You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@jackrabbit.apache.org by "Marcel Reutegger (JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org> on 2007/07/05 16:11:04 UTC

[jira] Resolved: (JCR-812) TCK: RestoreTest.testRestoreLabel

     [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCR-812?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ]

Marcel Reutegger resolved JCR-812.
----------------------------------

       Resolution: Fixed
    Fix Version/s: 1.4

Changed the test to only focus on a single versionable node.

Fixed in revision: 553510

> TCK: RestoreTest.testRestoreLabel
> ---------------------------------
>
>                 Key: JCR-812
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCR-812
>             Project: Jackrabbit
>          Issue Type: Bug
>          Components: JCR TCK
>            Reporter: angela
>             Fix For: 1.4
>
>
> According to tobi the jackrabbit implementation of 'Node.restoreByLabel' is an interpretation of the
> specification regarding the restore behaviour of versionable child nodes. while that interpetration might
> be legal unless the specification is violated, i would argue that the TCK should not test the interpretation.
> therefore i suggest to modify
> org.apache.jackrabbit.test.api.version.RestoreTest.testRestoreLabel
> by skipping line 334 - 345 in order to limit the test case to the behaviour that is defined by the specification.
> regards
> angela
> ps: the mentioned test is also executed within the scope of WorkspaceRestoreTest because the latter  extends RestoreTest.... that's misleading.

-- 
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.