You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@karaf.apache.org by Andreas Pieber <an...@gmail.com> on 2012/06/05 22:30:13 UTC
Re:svn commit: r1346392 - /karaf/trunk/assemblies/features/framework/src/main/resources/resources/etc/org.ops4j.pax.url.mvn.cfg
Tbh I do not like this commit. Nevertheless it shows that this is really
the problem. Moving the entry directly into the test setup and reverting
this commit would have the same Effekt but would be rather non intrusive.
At least we can't forget to remove it from the final distribution again
Kind regards Andreas
On Jun 5, 2012 4:08 PM, <cs...@apache.org> wrote:
> Author: cschneider
> Date: Tue Jun 5 14:07:42 2012
> New Revision: 1346392
>
> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1346392&view=rev
> Log:
> KARAF-1522 Add pax snapshot repo to karaf distro
>
> Modified:
>
> karaf/trunk/assemblies/features/framework/src/main/resources/resources/etc/org.ops4j.pax.url.mvn.cfg
>
> Modified:
> karaf/trunk/assemblies/features/framework/src/main/resources/resources/etc/org.ops4j.pax.url.mvn.cfg
> URL:
> http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/karaf/trunk/assemblies/features/framework/src/main/resources/resources/etc/org.ops4j.pax.url.mvn.cfg?rev=1346392&r1=1346391&r2=1346392&view=diff
>
> ==============================================================================
> ---
> karaf/trunk/assemblies/features/framework/src/main/resources/resources/etc/org.ops4j.pax.url.mvn.cfg
> (original)
> +++
> karaf/trunk/assemblies/features/framework/src/main/resources/resources/etc/org.ops4j.pax.url.mvn.cfg
> Tue Jun 5 14:07:42 2012
> @@ -95,5 +95,5 @@ org.ops4j.pax.url.mvn.defaultLocalRepoAs
> org.ops4j.pax.url.mvn.repositories= \
> http://repo1.maven.org/maven2@id=central, \
>
> http://repository.apache.org/content/groups/snapshots-group@id=apache@snapshots@noreleases,
> \
> +
> https://oss.sonatype.org/content/repositories/ops4j-snapshots@id=ops4j.sonatype.snapshots.deploy@snapshots@noreleases,
> \
> file:${karaf.home}/${karaf.default.repository}@id=systemrepo
> -
>
>
>
Re: svn commit: r1346392 - /karaf/trunk/assemblies/features/framework/src/main/resources/resources/etc/org.ops4j.pax.url.mvn.cfg
Posted by "Jamie G." <ja...@gmail.com>.
I'm not completely happy with having any dependencies on snapshots
when it comes to a release - we'll have to keep a very careful eye
here indeed.
Jamie
On Tue, Jun 5, 2012 at 8:34 PM, Christian Schneider
<ch...@die-schneider.net> wrote:
> I think it is ok to have a snapshot repo in the distro as long as we use
> these snapshots in the distro. We just need to make sure we check this
> before
> we release. I think the snapshot repo will even help people who just want to
> download the snapshot distro and test it. I think till now they were not
> able to install the http feature
> as pax web was missing.
>
> In any case I am happy the build fully works again.
>
> Christian
>
> Am 05.06.2012 22:30, schrieb Andreas Pieber:
>>
>> Tbh I do not like this commit. Nevertheless it shows that this is really
>> the problem. Moving the entry directly into the test setup and reverting
>> this commit would have the same Effekt but would be rather non intrusive.
>> At least we can't forget to remove it from the final distribution again
>>
>> Kind regards Andreas
>> On Jun 5, 2012 4:08 PM,<cs...@apache.org> wrote:
>>
>>> Author: cschneider
>>> Date: Tue Jun 5 14:07:42 2012
>>> New Revision: 1346392
>>>
>>> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1346392&view=rev
>>> Log:
>>> KARAF-1522 Add pax snapshot repo to karaf distro
>>>
>>> Modified:
>>>
>>>
>>> karaf/trunk/assemblies/features/framework/src/main/resources/resources/etc/org.ops4j.pax.url.mvn.cfg
>>>
>>> Modified:
>>>
>>> karaf/trunk/assemblies/features/framework/src/main/resources/resources/etc/org.ops4j.pax.url.mvn.cfg
>>> URL:
>>>
>>> http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/karaf/trunk/assemblies/features/framework/src/main/resources/resources/etc/org.ops4j.pax.url.mvn.cfg?rev=1346392&r1=1346391&r2=1346392&view=diff
>>>
>>>
>>> ==============================================================================
>>> ---
>>>
>>> karaf/trunk/assemblies/features/framework/src/main/resources/resources/etc/org.ops4j.pax.url.mvn.cfg
>>> (original)
>>> +++
>>>
>>> karaf/trunk/assemblies/features/framework/src/main/resources/resources/etc/org.ops4j.pax.url.mvn.cfg
>>> Tue Jun 5 14:07:42 2012
>>> @@ -95,5 +95,5 @@ org.ops4j.pax.url.mvn.defaultLocalRepoAs
>>> org.ops4j.pax.url.mvn.repositories= \
>>> http://repo1.maven.org/maven2@id=central, \
>>>
>>>
>>> http://repository.apache.org/content/groups/snapshots-group@id=apache@snapshots@noreleases,
>>> \
>>> +
>>>
>>> https://oss.sonatype.org/content/repositories/ops4j-snapshots@id=ops4j.sonatype.snapshots.deploy@snapshots@noreleases,
>>> \
>>> file:${karaf.home}/${karaf.default.repository}@id=systemrepo
>>> -
>>>
>>>
>>>
>
>
> --
>
> Christian Schneider
> http://www.liquid-reality.de
>
> Open Source Architect
> Talend Application Integration Division http://www.talend.com
>
Re: svn commit: r1346392 - /karaf/trunk/assemblies/features/framework/src/main/resources/resources/etc/org.ops4j.pax.url.mvn.cfg
Posted by Andreas Pieber <an...@gmail.com>.
@Willem not completely sure what you're after. I think we can source
it but what exactly, from where and what do we win by it?
