Any plans for porting OM vm's to using TorqueExceptions?

[Mathieu Frenette <ma...@freeborders.com>]

I'd just like to know what are the team's plans to porting the OM
velocimacros for using TorqueException instead of Exception...

It would be much cleaner to have all OM's throw TorqueException. :-)

I might not see all the impacts, but at the first glimpse it seems to be
something quite feasible, and backward compatible with all client code,
since all catches for Exception would also work with TorqueException.

In fact, I'm sure it's already on your agenda! ;-)  I'd just like to know
your plan in this regard.

TIA

-- Mathieu


--
To unsubscribe, e-mail:   <ma...@jakarta.apache.org>
For additional commands, e-mail: <ma...@jakarta.apache.org>

Re: Any plans for porting OM vm's to using TorqueExceptions?

[Daniel Rall <dl...@finemaltcoding.com>]

mathieu.frenette@freeborders.com (Mathieu Frenette) writes:

> I'd just like to know what are the team's plans to porting the OM
> velocimacros for using TorqueException instead of Exception...
>
> It would be much cleaner to have all OM's throw TorqueException. :-)
>
> I might not see all the impacts, but at the first glimpse it seems to be
> something quite feasible, and backward compatible with all client code,
> since all catches for Exception would also work with TorqueException.
>
> In fact, I'm sure it's already on your agenda! ;-)  I'd just like to know
> your plan in this regard.

A patch would be great.  That's a very backwards-compatible change.

--
To unsubscribe, e-mail:   <ma...@jakarta.apache.org>
For additional commands, e-mail: <ma...@jakarta.apache.org>