Re: the last build is successful but the project shows as "build in error"

[Julien Stern <ju...@cryptolog.com>]

Emmanuel,

just to let you know, that unfortunately, the issue
http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/CONTINUUM-1384
still happens with beta-3, albeit much less often than with beta-2.

It happened twice in the last two weeks.
In both cases there was nothing in the logs except the fact that
the cvs update for the failing project and the schedule activator
were essentially triggered at the same time.

--
Julien

On Thu, Aug 30, 2007 at 02:38:00PM +0200, Emmanuel Venisse wrote:
> 
> 
> Julien Stern a écrit :
> >On Thu, Aug 30, 2007 at 01:36:38PM +0200, Emmanuel Venisse wrote:
> >>
> >>Julien Stern a écrit :
> >>>On Thu, Aug 30, 2007 at 03:23:13AM -0700, Ionut S wrote:
> >>>>Hi,
> >>>>I don't know for what reason one of our projects (shown when you hit 
> >>>>"Show projects" link) show as "Build in error" although the last 10 or 
> >>>>so builds are successful.
> >>>>
> >>>>Did anybody had this problem ?
> >>>Yes, this happens to us about twice a day with 1.1
> >>>It may be related to http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/CONTINUUM-1384
> >>>
> >>>You may want to check your logs to see if this is the same issue
> >>>or a different one.
> >
> >Emmanuel,
> >
> >>Do you have it with beta-2 too?
> >
> >sorry, I haven't installed beta-2 yet. I will install it and let
> >you know.
> >
> >>What is your default schedule?
> >
> >Our default schedule is short (15 minutes) with many projects (> 200).
> >That's probably why we trigger this issue often.
> 
> yes.
> 
> >
> >>What is the max path length for your files?
> >
> >I'm not sure I understand this question.
> >If you mean the max length of the absolute unix file path from the cvs
> >root, I'd hazard a guess as between 128 and 256.
> 
> it's what I meant.
> 
> >
> >I've taken a very quick look at the continuum code. I would tend to
> >think that this issue may be related to a project state that is not set 
> >back
> >to the correct value because two concurrent threads try to modify it
> >(the thread that performs the scm update and the thread that queues the
> >builds ?)
> >
> >Maybe (just maybe, really :) ) in the class
> >UpdateWorkingDirectoryFromScmContinuumAction.java the latest
> >store.updateProject( project ) could fail, leaving an inconsistent
> >state ?
> 
> if the problem always exist in beta-2, yes, it should be the right place to 
> fix it.
> 
> >
> >Again, this is a wild guess that could be totally wrong, the continuum
> >code is too complex to be understood after a quick look.
> 
> The code isn't too complex as you find where we can have an error about 
> project state ;)
> 
> Emmanuel
> 
> 

Re: the last build is successful but the project shows as "build in error"

[Emmanuel Venisse <em...@venisse.net>]

Julien Stern a écrit :
> On Fri, Sep 21, 2007 at 04:02:01PM +0200, Emmanuel Venisse wrote:
>>
>> Julien Stern a écrit :
>>> On Fri, Sep 21, 2007 at 03:42:25PM +0200, Emmanuel Venisse wrote:
>>>> you use the 1.1-beta-3 sent to the vote, right? not a previeous snapshot?
>>> Dooh, my bad. I mixed up the numbers. Please replace beta-3 by beta-2
>>> below. I was originally using beta-1 when I reported the issue, then
>>> upgraded to beta-2. You guys are releasing faster than I can upgrade ;)
>> hehe
>>
>>> I can try to test beta-3 but as the bug only happens about once a week
>>> now, it will take about two weeks to be confident that it is gone for
>>> good.
>>>
>>> Is there a place where I can download it or should I build it from SVN ?
>> The thread about the release vote and links to download it is there: 
>> http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/maven-continuum-dev/200709.mbox/%3c46F170AD.9070701@venisse.net%3e
>>
>>>> I'll try to reproduce it a new time :(
>>> Don't bother yet. Give me a couple of weeks to try beta-3.
>>> I'll ring you back if the issue it still present.
>> Maybe 1.1 final will be released ;)
> 
> I'll try to speed up. I'll nag you for 1.1.1 otherwise.
> I just tried to use the data management cli, by the way.
> 
> First, I had to manually download data-management-jdo-1.1-beta-3.jar 
> Maybe you could include it directly in the jar ?

I don't know yet :)

> 
> Afterwards, when I tried to export a db, I had the following exception:
> 
> Exception in thread "main"
> org.codehaus.plexus.component.repository.exception.ComponentLookupException:
> Unable to lookup component
> 'org.apache.maven.continuum.management.DataManagementTool', it could not
> be created
> [snip]
> Caused by: java.lang.NoClassDefFoundError:
> org/apache/maven/continuum/store/ContinuumStoreException
> 
> I tried to download and install in my local repo:
> continuum-store-1.1-beta-3.jar

it is in continuum-api
> 
> but the ContinuumStoreException is not in the jar...
> 
> Any suggestion ?

I don't know about this exception without the full stacktrace, but to export an 1.1-beta-2 db, you must use data management cli 1.1-beta-2 and you do the import with 1.1-beta-3

> 
> --
> Julien
> 
>> Emmanuel
>>
>>> --
>>> Julien
>>>
>>>> Emmanuel
>>>>
>>>> Julien Stern a écrit :
>>>>> On Fri, Sep 21, 2007 at 03:13:55PM +0200, Emmanuel Venisse wrote:
>>>>>> I fixed it 3 days ago, before to start the vote of 1.1-beta-3 release.
>>>>> Yes, I saw that. It took me some time to actually test beta-3.
>>>>> I originally though the bug was fixed too, as it did not happen
>>>>> for 4 or 5 days. It really seem to happen rarely now.
>>>>>
>>>>> What is mostly annoying with this bug is when it happens on a "stable"
>>>>> project, or worse on a "parent pom". Because the project needs to
>>>>> be rebuilt manually, it forces the rebuild of many projects.
>>>>>
>>>>> What is really weird is that you could not reproduce the bug even
>>>>> with very short schedule. Maybe the fact that we are using CVS
>>>>> (and not SVN) as the SCM could be the difference ?
>>>>>
>>>>>> For 1.1-beta-3, do you use a db from 1.1-beta-2, a new db or a db 
>>>>>> created by the migration tool?
>>>>> A new DB.
>>>>>
>>>>> --
>>>>> Julien
>>>>>
>>>>>> Emmanuel
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Julien Stern a écrit :
>>>>>>> Emmanuel,
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> just to let you know, that unfortunately, the issue
>>>>>>> http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/CONTINUUM-1384
>>>>>>> still happens with beta-3, albeit much less often than with beta-2.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> It happened twice in the last two weeks.
>>>>>>> In both cases there was nothing in the logs except the fact that
>>>>>>> the cvs update for the failing project and the schedule activator
>>>>>>> were essentially triggered at the same time.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>> Julien
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On Thu, Aug 30, 2007 at 02:38:00PM +0200, Emmanuel Venisse wrote:
>>>>>>>> Julien Stern a écrit :
>>>>>>>>> On Thu, Aug 30, 2007 at 01:36:38PM +0200, Emmanuel Venisse wrote:
>>>>>>>>>> Julien Stern a écrit :
>>>>>>>>>>> On Thu, Aug 30, 2007 at 03:23:13AM -0700, Ionut S wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi,
>>>>>>>>>>>> I don't know for what reason one of our projects (shown when you 
>>>>>>>>>>>> hit "Show projects" link) show as "Build in error" although the 
>>>>>>>>>>>> last 10 or so builds are successful.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Did anybody had this problem ?
>>>>>>>>>>> Yes, this happens to us about twice a day with 1.1
>>>>>>>>>>> It may be related to http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/CONTINUUM-1384
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> You may want to check your logs to see if this is the same issue
>>>>>>>>>>> or a different one.
>>>>>>>>> Emmanuel,
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Do you have it with beta-2 too?
>>>>>>>>> sorry, I haven't installed beta-2 yet. I will install it and let
>>>>>>>>> you know.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> What is your default schedule?
>>>>>>>>> Our default schedule is short (15 minutes) with many projects (> 
>>>>>>>>> 200).
>>>>>>>>> That's probably why we trigger this issue often.
>>>>>>>> yes.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> What is the max path length for your files?
>>>>>>>>> I'm not sure I understand this question.
>>>>>>>>> If you mean the max length of the absolute unix file path from the 
>>>>>>>>> cvs
>>>>>>>>> root, I'd hazard a guess as between 128 and 256.
>>>>>>>> it's what I meant.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> I've taken a very quick look at the continuum code. I would tend to
>>>>>>>>> think that this issue may be related to a project state that is not 
>>>>>>>>> set back
>>>>>>>>> to the correct value because two concurrent threads try to modify it
>>>>>>>>> (the thread that performs the scm update and the thread that queues 
>>>>>>>>> the
>>>>>>>>> builds ?)
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Maybe (just maybe, really :) ) in the class
>>>>>>>>> UpdateWorkingDirectoryFromScmContinuumAction.java the latest
>>>>>>>>> store.updateProject( project ) could fail, leaving an inconsistent
>>>>>>>>> state ?
>>>>>>>> if the problem always exist in beta-2, yes, it should be the right 
>>>>>>>> place to fix it.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Again, this is a wild guess that could be totally wrong, the 
>>>>>>>>> continuum
>>>>>>>>> code is too complex to be understood after a quick look.
>>>>>>>> The code isn't too complex as you find where we can have an error 
>>>>>>>> about project state ;)
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Emmanuel
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>
> 
> 

