>> ip a s
>>> ip r s
>>>
>>>
>>> As an educated guess: did you setup your storage-network to the same
>>> cidr as your management-network?
>>>
>>> if yes, maybe the default route inside your ssvm is setup wrong (on
>>> the wrong NIC or errenously set up twice on two NICs)
>>>
>>>
>>> cheers,
>>>
>>> - Stephan
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Am Mittwoch, den 04.04.2018, 13:53 +0530 schrieb Swastik Mittal:
>>>> @Dag
>>>>
>>>> By legacy I meant one way ssl. I have set ca strictness for client
>>>> as false.
>>>>
>>>> I am using 1 nic common for all the network, that is one bridge
>>>> serving both public and private network.
>>>>
>>>> I am setting up a basic zone so I set my management within ip range
>>>> of 10 and guest within a range of 100, and my statement vms get ip
>>>> assigned within those ranges successfully.
>>>>
>>>> I used these similar configuration with ACL 4.6 and was able to run
>>>> vm's successfully.
>>>>
>>>> Regards
>>>> Swastik
>>>>
>>>> On 4 Apr 2018 1:44 p.m., "Dag Sonstebo"
>>>> <Da...@shapeblue.com>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> >
>>>> > Swastik,
>>>> >
>>>> > Your issue is most likely with your network configuration rather
>>>> > than anything to do with firewalls or system VM templates.
>>>> >
>>>> > First of all – what do you mean by legacy mode? Are you referring
>>>> > to advanced or basic zone?
>>>> >
>>>> > Secondly – can you tell us how you have configured your networking?
>>>> >
>>>> > - How many NICs you are using and how have you configured them
>>>> > - What management vs public IP ranges you are using
>>>> > - How you have mapped your networking in CloudStack against the
>>>> > underlying hardware NICs
>>>> > - Can you also check what your “host” global setting is set to
>>>> >
>>>> > Regards,
>>>> > Dag Sonstebo
>>>> > Cloud Architect
>>>> > ShapeBlue
>>>> >
>>>> > On 04/04/2018, 09:07, "Swastik Mittal" <mi...@gmail.com>
>>>> > wrote:
>>>> >
>>>> > @jagdish
>>>> >
>>>> > Yes I was using the same link.
>>>> >
>>>> >
>>>> > Dag.Sonstebo@shapeblue.com
>>>> > www.shapeblue.com
>>>> > 53 Chandos Place, Covent Garden, London WC2N 4HSUK @shapeblue
>>>> >
>>>> >
>>>> >
>>>> > On 4 Apr 2018 1:07 p.m., "Jagdish Patil" <jagdishpatil316@gmail.com
>>>> > >
>>>> > wrote:
>>>> >
>>>> > > Hey Swastik,
>>>> > >
>>>> > > download.cloudstack.org link doesn't look like an issue, but
>>>> > which
>>>> > version
>>>> > > and which hypervisor are you using?
>>>> > >
>>>> > > For KVM, download this:
>>>> > > http://download.cloudstack.org/systemvm/4.11/systemvmtemplat
>>>> > e-4.11.0-kvm.
>>>> > > qcow2.bz2
>>>> > >
>>>> > > Regards,
>>>> > > Jagdish Patil
>>>> > >
>>>> > > On Wed, Apr 4, 2018 at 1:00 PM Swastik Mittal <
>>>> > mittal.swastik@gmail.com>
>>>> > > wrote:
>>>> > >
>>>> > > > Hey @jagdish
>>>> > > >
>>>> > > > I was using download.cloudstack.org to download systemVM.
>>>> > Is
>>>> > there any
>>>> > > > bug within the template uploaded here?
>>>> > > >
>>>> > > > @Soundar
>>>> > > >
>>>> > > > I did disable firewall services but din't work. I'll check
>>>> > it again
>>>> > > though.
>>>> > > >
>>>> > > > On 4/4/18, soundar rajan <bs...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>> > > > > disabled firewalld service on the hostname and check. you
>>>> > should
>>>> > able
>>>> > > to
>>>> > > > > access using console window.
>>>> > > > >
>>>> > > > > On Wed, Apr 4, 2018 at 10:07 AM, Swastik Mittal <
>>>> > > > mittal.swastik@gmail.com>
>>>> > > > > wrote:
>>>> > > > >
>>>> > > > >> Hey,
>>>> > > > >>
>>>> > > > >> I am installing ACS 4.11 (legacy mode), with management
>>>> > and
>>>> > host on
>>>> > > same
>>>> > > > >> server and out-of-band management disabled. My host is
>>>> > enabled
>>>> > and up
>>>> > > > and
>>>> > > > >> ssvm successfully running. Though agent state column
>>>> > shows only
>>>> > '-'.
>>>> > > > >>
>>>> > > > >> CPVM is also running successfully but when I open
>>>> > console
>>>> > window I get
>>>> > > > >> unable to connect. Also I din't find check file in SSVM
>>>> > (accessed
>>>> > > > through
>>>> > > > >> terminal using ssh).
>>>> > > > >>
>>>> > > > >> From SSVM I can ssh into management but wget command to
>>>> > management
>>>> > > local
>>>> > > > >> host ain't working (is stuck at connecting but is not
>>>> > able to
>>>> > > connect.).
>>>> > > > >>
>>>> > > > >> Agent log does not show any error, just mentions "trying
>>>> > to
>>>> > fetch
>>>> > > > storage
>>>> > > > >> pool from libvirt" all the time. I checked my storage
>>>> > pool
>>>> > through
>>>> > > > "virsh
>>>> > > > >> pool-list" and it shows the storage pool mentioned in
>>>> > local
>>>> > storage
>>>> > > > under
>>>> > > > >> agent.properties.
>>>> > > > >>
>>>> > > > >> Any ideas?
>>>> > > > >>
>>>> > > > >> Regards
>>>> > > > >> Swastik
>>>> > > > >>
>>>> > > > >
>>>> > > >
>>>> > >
>>>> >
>>>> >
>>>> >
>>> --
>>>
>>> Heinlein Support GmbH
>>> Schwedter Str. 8/9b, 10119 Berlin
>>>
>>> http://www.heinlein-support.de
>>>
>>> Tel: 030 / 405051-44
>>> Fax: 030 / 405051-19
>>>
>>> Zwangsangaben lt. §35a GmbHG: HRB 93818 B / Amtsgericht
>>> Berlin-Charlottenburg,
>>> Geschäftsführer: Peer Heinlein -- Sitz: Berlin
>>>
>>>
>>
>
Re: systemvm
Posted by Swastik Mittal <mi...@gmail.com>.
@Stephen
"host" in global settings is set to 10.1.0.15 which is the ip address
of the management server.
Yes, I'll work on getting ssvm-check file.
Thanks
Swastik
On 4/4/18, Swastik Mittal <mi...@gmail.com> wrote:
> @Stephen
>
> Request to internal server mentioned in the global sec.storage.. after
> registering the iso successfully, get's stuck on HEAD request. As you
> mentioned there is an issue in route path from SSVM. Not able to
> figure out how do I find it.
>
> regards
> Swastik
>
> On 4/4/18, Swastik Mittal <mi...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> Hey @Stephen
>>
>> I am able to ping my management from ssvm. Also wget to internal
>> server works fine, it took some time to establish connection
>> initially.
>>
>> I don't have any ssvm-check.sh file. I forgot to mention it on this
>> thread.
