You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@esme.apache.org by Richard Hirsch <hi...@gmail.com> on 2010/09/22 10:10:23 UTC
1.2 Planning
Hi,
I know the 1.1 vote is currently in progress but I wanted to ask if we
should move to later lift version - I was thinking 2.1 and Scala
2.8.0.
Thoughts?
D.
Re: 1.2 Planning
Posted by Richard Hirsch <hi...@gmail.com>.
Tried building with 2.80 and 2.1-RC3 and got the following errors:
[INFO] Compiling 51 source files to D:\apache\esme\trunk\server\target\classes
[WARNING] D:\apache\esme\trunk\server\src\main\scala\org\apache\esme\model\Messa
ge.scala:481: error: expected start of definition
[WARNING] @SearchableProperty{val termVector=TermVector.YES, val analyzer="ste
mming"}
[WARNING] ^
[WARNING] D:\apache\esme\trunk\server\src\main\scala\org\apache\esme\model\Messa
ge.scala:487: error: expected start of definition
[WARNING] @SearchableProperty{val termVector=TermVector.YES, val analyzer="def
ault"}
[WARNING] ^
[WARNING] D:\apache\esme\trunk\server\src\main\scala\org\apache\esme\model\Messa
ge.scala:490: error: expected start of definition
[WARNING] @SearchableProperty{val format="yyyy-MM-dd mm:ss"}
[WARNING] ^
[WARNING] D:\apache\esme\trunk\server\src\main\scala\org\apache\esme\model\Messa
ge.scala:493: error: expected start of definition
[WARNING] @SearchableProperty{val termVector=TermVector.YES, val analyzer="def
ault"}
[WARNING] ^
[WARNING] D:\apache\esme\trunk\server\src\main\scala\org\apache\esme\model\Messa
ge.scala:500: error: expected start of definition
[WARNING] @SearchableProperty{val termVector=TermVector.YES, val analyzer="poo
l"}
[WARNING] ^
[WARNING] D:\apache\esme\trunk\server\src\main\scala\org\apache\esme\model\User.
scala:118: error: illegal start of simple expression
[WARNING] ) ++ SHtml.hidden(doSubmit _)
[WARNING] ^
[WARNING] D:\apache\esme\trunk\server\src\main\scala\org\apache\esme\model\User.
scala:119: error: ')' expected but '}' found.
[WARNING] }
[WARNING] ^
[WARNING] 7 errors found
[INFO] ------------------------------------------------------------------------
pom changes
<lift.version>2.1-RC3</lift.version>
<scala.version>2.8.0</scala.version>
Just change lift dependencies to
<artifactId>lift-json_${scala.version}</artifactId>
On Wed, Sep 22, 2010 at 12:08 PM, Imtiaz Ahmed H E <in...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Certainly Scala 2.8, actually again should be to 2.8.1 when it happens soon
> (lot of fixes in 2.8.1). We may of course need to fix up whatever Scala 2.8
> breaks in Esme.
>
> Imtiaz
>
> ----- Original Message ----- From: "Richard Hirsch" <hi...@gmail.com>
> To: <es...@incubator.apache.org>
> Sent: Wednesday, September 22, 2010 1:40 PM
> Subject: 1.2 Planning
>
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> I know the 1.1 vote is currently in progress but I wanted to ask if we
>> should move to later lift version - I was thinking 2.1 and Scala
>> 2.8.0.
>>
>> Thoughts?
>>
>> D.
>
>
Re: 1.2 Planning
Posted by Imtiaz Ahmed H E <in...@gmail.com>.
Certainly Scala 2.8, actually again should be to 2.8.1 when it happens soon
(lot of fixes in 2.8.1). We may of course need to fix up whatever Scala 2.8
breaks in Esme.
Imtiaz
----- Original Message -----
From: "Richard Hirsch" <hi...@gmail.com>
To: <es...@incubator.apache.org>
Sent: Wednesday, September 22, 2010 1:40 PM
Subject: 1.2 Planning
> Hi,
>
> I know the 1.1 vote is currently in progress but I wanted to ask if we
> should move to later lift version - I was thinking 2.1 and Scala
> 2.8.0.
>
> Thoughts?
>
> D.