Re: the last build is successful but the project shows as "build in error"

[Julien Stern <ju...@cryptolog.com>]

On Fri, Sep 21, 2007 at 04:02:01PM +0200, Emmanuel Venisse wrote:
> 
> 
> Julien Stern a écrit :
> >On Fri, Sep 21, 2007 at 03:42:25PM +0200, Emmanuel Venisse wrote:
> >>you use the 1.1-beta-3 sent to the vote, right? not a previeous snapshot?
> >
> >Dooh, my bad. I mixed up the numbers. Please replace beta-3 by beta-2
> >below. I was originally using beta-1 when I reported the issue, then
> >upgraded to beta-2. You guys are releasing faster than I can upgrade ;)
> 
> hehe
> 
> >
> >I can try to test beta-3 but as the bug only happens about once a week
> >now, it will take about two weeks to be confident that it is gone for
> >good.
> >
> >Is there a place where I can download it or should I build it from SVN ?
> 
> The thread about the release vote and links to download it is there: 
> http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/maven-continuum-dev/200709.mbox/%3c46F170AD.9070701@venisse.net%3e
> 
> >
> >>I'll try to reproduce it a new time :(
> >
> >Don't bother yet. Give me a couple of weeks to try beta-3.
> >I'll ring you back if the issue it still present.
> 
> Maybe 1.1 final will be released ;)

I'll try to speed up. I'll nag you for 1.1.1 otherwise.
I just tried to use the data management cli, by the way.

First, I had to manually download data-management-jdo-1.1-beta-3.jar 
Maybe you could include it directly in the jar ?

Afterwards, when I tried to export a db, I had the following exception:

Exception in thread "main"
org.codehaus.plexus.component.repository.exception.ComponentLookupException:
Unable to lookup component
'org.apache.maven.continuum.management.DataManagementTool', it could not
be created
[snip]
Caused by: java.lang.NoClassDefFoundError:
org/apache/maven/continuum/store/ContinuumStoreException

I tried to download and install in my local repo:
continuum-store-1.1-beta-3.jar

but the ContinuumStoreException is not in the jar...

Any suggestion ?

--
Julien

> Emmanuel
> 
> >
> >--
> >Julien
> >
> >>Emmanuel
> >>
> >>Julien Stern a écrit :
> >>>On Fri, Sep 21, 2007 at 03:13:55PM +0200, Emmanuel Venisse wrote:
> >>>>I fixed it 3 days ago, before to start the vote of 1.1-beta-3 release.
> >>>Yes, I saw that. It took me some time to actually test beta-3.
> >>>I originally though the bug was fixed too, as it did not happen
> >>>for 4 or 5 days. It really seem to happen rarely now.
> >>>
> >>>What is mostly annoying with this bug is when it happens on a "stable"
> >>>project, or worse on a "parent pom". Because the project needs to
> >>>be rebuilt manually, it forces the rebuild of many projects.
> >>>
> >>>What is really weird is that you could not reproduce the bug even
> >>>with very short schedule. Maybe the fact that we are using CVS
> >>>(and not SVN) as the SCM could be the difference ?
> >>>
> >>>>For 1.1-beta-3, do you use a db from 1.1-beta-2, a new db or a db 
> >>>>created by the migration tool?
> >>>A new DB.
> >>>
> >>>--
> >>>Julien
> >>>
> >>>>Emmanuel
> >>>>
> >>>>Julien Stern a écrit :
> >>>>>Emmanuel,
> >>>>>
> >>>>>just to let you know, that unfortunately, the issue
> >>>>>http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/CONTINUUM-1384
> >>>>>still happens with beta-3, albeit much less often than with beta-2.
> >>>>>
> >>>>>It happened twice in the last two weeks.
> >>>>>In both cases there was nothing in the logs except the fact that
> >>>>>the cvs update for the failing project and the schedule activator
> >>>>>were essentially triggered at the same time.
> >>>>>
> >>>>>--
> >>>>>Julien
> >>>>>
> >>>>>On Thu, Aug 30, 2007 at 02:38:00PM +0200, Emmanuel Venisse wrote:
> >>>>>>Julien Stern a écrit :
> >>>>>>>On Thu, Aug 30, 2007 at 01:36:38PM +0200, Emmanuel Venisse wrote:
> >>>>>>>>Julien Stern a écrit :
> >>>>>>>>>On Thu, Aug 30, 2007 at 03:23:13AM -0700, Ionut S wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>Hi,
> >>>>>>>>>>I don't know for what reason one of our projects (shown when you 
> >>>>>>>>>>hit "Show projects" link) show as "Build in error" although the 
> >>>>>>>>>>last 10 or so builds are successful.
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>Did anybody had this problem ?
> >>>>>>>>>Yes, this happens to us about twice a day with 1.1
> >>>>>>>>>It may be related to http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/CONTINUUM-1384
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>You may want to check your logs to see if this is the same issue
> >>>>>>>>>or a different one.
> >>>>>>>Emmanuel,
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>Do you have it with beta-2 too?
> >>>>>>>sorry, I haven't installed beta-2 yet. I will install it and let
> >>>>>>>you know.
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>What is your default schedule?
> >>>>>>>Our default schedule is short (15 minutes) with many projects (> 
> >>>>>>>200).
> >>>>>>>That's probably why we trigger this issue often.
> >>>>>>yes.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>What is the max path length for your files?
> >>>>>>>I'm not sure I understand this question.
> >>>>>>>If you mean the max length of the absolute unix file path from the 
> >>>>>>>cvs
> >>>>>>>root, I'd hazard a guess as between 128 and 256.
> >>>>>>it's what I meant.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>>I've taken a very quick look at the continuum code. I would tend to
> >>>>>>>think that this issue may be related to a project state that is not 
> >>>>>>>set back
> >>>>>>>to the correct value because two concurrent threads try to modify it
> >>>>>>>(the thread that performs the scm update and the thread that queues 
> >>>>>>>the
> >>>>>>>builds ?)
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>Maybe (just maybe, really :) ) in the class
> >>>>>>>UpdateWorkingDirectoryFromScmContinuumAction.java the latest
> >>>>>>>store.updateProject( project ) could fail, leaving an inconsistent
> >>>>>>>state ?
> >>>>>>if the problem always exist in beta-2, yes, it should be the right 
> >>>>>>place to fix it.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>>Again, this is a wild guess that could be totally wrong, the 
> >>>>>>>continuum
> >>>>>>>code is too complex to be understood after a quick look.
> >>>>>>The code isn't too complex as you find where we can have an error 
> >>>>>>about project state ;)
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>Emmanuel
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>
> >
> >
> 

Re: the last build is successful but the project shows as "build in error"

[Emmanuel Venisse <em...@venisse.net>]

Julien Stern a écrit :
> On Fri, Sep 21, 2007 at 03:42:25PM +0200, Emmanuel Venisse wrote:
>> you use the 1.1-beta-3 sent to the vote, right? not a previeous snapshot?
> 
> Dooh, my bad. I mixed up the numbers. Please replace beta-3 by beta-2
> below. I was originally using beta-1 when I reported the issue, then
> upgraded to beta-2. You guys are releasing faster than I can upgrade ;)

hehe

> 
> I can try to test beta-3 but as the bug only happens about once a week
> now, it will take about two weeks to be confident that it is gone for
> good.
> 
> Is there a place where I can download it or should I build it from SVN ?

The thread about the release vote and links to download it is there: http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/maven-continuum-dev/200709.mbox/%3c46F170AD.9070701@venisse.net%3e

> 
>> I'll try to reproduce it a new time :(
> 
> Don't bother yet. Give me a couple of weeks to try beta-3.
> I'll ring you back if the issue it still present.

Maybe 1.1 final will be released ;)

Emmanuel

> 
> --
> Julien
> 
>> Emmanuel
>>
>> Julien Stern a écrit :
>>> On Fri, Sep 21, 2007 at 03:13:55PM +0200, Emmanuel Venisse wrote:
>>>> I fixed it 3 days ago, before to start the vote of 1.1-beta-3 release.
>>> Yes, I saw that. It took me some time to actually test beta-3.
>>> I originally though the bug was fixed too, as it did not happen
>>> for 4 or 5 days. It really seem to happen rarely now.
>>>
>>> What is mostly annoying with this bug is when it happens on a "stable"
>>> project, or worse on a "parent pom". Because the project needs to
>>> be rebuilt manually, it forces the rebuild of many projects.
>>>
>>> What is really weird is that you could not reproduce the bug even
>>> with very short schedule. Maybe the fact that we are using CVS
>>> (and not SVN) as the SCM could be the difference ?
>>>
>>>> For 1.1-beta-3, do you use a db from 1.1-beta-2, a new db or a db created 
>>>> by the migration tool?
>>> A new DB.
>>>
>>> --
>>> Julien
>>>
>>>> Emmanuel
>>>>
>>>> Julien Stern a écrit :
>>>>> Emmanuel,
>>>>>
>>>>> just to let you know, that unfortunately, the issue
>>>>> http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/CONTINUUM-1384
>>>>> still happens with beta-3, albeit much less often than with beta-2.
>>>>>
>>>>> It happened twice in the last two weeks.
>>>>> In both cases there was nothing in the logs except the fact that
>>>>> the cvs update for the failing project and the schedule activator
>>>>> were essentially triggered at the same time.
>>>>>
>>>>> --
>>>>> Julien
>>>>>
>>>>> On Thu, Aug 30, 2007 at 02:38:00PM +0200, Emmanuel Venisse wrote:
>>>>>> Julien Stern a écrit :
>>>>>>> On Thu, Aug 30, 2007 at 01:36:38PM +0200, Emmanuel Venisse wrote:
>>>>>>>> Julien Stern a écrit :
>>>>>>>>> On Thu, Aug 30, 2007 at 03:23:13AM -0700, Ionut S wrote:
>>>>>>>>>> Hi,
>>>>>>>>>> I don't know for what reason one of our projects (shown when you 
>>>>>>>>>> hit "Show projects" link) show as "Build in error" although the 
>>>>>>>>>> last 10 or so builds are successful.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Did anybody had this problem ?
>>>>>>>>> Yes, this happens to us about twice a day with 1.1
>>>>>>>>> It may be related to http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/CONTINUUM-1384
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> You may want to check your logs to see if this is the same issue
>>>>>>>>> or a different one.
>>>>>>> Emmanuel,
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Do you have it with beta-2 too?
>>>>>>> sorry, I haven't installed beta-2 yet. I will install it and let
>>>>>>> you know.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> What is your default schedule?
>>>>>>> Our default schedule is short (15 minutes) with many projects (> 200).
>>>>>>> That's probably why we trigger this issue often.
>>>>>> yes.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> What is the max path length for your files?
>>>>>>> I'm not sure I understand this question.
>>>>>>> If you mean the max length of the absolute unix file path from the cvs
>>>>>>> root, I'd hazard a guess as between 128 and 256.
>>>>>> it's what I meant.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I've taken a very quick look at the continuum code. I would tend to
>>>>>>> think that this issue may be related to a project state that is not 
>>>>>>> set back
>>>>>>> to the correct value because two concurrent threads try to modify it
>>>>>>> (the thread that performs the scm update and the thread that queues the
>>>>>>> builds ?)
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Maybe (just maybe, really :) ) in the class
>>>>>>> UpdateWorkingDirectoryFromScmContinuumAction.java the latest
>>>>>>> store.updateProject( project ) could fail, leaving an inconsistent
>>>>>>> state ?
>>>>>> if the problem always exist in beta-2, yes, it should be the right 
>>>>>> place to fix it.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Again, this is a wild guess that could be totally wrong, the continuum
>>>>>>> code is too complex to be understood after a quick look.
>>>>>> The code isn't too complex as you find where we can have an error about 
>>>>>> project state ;)
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Emmanuel
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>
> 
> 

Re: the last build is successful but the project shows as "build in error"

[Julien Stern <ju...@cryptolog.com>]

On Fri, Sep 21, 2007 at 03:42:25PM +0200, Emmanuel Venisse wrote:
> you use the 1.1-beta-3 sent to the vote, right? not a previeous snapshot?

Dooh, my bad. I mixed up the numbers. Please replace beta-3 by beta-2
below. I was originally using beta-1 when I reported the issue, then
upgraded to beta-2. You guys are releasing faster than I can upgrade ;)

I can try to test beta-3 but as the bug only happens about once a week
now, it will take about two weeks to be confident that it is gone for
good.

Is there a place where I can download it or should I build it from SVN ?

> I'll try to reproduce it a new time :(

Don't bother yet. Give me a couple of weeks to try beta-3.
I'll ring you back if the issue it still present.

--
Julien

> Emmanuel
> 
> Julien Stern a écrit :
> >On Fri, Sep 21, 2007 at 03:13:55PM +0200, Emmanuel Venisse wrote:
> >>I fixed it 3 days ago, before to start the vote of 1.1-beta-3 release.
> >
> >Yes, I saw that. It took me some time to actually test beta-3.
> >I originally though the bug was fixed too, as it did not happen
> >for 4 or 5 days. It really seem to happen rarely now.
> >
> >What is mostly annoying with this bug is when it happens on a "stable"
> >project, or worse on a "parent pom". Because the project needs to
> >be rebuilt manually, it forces the rebuild of many projects.
> >
> >What is really weird is that you could not reproduce the bug even
> >with very short schedule. Maybe the fact that we are using CVS
> >(and not SVN) as the SCM could be the difference ?
> > 
> >>For 1.1-beta-3, do you use a db from 1.1-beta-2, a new db or a db created 
> >>by the migration tool?
> >
> >A new DB.
> >
> >--
> >Julien
> >
> >>Emmanuel
> >>
> >>Julien Stern a écrit :
> >>>Emmanuel,
> >>>
> >>>just to let you know, that unfortunately, the issue
> >>>http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/CONTINUUM-1384
> >>>still happens with beta-3, albeit much less often than with beta-2.
> >>>
> >>>It happened twice in the last two weeks.
> >>>In both cases there was nothing in the logs except the fact that
> >>>the cvs update for the failing project and the schedule activator
> >>>were essentially triggered at the same time.
> >>>
> >>>--
> >>>Julien
> >>>
> >>>On Thu, Aug 30, 2007 at 02:38:00PM +0200, Emmanuel Venisse wrote:
> >>>>Julien Stern a écrit :
> >>>>>On Thu, Aug 30, 2007 at 01:36:38PM +0200, Emmanuel Venisse wrote:
> >>>>>>Julien Stern a écrit :
> >>>>>>>On Thu, Aug 30, 2007 at 03:23:13AM -0700, Ionut S wrote:
> >>>>>>>>Hi,
> >>>>>>>>I don't know for what reason one of our projects (shown when you 
> >>>>>>>>hit "Show projects" link) show as "Build in error" although the 
> >>>>>>>>last 10 or so builds are successful.
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>Did anybody had this problem ?
> >>>>>>>Yes, this happens to us about twice a day with 1.1
> >>>>>>>It may be related to http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/CONTINUUM-1384
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>You may want to check your logs to see if this is the same issue
> >>>>>>>or a different one.
> >>>>>Emmanuel,
> >>>>>
> >>>>>>Do you have it with beta-2 too?
> >>>>>sorry, I haven't installed beta-2 yet. I will install it and let
> >>>>>you know.
> >>>>>
> >>>>>>What is your default schedule?
> >>>>>Our default schedule is short (15 minutes) with many projects (> 200).
> >>>>>That's probably why we trigger this issue often.
> >>>>yes.
> >>>>
> >>>>>>What is the max path length for your files?
> >>>>>I'm not sure I understand this question.
> >>>>>If you mean the max length of the absolute unix file path from the cvs
> >>>>>root, I'd hazard a guess as between 128 and 256.
> >>>>it's what I meant.
> >>>>
> >>>>>I've taken a very quick look at the continuum code. I would tend to
> >>>>>think that this issue may be related to a project state that is not 
> >>>>>set back
> >>>>>to the correct value because two concurrent threads try to modify it
> >>>>>(the thread that performs the scm update and the thread that queues the
> >>>>>builds ?)
> >>>>>
> >>>>>Maybe (just maybe, really :) ) in the class
> >>>>>UpdateWorkingDirectoryFromScmContinuumAction.java the latest
> >>>>>store.updateProject( project ) could fail, leaving an inconsistent
> >>>>>state ?
> >>>>if the problem always exist in beta-2, yes, it should be the right 
> >>>>place to fix it.
> >>>>
> >>>>>Again, this is a wild guess that could be totally wrong, the continuum
> >>>>>code is too complex to be understood after a quick look.
> >>>>The code isn't too complex as you find where we can have an error about 
> >>>>project state ;)
> >>>>
> >>>>Emmanuel
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>
> >
> >
> 

Re: the last build is successful but the project shows as "build in error"

[Emmanuel Venisse <em...@venisse.net>]

you use the 1.1-beta-3 sent to the vote, right? not a previeous snapshot?

I'll try to reproduce it a new time :(

Emmanuel

Julien Stern a écrit :
> On Fri, Sep 21, 2007 at 03:13:55PM +0200, Emmanuel Venisse wrote:
>> I fixed it 3 days ago, before to start the vote of 1.1-beta-3 release.
> 
> Yes, I saw that. It took me some time to actually test beta-3.
> I originally though the bug was fixed too, as it did not happen
> for 4 or 5 days. It really seem to happen rarely now.
> 
> What is mostly annoying with this bug is when it happens on a "stable"
> project, or worse on a "parent pom". Because the project needs to
> be rebuilt manually, it forces the rebuild of many projects.
> 
> What is really weird is that you could not reproduce the bug even
> with very short schedule. Maybe the fact that we are using CVS
> (and not SVN) as the SCM could be the difference ?
>  
>> For 1.1-beta-3, do you use a db from 1.1-beta-2, a new db or a db created 
>> by the migration tool?
> 
> A new DB.
> 
> --
> Julien
> 
>> Emmanuel
>>
>> Julien Stern a écrit :
>>> Emmanuel,
>>>
>>> just to let you know, that unfortunately, the issue
>>> http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/CONTINUUM-1384
>>> still happens with beta-3, albeit much less often than with beta-2.
>>>
>>> It happened twice in the last two weeks.
>>> In both cases there was nothing in the logs except the fact that
>>> the cvs update for the failing project and the schedule activator
>>> were essentially triggered at the same time.
>>>
>>> --
>>> Julien
>>>
>>> On Thu, Aug 30, 2007 at 02:38:00PM +0200, Emmanuel Venisse wrote:
>>>> Julien Stern a écrit :
>>>>> On Thu, Aug 30, 2007 at 01:36:38PM +0200, Emmanuel Venisse wrote:
>>>>>> Julien Stern a écrit :
>>>>>>> On Thu, Aug 30, 2007 at 03:23:13AM -0700, Ionut S wrote:
>>>>>>>> Hi,
>>>>>>>> I don't know for what reason one of our projects (shown when you hit 
>>>>>>>> "Show projects" link) show as "Build in error" although the last 10 
>>>>>>>> or so builds are successful.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Did anybody had this problem ?
>>>>>>> Yes, this happens to us about twice a day with 1.1
>>>>>>> It may be related to http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/CONTINUUM-1384
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> You may want to check your logs to see if this is the same issue
>>>>>>> or a different one.
>>>>> Emmanuel,
>>>>>
>>>>>> Do you have it with beta-2 too?
>>>>> sorry, I haven't installed beta-2 yet. I will install it and let
>>>>> you know.
>>>>>
>>>>>> What is your default schedule?
>>>>> Our default schedule is short (15 minutes) with many projects (> 200).
>>>>> That's probably why we trigger this issue often.
>>>> yes.
>>>>
>>>>>> What is the max path length for your files?
>>>>> I'm not sure I understand this question.
>>>>> If you mean the max length of the absolute unix file path from the cvs
>>>>> root, I'd hazard a guess as between 128 and 256.
>>>> it's what I meant.
>>>>
>>>>> I've taken a very quick look at the continuum code. I would tend to
>>>>> think that this issue may be related to a project state that is not set 
>>>>> back
>>>>> to the correct value because two concurrent threads try to modify it
>>>>> (the thread that performs the scm update and the thread that queues the
>>>>> builds ?)
>>>>>
>>>>> Maybe (just maybe, really :) ) in the class
>>>>> UpdateWorkingDirectoryFromScmContinuumAction.java the latest
>>>>> store.updateProject( project ) could fail, leaving an inconsistent
>>>>> state ?
>>>> if the problem always exist in beta-2, yes, it should be the right place 
>>>> to fix it.
>>>>
>>>>> Again, this is a wild guess that could be totally wrong, the continuum
>>>>> code is too complex to be understood after a quick look.
>>>> The code isn't too complex as you find where we can have an error about 
>>>> project state ;)
>>>>
>>>> Emmanuel
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
> 
> 

Re: the last build is successful but the project shows as "build in error"

[Julien Stern <ju...@cryptolog.com>]

On Fri, Sep 21, 2007 at 03:13:55PM +0200, Emmanuel Venisse wrote:
> I fixed it 3 days ago, before to start the vote of 1.1-beta-3 release.

Yes, I saw that. It took me some time to actually test beta-3.
I originally though the bug was fixed too, as it did not happen
for 4 or 5 days. It really seem to happen rarely now.

What is mostly annoying with this bug is when it happens on a "stable"
project, or worse on a "parent pom". Because the project needs to
be rebuilt manually, it forces the rebuild of many projects.

What is really weird is that you could not reproduce the bug even
with very short schedule. Maybe the fact that we are using CVS
(and not SVN) as the SCM could be the difference ?
 
> For 1.1-beta-3, do you use a db from 1.1-beta-2, a new db or a db created 
> by the migration tool?

A new DB.

