You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to woden-dev@ws.apache.org by Davanum Srinivas <da...@gmail.com> on 2008/04/09 17:18:30 UTC
[Axis2] Common VOTE for XmlSchema/Axiom/Neethi
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Folks,
In the interest of time, i propose we make a joint vote for all 3 commons projects (XmlSchema/Axiom/Neethi). Then woden
can pick up xmlschema/axiom and make their release. Then we cut Axis2 1.4 FINAL.
Sounds like a plan?
thanks,
dims
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (Cygwin)
iD8DBQFH/N5FgNg6eWEDv1kRAnQuAJ451uaLzmeN0DI+nhrUu61UgyWQiACgjohI
IAtgVSq7D8fXem03FW7XVk0=
=GgCd
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: woden-dev-unsubscribe@ws.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: woden-dev-help@ws.apache.org
Re: [Axis2] Common VOTE for XmlSchema/Axiom/Neethi
Posted by Davanum Srinivas <da...@gmail.com>.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
John,
Which tests fail?
- -- dims
John Kaputin (gmail) wrote:
| With XmlSchema 1.4.1 we are seeing a regression in the Woden test results
| for the W3C WSDL 2.0 test suite. We see 4 test cases fail which passed
| successfully when Woden was last tested with XmlSchema 1.3.1. It seems to
| be related to chameleon includes (including a schema that has no TNS). In
| 1.3.1, no target namespace was represented in the XmlSchema object by a
| null. In 1.4.1 no target namespace is represented by the empty string "".
| This change in the representation of a missing target namespace is causing
| the regression in Woden. I think the 1.3.1 behaviour was correct. I don't
| think a missing TNS should be represented as an empty string. Can any
| XmlSchema devs shed more light on this?
|
| thanks,
| John Kaputin.
|
| On 4/10/08, Eran Chinthaka <ch...@opensource.lk> wrote:
|
|> +1 from me too.
|>
|> Thanks,
|> Eran
|>
|> On Thu, Apr 10, 2008 at 9:42 AM, Glen Daniels <gl...@thoughtcraft.com>
|> wrote:
|>
|>> Hi dims:
|>>
|>> Davanum Srinivas wrote:
|>>
|>>> In the interest of time, i propose we make a joint vote for all 3
|>>> commons projects (XmlSchema/Axiom/Neethi). Then woden
|>>> can pick up xmlschema/axiom and make their release. Then we cut Axis2
|>>> 1.4 FINAL.
|>>>
|>>> Sounds like a plan?
|>>>
|>> +1, sounds like a plan. I'll grab the latest and kick some tires.
|>>
|>> --Glen
|>>
|>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
|>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: commons-dev-unsubscribe@ws.apache.org
|>> For additional commands, e-mail: commons-dev-help@ws.apache.org
|>>
|>>
|
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (Cygwin)
iD8DBQFIBLUqgNg6eWEDv1kRAtbDAJ93rhDBchyw8moPsz+Js6qR2pRCPACfTt9K
C0D/1bsFqHwlKCIiwRD1VY4=
=RF6F
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: woden-dev-unsubscribe@ws.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: woden-dev-help@ws.apache.org
Re: [Axis2] Common VOTE for XmlSchema/Axiom/Neethi
Posted by Lawrence Mandel <lm...@ca.ibm.com>.
Dims,
I'll cut another version of Woden M8 as soon as you've got XmlSchema 1.4.2
ready. Let me know.
Lawrence
"John Kaputin (gmail)" <ja...@gmail.com>
04/16/2008 03:21 AM
Please respond to
commons-dev@ws.apache.org
To
commons-dev@ws.apache.org
cc
Subject
Re: [Axis2] Common VOTE for XmlSchema/Axiom/Neethi
Dims,
Your XmlSchema fix worked. Woden now passes the W3C WSDL 2.0 tests that
were
failing with XmlSchema 1.4.1. Thanks.
John Kaputin.
On Wed, Apr 16, 2008 at 12:09 AM, Lawrence Mandel <lm...@ca.ibm.com>
wrote:
> Sounds good Dims. Thanks for the quick turnaround.