>>
>> Outputs:
>>
>> root@s-1-VM:~# ip a s
>> 1: lo: <LOOPBACK,UP,LOWER_UP> mtu 16436 qdisc noqueue state UNKNOWN
>> link/loopback 00:00:00:00:00:00 brd 00:00:00:00:00:00
>> inet 127.0.0.1/8 scope host lo
>> 2: eth0: <BROADCAST,MULTICAST,UP,LOWER_UP> mtu 1500 qdisc pfifo_fast
>> state UP qlen 1000
>> link/ether 0e:00:a9:fe:02:2a brd ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff
>> inet 169.254.2.42/16 brd 169.254.255.255 scope global eth0
>> 3: eth1: <BROADCAST,MULTICAST,UP,LOWER_UP> mtu 1500 qdisc pfifo_fast
>> state UP qlen 1000
>> link/ether 1e:00:ce:00:00:0e brd ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff
>> inet 10.1.0.43/24 brd 10.1.0.255 scope global eth1
>> 4: eth2: <BROADCAST,MULTICAST,UP,LOWER_UP> mtu 1500 qdisc pfifo_fast
>> state UP qlen 1000
>> link/ether 1e:00:a1:00:00:a2 brd ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff
>> inet 10.1.0.191/24 brd 10.1.0.255 scope global eth2
>>
>>
>> root@s-1-VM:~# ip r s
>> default via 10.1.0.2 dev eth2
>> 10.1.0.0/24 dev eth1 proto kernel scope link src 10.1.0.43
>> 10.1.0.0/24 dev eth2 proto kernel scope link src 10.1.0.191
>> 169.254.0.0/16 dev eth0 proto kernel scope link src 169.254.2.42
>>
>> Yes, my storage and management are the same.
>>
>> root@s-1-VM:~# route -n
>> Kernel IP routing table
>> Destination Gateway Genmask Flags Metric Ref Use
>> Iface
>> 0.0.0.0 10.1.0.2 0.0.0.0 UG 0
>> 0 0 eth2
>> 10.1.0.0 0.0.0.0 255.255.255.0 U 0 0
>> 0 eth1
>> 10.1.0.0 0.0.0.0 255.255.255.0 U 0 0
>> 0 eth2
>> 169.254.0.0 0.0.0.0 255.255.0.0 U 0 0
>> 0 eth0
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> On 4/4/18, Stephan Seitz <s....@heinlein-support.de> wrote:
>>> Hu!
>>>
>>> I'ld recommend to log in to your ssvm and check if everything is able
>>> to connect.
>>>
>>> I second dag's suggestion to double check your network setup.
>>>
>>> Inside your ssvm I'ld run
>>>
>>> /usr/local/cloud/systemvm/ssvm-check.sh
>>>
>>> also
>>>
>>> ip a s
>>> ip r s
>>>
>>>
>>> As an educated guess: did you setup your storage-network to the same
>>> cidr as your management-network?
>>>
>>> if yes, maybe the default route inside your ssvm is setup wrong (on the
>>> wrong NIC or errenously set up twice on two NICs)
>>>
>>>
>>> cheers,
>>>
>>> - Stephan
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Am Mittwoch, den 04.04.2018, 13:53 +0530 schrieb Swastik Mittal:
>>>> @Dag
>>>>
>>>> By legacy I meant one way ssl. I have set ca strictness for client as
>>>> false.
>>>>
>>>> I am using 1 nic common for all the network, that is one bridge
>>>> serving
>>>> both public and private network.
>>>>
>>>> I am setting up a basic zone so I set my management within ip range
>>>> of 10
>>>> and guest within a range of 100, and my statement vms get ip assigned
>>>> within those ranges successfully.
>>>>
>>>> I used these similar configuration with ACL 4.6 and was able to run
>>>> vm's
>>>> successfully.
>>>>
>>>> Regards
>>>> Swastik
>>>>
>>>> On 4 Apr 2018 1:44 p.m., "Dag Sonstebo" <Da...@shapeblue.com>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> >
>>>> > Swastik,
>>>> >
>>>> > Your issue is most likely with your network configuration rather
>>>> > than
>>>> > anything to do with firewalls or system VM templates.
>>>> >
>>>> > First of all – what do you mean by legacy mode? Are you referring
>>>> > to
>>>> > advanced or basic zone?
>>>> >
>>>> > Secondly – can you tell us how you have configured your networking?
>>>> >
>>>> > - How many NICs you are using and how have you configured them
>>>> > - What management vs public IP ranges you are using
>>>> > - How you have mapped your networking in CloudStack against the
>>>> > underlying
>>>> > hardware NICs
>>>> > - Can you also check what your “host” global setting is set to
>>>> >
>>>> > Regards,
>>>> > Dag Sonstebo
>>>> > Cloud Architect
>>>> > ShapeBlue
>>>> >
>>>> > On 04/04/2018, 09:07, "Swastik Mittal" <mi...@gmail.com>
>>>> > wrote:
>>>> >
>>>> > @jagdish
>>>> >
>>>> > Yes I was using the same link.
>>>> >
>>>> >
>>>> > Dag.Sonstebo@shapeblue.com
>>>> > www.shapeblue.com
>>>> > 53 Chandos Place, Covent Garden, London WC2N 4HSUK
>>>> > @shapeblue
>>>> >
>>>> >
>>>> >
>>>> > On 4 Apr 2018 1:07 p.m., "Jagdish Patil" <jagdishpatil316@gmail.com
>>>> > >
>>>> > wrote:
>>>> >
>>>> > > Hey Swastik,
>>>> > >
>>>> > > download.cloudstack.org link doesn't look like an issue, but
>>>> > which
>>>> > version
>>>> > > and which hypervisor are you using?
>>>> > >
>>>> > > For KVM, download this:
>>>> > > http://download.cloudstack.org/systemvm/4.11/systemvmtemplat
>>>> > e-4.11.0-kvm.
>>>> > > qcow2.bz2
>>>> > >
>>>> > > Regards,
>>>> > > Jagdish Patil
>>>> > >
>>>> > > On Wed, Apr 4, 2018 at 1:00 PM Swastik Mittal <
>>>> > mittal.swastik@gmail.com>
>>>> > > wrote:
>>>> > >
>>>> > > > Hey @jagdish
>>>> > > >
>>>> > > > I was using download.cloudstack.org to download systemVM.
>>>> > Is
>>>> > there any
>>>> > > > bug within the template uploaded here?
>>>> > > >
>>>> > > > @Soundar
>>>> > > >
>>>> > > > I did disable firewall services but din't work. I'll check
>>>> > it again
>>>> > > though.
>>>> > > >
>>>> > > > On 4/4/18, soundar rajan <bs...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>> > > > > disabled firewalld service on the hostname and check. you
>>>> > should
>>>> > able
>>>> > > to
>>>> > > > > access using console window.
>>>> > > > >
>>>> > > > > On Wed, Apr 4, 2018 at 10:07 AM, Swastik Mittal <
>>>> > > > mittal.swastik@gmail.com>
>>>> > > > > wrote:
>>>> > > > >
>>>> > > > >> Hey,
>>>> > > > >>
>>>> > > > >> I am installing ACS 4.11 (legacy mode), with management
>>>> > and
>>>> > host on
>>>> > > same
>>>> > > > >> server and out-of-band management disabled. My host is
>>>> > enabled
>>>> > and up
>>>> > > > and
>>>> > > > >> ssvm successfully running. Though agent state column
>>>> > shows only
>>>> > '-'.
>>>> > > > >>
>>>> > > > >> CPVM is also running successfully but when I open
>>>> > console
>>>> > window I get
>>>> > > > >> unable to connect. Also I din't find check file in SSVM
>>>> > (accessed
>>>> > > > through
>>>> > > > >> terminal using ssh).
>>>> > > > >>
>>>> > > > >> From SSVM I can ssh into management but wget command to
>>>> > management
>>>> > > local
>>>> > > > >> host ain't working (is stuck at connecting but is not
>>>> > able to
>>>> > > connect.).
>>>> > > > >>
>>>> > > > >> Agent log does not show any error, just mentions "trying
>>>> > to
>>>> > fetch
>>>> > > > storage
>>>> > > > >> pool from libvirt" all the time. I checked my storage
>>>> > pool
>>>> > through
>>>> > > > "virsh
>>>> > > > >> pool-list" and it shows the storage pool mentioned in
>>>> > local
>>>> > storage
>>>> > > > under
>>>> > > > >> agent.properties.