After thinking about it again it might not be the worst idea to
include the snapshot repos into the pax.url.cfg; at least during
development. Might be an option to include the changes into
release.txt? That way jamie would at least catch it during the
release?
another option I could think of is extending our maven plugin to
generate those files from the referenced repos. For snapshot builds
and final builds.
Kind regards,
Andreas
On Wed, Jun 6, 2012 at 4:26 AM, Willem Jiang <wi...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Is there a way to filter the snapshot repository with the resource maven
> plugin ?
>
>
> On Wed Jun 6 07:04:11 2012, Christian Schneider wrote:
>>
>> I think it is ok to have a snapshot repo in the distro as long as we
>> use these snapshots in the distro. We just need to make sure we check
>> this before
>> we release. I think the snapshot repo will even help people who just
>> want to download the snapshot distro and test it. I think till now
>> they were not able to install the http feature
>> as pax web was missing.
>>
>> In any case I am happy the build fully works again.
>>
>> Christian
>>
>> Am 05.06.2012 22:30, schrieb Andreas Pieber:
>>>
>>> Tbh I do not like this commit. Nevertheless it shows that this is really
>>> the problem. Moving the entry directly into the test setup and reverting
>>> this commit would have the same Effekt but would be rather non
>>> intrusive.
>>> At least we can't forget to remove it from the final distribution again
>>>
>>> Kind regards Andreas
>>> On Jun 5, 2012 4:08 PM,<cs...@apache.org> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Author: cschneider
>>>> Date: Tue Jun 5 14:07:42 2012
>>>> New Revision: 1346392
>>>>
>>>> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1346392&view=rev
>>>> Log:
>>>> KARAF-1522 Add pax snapshot repo to karaf distro
>>>>
>>>> Modified:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> karaf/trunk/assemblies/features/framework/src/main/resources/resources/etc/org.ops4j.pax.url.mvn.cfg
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Modified:
>>>>
>>>> karaf/trunk/assemblies/features/framework/src/main/resources/resources/etc/org.ops4j.pax.url.mvn.cfg
>>>>
>>>> URL:
>>>>
>>>> http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/karaf/trunk/assemblies/features/framework/src/main/resources/resources/etc/org.ops4j.pax.url.mvn.cfg?rev=1346392&r1=1346391&r2=1346392&view=diff
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> ==============================================================================
>>>>
>>>> ---
>>>>
>>>> karaf/trunk/assemblies/features/framework/src/main/resources/resources/etc/org.ops4j.pax.url.mvn.cfg
>>>>
>>>> (original)
>>>> +++
>>>>
>>>> karaf/trunk/assemblies/features/framework/src/main/resources/resources/etc/org.ops4j.pax.url.mvn.cfg
>>>>
>>>> Tue Jun 5 14:07:42 2012
>>>> @@ -95,5 +95,5 @@ org.ops4j.pax.url.mvn.defaultLocalRepoAs
>>>> org.ops4j.pax.url.mvn.repositories= \
>>>> http://repo1.maven.org/maven2@id=central, \
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> http://repository.apache.org/content/groups/snapshots-group@id=apache@snapshots@noreleases,
>>>>
>>>> \
>>>> +
>>>>
>>>> https://oss.sonatype.org/content/repositories/ops4j-snapshots@id=ops4j.sonatype.snapshots.deploy@snapshots@noreleases,
>>>>
>>>> \
>>>> file:${karaf.home}/${karaf.default.repository}@id=systemrepo
>>>> -
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>
>>
>
>
>
> --
> Willem
> ----------------------------------
> CamelOne 2012 Conference, May 15-16, 2012: http://camelone.com
> FuseSource
> Web: http://www.fusesource.com
> Blog: http://willemjiang.blogspot.com (English)
> http://jnn.javaeye.com (Chinese)
> Twitter: willemjiang
> Weibo: willemjiang
>
Re: svn commit: r1346392 - /karaf/trunk/assemblies/features/framework/src/main/resources/resources/etc/org.ops4j.pax.url.mvn.cfg
Posted by Willem Jiang <wi...@gmail.com>.
Is there a way to filter the snapshot repository with the resource
maven plugin ?
On Wed Jun 6 07:04:11 2012, Christian Schneider wrote:
> I think it is ok to have a snapshot repo in the distro as long as we
> use these snapshots in the distro. We just need to make sure we check
> this before
> we release. I think the snapshot repo will even help people who just
> want to download the snapshot distro and test it. I think till now
> they were not able to install the http feature
> as pax web was missing.
>
> In any case I am happy the build fully works again.
>
> Christian
>
> Am 05.06.2012 22:30, schrieb Andreas Pieber:
>> Tbh I do not like this commit. Nevertheless it shows that this is really
>> the problem. Moving the entry directly into the test setup and reverting
>> this commit would have the same Effekt but would be rather non
>> intrusive.
