You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to legal-discuss@apache.org by "Heping Wang (Jira)" <ji...@apache.org> on 2022/01/10 08:05:00 UTC
[jira] [Created] (LEGAL-592) Third-party jar of [Indiana University Extreme! Lab Software License] is used in the binary release, whether it satisfies license policy?
Heping Wang created LEGAL-592:
---------------------------------
Summary: Third-party jar of [Indiana University Extreme! Lab Software License] is used in the binary release, whether it satisfies license policy?
Key: LEGAL-592
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LEGAL-592
Project: Legal Discuss
Issue Type: Question
Reporter: Heping Wang
We used org.springframework.cloud:spring-cloud-starter-netflix-ribbon:jar
in linkis project. And It indirectly depends on io.github.x-stream:mxparser. The license of x-stream:mxparser is：
(Indiana University Extreme! Lab Software License) MXParser (io.github.x-stream:mxparser:1.2.2 - http://x-stream.github.io/mxparser)
[https://github.com/x-stream/mxparser/blob/master/LICENSE.txt]
This license does not find the corresponding classification in the A/B/X category[1].
Third-party jar of [Indiana University Extreme! Lab Software License] is used in the binary release, whether it satisfies license policy?
[[1] https://apache.org/legal/resolved.html|https://apache.org/legal/resolved.html]
--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.20.1#820001)
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: legal-discuss-unsubscribe@apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: legal-discuss-help@apache.org
Re: [jira] [Created] (LEGAL-592) Third-party jar of [Indiana University Extreme! Lab Software License] is used in the binary release, whether it satisfies license policy?
Posted by Justin Mclean <ju...@classsoftware.com>.
Hi,
This is similar to the BSD 4 clause license and might be considered Category X. However the similar clause in question limits this to “any documentation” rather than all advertising, so I think you could treat it like any other permissive BSD license as long as you follow that clause 3. Any other opinions on this?
Kind Regards,
Justin
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: legal-discuss-unsubscribe@apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: legal-discuss-help@apache.org