You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to users@qpid.apache.org by Adel Boutros <Ad...@live.com> on 2017/10/18 10:39:46 UTC

[Qpid Java Broker 6.1.4] JDBC fixes

Hello guys,


While testing the tableNamePrefix, we noticed a bug and a very slow performance on Oracle Database.

I have submitted 2 jiras one for each and a pull request on the master of qpid-broker-j.


So I was wondering if they are accepted if it is possible to backport them to 6.1 branch and release 6.1.5 with these fixed?


https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/QPID-7973

https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/QPID-7974


PS 1: Do not hesitate to change my commits or propose enhancements.

PS 2: Is travis connected at qpid-broker-j on github so I can see if my pull request does not fail the build?


Regards,

Adel

Re: [Qpid Java Broker 6.1.4] JDBC fixes

Posted by Adel Boutros <Ad...@live.com>.
Thanks Keith!


Regards,

Adel

________________________________
From: Keith W <ke...@gmail.com>
Sent: Friday, October 20, 2017 9:57:56 AM
To: users@qpid.apache.org
Subject: Re: [Qpid Java Broker 6.1.4] JDBC fixes

Hi Adel



On 18 October 2017 at 11:39, Adel Boutros <Ad...@live.com> wrote:
> Hello guys,
>
>
> While testing the tableNamePrefix, we noticed a bug and a very slow performance on Oracle Database.
>
> I have submitted 2 jiras one for each and a pull request on the master of qpid-broker-j.
>

Belated thanks.

>
> So I was wondering if they are accepted if it is possible to backport them to 6.1 branch and release 6.1.5 with these fixed?
>

Yes, that should be no problem.   There are a couple of things we
would like to include in a 6.1,x defect fix.  Making these part of
that should be no problem.  We regard to timing, hands are full at the
moment with the Qpid Broker v7 (hopefully there will be an RC out in
just over a week), after that attention will turn to the Qpid JMS
Client AMQP 0-x (the 6.3.0 release - mainly to completely cleanly
separate from the Broker J) and the defect fixes due on the 6.1.x
line.

>
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/QPID-7973
>
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/QPID-7974
>
>
> PS 1: Do not hesitate to change my commits or propose enhancements.
>
> PS 2: Is travis connected at qpid-broker-j on github so I can see if my pull request does not fail the build?
>

We use Apache CI instance.

https://builds.apache.org/view/M-R/view/Qpid/

Sometimes we do see spurious failures on some of the slower slaves.


>
> Regards,
>
> Adel

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@qpid.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@qpid.apache.org


Re: [Qpid Java Broker 6.1.4] JDBC fixes

Posted by Keith W <ke...@gmail.com>.
Hi Adel



On 18 October 2017 at 11:39, Adel Boutros <Ad...@live.com> wrote:
> Hello guys,
>
>
> While testing the tableNamePrefix, we noticed a bug and a very slow performance on Oracle Database.
>
> I have submitted 2 jiras one for each and a pull request on the master of qpid-broker-j.
>

Belated thanks.

>
> So I was wondering if they are accepted if it is possible to backport them to 6.1 branch and release 6.1.5 with these fixed?
>

Yes, that should be no problem.   There are a couple of things we
would like to include in a 6.1,x defect fix.  Making these part of
that should be no problem.  We regard to timing, hands are full at the
moment with the Qpid Broker v7 (hopefully there will be an RC out in
just over a week), after that attention will turn to the Qpid JMS
Client AMQP 0-x (the 6.3.0 release - mainly to completely cleanly
separate from the Broker J) and the defect fixes due on the 6.1.x
line.

>
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/QPID-7973
>
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/QPID-7974
>
>
> PS 1: Do not hesitate to change my commits or propose enhancements.
>
> PS 2: Is travis connected at qpid-broker-j on github so I can see if my pull request does not fail the build?
>

We use Apache CI instance.

https://builds.apache.org/view/M-R/view/Qpid/

Sometimes we do see spurious failures on some of the slower slaves.


>
> Regards,
>
> Adel

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@qpid.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@qpid.apache.org