>> At least we can't forget to remove it from the final distribution again
>>
>> Kind regards Andreas
>> On Jun 5, 2012 4:08 PM,<cs...@apache.org> wrote:
>>
>>> Author: cschneider
>>> Date: Tue Jun 5 14:07:42 2012
>>> New Revision: 1346392
>>>
>>> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1346392&view=rev
>>> Log:
>>> KARAF-1522 Add pax snapshot repo to karaf distro
>>>
>>> Modified:
>>>
>>> karaf/trunk/assemblies/features/framework/src/main/resources/resources/etc/org.ops4j.pax.url.mvn.cfg
>>>
>>>
>>> Modified:
>>> karaf/trunk/assemblies/features/framework/src/main/resources/resources/etc/org.ops4j.pax.url.mvn.cfg
>>>
>>> URL:
>>> http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/karaf/trunk/assemblies/features/framework/src/main/resources/resources/etc/org.ops4j.pax.url.mvn.cfg?rev=1346392&r1=1346391&r2=1346392&view=diff
>>>
>>>
>>> ==============================================================================
>>>
>>> ---
>>> karaf/trunk/assemblies/features/framework/src/main/resources/resources/etc/org.ops4j.pax.url.mvn.cfg
>>>
>>> (original)
>>> +++
>>> karaf/trunk/assemblies/features/framework/src/main/resources/resources/etc/org.ops4j.pax.url.mvn.cfg
>>>
>>> Tue Jun 5 14:07:42 2012
>>> @@ -95,5 +95,5 @@ org.ops4j.pax.url.mvn.defaultLocalRepoAs
>>> org.ops4j.pax.url.mvn.repositories= \
>>> http://repo1.maven.org/maven2@id=central, \
>>>
>>> http://repository.apache.org/content/groups/snapshots-group@id=apache@snapshots@noreleases,
>>>
>>> \
>>> +
>>> https://oss.sonatype.org/content/repositories/ops4j-snapshots@id=ops4j.sonatype.snapshots.deploy@snapshots@noreleases,
>>>
>>> \
>>> file:${karaf.home}/${karaf.default.repository}@id=systemrepo
>>> -
>>>
>>>
>>>
>
>
--
Willem
----------------------------------
CamelOne 2012 Conference, May 15-16, 2012: http://camelone.com
FuseSource
Web: http://www.fusesource.com
Blog: http://willemjiang.blogspot.com (English)
http://jnn.javaeye.com (Chinese)
Twitter: willemjiang
Weibo: willemjiang
Re: svn commit: r1346392 - /karaf/trunk/assemblies/features/framework/src/main/resources/resources/etc/org.ops4j.pax.url.mvn.cfg
Posted by Christian Schneider <ch...@die-schneider.net>.
I think it is ok to have a snapshot repo in the distro as long as we use
these snapshots in the distro. We just need to make sure we check this
before
we release. I think the snapshot repo will even help people who just
want to download the snapshot distro and test it. I think till now they
were not able to install the http feature
as pax web was missing.
In any case I am happy the build fully works again.
Christian
Am 05.06.2012 22:30, schrieb Andreas Pieber:
> Tbh I do not like this commit. Nevertheless it shows that this is really
> the problem. Moving the entry directly into the test setup and reverting
> this commit would have the same Effekt but would be rather non intrusive.
> At least we can't forget to remove it from the final distribution again
>
> Kind regards Andreas
> On Jun 5, 2012 4:08 PM,<cs...@apache.org> wrote:
>
>> Author: cschneider
>> Date: Tue Jun 5 14:07:42 2012
>> New Revision: 1346392
>>
>> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1346392&view=rev
>> Log:
>> KARAF-1522 Add pax snapshot repo to karaf distro
>>
>> Modified:
>>
>> karaf/trunk/assemblies/features/framework/src/main/resources/resources/etc/org.ops4j.pax.url.mvn.cfg
>>
>> Modified:
>> karaf/trunk/assemblies/features/framework/src/main/resources/resources/etc/org.ops4j.pax.url.mvn.cfg
>> URL:
>> http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/karaf/trunk/assemblies/features/framework/src/main/resources/resources/etc/org.ops4j.pax.url.mvn.cfg?rev=1346392&r1=1346391&r2=1346392&view=diff
>>
>> ==============================================================================
>> ---
>> karaf/trunk/assemblies/features/framework/src/main/resources/resources/etc/org.ops4j.pax.url.mvn.cfg
>> (original)
>> +++
>> karaf/trunk/assemblies/features/framework/src/main/resources/resources/etc/org.ops4j.pax.url.mvn.cfg
>> Tue Jun 5 14:07:42 2012
>> @@ -95,5 +95,5 @@ org.ops4j.pax.url.mvn.defaultLocalRepoAs
>> org.ops4j.pax.url.mvn.repositories= \
>> http://repo1.maven.org/maven2@id=central, \
>>
>> http://repository.apache.org/content/groups/snapshots-group@id=apache@snapshots@noreleases,
>> \
>> +
>> https://oss.sonatype.org/content/repositories/ops4j-snapshots@id=ops4j.sonatype.snapshots.deploy@snapshots@noreleases,
>> \
>> file:${karaf.home}/${karaf.default.repository}@id=systemrepo
>> -
>>
>>
>>
--
Christian Schneider
http://www.liquid-reality.de
Open Source Architect
Talend Application Integration Division http://www.talend.com
Re: svn commit: r1346392 - /karaf/trunk/assemblies/features/framework/src/main/resources/resources/etc/org.ops4j.pax.url.mvn.cfg
Posted by Christian Schneider <ch...@die-schneider.net>.
+1
Christian
Am 06.06.2012 10:46, schrieb Jean-Baptiste Onofré:
> From a "dev" perspective, by default, in the
> etc/org.ops4j.pax.url.mvn.cfg file, I would add apache snapshot repo
> and ops4j snapshot repo (of course @snapshot annotated). It would
> allow users to install snapshot "easily" which can be good in a dev
> perspective.
>
> WDYT ?
>
> Regards
> JB
>
> On 06/06/2012 10:28 AM, Andreas Pieber wrote:
>> as long as it's last "in the line" I'm +1 for it.
>>
>> Kind regards,
>> Andreas
>>
>> On Wed, Jun 6, 2012 at 10:27 AM, Jean-Baptiste
>> Onofré<jb...@nanthrax.net> wrote:
>>> As discussed with Christian on IRC, why not simply let ops4j SNAPSHOT
>>> repository (with @snapshot annotated) by default.
>>>
>>> AFAIR, we had it in the past, so I think it's not a problem.
>>>
>>> Regards
>>> JB
>>>
>>>
>>> On 06/06/2012 10:22 AM, Jean-Baptiste Onofré wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Just to explain, pax-url* should be in the system repo, pax-web*
>>>> not as
>>>> an optional issue.
>>>>
>>>> IMHO, for pax-web, we should not add SNAPSHOT (artifacts or repo), but
>>>> more wait for a release (that we can do easily and quickly).
>>>>
>>>> Regards
>>>> JB
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On 06/06/2012 10:19 AM, Jean-Baptiste Onofré wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> Correct me if I'm wrong but those artifacts should be in the system
>>>>> repo. So, it's not required to have the snapshot repository in the
>>>>> org.ops4j.pax.url.mvn.cfg file as it should be resolved from
>>>>> system repo.
>>>>>
>>>>> We have two cases:
>>>>> 1/ the artifacts are not in the system repo => we have an
>>>>> assembly issue
>>>>> 2/ the artifacts are in the system repo but not used => we have
>>>>> an issue
>>>>> around pax-url-aether (config for instance)
>>>>>
>>>>> My 0.02€
>>>>>
>>>>> Regards
>>>>> JB
>>>>>
>>>>> On 06/05/2012 10:30 PM, Andreas Pieber wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Tbh I do not like this commit. Nevertheless it shows that this is
>>>>>> really
>>>>>> the problem. Moving the entry directly into the test setup and
>>>>>> reverting
>>>>>> this commit would have the same Effekt but would be rather non
>>>>>> intrusive.
>>>>>> At least we can't forget to remove it from the final distribution
>>>>>> again
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Kind regards Andreas
>>>>>> On Jun 5, 2012 4:08 PM,<cs...@apache.org> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Author: cschneider
>>>>>>> Date: Tue Jun 5 14:07:42 2012
>>>>>>> New Revision: 1346392
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1346392&view=rev
>>>>>>> Log:
>>>>>>> KARAF-1522 Add pax snapshot repo to karaf distro
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Modified:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> karaf/trunk/assemblies/features/framework/src/main/resources/resources/etc/org.ops4j.pax.url.mvn.cfg
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Modified:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> karaf/trunk/assemblies/features/framework/src/main/resources/resources/etc/org.ops4j.pax.url.mvn.cfg
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> URL:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/karaf/trunk/assemblies/features/framework/src/main/resources/resources/etc/org.ops4j.pax.url.mvn.cfg?rev=1346392&r1=1346391&r2=1346392&view=diff
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> ==============================================================================
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> ---
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> karaf/trunk/assemblies/features/framework/src/main/resources/resources/etc/org.ops4j.pax.url.mvn.cfg
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> (original)
>>>>>>> +++
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> karaf/trunk/assemblies/features/framework/src/main/resources/resources/etc/org.ops4j.pax.url.mvn.cfg
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Tue Jun 5 14:07:42 2012
>>>>>>> @@ -95,5 +95,5 @@ org.ops4j.pax.url.mvn.defaultLocalRepoAs
>>>>>>> org.ops4j.pax.url.mvn.repositories= \
>>>>>>> http://repo1.maven.org/maven2@id=central, \
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> http://repository.apache.org/content/groups/snapshots-group@id=apache@snapshots@noreleases,
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> \
>>>>>>> +
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> https://oss.sonatype.org/content/repositories/ops4j-snapshots@id=ops4j.sonatype.snapshots.deploy@snapshots@noreleases,
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> \
>>>>>>> file:${karaf.home}/${karaf.default.repository}@id=systemrepo
>>>>>>> -
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> Jean-Baptiste Onofré
>>> jbonofre@apache.org
>>> http://blog.nanthrax.net
>>> Talend - http://www.talend.com
>
--
Christian Schneider
http://www.liquid-reality.de
Open Source Architect
Talend Application Integration Division http://www.talend.com
Re: svn commit: r1346392 - /karaf/trunk/assemblies/features/framework/src/main/resources/resources/etc/org.ops4j.pax.url.mvn.cfg
Posted by Jean-Baptiste Onofré <jb...@nanthrax.net>.
Agree
Regards
JB
On 06/06/2012 01:24 PM, Andreas Pieber wrote:
> Sounds like a plan, nevertheless I think it might be a help for someone
> playing around with karaf or developing on its top to have the most commen
> snapshot repos at hand directly. Don't you think?
> On Jun 6, 2012 1:11 PM, "Ioannis Canellos"<io...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Guys, why don't we use maven filtering capabilities and have different
>> filters per profile?
>> We could then use a release profile with clean repo configuration while the
>> rest of profile use snapshots to aid development.
>>
>> --
>> *Ioannis Canellos*
>> *
>> FuseSource<http://fusesource.com>
>>
>> **
>> Blog: http://iocanel.blogspot.com
>> **
>> Twitter: iocanel
>> *
>>
>
--
Jean-Baptiste Onofré
jbonofre@apache.org
http://blog.nanthrax.net
Talend - http://www.talend.com
Re: svn commit: r1346392 - /karaf/trunk/assemblies/features/framework/src/main/resources/resources/etc/org.ops4j.pax.url.mvn.cfg
Posted by Andreas Pieber <an...@gmail.com>.
Sounds like a plan, nevertheless I think it might be a help for someone
playing around with karaf or developing on its top to have the most commen
snapshot repos at hand directly. Don't you think?
On Jun 6, 2012 1:11 PM, "Ioannis Canellos" <io...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Guys, why don't we use maven filtering capabilities and have different
> filters per profile?
> We could then use a release profile with clean repo configuration while the
> rest of profile use snapshots to aid development.
>
> --
> *Ioannis Canellos*
> *
> FuseSource <http://fusesource.com>
>
> **
> Blog: http://iocanel.blogspot.com
> **
> Twitter: iocanel
> *
>
Re: svn commit: r1346392 - /karaf/trunk/assemblies/features/framework/src/main/resources/resources/etc/org.ops4j.pax.url.mvn.cfg
Posted by Ioannis Canellos <io...@gmail.com>.
Guys, why don't we use maven filtering capabilities and have different
filters per profile?
We could then use a release profile with clean repo configuration while the
rest of profile use snapshots to aid development.
--
*Ioannis Canellos*
*
FuseSource <http://fusesource.com>
**
Blog: http://iocanel.blogspot.com
**
Twitter: iocanel
*
Re: svn commit: r1346392 - /karaf/trunk/assemblies/features/framework/src/main/resources/resources/etc/org.ops4j.pax.url.mvn.cfg
Posted by Andreas Pieber <an...@gmail.com>.
maybe we should also add the general sonatype snapshot repo most
non-asf OS projects use; those repos should help during development
and testing of karaf. Most production environments will change/modify
this file anyhow I assume --> no harm done here --> +1
Kind regards,
Andreas
On Wed, Jun 6, 2012 at 10:46 AM, Jean-Baptiste Onofré <jb...@nanthrax.net> wrote:
> From a "dev" perspective, by default, in the etc/org.ops4j.pax.url.mvn.cfg
> file, I would add apache snapshot repo and ops4j snapshot repo (of course
> @snapshot annotated). It would allow users to install snapshot "easily"
> which can be good in a dev perspective.