>
> Lawrence
>
>
>
>
>
> Davanum Srinivas <da...@gmail.com>
> 04/15/2008 11:54 AM
> Please respond to
> commons-dev@ws.apache.org
>
>
> To
> axis-dev@ws.apache.org
> cc
> commons-dev@ws.apache.org, woden-dev@ws.apache.org
> Subject
> Re: [Axis2] Common VOTE for XmlSchema/Axiom/Neethi
>
>
>
>
>
>
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Team,
>
> Once John confirms this works, i will post a XmlSchema 1.4.2 jar for
VOTE
> and Woden folks can recut another M8 candidate
> with that jar and start their VOTE.
>
> Sounds like a plan?
>
> thanks,
> dims
>
> Davanum Srinivas wrote:
> | John,
> |
> | Please check this revision
> |
> | http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=rev&revision=648283
> |
> | and see if it works for you.
> |
> | -- dims
> |
> | John Kaputin (gmail) wrote:
> | | Sorry, forgot to provide a test case:
> | |
> | |
> |
>
>
http://dev.w3.org/2002/ws/desc/test-suite/documents/good/Chameleon-1G/getBalance.wsdl
>
> |
> | |
> | | The inlined schema in this WSDL2 doc includes another schema that
has
> no
> | | target namespace. In 1.3.1 this missing TNS was represented by a
null.
> In
> | | 1.4.1 it's an empty string.
> | |
> | | regards,
> | | John Kaputin.
> | |
> | |
> | | On 4/15/08, John Kaputin (gmail) <ja...@gmail.com> wrote:
> | |> With XmlSchema 1.4.1 we are seeing a regression in the Woden test
> | results
> | |> for the W3C WSDL 2.0 test suite. We see 4 test cases fail which
> passed
> | |> successfully when Woden was last tested with XmlSchema 1.3.1. It
> | seems to
> | |> be related to chameleon includes (including a schema that has no
> | TNS). In
> | |> 1.3.1, no target namespace was represented in the XmlSchema object
by
> a
> | |> null. In 1.4.1 no target namespace is represented by the empty
string
> | "".
> | |> This change in the representation of a missing target namespace is
> | causing
> | |> the regression in Woden. I think the 1.3.1 behaviour was correct.
I
> | don't
> | |> think a missing TNS should be represented as an empty string. Can
any
> | |> XmlSchema devs shed more light on this?
> | |>
> | |> thanks,
> | |> John Kaputin.
> | |>
> | |> On 4/10/08, Eran Chinthaka <ch...@opensource.lk> wrote:
> | |>
> | |>> +1 from me too.
> | |>>
> | |>> Thanks,
> | |>> Eran
> | |>>
> | |>> On Thu, Apr 10, 2008 at 9:42 AM, Glen Daniels
> <gl...@thoughtcraft.com>
> | |>> wrote:
> | |>>
> | |>>> Hi dims:
> | |>>>
> | |>>> Davanum Srinivas wrote:
> | |>>>
> | |>>>> In the interest of time, i propose we make a joint vote for all
3
> | |>>>> commons projects (XmlSchema/Axiom/Neethi). Then woden
> | |>>>> can pick up xmlschema/axiom and make their release. Then we cut
> | |>> Axis2
> | |>>>> 1.4 FINAL.
> | |>>>>
> | |>>>> Sounds like a plan?
> | |>>>>
> | |>>> +1, sounds like a plan. I'll grab the latest and kick some
tires.
> | |>>>
> | |>>> --Glen
> | |>>>
> | |>>>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> | |>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: commons-dev-unsubscribe@ws.apache.org
> | |>>> For additional commands, e-mail: commons-dev-help@ws.apache.org
> | |>>>
> | |>>>
> | |>
> | |
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
> Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (Cygwin)
>
> iD8DBQFIBM+9gNg6eWEDv1kRAh9NAKDICXnH5zWmsGbC44kA7IQLtGzRzgCgqj4l
> CDAzDLsrhptW4dZqSIm1HEs=
> =PTHx
> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: commons-dev-unsubscribe@ws.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: commons-dev-help@ws.apache.org
>
>
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: commons-dev-unsubscribe@ws.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: commons-dev-help@ws.apache.org
>
>
Re: [Axis2] Common VOTE for XmlSchema/Axiom/Neethi
Posted by Lawrence Mandel <lm...@ca.ibm.com>.
Dims,
I'll cut another version of Woden M8 as soon as you've got XmlSchema 1.4.2
ready. Let me know.
Lawrence
"John Kaputin (gmail)" <ja...@gmail.com>
04/16/2008 03:21 AM
Please respond to
commons-dev@ws.apache.org
To
commons-dev@ws.apache.org
cc
Subject
Re: [Axis2] Common VOTE for XmlSchema/Axiom/Neethi
Dims,
Your XmlSchema fix worked. Woden now passes the W3C WSDL 2.0 tests that
were
failing with XmlSchema 1.4.1. Thanks.
John Kaputin.
On Wed, Apr 16, 2008 at 12:09 AM, Lawrence Mandel <lm...@ca.ibm.com>
wrote:
> Sounds good Dims. Thanks for the quick turnaround.
>
> Lawrence
>
>
>
>
>
> Davanum Srinivas <da...@gmail.com>
> 04/15/2008 11:54 AM
> Please respond to
> commons-dev@ws.apache.org
>
>
> To
> axis-dev@ws.apache.org
> cc
> commons-dev@ws.apache.org, woden-dev@ws.apache.org
> Subject
> Re: [Axis2] Common VOTE for XmlSchema/Axiom/Neethi
>
>
>
>
>
>
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Team,
>
> Once John confirms this works, i will post a XmlSchema 1.4.2 jar for
VOTE
> and Woden folks can recut another M8 candidate
> with that jar and start their VOTE.
>
> Sounds like a plan?
>
> thanks,
> dims
>
> Davanum Srinivas wrote:
> | John,
> |
> | Please check this revision
> |
> | http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=rev&revision=648283
> |
> | and see if it works for you.
> |
> | -- dims
> |
> | John Kaputin (gmail) wrote:
> | | Sorry, forgot to provide a test case:
> | |
> | |
> |
>
>
http://dev.w3.org/2002/ws/desc/test-suite/documents/good/Chameleon-1G/getBalance.wsdl
>
> |
> | |
> | | The inlined schema in this WSDL2 doc includes another schema that
has
> no
> | | target namespace. In 1.3.1 this missing TNS was represented by a
null.
> In
> | | 1.4.1 it's an empty string.
> | |
> | | regards,
> | | John Kaputin.
> | |
> | |
> | | On 4/15/08, John Kaputin (gmail) <ja...@gmail.com> wrote:
> | |> With XmlSchema 1.4.1 we are seeing a regression in the Woden test
> | results
> | |> for the W3C WSDL 2.0 test suite. We see 4 test cases fail which
> passed
> | |> successfully when Woden was last tested with XmlSchema 1.3.1. It
> | seems to
> | |> be related to chameleon includes (including a schema that has no
> | TNS). In
> | |> 1.3.1, no target namespace was represented in the XmlSchema object
by
> a
> | |> null. In 1.4.1 no target namespace is represented by the empty
string
> | "".
> | |> This change in the representation of a missing target namespace is
> | causing
> | |> the regression in Woden. I think the 1.3.1 behaviour was correct.
I
> | don't
> | |> think a missing TNS should be represented as an empty string. Can
any
> | |> XmlSchema devs shed more light on this?
> | |>
> | |> thanks,
> | |> John Kaputin.
> | |>
> | |> On 4/10/08, Eran Chinthaka <ch...@opensource.lk> wrote:
> | |>
> | |>> +1 from me too.
> | |>>
> | |>> Thanks,
> | |>> Eran
> | |>>
> | |>> On Thu, Apr 10, 2008 at 9:42 AM, Glen Daniels
> <gl...@thoughtcraft.com>
> | |>> wrote:
> | |>>
> | |>>> Hi dims:
> | |>>>
> | |>>> Davanum Srinivas wrote:
> | |>>>
> | |>>>> In the interest of time, i propose we make a joint vote for all
3
> | |>>>> commons projects (XmlSchema/Axiom/Neethi). Then woden
> | |>>>> can pick up xmlschema/axiom and make their release. Then we cut
> | |>> Axis2
> | |>>>> 1.4 FINAL.
> | |>>>>
> | |>>>> Sounds like a plan?
> | |>>>>
> | |>>> +1, sounds like a plan. I'll grab the latest and kick some
tires.
> | |>>>
> | |>>> --Glen
> | |>>>
> | |>>>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> | |>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: commons-dev-unsubscribe@ws.apache.org
> | |>>> For additional commands, e-mail: commons-dev-help@ws.apache.org
> | |>>>
> | |>>>
> | |>
> | |
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
> Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (Cygwin)
>
> iD8DBQFIBM+9gNg6eWEDv1kRAh9NAKDICXnH5zWmsGbC44kA7IQLtGzRzgCgqj4l
> CDAzDLsrhptW4dZqSIm1HEs=
> =PTHx
> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: commons-dev-unsubscribe@ws.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: commons-dev-help@ws.apache.org
>
>
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: commons-dev-unsubscribe@ws.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: commons-dev-help@ws.apache.org
>
>
Re: [Axis2] Common VOTE for XmlSchema/Axiom/Neethi
Posted by "John Kaputin (gmail)" <ja...@gmail.com>.
Dims,
Your XmlSchema fix worked. Woden now passes the W3C WSDL 2.0 tests that were
failing with XmlSchema 1.4.1. Thanks.
John Kaputin.
On Wed, Apr 16, 2008 at 12:09 AM, Lawrence Mandel <lm...@ca.ibm.com>
wrote:
> Sounds good Dims. Thanks for the quick turnaround.
>
> Lawrence
>
>
>
>
>
> Davanum Srinivas <da...@gmail.com>
> 04/15/2008 11:54 AM
> Please respond to
> commons-dev@ws.apache.org
>
>
> To
> axis-dev@ws.apache.org
> cc
> commons-dev@ws.apache.org, woden-dev@ws.apache.org
> Subject
> Re: [Axis2] Common VOTE for XmlSchema/Axiom/Neethi
>
>
>
>
>
>
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Team,
>
> Once John confirms this works, i will post a XmlSchema 1.4.2 jar for VOTE
> and Woden folks can recut another M8 candidate
> with that jar and start their VOTE.
>
> Sounds like a plan?
>
> thanks,
> dims
>
> Davanum Srinivas wrote:
> | John,
> |
> | Please check this revision
> |
> | http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=rev&revision=648283
> |
> | and see if it works for you.
> |
> | -- dims
> |
> | John Kaputin (gmail) wrote:
> | | Sorry, forgot to provide a test case:
> | |
> | |
> |
>
> http://dev.w3.org/2002/ws/desc/test-suite/documents/good/Chameleon-1G/getBalance.wsdl
>
> |
> | |
> | | The inlined schema in this WSDL2 doc includes another schema that has
> no
> | | target namespace. In 1.3.1 this missing TNS was represented by a null.
> In
> | | 1.4.1 it's an empty string.
> | |
> | | regards,
> | | John Kaputin.
> | |
> | |
> | | On 4/15/08, John Kaputin (gmail) <ja...@gmail.com> wrote:
> | |> With XmlSchema 1.4.1 we are seeing a regression in the Woden test
> | results
> | |> for the W3C WSDL 2.0 test suite. We see 4 test cases fail which
> passed
> | |> successfully when Woden was last tested with XmlSchema 1.3.1. It
> | seems to
> | |> be related to chameleon includes (including a schema that has no
> | TNS). In
> | |> 1.3.1, no target namespace was represented in the XmlSchema object by
> a
> | |> null. In 1.4.1 no target namespace is represented by the empty string
> | "".
> | |> This change in the representation of a missing target namespace is
> | causing
> | |> the regression in Woden. I think the 1.3.1 behaviour was correct. I
> | don't
> | |> think a missing TNS should be represented as an empty string. Can any
> | |> XmlSchema devs shed more light on this?
> | |>
> | |> thanks,
> | |> John Kaputin.
> | |>
> | |> On 4/10/08, Eran Chinthaka <ch...@opensource.lk> wrote:
> | |>
> | |>> +1 from me too.
> | |>>
> | |>> Thanks,
> | |>> Eran
> | |>>
> | |>> On Thu, Apr 10, 2008 at 9:42 AM, Glen Daniels
> <gl...@thoughtcraft.com>
> | |>> wrote:
> | |>>
> | |>>> Hi dims:
> | |>>>
> | |>>> Davanum Srinivas wrote:
> | |>>>
> | |>>>> In the interest of time, i propose we make a joint vote for all 3
> | |>>>> commons projects (XmlSchema/Axiom/Neethi). Then woden
> | |>>>> can pick up xmlschema/axiom and make their release. Then we cut
> | |>> Axis2
> | |>>>> 1.4 FINAL.
> | |>>>>
> | |>>>> Sounds like a plan?
> | |>>>>
> | |>>> +1, sounds like a plan. I'll grab the latest and kick some tires.
> | |>>>
> | |>>> --Glen
> | |>>>
> | |>>>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> | |>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: commons-dev-unsubscribe@ws.apache.org
> | |>>> For additional commands, e-mail: commons-dev-help@ws.apache.org
> | |>>>
> | |>>>
> | |>
> | |
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
> Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (Cygwin)
>
> iD8DBQFIBM+9gNg6eWEDv1kRAh9NAKDICXnH5zWmsGbC44kA7IQLtGzRzgCgqj4l
> CDAzDLsrhptW4dZqSIm1HEs=
> =PTHx
> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: commons-dev-unsubscribe@ws.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: commons-dev-help@ws.apache.org
>
>
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: commons-dev-unsubscribe@ws.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: commons-dev-help@ws.apache.org
>
>
Re: [Axis2] Common VOTE for XmlSchema/Axiom/Neethi
Posted by Lawrence Mandel <lm...@ca.ibm.com>.
Sounds good Dims. Thanks for the quick turnaround.
Lawrence
Davanum Srinivas <da...@gmail.com>
04/15/2008 11:54 AM
Please respond to
commons-dev@ws.apache.org
To
axis-dev@ws.apache.org
cc
commons-dev@ws.apache.org, woden-dev@ws.apache.org
Subject
Re: [Axis2] Common VOTE for XmlSchema/Axiom/Neethi
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Team,
Once John confirms this works, i will post a XmlSchema 1.4.2 jar for VOTE
and Woden folks can recut another M8 candidate
with that jar and start their VOTE.
Sounds like a plan?
thanks,
dims
Davanum Srinivas wrote:
| John,
|
| Please check this revision
|
| http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=rev&revision=648283
|
| and see if it works for you.
|
| -- dims
|
| John Kaputin (gmail) wrote:
| | Sorry, forgot to provide a test case:
| |
| |
|
http://dev.w3.org/2002/ws/desc/test-suite/documents/good/Chameleon-1G/getBalance.wsdl
|
| |
| | The inlined schema in this WSDL2 doc includes another schema that has
no
| | target namespace. In 1.3.1 this missing TNS was represented by a null.
In
| | 1.4.1 it's an empty string.
| |
| | regards,
| | John Kaputin.
| |
| |
| | On 4/15/08, John Kaputin (gmail) <ja...@gmail.com> wrote:
| |> With XmlSchema 1.4.1 we are seeing a regression in the Woden test
| results
| |> for the W3C WSDL 2.0 test suite. We see 4 test cases fail which
passed
| |> successfully when Woden was last tested with XmlSchema 1.3.1. It
| seems to
| |> be related to chameleon includes (including a schema that has no
| TNS). In
| |> 1.3.1, no target namespace was represented in the XmlSchema object by
a
| |> null. In 1.4.1 no target namespace is represented by the empty string
| "".
| |> This change in the representation of a missing target namespace is
| causing
| |> the regression in Woden. I think the 1.3.1 behaviour was correct. I
| don't
| |> think a missing TNS should be represented as an empty string. Can any
| |> XmlSchema devs shed more light on this?
| |>
| |> thanks,
| |> John Kaputin.
| |>
| |> On 4/10/08, Eran Chinthaka <ch...@opensource.lk> wrote:
| |>
| |>> +1 from me too.
| |>>
| |>> Thanks,
| |>> Eran
| |>>
| |>> On Thu, Apr 10, 2008 at 9:42 AM, Glen Daniels
<gl...@thoughtcraft.com>
| |>> wrote:
| |>>
| |>>> Hi dims:
| |>>>
| |>>> Davanum Srinivas wrote:
| |>>>
| |>>>> In the interest of time, i propose we make a joint vote for all 3
| |>>>> commons projects (XmlSchema/Axiom/Neethi). Then woden
| |>>>> can pick up xmlschema/axiom and make their release. Then we cut
| |>> Axis2
| |>>>> 1.4 FINAL.
| |>>>>
| |>>>> Sounds like a plan?
| |>>>>
| |>>> +1, sounds like a plan. I'll grab the latest and kick some tires.
| |>>>
| |>>> --Glen
| |>>>
| |>>>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
| |>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: commons-dev-unsubscribe@ws.apache.org
| |>>> For additional commands, e-mail: commons-dev-help@ws.apache.org
| |>>>
| |>>>
| |>
| |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (Cygwin)
iD8DBQFIBM+9gNg6eWEDv1kRAh9NAKDICXnH5zWmsGbC44kA7IQLtGzRzgCgqj4l
CDAzDLsrhptW4dZqSIm1HEs=
=PTHx
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: commons-dev-unsubscribe@ws.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: commons-dev-help@ws.apache.org
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: commons-dev-unsubscribe@ws.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: commons-dev-help@ws.apache.org
Re: [Axis2] Common VOTE for XmlSchema/Axiom/Neethi
Posted by Lawrence Mandel <lm...@ca.ibm.com>.
Sounds good Dims. Thanks for the quick turnaround.
Lawrence
Davanum Srinivas <da...@gmail.com>
04/15/2008 11:54 AM
Please respond to
commons-dev@ws.apache.org
To
axis-dev@ws.apache.org
cc
commons-dev@ws.apache.org, woden-dev@ws.apache.org
Subject
Re: [Axis2] Common VOTE for XmlSchema/Axiom/Neethi
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Team,
Once John confirms this works, i will post a XmlSchema 1.4.2 jar for VOTE
and Woden folks can recut another M8 candidate
with that jar and start their VOTE.
Sounds like a plan?
thanks,
dims
Davanum Srinivas wrote:
| John,
|
| Please check this revision
|
| http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=rev&revision=648283
|
| and see if it works for you.
|
| -- dims
|
| John Kaputin (gmail) wrote:
| | Sorry, forgot to provide a test case:
| |
| |
|
http://dev.w3.org/2002/ws/desc/test-suite/documents/good/Chameleon-1G/getBalance.wsdl
|
| |
| | The inlined schema in this WSDL2 doc includes another schema that has
no
| | target namespace. In 1.3.1 this missing TNS was represented by a null.
In
| | 1.4.1 it's an empty string.
| |
| | regards,
| | John Kaputin.
| |
| |
| | On 4/15/08, John Kaputin (gmail) <ja...@gmail.com> wrote:
| |> With XmlSchema 1.4.1 we are seeing a regression in the Woden test
| results
| |> for the W3C WSDL 2.0 test suite. We see 4 test cases fail which
passed
| |> successfully when Woden was last tested with XmlSchema 1.3.1. It
| seems to
| |> be related to chameleon includes (including a schema that has no
| TNS). In
| |> 1.3.1, no target namespace was represented in the XmlSchema object by
a
| |> null. In 1.4.1 no target namespace is represented by the empty string
| "".
| |> This change in the representation of a missing target namespace is
| causing
| |> the regression in Woden. I think the 1.3.1 behaviour was correct. I
| don't
| |> think a missing TNS should be represented as an empty string. Can any
| |> XmlSchema devs shed more light on this?
| |>
| |> thanks,
| |> John Kaputin.
| |>
| |> On 4/10/08, Eran Chinthaka <ch...@opensource.lk> wrote:
| |>
| |>> +1 from me too.
| |>>
| |>> Thanks,
| |>> Eran
| |>>
| |>> On Thu, Apr 10, 2008 at 9:42 AM, Glen Daniels
<gl...@thoughtcraft.com>
| |>> wrote:
| |>>
| |>>> Hi dims:
| |>>>
| |>>> Davanum Srinivas wrote:
| |>>>
| |>>>> In the interest of time, i propose we make a joint vote for all 3
| |>>>> commons projects (XmlSchema/Axiom/Neethi). