Re: Retagging false positives?

[Robert Nicholson <ro...@elastica.com>]

Yes that's correct. when you relearn a message for bayes you don't  
need to write a new message at all. You just update the db based on  
the contents of the message as HAM or SPAM. that's easy because it's  
easy to query the message back using IMAP and the message-id. But I  
don't think IMAP will easily let you  rewrite the message. I say  
don't think because I honestly haven't looked too hard at the IMAP  
apis yet. I use Mail::Audit to store the message as it arrives in a  
maildir folder. and I use Mail::IMAPClient to read the message to  
relearn based on it's message id.

On Jul 31, 2006, at 1:37 AM, Logan Shaw wrote:

> On Sun, 30 Jul 2006, Loren Wilton wrote:
>> If you know how to run SA to relearn the message, why not just use  
>> SA to strip the headers off the message?  It certainly knows how  
>> to do that, and I'm pretty sure it will output the clean file.
>
> Because if I am understanding this right (not certain of that
> at all), his goal is to clean up the mess that is made when
> a message is tagged as a false positive and the problem he is
> facing in achieving that goal is finding the message once it's
> further down in the chain (i.e. after it has been delivered
> to an IMAP folder).
>
>   - Logan