>
> WDYT ?
>
> Regards
> JB
>
>
> On 06/06/2012 10:28 AM, Andreas Pieber wrote:
>>
>> as long as it's last "in the line" I'm +1 for it.
>>
>> Kind regards,
>> Andreas
>>
>> On Wed, Jun 6, 2012 at 10:27 AM, Jean-Baptiste Onofré<jb...@nanthrax.net>
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> As discussed with Christian on IRC, why not simply let ops4j SNAPSHOT
>>> repository (with @snapshot annotated) by default.
>>>
>>> AFAIR, we had it in the past, so I think it's not a problem.
>>>
>>> Regards
>>> JB
>>>
>>>
>>> On 06/06/2012 10:22 AM, Jean-Baptiste Onofré wrote:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Just to explain, pax-url* should be in the system repo, pax-web* not as
>>>> an optional issue.
>>>>
>>>> IMHO, for pax-web, we should not add SNAPSHOT (artifacts or repo), but
>>>> more wait for a release (that we can do easily and quickly).
>>>>
>>>> Regards
>>>> JB
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On 06/06/2012 10:19 AM, Jean-Baptiste Onofré wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Correct me if I'm wrong but those artifacts should be in the system
>>>>> repo. So, it's not required to have the snapshot repository in the
>>>>> org.ops4j.pax.url.mvn.cfg file as it should be resolved from system
>>>>> repo.
>>>>>
>>>>> We have two cases:
>>>>> 1/ the artifacts are not in the system repo => we have an assembly
>>>>> issue
>>>>> 2/ the artifacts are in the system repo but not used => we have an
>>>>> issue
>>>>> around pax-url-aether (config for instance)
>>>>>
>>>>> My 0.02€
>>>>>
>>>>> Regards
>>>>> JB
>>>>>
>>>>> On 06/05/2012 10:30 PM, Andreas Pieber wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Tbh I do not like this commit. Nevertheless it shows that this is
>>>>>> really
>>>>>> the problem. Moving the entry directly into the test setup and
>>>>>> reverting
>>>>>> this commit would have the same Effekt but would be rather non
>>>>>> intrusive.
>>>>>> At least we can't forget to remove it from the final distribution
>>>>>> again
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Kind regards Andreas
>>>>>> On Jun 5, 2012 4:08 PM,<cs...@apache.org> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Author: cschneider
>>>>>>> Date: Tue Jun 5 14:07:42 2012
>>>>>>> New Revision: 1346392
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1346392&view=rev
>>>>>>> Log:
>>>>>>> KARAF-1522 Add pax snapshot repo to karaf distro
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Modified:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> karaf/trunk/assemblies/features/framework/src/main/resources/resources/etc/org.ops4j.pax.url.mvn.cfg
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Modified:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> karaf/trunk/assemblies/features/framework/src/main/resources/resources/etc/org.ops4j.pax.url.mvn.cfg
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> URL:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/karaf/trunk/assemblies/features/framework/src/main/resources/resources/etc/org.ops4j.pax.url.mvn.cfg?rev=1346392&r1=1346391&r2=1346392&view=diff
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> ==============================================================================
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> ---
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> karaf/trunk/assemblies/features/framework/src/main/resources/resources/etc/org.ops4j.pax.url.mvn.cfg
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> (original)
>>>>>>> +++
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> karaf/trunk/assemblies/features/framework/src/main/resources/resources/etc/org.ops4j.pax.url.mvn.cfg
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Tue Jun 5 14:07:42 2012
>>>>>>> @@ -95,5 +95,5 @@ org.ops4j.pax.url.mvn.defaultLocalRepoAs
>>>>>>> org.ops4j.pax.url.mvn.repositories= \
>>>>>>> http://repo1.maven.org/maven2@id=central, \
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> http://repository.apache.org/content/groups/snapshots-group@id=apache@snapshots@noreleases,
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> \
>>>>>>> +
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> https://oss.sonatype.org/content/repositories/ops4j-snapshots@id=ops4j.sonatype.snapshots.deploy@snapshots@noreleases,
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> \
>>>>>>> file:${karaf.home}/${karaf.default.repository}@id=systemrepo
>>>>>>> -
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> Jean-Baptiste Onofré
>>> jbonofre@apache.org
>>> http://blog.nanthrax.net
>>> Talend - http://www.talend.com
>
>
> --
> Jean-Baptiste Onofré
> jbonofre@apache.org
> http://blog.nanthrax.net
> Talend - http://www.talend.com
Re: svn commit: r1346392 - /karaf/trunk/assemblies/features/framework/src/main/resources/resources/etc/org.ops4j.pax.url.mvn.cfg
Posted by Jean-Baptiste Onofré <jb...@nanthrax.net>.
From a "dev" perspective, by default, in the
etc/org.ops4j.pax.url.mvn.cfg file, I would add apache snapshot repo and
ops4j snapshot repo (of course @snapshot annotated). It would allow
users to install snapshot "easily" which can be good in a dev perspective.
WDYT ?
Regards
JB
On 06/06/2012 10:28 AM, Andreas Pieber wrote:
> as long as it's last "in the line" I'm +1 for it.
>
> Kind regards,
> Andreas
>
> On Wed, Jun 6, 2012 at 10:27 AM, Jean-Baptiste Onofré<jb...@nanthrax.net> wrote:
>> As discussed with Christian on IRC, why not simply let ops4j SNAPSHOT
>> repository (with @snapshot annotated) by default.
>>
>> AFAIR, we had it in the past, so I think it's not a problem.
>>
>> Regards
>> JB
>>
>>
>> On 06/06/2012 10:22 AM, Jean-Baptiste Onofré wrote:
>>>
>>> Just to explain, pax-url* should be in the system repo, pax-web* not as
>>> an optional issue.
>>>
>>> IMHO, for pax-web, we should not add SNAPSHOT (artifacts or repo), but
>>> more wait for a release (that we can do easily and quickly).
>>>
>>> Regards
>>> JB
>>>
>>>
>>> On 06/06/2012 10:19 AM, Jean-Baptiste Onofré wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Correct me if I'm wrong but those artifacts should be in the system
>>>> repo. So, it's not required to have the snapshot repository in the
>>>> org.ops4j.pax.url.mvn.cfg file as it should be resolved from system repo.
>>>>
>>>> We have two cases:
>>>> 1/ the artifacts are not in the system repo => we have an assembly issue
>>>> 2/ the artifacts are in the system repo but not used => we have an issue
>>>> around pax-url-aether (config for instance)
>>>>
>>>> My 0.02€
>>>>
>>>> Regards
>>>> JB
>>>>
>>>> On 06/05/2012 10:30 PM, Andreas Pieber wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> Tbh I do not like this commit. Nevertheless it shows that this is really
>>>>> the problem. Moving the entry directly into the test setup and reverting
>>>>> this commit would have the same Effekt but would be rather non
>>>>> intrusive.
>>>>> At least we can't forget to remove it from the final distribution again
>>>>>
>>>>> Kind regards Andreas
>>>>> On Jun 5, 2012 4:08 PM,<cs...@apache.org> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> Author: cschneider
>>>>>> Date: Tue Jun 5 14:07:42 2012
>>>>>> New Revision: 1346392
>>>>>>
>>>>>> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1346392&view=rev
>>>>>> Log:
>>>>>> KARAF-1522 Add pax snapshot repo to karaf distro
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Modified:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> karaf/trunk/assemblies/features/framework/src/main/resources/resources/etc/org.ops4j.pax.url.mvn.cfg
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Modified:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> karaf/trunk/assemblies/features/framework/src/main/resources/resources/etc/org.ops4j.pax.url.mvn.cfg
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> URL:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/karaf/trunk/assemblies/features/framework/src/main/resources/resources/etc/org.ops4j.pax.url.mvn.cfg?rev=1346392&r1=1346391&r2=1346392&view=diff
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> ==============================================================================
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> ---
>>>>>>
>>>>>> karaf/trunk/assemblies/features/framework/src/main/resources/resources/etc/org.ops4j.pax.url.mvn.cfg
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> (original)
>>>>>> +++
>>>>>>
>>>>>> karaf/trunk/assemblies/features/framework/src/main/resources/resources/etc/org.ops4j.pax.url.mvn.cfg
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Tue Jun 5 14:07:42 2012
>>>>>> @@ -95,5 +95,5 @@ org.ops4j.pax.url.mvn.defaultLocalRepoAs
>>>>>> org.ops4j.pax.url.mvn.repositories= \
>>>>>> http://repo1.maven.org/maven2@id=central, \
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> http://repository.apache.org/content/groups/snapshots-group@id=apache@snapshots@noreleases,
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> \
>>>>>> +
>>>>>>
>>>>>> https://oss.sonatype.org/content/repositories/ops4j-snapshots@id=ops4j.sonatype.snapshots.deploy@snapshots@noreleases,
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> \
>>>>>> file:${karaf.home}/${karaf.default.repository}@id=systemrepo
>>>>>> -
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>
>> --
>> Jean-Baptiste Onofré
>> jbonofre@apache.org
>> http://blog.nanthrax.net
>> Talend - http://www.talend.com
--
Jean-Baptiste Onofré
jbonofre@apache.org
http://blog.nanthrax.net
Talend - http://www.talend.com
Re: svn commit: r1346392 - /karaf/trunk/assemblies/features/framework/src/main/resources/resources/etc/org.ops4j.pax.url.mvn.cfg
Posted by Andreas Pieber <an...@gmail.com>.
as long as it's last "in the line" I'm +1 for it.
Kind regards,
Andreas
On Wed, Jun 6, 2012 at 10:27 AM, Jean-Baptiste Onofré <jb...@nanthrax.net> wrote:
> As discussed with Christian on IRC, why not simply let ops4j SNAPSHOT
> repository (with @snapshot annotated) by default.
>
> AFAIR, we had it in the past, so I think it's not a problem.
>
> Regards
> JB
>
>
> On 06/06/2012 10:22 AM, Jean-Baptiste Onofré wrote:
>>
>> Just to explain, pax-url* should be in the system repo, pax-web* not as
>> an optional issue.
>>
>> IMHO, for pax-web, we should not add SNAPSHOT (artifacts or repo), but
>> more wait for a release (that we can do easily and quickly).
>>
>> Regards
>> JB
>>
>>
>> On 06/06/2012 10:19 AM, Jean-Baptiste Onofré wrote:
>>>
>>> Correct me if I'm wrong but those artifacts should be in the system
>>> repo. So, it's not required to have the snapshot repository in the
>>> org.ops4j.pax.url.mvn.cfg file as it should be resolved from system repo.
>>>
>>> We have two cases:
>>> 1/ the artifacts are not in the system repo => we have an assembly issue
>>> 2/ the artifacts are in the system repo but not used => we have an issue
>>> around pax-url-aether (config for instance)
>>>
>>> My 0.02€
>>>
>>> Regards
>>> JB
>>>
>>> On 06/05/2012 10:30 PM, Andreas Pieber wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Tbh I do not like this commit. Nevertheless it shows that this is really
>>>> the problem. Moving the entry directly into the test setup and reverting
>>>> this commit would have the same Effekt but would be rather non
>>>> intrusive.