--
Julien

> Emmanuel
> 
> Julien Stern a écrit :
> >Emmanuel,
> >
> >just to let you know, that unfortunately, the issue
> >http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/CONTINUUM-1384
> >still happens with beta-3, albeit much less often than with beta-2.
> >
> >It happened twice in the last two weeks.
> >In both cases there was nothing in the logs except the fact that
> >the cvs update for the failing project and the schedule activator
> >were essentially triggered at the same time.
> >
> >--
> >Julien
> >
> >On Thu, Aug 30, 2007 at 02:38:00PM +0200, Emmanuel Venisse wrote:
> >>
> >>Julien Stern a écrit :
> >>>On Thu, Aug 30, 2007 at 01:36:38PM +0200, Emmanuel Venisse wrote:
> >>>>Julien Stern a écrit :
> >>>>>On Thu, Aug 30, 2007 at 03:23:13AM -0700, Ionut S wrote:
> >>>>>>Hi,
> >>>>>>I don't know for what reason one of our projects (shown when you hit 
> >>>>>>"Show projects" link) show as "Build in error" although the last 10 
> >>>>>>or so builds are successful.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>Did anybody had this problem ?
> >>>>>Yes, this happens to us about twice a day with 1.1
> >>>>>It may be related to http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/CONTINUUM-1384
> >>>>>
> >>>>>You may want to check your logs to see if this is the same issue
> >>>>>or a different one.
> >>>Emmanuel,
> >>>
> >>>>Do you have it with beta-2 too?
> >>>sorry, I haven't installed beta-2 yet. I will install it and let
> >>>you know.
> >>>
> >>>>What is your default schedule?
> >>>Our default schedule is short (15 minutes) with many projects (> 200).
> >>>That's probably why we trigger this issue often.
> >>yes.
> >>
> >>>>What is the max path length for your files?
> >>>I'm not sure I understand this question.
> >>>If you mean the max length of the absolute unix file path from the cvs
> >>>root, I'd hazard a guess as between 128 and 256.
> >>it's what I meant.
> >>
> >>>I've taken a very quick look at the continuum code. I would tend to
> >>>think that this issue may be related to a project state that is not set 
> >>>back
> >>>to the correct value because two concurrent threads try to modify it
> >>>(the thread that performs the scm update and the thread that queues the
> >>>builds ?)
> >>>
> >>>Maybe (just maybe, really :) ) in the class
> >>>UpdateWorkingDirectoryFromScmContinuumAction.java the latest
> >>>store.updateProject( project ) could fail, leaving an inconsistent
> >>>state ?
> >>if the problem always exist in beta-2, yes, it should be the right place 
> >>to fix it.
> >>
> >>>Again, this is a wild guess that could be totally wrong, the continuum
> >>>code is too complex to be understood after a quick look.
> >>The code isn't too complex as you find where we can have an error about 
> >>project state ;)
> >>
> >>Emmanuel
> >>
> >>
> >
> >
> 

Re: the last build is successful but the project shows as "build in error"

[Emmanuel Venisse <em...@venisse.net>]

I fixed it 3 days ago, before to start the vote of 1.1-beta-3 release.

For 1.1-beta-3, do you use a db from 1.1-beta-2, a new db or a db created by the migration tool?

Emmanuel

Julien Stern a écrit :
> Emmanuel,
> 
> just to let you know, that unfortunately, the issue
> http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/CONTINUUM-1384
> still happens with beta-3, albeit much less often than with beta-2.
> 
> It happened twice in the last two weeks.
> In both cases there was nothing in the logs except the fact that
> the cvs update for the failing project and the schedule activator
> were essentially triggered at the same time.
> 
> --
> Julien
> 
> On Thu, Aug 30, 2007 at 02:38:00PM +0200, Emmanuel Venisse wrote:
>>
>> Julien Stern a écrit :
>>> On Thu, Aug 30, 2007 at 01:36:38PM +0200, Emmanuel Venisse wrote:
>>>> Julien Stern a écrit :
>>>>> On Thu, Aug 30, 2007 at 03:23:13AM -0700, Ionut S wrote:
>>>>>> Hi,
>>>>>> I don't know for what reason one of our projects (shown when you hit 
>>>>>> "Show projects" link) show as "Build in error" although the last 10 or 
>>>>>> so builds are successful.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Did anybody had this problem ?
>>>>> Yes, this happens to us about twice a day with 1.1
>>>>> It may be related to http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/CONTINUUM-1384
>>>>>
>>>>> You may want to check your logs to see if this is the same issue
>>>>> or a different one.
>>> Emmanuel,
>>>
>>>> Do you have it with beta-2 too?
>>> sorry, I haven't installed beta-2 yet. I will install it and let
>>> you know.
>>>
>>>> What is your default schedule?
>>> Our default schedule is short (15 minutes) with many projects (> 200).
>>> That's probably why we trigger this issue often.
>> yes.
>>
>>>> What is the max path length for your files?
>>> I'm not sure I understand this question.
>>> If you mean the max length of the absolute unix file path from the cvs
>>> root, I'd hazard a guess as between 128 and 256.
>> it's what I meant.
>>
>>> I've taken a very quick look at the continuum code. I would tend to
>>> think that this issue may be related to a project state that is not set 
>>> back
>>> to the correct value because two concurrent threads try to modify it
>>> (the thread that performs the scm update and the thread that queues the
>>> builds ?)
>>>
>>> Maybe (just maybe, really :) ) in the class
>>> UpdateWorkingDirectoryFromScmContinuumAction.java the latest
>>> store.updateProject( project ) could fail, leaving an inconsistent
>>> state ?
>> if the problem always exist in beta-2, yes, it should be the right place to 
>> fix it.
>>
>>> Again, this is a wild guess that could be totally wrong, the continuum
>>> code is too complex to be understood after a quick look.
>> The code isn't too complex as you find where we can have an error about 
>> project state ;)
>>
>> Emmanuel
>>
>>
> 
>