You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to c-dev@axis.apache.org by John Hawkins <HA...@uk.ibm.com> on 2005/02/08 15:43:00 UTC
Gnu Make files
Hi Folk,
I remember a long time ago a small debate about having WSD2Ws generate Gnu
make files? I think this is wierd and I remember some people objecting
previously. However, Do we test this today? If not then I suggest remove
this function on the basis that we're just making more rope to hang
ourselves with?
I've certainly not seen anyone on the mailng list using this?
thoughts?
cheers
John.
Re: Gnu Make files
Posted by Samisa Abeysinghe <sa...@gmail.com>.
Given that we have problems with make file system even with build on
L/Unix like platforms, I feel that it is not worth having it here.
Could document how to compile and link clients/servers using basic g++
commands to help users.
Thanks,
Samisa...
On Tue, 8 Feb 2005 16:18:30 +0000, Andrew Perry2 <PE...@uk.ibm.com> wrote:
> There is a test which checks -m option. but it only checks if the makefile
> is generated or not and not the validity of the makefile.
> These WSDL2WS options tests will be added soon.
>
> Regards,
>
> Andrew Perry
> IBM Web Services Client for C/C++
> perryan@uk.ibm.com
> Mail Point 127
> IBM UK Laboratories. Hursley Park, Winchester, Hants. SO21 2JN
> Tel. Internal 249828 External + 44 (0)1962 819828
> Fax. + 44(0)1962 818080
>
> John
> Hawkins/UK/IBM@IB
> MGB To
> "Apache AXIS C Developers List"
> 08/02/2005 14:57 <ax...@ws.apache.org>
> cc
>
> Please respond to Subject
> "Apache AXIS C Re: Gnu Make files
> Developers List"
>
>
> It is an option currently on WSDL2Ws ->
> "-m<none|gnu> generate make files (none|gnu) - default is
> none\n");
>
> Nadir Amra
> <am...@us.ibm.com>
> To
> "Apache AXIS C Developers List"
> 08/02/2005 14:44 <ax...@ws.apache.org>
> cc
>
> Please respond to Subject
> "Apache AXIS C Re: Gnu Make files
> Developers List"
>
>
> I prefer not to generate makefiles....but if people want this then it
> should be on option on the command that you would need to set (i.e. it
> should not be automatically generated).
>
> John Hawkins <HA...@uk.ibm.com> wrote on 02/08/2005 08:43:00 AM:
>
> >
> > Hi Folk,
> >
> > I remember a long time ago a small debate about having WSD2Ws
> > generate Gnu make files? I think this is wierd and I remember some
> > people objecting previously. However, Do we test this today? If not
> > then I suggest remove this function on the basis that we're just
> > making more rope to hang ourselves with?
> >
> > I've certainly not seen anyone on the mailng list using this?
> >
> > thoughts?
> >
> > cheers
> > John.
>
>
Re: Gnu Make files
Posted by Andrew Perry2 <PE...@uk.ibm.com>.
There is a test which checks -m option. but it only checks if the makefile
is generated or not and not the validity of the makefile.
These WSDL2WS options tests will be added soon.
Regards,
Andrew Perry
IBM Web Services Client for C/C++
perryan@uk.ibm.com
Mail Point 127
IBM UK Laboratories. Hursley Park, Winchester, Hants. SO21 2JN
Tel. Internal 249828 External + 44 (0)1962 819828
Fax. + 44(0)1962 818080
John
Hawkins/UK/IBM@IB
MGB To
"Apache AXIS C Developers List"
08/02/2005 14:57 <ax...@ws.apache.org>
cc
Please respond to Subject
"Apache AXIS C Re: Gnu Make files
Developers List"
It is an option currently on WSDL2Ws ->
"-m<none|gnu> generate make files (none|gnu) - default is
none\n");
Nadir Amra
<am...@us.ibm.com>
To
"Apache AXIS C Developers List"
08/02/2005 14:44 <ax...@ws.apache.org>
cc
Please respond to Subject
"Apache AXIS C Re: Gnu Make files
Developers List"
I prefer not to generate makefiles....but if people want this then it
should be on option on the command that you would need to set (i.e. it
should not be automatically generated).
John Hawkins <HA...@uk.ibm.com> wrote on 02/08/2005 08:43:00 AM:
>
> Hi Folk,
>
> I remember a long time ago a small debate about having WSD2Ws
> generate Gnu make files? I think this is wierd and I remember some
> people objecting previously. However, Do we test this today? If not
> then I suggest remove this function on the basis that we're just
> making more rope to hang ourselves with?
>
> I've certainly not seen anyone on the mailng list using this?
>
> thoughts?
>
> cheers
> John.
Re: Gnu Make files
Posted by John Hawkins <HA...@uk.ibm.com>.
It is an option currently on WSDL2Ws ->
"-m<none|gnu> generate make files (none|gnu) - default is
none\n");
Nadir Amra <am...@us.ibm.com>
08/02/2005 14:44
Please respond to
"Apache AXIS C Developers List"
To
"Apache AXIS C Developers List" <ax...@ws.apache.org>
cc
Subject
Re: Gnu Make files
I prefer not to generate makefiles....but if people want this then it
should be on option on the command that you would need to set (i.e. it
should not be automatically generated).
John Hawkins <HA...@uk.ibm.com> wrote on 02/08/2005 08:43:00 AM:
>
> Hi Folk,
>
> I remember a long time ago a small debate about having WSD2Ws
> generate Gnu make files? I think this is wierd and I remember some
> people objecting previously. However, Do we test this today? If not
> then I suggest remove this function on the basis that we're just
> making more rope to hang ourselves with?
>
> I've certainly not seen anyone on the mailng list using this?
>
> thoughts?
>
> cheers
> John.
Re: Gnu Make files
Posted by Nadir Amra <am...@us.ibm.com>.
I prefer not to generate makefiles....but if people want this then it
should be on option on the command that you would need to set (i.e. it
should not be automatically generated).
John Hawkins <HA...@uk.ibm.com> wrote on 02/08/2005 08:43:00 AM:
>
> Hi Folk,
>
> I remember a long time ago a small debate about having WSD2Ws
> generate Gnu make files? I think this is wierd and I remember some
> people objecting previously. However, Do we test this today? If not
> then I suggest remove this function on the basis that we're just
> making more rope to hang ourselves with?
>
> I've certainly not seen anyone on the mailng list using this?
>
> thoughts?
>
> cheers
> John.