>>>> > > > >>
>>>> > > > >> Any ideas?
>>>> > > > >>
>>>> > > > >> Regards
>>>> > > > >> Swastik
>>>> > > > >>
>>>> > > > >
>>>> > > >
>>>> > >
>>>> >
>>>> >
>>>> >
>>> --
>>>
>>> Heinlein Support GmbH
>>> Schwedter Str. 8/9b, 10119 Berlin
>>>
>>> http://www.heinlein-support.de
>>>
>>> Tel: 030 / 405051-44
>>> Fax: 030 / 405051-19
>>>
>>> Zwangsangaben lt. §35a GmbHG: HRB 93818 B / Amtsgericht
>>> Berlin-Charlottenburg,
>>> Geschäftsführer: Peer Heinlein -- Sitz: Berlin
>>>
>>>
>>
>
Re: systemvm
Posted by Swastik Mittal <mi...@gmail.com>.
@Stephen
Request to internal server mentioned in the global sec.storage.. after
registering the iso successfully, get's stuck on HEAD request. As you
mentioned there is an issue in route path from SSVM. Not able to
figure out how do I find it.
regards
Swastik
On 4/4/18, Swastik Mittal <mi...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hey @Stephen
>
> I am able to ping my management from ssvm. Also wget to internal
> server works fine, it took some time to establish connection
> initially.
>
> I don't have any ssvm-check.sh file. I forgot to mention it on this thread.
>
> Outputs:
>
> root@s-1-VM:~# ip a s
> 1: lo: <LOOPBACK,UP,LOWER_UP> mtu 16436 qdisc noqueue state UNKNOWN
> link/loopback 00:00:00:00:00:00 brd 00:00:00:00:00:00
> inet 127.0.0.1/8 scope host lo
> 2: eth0: <BROADCAST,MULTICAST,UP,LOWER_UP> mtu 1500 qdisc pfifo_fast
> state UP qlen 1000
> link/ether 0e:00:a9:fe:02:2a brd ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff
> inet 169.254.2.42/16 brd 169.254.255.255 scope global eth0
> 3: eth1: <BROADCAST,MULTICAST,UP,LOWER_UP> mtu 1500 qdisc pfifo_fast
> state UP qlen 1000
> link/ether 1e:00:ce:00:00:0e brd ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff
> inet 10.1.0.43/24 brd 10.1.0.255 scope global eth1
> 4: eth2: <BROADCAST,MULTICAST,UP,LOWER_UP> mtu 1500 qdisc pfifo_fast
> state UP qlen 1000
> link/ether 1e:00:a1:00:00:a2 brd ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff
> inet 10.1.0.191/24 brd 10.1.0.255 scope global eth2
>
>
> root@s-1-VM:~# ip r s
> default via 10.1.0.2 dev eth2
> 10.1.0.0/24 dev eth1 proto kernel scope link src 10.1.0.43
> 10.1.0.0/24 dev eth2 proto kernel scope link src 10.1.0.191
> 169.254.0.0/16 dev eth0 proto kernel scope link src 169.254.2.42
>
> Yes, my storage and management are the same.
>
> root@s-1-VM:~# route -n
> Kernel IP routing table
> Destination Gateway Genmask Flags Metric Ref Use
> Iface
> 0.0.0.0 10.1.0.2 0.0.0.0 UG 0
> 0 0 eth2
> 10.1.0.0 0.0.0.0 255.255.255.0 U 0 0
> 0 eth1
> 10.1.0.0 0.0.0.0 255.255.255.0 U 0 0
> 0 eth2
> 169.254.0.0 0.0.0.0 255.255.0.0 U 0 0
> 0 eth0
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> On 4/4/18, Stephan Seitz <s....@heinlein-support.de> wrote:
>> Hu!
>>
>> I'ld recommend to log in to your ssvm and check if everything is able
>> to connect.
>>
>> I second dag's suggestion to double check your network setup.
>>
>> Inside your ssvm I'ld run
>>
>> /usr/local/cloud/systemvm/ssvm-check.sh
>>
>> also
>>
>> ip a s
>> ip r s
>>
>>
>> As an educated guess: did you setup your storage-network to the same
>> cidr as your management-network?
>>
>> if yes, maybe the default route inside your ssvm is setup wrong (on the
>> wrong NIC or errenously set up twice on two NICs)
>>
>>
>> cheers,
>>
>> - Stephan
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> Am Mittwoch, den 04.04.2018, 13:53 +0530 schrieb Swastik Mittal:
>>> @Dag
>>>
>>> By legacy I meant one way ssl. I have set ca strictness for client as
>>> false.
>>>
>>> I am using 1 nic common for all the network, that is one bridge
>>> serving
>>> both public and private network.
>>>
>>> I am setting up a basic zone so I set my management within ip range
>>> of 10
>>> and guest within a range of 100, and my statement vms get ip assigned
>>> within those ranges successfully.
>>>
>>> I used these similar configuration with ACL 4.6 and was able to run
>>> vm's
>>> successfully.
>>>
>>> Regards
>>> Swastik
>>>
>>> On 4 Apr 2018 1:44 p.m., "Dag Sonstebo" <Da...@shapeblue.com>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>> >
>>> > Swastik,
>>> >
>>> > Your issue is most likely with your network configuration rather
>>> > than
>>> > anything to do with firewalls or system VM templates.
>>> >
>>> > First of all – what do you mean by legacy mode? Are you referring
>>> > to
>>> > advanced or basic zone?
>>> >
>>> > Secondly – can you tell us how you have configured your networking?
>>> >
>>> > - How many NICs you are using and how have you configured them
>>> > - What management vs public IP ranges you are using
>>> > - How you have mapped your networking in CloudStack against the
>>> > underlying
>>> > hardware NICs
>>> > - Can you also check what your “host” global setting is set to
>>> >
>>> > Regards,
>>> > Dag Sonstebo
>>> > Cloud Architect
>>> > ShapeBlue
>>> >
>>> > On 04/04/2018, 09:07, "Swastik Mittal" <mi...@gmail.com>
>>> > wrote:
>>> >
>>> > @jagdish
>>> >
>>> > Yes I was using the same link.
>>> >
>>> >
>>> > Dag.Sonstebo@shapeblue.com
>>> > www.shapeblue.com
>>> > 53 Chandos Place, Covent Garden, London WC2N 4HSUK
>>> > @shapeblue
>>> >
>>> >
>>> >
>>> > On 4 Apr 2018 1:07 p.m., "Jagdish Patil" <jagdishpatil316@gmail.com
>>> > >
>>> > wrote:
>>> >
>>> > > Hey Swastik,
>>> > >
>>> > > download.cloudstack.org link doesn't look like an issue, but
>>> > which
>>> > version
>>> > > and which hypervisor are you using?
>>> > >
>>> > > For KVM, download this:
>>> > > http://download.cloudstack.org/systemvm/4.11/systemvmtemplat
>>> > e-4.11.0-kvm.
>>> > > qcow2.bz2
>>> > >
>>> > > Regards,
>>> > > Jagdish Patil
>>> > >
>>> > > On Wed, Apr 4, 2018 at 1:00 PM Swastik Mittal <
>>> > mittal.swastik@gmail.com>
>>> > > wrote:
>>> > >
>>> > > > Hey @jagdish
>>> > > >
>>> > > > I was using download.cloudstack.org to download systemVM.
>>> > Is
>>> > there any
>>> > > > bug within the template uploaded here?
>>> > > >
>>> > > > @Soundar
>>> > > >
>>> > > > I did disable firewall services but din't work. I'll check
>>> > it again
>>> > > though.
