[GitHub] [arrow-datafusion] berkaysynnada opened a new issue, #6468: Defining Ordering Equivalence at the Source

["berkaysynnada (via GitHub)" <gi...@apache.org>]

berkaysynnada opened a new issue, #6468:
URL: https://github.com/apache/arrow-datafusion/issues/6468

   ### Is your feature request related to a problem or challenge?
   
   Currently, we have the support of a table given an ordering such as `WITH ORDER (c ASC)` with `CREATE EXTERNAL TABLE` statement. However, if we need to give 2 or more orderings for a table, we cannot define it with multiple WITH ORDER's.
   
   ### Describe the solution you'd like
   
   Output orderings are in the type of `Option<Vec<PhysicalSortExpr>>`. After we properly parse multiple with order's, we can refactor it as `Vec<Vec<PhysicalSortExpr>>`.
   
   ### Describe alternatives you've considered
   
   _No response_
   
   ### Additional context
   
   _No response_


-- 
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

To unsubscribe, e-mail: github-unsubscribe@arrow.apache.org.apache.org

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
users@infra.apache.org

[GitHub] [arrow-datafusion] alamb closed issue #6468: Defining Ordering Equivalence at the Source

["alamb (via GitHub)" <gi...@apache.org>]

alamb closed issue #6468: Defining Ordering Equivalence at the Source
URL: https://github.com/apache/arrow-datafusion/issues/6468


-- 
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

To unsubscribe, e-mail: github-unsubscribe@arrow.apache.org

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
users@infra.apache.org