>>>> At least we can't forget to remove it from the final distribution again
>>>>
>>>> Kind regards Andreas
>>>> On Jun 5, 2012 4:08 PM,<cs...@apache.org> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Author: cschneider
>>>>> Date: Tue Jun 5 14:07:42 2012
>>>>> New Revision: 1346392
>>>>>
>>>>> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1346392&view=rev
>>>>> Log:
>>>>> KARAF-1522 Add pax snapshot repo to karaf distro
>>>>>
>>>>> Modified:
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> karaf/trunk/assemblies/features/framework/src/main/resources/resources/etc/org.ops4j.pax.url.mvn.cfg
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Modified:
>>>>>
>>>>> karaf/trunk/assemblies/features/framework/src/main/resources/resources/etc/org.ops4j.pax.url.mvn.cfg
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> URL:
>>>>>
>>>>> http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/karaf/trunk/assemblies/features/framework/src/main/resources/resources/etc/org.ops4j.pax.url.mvn.cfg?rev=1346392&r1=1346391&r2=1346392&view=diff
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> ==============================================================================
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> ---
>>>>>
>>>>> karaf/trunk/assemblies/features/framework/src/main/resources/resources/etc/org.ops4j.pax.url.mvn.cfg
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> (original)
>>>>> +++
>>>>>
>>>>> karaf/trunk/assemblies/features/framework/src/main/resources/resources/etc/org.ops4j.pax.url.mvn.cfg
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Tue Jun 5 14:07:42 2012
>>>>> @@ -95,5 +95,5 @@ org.ops4j.pax.url.mvn.defaultLocalRepoAs
>>>>> org.ops4j.pax.url.mvn.repositories= \
>>>>> http://repo1.maven.org/maven2@id=central, \
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> http://repository.apache.org/content/groups/snapshots-group@id=apache@snapshots@noreleases,
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> \
>>>>> +
>>>>>
>>>>> https://oss.sonatype.org/content/repositories/ops4j-snapshots@id=ops4j.sonatype.snapshots.deploy@snapshots@noreleases,
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> \
>>>>> file:${karaf.home}/${karaf.default.repository}@id=systemrepo
>>>>> -
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>
>
> --
> Jean-Baptiste Onofré
> jbonofre@apache.org
> http://blog.nanthrax.net
> Talend - http://www.talend.com
Re: svn commit: r1346392 - /karaf/trunk/assemblies/features/framework/src/main/resources/resources/etc/org.ops4j.pax.url.mvn.cfg
Posted by Jean-Baptiste Onofré <jb...@nanthrax.net>.
As discussed with Christian on IRC, why not simply let ops4j SNAPSHOT
repository (with @snapshot annotated) by default.
AFAIR, we had it in the past, so I think it's not a problem.
Regards
JB
On 06/06/2012 10:22 AM, Jean-Baptiste Onofré wrote:
> Just to explain, pax-url* should be in the system repo, pax-web* not as
> an optional issue.
>
> IMHO, for pax-web, we should not add SNAPSHOT (artifacts or repo), but
> more wait for a release (that we can do easily and quickly).
>
> Regards
> JB
>
>
> On 06/06/2012 10:19 AM, Jean-Baptiste Onofré wrote:
>> Correct me if I'm wrong but those artifacts should be in the system
>> repo. So, it's not required to have the snapshot repository in the
>> org.ops4j.pax.url.mvn.cfg file as it should be resolved from system repo.
>>
>> We have two cases:
>> 1/ the artifacts are not in the system repo => we have an assembly issue
>> 2/ the artifacts are in the system repo but not used => we have an issue
>> around pax-url-aether (config for instance)
>>
>> My 0.02€
>>
>> Regards
>> JB
>>
>> On 06/05/2012 10:30 PM, Andreas Pieber wrote:
>>> Tbh I do not like this commit. Nevertheless it shows that this is really
>>> the problem. Moving the entry directly into the test setup and reverting
>>> this commit would have the same Effekt but would be rather non
>>> intrusive.
>>> At least we can't forget to remove it from the final distribution again
>>>
>>> Kind regards Andreas
>>> On Jun 5, 2012 4:08 PM,<cs...@apache.org> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Author: cschneider
>>>> Date: Tue Jun 5 14:07:42 2012
>>>> New Revision: 1346392
>>>>
>>>> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1346392&view=rev
>>>> Log:
>>>> KARAF-1522 Add pax snapshot repo to karaf distro
>>>>
>>>> Modified:
>>>>
>>>> karaf/trunk/assemblies/features/framework/src/main/resources/resources/etc/org.ops4j.pax.url.mvn.cfg
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Modified:
>>>> karaf/trunk/assemblies/features/framework/src/main/resources/resources/etc/org.ops4j.pax.url.mvn.cfg
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> URL:
>>>> http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/karaf/trunk/assemblies/features/framework/src/main/resources/resources/etc/org.ops4j.pax.url.mvn.cfg?rev=1346392&r1=1346391&r2=1346392&view=diff
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> ==============================================================================
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> ---
>>>> karaf/trunk/assemblies/features/framework/src/main/resources/resources/etc/org.ops4j.pax.url.mvn.cfg
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> (original)
>>>> +++
>>>> karaf/trunk/assemblies/features/framework/src/main/resources/resources/etc/org.ops4j.pax.url.mvn.cfg
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Tue Jun 5 14:07:42 2012
>>>> @@ -95,5 +95,5 @@ org.ops4j.pax.url.mvn.defaultLocalRepoAs
>>>> org.ops4j.pax.url.mvn.repositories= \
>>>> http://repo1.maven.org/maven2@id=central, \
>>>>
>>>> http://repository.apache.org/content/groups/snapshots-group@id=apache@snapshots@noreleases,
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> \
>>>> +
>>>> https://oss.sonatype.org/content/repositories/ops4j-snapshots@id=ops4j.sonatype.snapshots.deploy@snapshots@noreleases,
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> \
>>>> file:${karaf.home}/${karaf.default.repository}@id=systemrepo
>>>> -
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>
>
--
Jean-Baptiste Onofré
jbonofre@apache.org
http://blog.nanthrax.net
Talend - http://www.talend.com
Re: svn commit: r1346392 - /karaf/trunk/assemblies/features/framework/src/main/resources/resources/etc/org.ops4j.pax.url.mvn.cfg
Posted by Jean-Baptiste Onofré <jb...@nanthrax.net>.
Just to explain, pax-url* should be in the system repo, pax-web* not as
an optional issue.
IMHO, for pax-web, we should not add SNAPSHOT (artifacts or repo), but
more wait for a release (that we can do easily and quickly).