>>> > > >
>>> > > > On 4/4/18, soundar rajan <bs...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> > > > > disabled firewalld service on the hostname and check. you
>>> > should
>>> > able
>>> > > to
>>> > > > > access using console window.
>>> > > > >
>>> > > > > On Wed, Apr 4, 2018 at 10:07 AM, Swastik Mittal <
>>> > > > mittal.swastik@gmail.com>
>>> > > > > wrote:
>>> > > > >
>>> > > > >> Hey,
>>> > > > >>
>>> > > > >> I am installing ACS 4.11 (legacy mode), with management
>>> > and
>>> > host on
>>> > > same
>>> > > > >> server and out-of-band management disabled. My host is
>>> > enabled
>>> > and up
>>> > > > and
>>> > > > >> ssvm successfully running. Though agent state column
>>> > shows only
>>> > '-'.
>>> > > > >>
>>> > > > >> CPVM is also running successfully but when I open
>>> > console
>>> > window I get
>>> > > > >> unable to connect. Also I din't find check file in SSVM
>>> > (accessed
>>> > > > through
>>> > > > >> terminal using ssh).
>>> > > > >>
>>> > > > >> From SSVM I can ssh into management but wget command to
>>> > management
>>> > > local
>>> > > > >> host ain't working (is stuck at connecting but is not
>>> > able to
>>> > > connect.).
>>> > > > >>
>>> > > > >> Agent log does not show any error, just mentions "trying
>>> > to
>>> > fetch
>>> > > > storage
>>> > > > >> pool from libvirt" all the time. I checked my storage
>>> > pool
>>> > through
>>> > > > "virsh
>>> > > > >> pool-list" and it shows the storage pool mentioned in
>>> > local
>>> > storage
>>> > > > under
>>> > > > >> agent.properties.
>>> > > > >>
>>> > > > >> Any ideas?
>>> > > > >>
>>> > > > >> Regards
>>> > > > >> Swastik
>>> > > > >>
>>> > > > >
>>> > > >
>>> > >
>>> >
>>> >
>>> >
>> --
>>
>> Heinlein Support GmbH
>> Schwedter Str. 8/9b, 10119 Berlin
>>
>> http://www.heinlein-support.de
>>
>> Tel: 030 / 405051-44
>> Fax: 030 / 405051-19
>>
>> Zwangsangaben lt. §35a GmbHG: HRB 93818 B / Amtsgericht
>> Berlin-Charlottenburg,
>> Geschäftsführer: Peer Heinlein -- Sitz: Berlin
>>
>>
>
Re: systemvm
Posted by Dag Sonstebo <Da...@shapeblue.com>.
Swastik,
What is your “host” global setting set to?
Also – the check script should be in /usr/local/cloud/systemvm/ssvm-check.sh – if this is missing you have other issues – possibly with the systemvm.iso.
Regards,
Dag Sonstebo
Cloud Architect
ShapeBlue
On 04/04/2018, 11:07, "Swastik Mittal" <mi...@gmail.com> wrote:
Hey @Stephen
I am able to ping my management from ssvm. Also wget to internal
server works fine, it took some time to establish connection
initially.
I don't have any ssvm-check.sh file. I forgot to mention it on this thread.
Outputs:
root@s-1-VM:~# ip a s
1: lo: <LOOPBACK,UP,LOWER_UP> mtu 16436 qdisc noqueue state UNKNOWN
link/loopback 00:00:00:00:00:00 brd 00:00:00:00:00:00
inet 127.0.0.1/8 scope host lo
2: eth0: <BROADCAST,MULTICAST,UP,LOWER_UP> mtu 1500 qdisc pfifo_fast
state UP qlen 1000
link/ether 0e:00:a9:fe:02:2a brd ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff
inet 169.254.2.42/16 brd 169.254.255.255 scope global eth0
3: eth1: <BROADCAST,MULTICAST,UP,LOWER_UP> mtu 1500 qdisc pfifo_fast
state UP qlen 1000
link/ether 1e:00:ce:00:00:0e brd ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff
inet 10.1.0.43/24 brd 10.1.0.255 scope global eth1
4: eth2: <BROADCAST,MULTICAST,UP,LOWER_UP> mtu 1500 qdisc pfifo_fast
state UP qlen 1000
link/ether 1e:00:a1:00:00:a2 brd ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff
inet 10.1.0.191/24 brd 10.1.0.255 scope global eth2
root@s-1-VM:~# ip r s
default via 10.1.0.2 dev eth2
10.1.0.0/24 dev eth1 proto kernel scope link src 10.1.0.43
10.1.0.0/24 dev eth2 proto kernel scope link src 10.1.0.191
169.254.0.0/16 dev eth0 proto kernel scope link src 169.254.2.42
Yes, my storage and management are the same.
root@s-1-VM:~# route -n
Kernel IP routing table
Destination Gateway Genmask Flags Metric Ref Use Iface
0.0.0.0 10.1.0.2 0.0.0.0 UG 0
0 0 eth2
10.1.0.0 0.0.0.0 255.255.255.0 U 0 0
0 eth1
10.1.0.0 0.0.0.0 255.255.255.0 U 0 0
0 eth2
169.254.0.0 0.0.0.0 255.255.0.0 U 0 0
0 eth0
On 4/4/18, Stephan Seitz <s....@heinlein-support.de> wrote:
> Hu!
>
> I'ld recommend to log in to your ssvm and check if everything is able
> to connect.
>
> I second dag's suggestion to double check your network setup.
>
> Inside your ssvm I'ld run
>
> /usr/local/cloud/systemvm/ssvm-check.sh
>
> also
>
> ip a s
> ip r s
>
>
> As an educated guess: did you setup your storage-network to the same
> cidr as your management-network?
>
> if yes, maybe the default route inside your ssvm is setup wrong (on the
> wrong NIC or errenously set up twice on two NICs)
>
>
> cheers,
>
> - Stephan
>
>
>
>
> Am Mittwoch, den 04.04.2018, 13:53 +0530 schrieb Swastik Mittal:
>> @Dag
>>
>> By legacy I meant one way ssl. I have set ca strictness for client as
>> false.
>>
>> I am using 1 nic common for all the network, that is one bridge
>> serving
>> both public and private network.
>>
>> I am setting up a basic zone so I set my management within ip range
>> of 10
>> and guest within a range of 100, and my statement vms get ip assigned
>> within those ranges successfully.
>>
>> I used these similar configuration with ACL 4.6 and was able to run
>> vm's
>> successfully.
>>
>> Regards
>> Swastik
>>
>> On 4 Apr 2018 1:44 p.m., "Dag Sonstebo" <Da...@shapeblue.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>> >
>> > Swastik,
>> >
>> > Your issue is most likely with your network configuration rather
>> > than
>> > anything to do with firewalls or system VM templates.
>> >
>> > First of all – what do you mean by legacy mode? Are you referring
>> > to
>> > advanced or basic zone?
>> >
>> > Secondly – can you tell us how you have configured your networking?
>> >
>> > - How many NICs you are using and how have you configured them
>> > - What management vs public IP ranges you are using
>> > - How you have mapped your networking in CloudStack against the
>> > underlying
>> > hardware NICs
>> > - Can you also check what your “host” global setting is set to
>> >
>> > Regards,
>> > Dag Sonstebo
>> > Cloud Architect
>> > ShapeBlue
>> >
>> > On 04/04/2018, 09:07, "Swastik Mittal" <mi...@gmail.com>
>> > wrote:
>> >
>> > @jagdish
>> >
>> > Yes I was using the same link.
>> >
>> >
>> > Dag.Sonstebo@shapeblue.com
>> > www.shapeblue.com
>> > 53 Chandos Place, Covent Garden, London WC2N 4HSUK
>> > @shapeblue
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > On 4 Apr 2018 1:07 p.m., "Jagdish Patil" <jagdishpatil316@gmail.com
>> > >
>> > wrote:
>> >
>> > > Hey Swastik,
>> > >
>> > > download.cloudstack.org link doesn't look like an issue, but
>> > which
>> > version
>> > > and which hypervisor are you using?
