You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@lucene.apache.org by "Simon Willnauer (JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org> on 2012/05/23 20:35:41 UTC
[jira] [Commented] (LUCENE-2443) Don't assume IntsRef offset is 0
after postings bulk read
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2443?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13281783#comment-13281783 ]
Simon Willnauer commented on LUCENE-2443:
-----------------------------------------
seems like this is invalid now no?
> Don't assume IntsRef offset is 0 after postings bulk read
> ---------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: LUCENE-2443
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2443
> Project: Lucene - Java
> Issue Type: Bug
> Components: core/index
> Reporter: Michael McCandless
> Assignee: Michael McCandless
> Fix For: 4.0
>
>
> Yonik found 2 places where we assume the ints starts at offset=0 after bulk read -- we can't do this because in general a codec can give us a slice into private int[] arrays, eg int block codec.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators: https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ContactAdministrators!default.jspa
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@lucene.apache.org