You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@jackrabbit.apache.org by "Marcel Reutegger (JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org> on 2007/07/05 16:11:04 UTC
[jira] Resolved: (JCR-812) TCK: RestoreTest.testRestoreLabel
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCR-812?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ]
Marcel Reutegger resolved JCR-812.
----------------------------------
Resolution: Fixed
Fix Version/s: 1.4
Changed the test to only focus on a single versionable node.
Fixed in revision: 553510
> TCK: RestoreTest.testRestoreLabel
> ---------------------------------
>
> Key: JCR-812
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCR-812
> Project: Jackrabbit
> Issue Type: Bug
> Components: JCR TCK
> Reporter: angela
> Fix For: 1.4
>
>
> According to tobi the jackrabbit implementation of 'Node.restoreByLabel' is an interpretation of the
> specification regarding the restore behaviour of versionable child nodes. while that interpetration might
> be legal unless the specification is violated, i would argue that the TCK should not test the interpretation.
> therefore i suggest to modify
> org.apache.jackrabbit.test.api.version.RestoreTest.testRestoreLabel
> by skipping line 334 - 345 in order to limit the test case to the behaviour that is defined by the specification.
> regards
> angela
> ps: the mentioned test is also executed within the scope of WorkspaceRestoreTest because the latter extends RestoreTest.... that's misleading.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.