Regards
JB
On 06/06/2012 10:19 AM, Jean-Baptiste Onofré wrote:
> Correct me if I'm wrong but those artifacts should be in the system
> repo. So, it's not required to have the snapshot repository in the
> org.ops4j.pax.url.mvn.cfg file as it should be resolved from system repo.
>
> We have two cases:
> 1/ the artifacts are not in the system repo => we have an assembly issue
> 2/ the artifacts are in the system repo but not used => we have an issue
> around pax-url-aether (config for instance)
>
> My 0.02€
>
> Regards
> JB
>
> On 06/05/2012 10:30 PM, Andreas Pieber wrote:
>> Tbh I do not like this commit. Nevertheless it shows that this is really
>> the problem. Moving the entry directly into the test setup and reverting
>> this commit would have the same Effekt but would be rather non intrusive.
>> At least we can't forget to remove it from the final distribution again
>>
>> Kind regards Andreas
>> On Jun 5, 2012 4:08 PM,<cs...@apache.org> wrote:
>>
>>> Author: cschneider
>>> Date: Tue Jun 5 14:07:42 2012
>>> New Revision: 1346392
>>>
>>> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1346392&view=rev
>>> Log:
>>> KARAF-1522 Add pax snapshot repo to karaf distro
>>>
>>> Modified:
>>>
>>> karaf/trunk/assemblies/features/framework/src/main/resources/resources/etc/org.ops4j.pax.url.mvn.cfg
>>>
>>>
>>> Modified:
>>> karaf/trunk/assemblies/features/framework/src/main/resources/resources/etc/org.ops4j.pax.url.mvn.cfg
>>>
>>> URL:
>>> http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/karaf/trunk/assemblies/features/framework/src/main/resources/resources/etc/org.ops4j.pax.url.mvn.cfg?rev=1346392&r1=1346391&r2=1346392&view=diff
>>>
>>>
>>> ==============================================================================
>>>
>>> ---
>>> karaf/trunk/assemblies/features/framework/src/main/resources/resources/etc/org.ops4j.pax.url.mvn.cfg
>>>
>>> (original)
>>> +++
>>> karaf/trunk/assemblies/features/framework/src/main/resources/resources/etc/org.ops4j.pax.url.mvn.cfg
>>>
>>> Tue Jun 5 14:07:42 2012
>>> @@ -95,5 +95,5 @@ org.ops4j.pax.url.mvn.defaultLocalRepoAs
>>> org.ops4j.pax.url.mvn.repositories= \
>>> http://repo1.maven.org/maven2@id=central, \
>>>
>>> http://repository.apache.org/content/groups/snapshots-group@id=apache@snapshots@noreleases,
>>>
>>> \
>>> +
>>> https://oss.sonatype.org/content/repositories/ops4j-snapshots@id=ops4j.sonatype.snapshots.deploy@snapshots@noreleases,
>>>
>>> \
>>> file:${karaf.home}/${karaf.default.repository}@id=systemrepo
>>> -
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>
--
Jean-Baptiste Onofré
jbonofre@apache.org
http://blog.nanthrax.net
Talend - http://www.talend.com
Re: svn commit: r1346392 - /karaf/trunk/assemblies/features/framework/src/main/resources/resources/etc/org.ops4j.pax.url.mvn.cfg
Posted by Jean-Baptiste Onofré <jb...@nanthrax.net>.
Correct me if I'm wrong but those artifacts should be in the system
repo. So, it's not required to have the snapshot repository in the
org.ops4j.pax.url.mvn.cfg file as it should be resolved from system repo.
We have two cases:
1/ the artifacts are not in the system repo => we have an assembly issue
2/ the artifacts are in the system repo but not used => we have an issue
around pax-url-aether (config for instance)
My 0.02€
Regards
JB
On 06/05/2012 10:30 PM, Andreas Pieber wrote:
> Tbh I do not like this commit. Nevertheless it shows that this is really
> the problem. Moving the entry directly into the test setup and reverting
> this commit would have the same Effekt but would be rather non intrusive.
> At least we can't forget to remove it from the final distribution again
>
> Kind regards Andreas
> On Jun 5, 2012 4:08 PM,<cs...@apache.org> wrote:
>
>> Author: cschneider
>> Date: Tue Jun 5 14:07:42 2012
>> New Revision: 1346392
>>
>> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1346392&view=rev
>> Log:
>> KARAF-1522 Add pax snapshot repo to karaf distro
>>
>> Modified:
>>
>> karaf/trunk/assemblies/features/framework/src/main/resources/resources/etc/org.ops4j.pax.url.mvn.cfg
>>
>> Modified:
>> karaf/trunk/assemblies/features/framework/src/main/resources/resources/etc/org.ops4j.pax.url.mvn.cfg
>> URL:
>> http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/karaf/trunk/assemblies/features/framework/src/main/resources/resources/etc/org.ops4j.pax.url.mvn.cfg?rev=1346392&r1=1346391&r2=1346392&view=diff
>>
>> ==============================================================================
>> ---
>> karaf/trunk/assemblies/features/framework/src/main/resources/resources/etc/org.ops4j.pax.url.mvn.cfg
>> (original)
>> +++
>> karaf/trunk/assemblies/features/framework/src/main/resources/resources/etc/org.ops4j.pax.url.mvn.cfg
>> Tue Jun 5 14:07:42 2012
>> @@ -95,5 +95,5 @@ org.ops4j.pax.url.mvn.defaultLocalRepoAs
>> org.ops4j.pax.url.mvn.repositories= \
>> http://repo1.maven.org/maven2@id=central, \
>>
>> http://repository.apache.org/content/groups/snapshots-group@id=apache@snapshots@noreleases,
>> \
>> +
>> https://oss.sonatype.org/content/repositories/ops4j-snapshots@id=ops4j.sonatype.snapshots.deploy@snapshots@noreleases,
>> \
>> file:${karaf.home}/${karaf.default.repository}@id=systemrepo
>> -
>>
>>
>>
>
--
Jean-Baptiste Onofré
jbonofre@apache.org
http://blog.nanthrax.net
Talend - http://www.talend.com