>> > >
>> > > For KVM, download this:
>> > > http://download.cloudstack.org/systemvm/4.11/systemvmtemplat
>> > e-4.11.0-kvm.
>> > > qcow2.bz2
>> > >
>> > > Regards,
>> > > Jagdish Patil
>> > >
>> > > On Wed, Apr 4, 2018 at 1:00 PM Swastik Mittal <
>> > mittal.swastik@gmail.com>
>> > > wrote:
>> > >
>> > > > Hey @jagdish
>> > > >
>> > > > I was using download.cloudstack.org to download systemVM.
>> > Is
>> > there any
>> > > > bug within the template uploaded here?
>> > > >
>> > > > @Soundar
>> > > >
>> > > > I did disable firewall services but din't work. I'll check
>> > it again
>> > > though.
>> > > >
>> > > > On 4/4/18, soundar rajan <bs...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> > > > > disabled firewalld service on the hostname and check. you
>> > should
>> > able
>> > > to
>> > > > > access using console window.
>> > > > >
>> > > > > On Wed, Apr 4, 2018 at 10:07 AM, Swastik Mittal <
>> > > > mittal.swastik@gmail.com>
>> > > > > wrote:
>> > > > >
>> > > > >> Hey,
>> > > > >>
>> > > > >> I am installing ACS 4.11 (legacy mode), with management
>> > and
>> > host on
>> > > same
>> > > > >> server and out-of-band management disabled. My host is
>> > enabled
>> > and up
>> > > > and
>> > > > >> ssvm successfully running. Though agent state column
>> > shows only
>> > '-'.
>> > > > >>
>> > > > >> CPVM is also running successfully but when I open
>> > console
>> > window I get
>> > > > >> unable to connect. Also I din't find check file in SSVM
>> > (accessed
>> > > > through
>> > > > >> terminal using ssh).
>> > > > >>
>> > > > >> From SSVM I can ssh into management but wget command to
>> > management
>> > > local
>> > > > >> host ain't working (is stuck at connecting but is not
>> > able to
>> > > connect.).
>> > > > >>
>> > > > >> Agent log does not show any error, just mentions "trying
>> > to
>> > fetch
>> > > > storage
>> > > > >> pool from libvirt" all the time. I checked my storage
>> > pool
>> > through
>> > > > "virsh
>> > > > >> pool-list" and it shows the storage pool mentioned in
>> > local
>> > storage
>> > > > under
>> > > > >> agent.properties.
>> > > > >>
>> > > > >> Any ideas?
>> > > > >>
>> > > > >> Regards
>> > > > >> Swastik
>> > > > >>
>> > > > >
>> > > >
>> > >
>> >
>> >
>> >
> --
>
> Heinlein Support GmbH
> Schwedter Str. 8/9b, 10119 Berlin
>
> http://www.heinlein-support.de
>
> Tel: 030 / 405051-44
> Fax: 030 / 405051-19
>
> Zwangsangaben lt. §35a GmbHG: HRB 93818 B / Amtsgericht
> Berlin-Charlottenburg,
> Geschäftsführer: Peer Heinlein -- Sitz: Berlin
>
>
Dag.Sonstebo@shapeblue.com
www.shapeblue.com
53 Chandos Place, Covent Garden, London WC2N 4HSUK
@shapeblue
Re: systemvm
Posted by Swastik Mittal <mi...@gmail.com>.
Hey @Stephen
I am able to ping my management from ssvm. Also wget to internal
server works fine, it took some time to establish connection
initially.
I don't have any ssvm-check.sh file. I forgot to mention it on this thread.
Outputs:
root@s-1-VM:~# ip a s
1: lo: <LOOPBACK,UP,LOWER_UP> mtu 16436 qdisc noqueue state UNKNOWN
link/loopback 00:00:00:00:00:00 brd 00:00:00:00:00:00
inet 127.0.0.1/8 scope host lo
2: eth0: <BROADCAST,MULTICAST,UP,LOWER_UP> mtu 1500 qdisc pfifo_fast
state UP qlen 1000
link/ether 0e:00:a9:fe:02:2a brd ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff
inet 169.254.2.42/16 brd 169.254.255.255 scope global eth0
3: eth1: <BROADCAST,MULTICAST,UP,LOWER_UP> mtu 1500 qdisc pfifo_fast
state UP qlen 1000
link/ether 1e:00:ce:00:00:0e brd ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff
inet 10.1.0.43/24 brd 10.1.0.255 scope global eth1
4: eth2: <BROADCAST,MULTICAST,UP,LOWER_UP> mtu 1500 qdisc pfifo_fast
state UP qlen 1000
link/ether 1e:00:a1:00:00:a2 brd ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff
inet 10.1.0.191/24 brd 10.1.0.255 scope global eth2
root@s-1-VM:~# ip r s
default via 10.1.0.2 dev eth2
10.1.0.0/24 dev eth1 proto kernel scope link src 10.1.0.43
10.1.0.0/24 dev eth2 proto kernel scope link src 10.1.0.191
169.254.0.0/16 dev eth0 proto kernel scope link src 169.254.2.42
Yes, my storage and management are the same.
root@s-1-VM:~# route -n
Kernel IP routing table
Destination Gateway Genmask Flags Metric Ref Use Iface
0.0.0.0 10.1.0.2 0.0.0.0 UG 0
0 0 eth2
10.1.0.0 0.0.0.0 255.255.255.0 U 0 0
0 eth1
10.1.0.0 0.0.0.0 255.255.255.0 U 0 0
0 eth2
169.254.0.0 0.0.0.0 255.255.0.0 U 0 0
0 eth0
On 4/4/18, Stephan Seitz <s....@heinlein-support.de> wrote:
> Hu!
>
> I'ld recommend to log in to your ssvm and check if everything is able
> to connect.
>
> I second dag's suggestion to double check your network setup.
>
> Inside your ssvm I'ld run
>
> /usr/local/cloud/systemvm/ssvm-check.sh
>
> also
>
> ip a s
> ip r s
>
>
> As an educated guess: did you setup your storage-network to the same
> cidr as your management-network?
>
> if yes, maybe the default route inside your ssvm is setup wrong (on the
> wrong NIC or errenously set up twice on two NICs)
>
>
> cheers,
>
> - Stephan
>
>
>
>
> Am Mittwoch, den 04.04.2018, 13:53 +0530 schrieb Swastik Mittal:
>> @Dag
>>
>> By legacy I meant one way ssl. I have set ca strictness for client as
>> false.
>>
>> I am using 1 nic common for all the network, that is one bridge
>> serving
>> both public and private network.
>>
>> I am setting up a basic zone so I set my management within ip range
>> of 10
>> and guest within a range of 100, and my statement vms get ip assigned
>> within those ranges successfully.
>>
>> I used these similar configuration with ACL 4.6 and was able to run
>> vm's
>> successfully.
>>
>> Regards
>> Swastik
>>
>> On 4 Apr 2018 1:44 p.m., "Dag Sonstebo" <Da...@shapeblue.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>> >
>> > Swastik,
>> >
>> > Your issue is most likely with your network configuration rather
>> > than
>> > anything to do with firewalls or system VM templates.
>> >
>> > First of all – what do you mean by legacy mode? Are you referring
>> > to
>> > advanced or basic zone?
>> >
>> > Secondly – can you tell us how you have configured your networking?
>> >
>> > - How many NICs you are using and how have you configured them
>> > - What management vs public IP ranges you are using
>> > - How you have mapped your networking in CloudStack against the
>> > underlying
>> > hardware NICs
>> > - Can you also check what your “host” global setting is set to
>> >
>> > Regards,
>> > Dag Sonstebo
>> > Cloud Architect
>> > ShapeBlue
>> >
>> > On 04/04/2018, 09:07, "Swastik Mittal" <mi...@gmail.com>
>> > wrote:
>> >
>> > @jagdish
>> >
>> > Yes I was using the same link.
>> >
>> >
>> > Dag.Sonstebo@shapeblue.com
>> > www.shapeblue.com
>> > 53 Chandos Place, Covent Garden, London WC2N 4HSUK
>> > @shapeblue
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > On 4 Apr 2018 1:07 p.m., "Jagdish Patil" <jagdishpatil316@gmail.com
>> > >
>> > wrote:
>> >
>> > > Hey Swastik,
>> > >
>> > > download.cloudstack.org link doesn't look like an issue, but
>> > which
>> > version
>> > > and which hypervisor are you using?
>> > >
>> > > For KVM, download this:
>> > > http://download.cloudstack.org/systemvm/4.11/systemvmtemplat
>> > e-4.11.0-kvm.
>> > > qcow2.bz2
>> > >
>> > > Regards,
>> > > Jagdish Patil
>> > >
>> > > On Wed, Apr 4, 2018 at 1:00 PM Swastik Mittal <
>> > mittal.swastik@gmail.com>
>> > > wrote:
>> > >
>> > > > Hey @jagdish
>> > > >
>> > > > I was using download.cloudstack.org to download systemVM.
>> > Is
>> > there any
>> > > > bug within the template uploaded here?
>> > > >
>> > > > @Soundar
>> > > >
>> > > > I did disable firewall services but din't work. I'll check
>> > it again
>> > > though.
>> > > >
>> > > > On 4/4/18, soundar rajan <bs...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> > > > > disabled firewalld service on the hostname and check. you
>> > should
>> > able
>> > > to
>> > > > > access using console window.
>> > > > >
>> > > > > On Wed, Apr 4, 2018 at 10:07 AM, Swastik Mittal <
>> > > > mittal.swastik@gmail.com>
>> > > > > wrote:
>> > > > >
>> > > > >> Hey,
>> > > > >>
>> > > > >> I am installing ACS 4.11 (legacy mode), with management
>> > and
>> > host on
>> > > same
>> > > > >> server and out-of-band management disabled. My host is
>> > enabled
>> > and up
>> > > > and
>> > > > >> ssvm successfully running. Though agent state column
>> > shows only
>> > '-'.
>> > > > >>
>> > > > >> CPVM is also running successfully but when I open
>> > console
>> > window I get
>> > > > >> unable to connect. Also I din't find check file in SSVM
>> > (accessed
>> > > > through
>> > > > >> terminal using ssh).
>> > > > >>
>> > > > >> From SSVM I can ssh into management but wget command to
>> > management
>> > > local
>> > > > >> host ain't working (is stuck at connecting but is not
>> > able to
>> > > connect.).
>> > > > >>
>> > > > >> Agent log does not show any error, just mentions "trying
>> > to
>> > fetch
>> > > > storage
>> > > > >> pool from libvirt" all the time. I checked my storage
>> > pool
>> > through
>> > > > "virsh
>> > > > >> pool-list" and it shows the storage pool mentioned in
>> > local
>> > storage
>> > > > under
>> > > > >> agent.properties.
>> > > > >>
>> > > > >> Any ideas?
>> > > > >>
>> > > > >> Regards
>> > > > >> Swastik
>> > > > >>
>> > > > >
>> > > >
>> > >
>> >
>> >
>> >
> --
>
> Heinlein Support GmbH
> Schwedter Str. 8/9b, 10119 Berlin
>
> http://www.heinlein-support.de
>
> Tel: 030 / 405051-44
> Fax: 030 / 405051-19
>
> Zwangsangaben lt. §35a GmbHG: HRB 93818 B / Amtsgericht
> Berlin-Charlottenburg,
> Geschäftsführer: Peer Heinlein -- Sitz: Berlin
>
>
Re: systemvm
Posted by Stephan Seitz <s....@heinlein-support.de>.
Hu!
I'ld recommend to log in to your ssvm and check if everything is able
to connect.
I second dag's suggestion to double check your network setup.
Inside your ssvm I'ld run
/usr/local/cloud/systemvm/ssvm-check.sh
also
ip a s
ip r s
As an educated guess: did you setup your storage-network to the same
cidr as your management-network?
if yes, maybe the default route inside your ssvm is setup wrong (on the
wrong NIC or errenously set up twice on two NICs)
cheers,
- Stephan
Am Mittwoch, den 04.04.2018, 13:53 +0530 schrieb Swastik Mittal:
> @Dag
>
> By legacy I meant one way ssl. I have set ca strictness for client as
> false.
>
> I am using 1 nic common for all the network, that is one bridge
> serving
> both public and private network.
>
> I am setting up a basic zone so I set my management within ip range
> of 10
> and guest within a range of 100, and my statement vms get ip assigned
> within those ranges successfully.
>
> I used these similar configuration with ACL 4.6 and was able to run
> vm's
> successfully.
>
> Regards
> Swastik
>
> On 4 Apr 2018 1:44 p.m., "Dag Sonstebo" <Da...@shapeblue.com>
> wrote:
>
> >
> > Swastik,
> >
> > Your issue is most likely with your network configuration rather
> > than
> > anything to do with firewalls or system VM templates.
> >
> > First of all – what do you mean by legacy mode? Are you referring
> > to
> > advanced or basic zone?
> >
> > Secondly – can you tell us how you have configured your networking?
> >
> > - How many NICs you are using and how have you configured them
> > - What management vs public IP ranges you are using
> > - How you have mapped your networking in CloudStack against the
> > underlying
> > hardware NICs
> > - Can you also check what your “host” global setting is set to
> >
> > Regards,
> > Dag Sonstebo
> > Cloud Architect
> > ShapeBlue
> >
> > On 04/04/2018, 09:07, "Swastik Mittal" <mi...@gmail.com>
> > wrote:
> >
> > @jagdish
> >
> > Yes I was using the same link.
> >
> >
> > Dag.Sonstebo@shapeblue.com
> > www.shapeblue.com
> > 53 Chandos Place, Covent Garden, London WC2N 4HSUK
> > @shapeblue
> >
> >
> >
> > On 4 Apr 2018 1:07 p.m., "Jagdish Patil" <jagdishpatil316@gmail.com
> > >
> > wrote:
> >
> > > Hey Swastik,
> > >
> > > download.cloudstack.org link doesn't look like an issue, but
> > which
> > version
> > > and which hypervisor are you using?
> > >
> > > For KVM, download this:
> > > http://download.cloudstack.org/systemvm/4.11/systemvmtemplat
> > e-4.11.0-kvm.
> > > qcow2.bz2
> > >
> > > Regards,
> > > Jagdish Patil
> > >
> > > On Wed, Apr 4, 2018 at 1:00 PM Swastik Mittal <
> > mittal.swastik@gmail.com>
> > > wrote:
> > >
> > > > Hey @jagdish
> > > >
> > > > I was using download.cloudstack.org to download systemVM.
> > Is
> > there any
> > > > bug within the template uploaded here?
> > > >
> > > > @Soundar
> > > >
> > > > I did disable firewall services but din't work. I'll check
> > it again
> > > though.
> > > >
> > > > On 4/4/18, soundar rajan <bs...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > > disabled firewalld service on the hostname and check. you
> > should
> > able
> > > to
> > > > > access using console window.
> > > > >
> > > > > On Wed, Apr 4, 2018 at 10:07 AM, Swastik Mittal <
> > > > mittal.swastik@gmail.com>
> > > > > wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > >> Hey,
> > > > >>
> > > > >> I am installing ACS 4.11 (legacy mode), with management
> > and
> > host on
> > > same
> > > > >> server and out-of-band management disabled. My host is
> > enabled
> > and up
> > > > and
> > > > >> ssvm successfully running. Though agent state column
> > shows only
> > '-'.
> > > > >>
> > > > >> CPVM is also running successfully but when I open
> > console
> > window I get
> > > > >> unable to connect. Also I din't find check file in SSVM
> > (accessed
> > > > through
> > > > >> terminal using ssh).
> > > > >>
> > > > >> From SSVM I can ssh into management but wget command to
> > management
> > > local
> > > > >> host ain't working (is stuck at connecting but is not
> > able to
> > > connect.).
> > > > >>
> > > > >> Agent log does not show any error, just mentions "trying
> > to
> > fetch
> > > > storage
> > > > >> pool from libvirt" all the time. I checked my storage
> > pool
> > through
> > > > "virsh
> > > > >> pool-list" and it shows the storage pool mentioned in
> > local
> > storage
> > > > under
> > > > >> agent.properties.
> > > > >>
> > > > >> Any ideas?
> > > > >>
> > > > >> Regards
> > > > >> Swastik
> > > > >>
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
> >
> >
--
Heinlein Support GmbH
Schwedter Str. 8/9b, 10119 Berlin
http://www.heinlein-support.de
Tel: 030 / 405051-44
Fax: 030 / 405051-19
Zwangsangaben lt. §35a GmbHG: HRB 93818 B / Amtsgericht
Berlin-Charlottenburg,
Geschäftsführer: Peer Heinlein -- Sitz: Berlin
Re: systemvm
Posted by Swastik Mittal <mi...@gmail.com>.
@Dag
By legacy I meant one way ssl. I have set ca strictness for client as false.
I am using 1 nic common for all the network, that is one bridge serving
both public and private network.
I am setting up a basic zone so I set my management within ip range of 10
and guest within a range of 100, and my statement vms get ip assigned
within those ranges successfully.
I used these similar configuration with ACL 4.6 and was able to run vm's
successfully.
Regards
Swastik
On 4 Apr 2018 1:44 p.m., "Dag Sonstebo" <Da...@shapeblue.com> wrote:
> Swastik,
>
> Your issue is most likely with your network configuration rather than
> anything to do with firewalls or system VM templates.
>
> First of all – what do you mean by legacy mode? Are you referring to
> advanced or basic zone?
>
> Secondly – can you tell us how you have configured your networking?
>
> - How many NICs you are using and how have you configured them
> - What management vs public IP ranges you are using
> - How you have mapped your networking in CloudStack against the underlying
> hardware NICs
> - Can you also check what your “host” global setting is set to
>
> Regards,
> Dag Sonstebo
> Cloud Architect
> ShapeBlue
>
> On 04/04/2018, 09:07, "Swastik Mittal" <mi...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> @jagdish
>
> Yes I was using the same link.
>
>
> Dag.Sonstebo@shapeblue.com
> www.shapeblue.com
> 53 Chandos Place, Covent Garden, London WC2N 4HSUK
> @shapeblue
>
>
>
> On 4 Apr 2018 1:07 p.m., "Jagdish Patil" <ja...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
> > Hey Swastik,
> >
> > download.cloudstack.org link doesn't look like an issue, but which
> version
> > and which hypervisor are you using?
> >
> > For KVM, download this:
> > http://download.cloudstack.org/systemvm/4.11/systemvmtemplat
> e-4.11.0-kvm.
> > qcow2.bz2
> >
> > Regards,
> > Jagdish Patil
> >
> > On Wed, Apr 4, 2018 at 1:00 PM Swastik Mittal <
> mittal.swastik@gmail.com>
> > wrote:
> >
> > > Hey @jagdish
> > >
> > > I was using download.cloudstack.org to download systemVM. Is
> there any
> > > bug within the template uploaded here?
> > >
> > > @Soundar
> > >
> > > I did disable firewall services but din't work. I'll check it again
> > though.
> > >
> > > On 4/4/18, soundar rajan <bs...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > disabled firewalld service on the hostname and check. you should
> able
> > to
> > > > access using console window.
> > > >
> > > > On Wed, Apr 4, 2018 at 10:07 AM, Swastik Mittal <
> > > mittal.swastik@gmail.com>
> > > > wrote:
> > > >
> > > >> Hey,
> > > >>
> > > >> I am installing ACS 4.11 (legacy mode), with management and
> host on
> > same
> > > >> server and out-of-band management disabled. My host is enabled
> and up
> > > and
> > > >> ssvm successfully running. Though agent state column shows only
> '-'.
> > > >>
> > > >> CPVM is also running successfully but when I open console
> window I get
> > > >> unable to connect. Also I din't find check file in SSVM
> (accessed
> > > through
> > > >> terminal using ssh).
> > > >>
> > > >> From SSVM I can ssh into management but wget command to
> management
> > local
> > > >> host ain't working (is stuck at connecting but is not able to
> > connect.).
> > > >>
> > > >> Agent log does not show any error, just mentions "trying to
> fetch
> > > storage
> > > >> pool from libvirt" all the time. I checked my storage pool
> through
> > > "virsh
> > > >> pool-list" and it shows the storage pool mentioned in local
> storage
> > > under
> > > >> agent.properties.
> > > >>
> > > >> Any ideas?
> > > >>
> > > >> Regards
> > > >> Swastik
> > > >>
> > > >
> > >
> >
>
>
>
Re: systemvm
Posted by Dag Sonstebo <Da...@shapeblue.com>.
Swastik,
Your issue is most likely with your network configuration rather than anything to do with firewalls or system VM templates.
First of all – what do you mean by legacy mode? Are you referring to advanced or basic zone?
Secondly – can you tell us how you have configured your networking?
- How many NICs you are using and how have you configured them
- What management vs public IP ranges you are using
- How you have mapped your networking in CloudStack against the underlying hardware NICs
- Can you also check what your “host” global setting is set to
Regards,
Dag Sonstebo
Cloud Architect
ShapeBlue
On 04/04/2018, 09:07, "Swastik Mittal" <mi...@gmail.com> wrote:
@jagdish
Yes I was using the same link.
Dag.Sonstebo@shapeblue.com
www.shapeblue.com
53 Chandos Place, Covent Garden, London WC2N 4HSUK
@shapeblue
On 4 Apr 2018 1:07 p.m., "Jagdish Patil" <ja...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hey Swastik,
>
> download.cloudstack.org link doesn't look like an issue, but which version
> and which hypervisor are you using?
>
> For KVM, download this:
> http://download.cloudstack.org/systemvm/4.11/systemvmtemplate-4.11.0-kvm.
> qcow2.bz2
>
> Regards,
> Jagdish Patil
>
> On Wed, Apr 4, 2018 at 1:00 PM Swastik Mittal <mi...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
> > Hey @jagdish
> >
> > I was using download.cloudstack.org to download systemVM. Is there any
> > bug within the template uploaded here?
> >
> > @Soundar
> >
> > I did disable firewall services but din't work. I'll check it again
> though.
> >
> > On 4/4/18, soundar rajan <bs...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > disabled firewalld service on the hostname and check. you should able
> to
> > > access using console window.
> > >
> > > On Wed, Apr 4, 2018 at 10:07 AM, Swastik Mittal <
> > mittal.swastik@gmail.com>
> > > wrote:
> > >
> > >> Hey,
> > >>
> > >> I am installing ACS 4.11 (legacy mode), with management and host on
> same
> > >> server and out-of-band management disabled. My host is enabled and up
> > and
> > >> ssvm successfully running. Though agent state column shows only '-'.
> > >>
> > >> CPVM is also running successfully but when I open console window I get
> > >> unable to connect. Also I din't find check file in SSVM (accessed
> > through
> > >> terminal using ssh).
> > >>
> > >> From SSVM I can ssh into management but wget command to management
> local
> > >> host ain't working (is stuck at connecting but is not able to
> connect.).
> > >>
> > >> Agent log does not show any error, just mentions "trying to fetch
> > storage
> > >> pool from libvirt" all the time. I checked my storage pool through
> > "virsh
> > >> pool-list" and it shows the storage pool mentioned in local storage
> > under
> > >> agent.properties.
> > >>
> > >> Any ideas?
> > >>
> > >> Regards
> > >> Swastik
> > >>
> > >
> >
>
Re: systemvm
Posted by Swastik Mittal <mi...@gmail.com>.
@jagdish
Yes I was using the same link.
On 4 Apr 2018 1:07 p.m., "Jagdish Patil" <ja...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hey Swastik,
>
> download.cloudstack.org link doesn't look like an issue, but which version
> and which hypervisor are you using?
>
> For KVM, download this:
> http://download.cloudstack.org/systemvm/4.11/systemvmtemplate-4.11.0-kvm.
> qcow2.bz2
>
> Regards,
> Jagdish Patil
>
> On Wed, Apr 4, 2018 at 1:00 PM Swastik Mittal <mi...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
> > Hey @jagdish
> >
> > I was using download.cloudstack.org to download systemVM. Is there any
> > bug within the template uploaded here?
> >
> > @Soundar
> >
> > I did disable firewall services but din't work. I'll check it again
> though.
> >
> > On 4/4/18, soundar rajan <bs...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > disabled firewalld service on the hostname and check. you should able
> to
> > > access using console window.
> > >
> > > On Wed, Apr 4, 2018 at 10:07 AM, Swastik Mittal <
> > mittal.swastik@gmail.com>
> > > wrote:
> > >
> > >> Hey,
> > >>
> > >> I am installing ACS 4.11 (legacy mode), with management and host on
> same
> > >> server and out-of-band management disabled. My host is enabled and up
> > and
> > >> ssvm successfully running. Though agent state column shows only '-'.
> > >>
> > >> CPVM is also running successfully but when I open console window I get
> > >> unable to connect. Also I din't find check file in SSVM (accessed
> > through
> > >> terminal using ssh).
> > >>
> > >> From SSVM I can ssh into management but wget command to management
> local
> > >> host ain't working (is stuck at connecting but is not able to
> connect.).
> > >>
> > >> Agent log does not show any error, just mentions "trying to fetch
> > storage
> > >> pool from libvirt" all the time. I checked my storage pool through
> > "virsh
> > >> pool-list" and it shows the storage pool mentioned in local storage
> > under
> > >> agent.properties.
> > >>
> > >> Any ideas?
> > >>
> > >> Regards
> > >> Swastik
> > >>
> > >
> >
>
Re: systemvm
Posted by Jagdish Patil <ja...@gmail.com>.
Hey Swastik,
download.cloudstack.org link doesn't look like an issue, but which version
and which hypervisor are you using?
For KVM, download this:
http://download.cloudstack.org/systemvm/4.11/systemvmtemplate-4.11.0-kvm.qcow2.bz2
Regards,
Jagdish Patil
On Wed, Apr 4, 2018 at 1:00 PM Swastik Mittal <mi...@gmail.com>
wrote:
> Hey @jagdish
>
> I was using download.cloudstack.org to download systemVM. Is there any
> bug within the template uploaded here?
>
> @Soundar
>
> I did disable firewall services but din't work. I'll check it again though.
>
> On 4/4/18, soundar rajan <bs...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > disabled firewalld service on the hostname and check. you should able to
> > access using console window.
> >
> > On Wed, Apr 4, 2018 at 10:07 AM, Swastik Mittal <
> mittal.swastik@gmail.com>
> > wrote:
> >
> >> Hey,
> >>
> >> I am installing ACS 4.11 (legacy mode), with management and host on same
> >> server and out-of-band management disabled. My host is enabled and up
> and
> >> ssvm successfully running. Though agent state column shows only '-'.
> >>
> >> CPVM is also running successfully but when I open console window I get
> >> unable to connect. Also I din't find check file in SSVM (accessed
> through
> >> terminal using ssh).
> >>
> >> From SSVM I can ssh into management but wget command to management local
> >> host ain't working (is stuck at connecting but is not able to connect.).
> >>
> >> Agent log does not show any error, just mentions "trying to fetch
> storage
> >> pool from libvirt" all the time. I checked my storage pool through
> "virsh
> >> pool-list" and it shows the storage pool mentioned in local storage
> under
> >> agent.properties.
> >>
> >> Any ideas?
> >>
> >> Regards
> >> Swastik
> >>
> >
>
Re: systemvm
Posted by Swastik Mittal <mi...@gmail.com>.
Hey @jagdish
I was using download.cloudstack.org to download systemVM. Is there any
bug within the template uploaded here?
@Soundar
I did disable firewall services but din't work. I'll check it again though.
On 4/4/18, soundar rajan <bs...@gmail.com> wrote:
> disabled firewalld service on the hostname and check. you should able to
> access using console window.
>
> On Wed, Apr 4, 2018 at 10:07 AM, Swastik Mittal <mi...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
>> Hey,
>>
>> I am installing ACS 4.11 (legacy mode), with management and host on same
>> server and out-of-band management disabled. My host is enabled and up and
>> ssvm successfully running. Though agent state column shows only '-'.
>>
>> CPVM is also running successfully but when I open console window I get
>> unable to connect. Also I din't find check file in SSVM (accessed through
>> terminal using ssh).
>>
>> From SSVM I can ssh into management but wget command to management local
>> host ain't working (is stuck at connecting but is not able to connect.).
>>
>> Agent log does not show any error, just mentions "trying to fetch storage
>> pool from libvirt" all the time. I checked my storage pool through "virsh
>> pool-list" and it shows the storage pool mentioned in local storage under
>> agent.properties.
>>
>> Any ideas?
>>
>> Regards
>> Swastik
>>
>
Re: systemvm
Posted by soundar rajan <bs...@gmail.com>.
disabled firewalld service on the hostname and check. you should able to
access using console window.
On Wed, Apr 4, 2018 at 10:07 AM, Swastik Mittal <mi...@gmail.com>
wrote:
> Hey,
>
> I am installing ACS 4.11 (legacy mode), with management and host on same
> server and out-of-band management disabled. My host is enabled and up and
> ssvm successfully running. Though agent state column shows only '-'.
>
> CPVM is also running successfully but when I open console window I get
> unable to connect. Also I din't find check file in SSVM (accessed through
> terminal using ssh).
>
> From SSVM I can ssh into management but wget command to management local
> host ain't working (is stuck at connecting but is not able to connect.).
>
> Agent log does not show any error, just mentions "trying to fetch storage
> pool from libvirt" all the time. I checked my storage pool through "virsh
> pool-list" and it shows the storage pool mentioned in local storage under
> agent.properties.
>
> Any ideas?
>
> Regards
> Swastik
>
Re: systemvm
Posted by Jagdish Patil <ja...@gmail.com>.
Hey Swastik,
Which SSVM are you using?
Install SSVM from this link:
http://cloudstack.apt-get.eu/systemvm/4.11/
Regards,
Jagdish Patil
On Wed, Apr 4, 2018 at 10:07 AM Swastik Mittal <mi...@gmail.com>
wrote:
> Hey,
>
> I am installing ACS 4.11 (legacy mode), with management and host on same
> server and out-of-band management disabled. My host is enabled and up and
> ssvm successfully running. Though agent state column shows only '-'.
>
> CPVM is also running successfully but when I open console window I get
> unable to connect. Also I din't find check file in SSVM (accessed through
> terminal using ssh).
>
> From SSVM I can ssh into management but wget command to management local
> host ain't working (is stuck at connecting but is not able to connect.).
>
> Agent log does not show any error, just mentions "trying to fetch storage
> pool from libvirt" all the time. I checked my storage pool through "virsh
> pool-list" and it shows the storage pool mentioned in local storage under
> agent.properties.
>
> Any ideas?
>
> Regards
> Swastik
>