You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@mxnet.apache.org by Steffen Rochel <st...@gmail.com> on 2019/02/05 04:41:32 UTC

[RESULTS][VOTE] Release Apache MXNet (incubating) version 1.4.0.rc2

Dear MXNet community -
the result of the vote to release Apache MXNet (incubating) version
1.4.0.rc2 are as follows:
Binding:
+1  three (Carin, Indhu, Haibin)
+0  one (Sheng)
-0   one (Anirudh)
-1   none

Non-binding:
+1  six   (Yuxi, Aston, Kellen, Aaron, Tao, Lin)
0 none
-1 none

Voting thread:

https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/5d4aa084e51e9be919d62bfd0e6d625f37318624124a033a5c48507c@%3Cdev.mxnet.apache.org%3E
<https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/5d4aa084e51e9be919d62bfd0e6d625f37318624124a033a5c48507c@%3Cdev.mxnet.apache.org%3E>

The following issues have been raised with v1.4.0.rc2:
1. NOTICE year is wrong (2018): Not considered a stopping issue as release
was started in 2018.
2. TVM NOTICE missing - TVM NOTICE file was added post the commit ID used
in MXNet v1.4.0.rc2 release, not considered a stopping issue
3. build with make passes, but build with cmake failed in
3rdparty/dmlc-core/test/unittest
4. Recent MKLDNN upgrade prevents us from offering binary distribution for
earlier versions before OSX 10.13.

The vote results meet the release voting criteria as defined at
https://www.apache.org/foundation/voting.html#ReleaseVotes: 3 +1 binding
votes, no -1, more positive then negative votes.
I'm not sure there is a difference between -0 and +0 votes, but even if
there is a difference there are more positive vs. negative votes.

I do consider the issues raised not as show stoppers to move forward with
the release. I do suggest to get these issues addressed in the next release
or with a patch on version 1.4.0.
To give everybody a chance to way into my decision as release manger, I
will wait until Wednesday 9am PST (about 36h from now) before starting vote
on general list.
Please speak up asap if you think the release cannot move forward as is and
provide justification.

Regards,
Steffen

Re: [RESULTS][VOTE] Release Apache MXNet (incubating) version 1.4.0.rc2

Posted by Sheng Zha <zh...@apache.org>.
Update on the issue 1. and 4.:
For 1., I fixed the notice year in master branch [1]. If we are to create a new rc, the fix should be cherry-picked.
For 4., MKLDNN has found the issue [2] and posted the fix in their master branch. I'm requesting that the fix be backported for the minor version 0.17 that mxnet 1.4 is using.

-sz

[1] https://github.com/apache/incubator-mxnet/pull/14043
[2] https://github.com/intel/mkl-dnn/issues/405#issuecomment-462400456

On 2019/02/05 04:41:32, Steffen Rochel <st...@gmail.com> wrote: 
> Dear MXNet community -
> the result of the vote to release Apache MXNet (incubating) version
> 1.4.0.rc2 are as follows:
> Binding:
> +1  three (Carin, Indhu, Haibin)
> +0  one (Sheng)
> -0   one (Anirudh)
> -1   none
> 
> Non-binding:
> +1  six   (Yuxi, Aston, Kellen, Aaron, Tao, Lin)
> 0 none
> -1 none
> 
> Voting thread:
> 
> https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/5d4aa084e51e9be919d62bfd0e6d625f37318624124a033a5c48507c@%3Cdev.mxnet.apache.org%3E
> <https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/5d4aa084e51e9be919d62bfd0e6d625f37318624124a033a5c48507c@%3Cdev.mxnet.apache.org%3E>
> 
> The following issues have been raised with v1.4.0.rc2:
> 1. NOTICE year is wrong (2018): Not considered a stopping issue as release
> was started in 2018.
> 2. TVM NOTICE missing - TVM NOTICE file was added post the commit ID used
> in MXNet v1.4.0.rc2 release, not considered a stopping issue
> 3. build with make passes, but build with cmake failed in
> 3rdparty/dmlc-core/test/unittest
> 4. Recent MKLDNN upgrade prevents us from offering binary distribution for
> earlier versions before OSX 10.13.
> 
> The vote results meet the release voting criteria as defined at
> https://www.apache.org/foundation/voting.html#ReleaseVotes: 3 +1 binding
> votes, no -1, more positive then negative votes.
> I'm not sure there is a difference between -0 and +0 votes, but even if
> there is a difference there are more positive vs. negative votes.
> 
> I do consider the issues raised not as show stoppers to move forward with
> the release. I do suggest to get these issues addressed in the next release
> or with a patch on version 1.4.0.
> To give everybody a chance to way into my decision as release manger, I
> will wait until Wednesday 9am PST (about 36h from now) before starting vote
> on general list.
> Please speak up asap if you think the release cannot move forward as is and
> provide justification.
> 
> Regards,
> Steffen
>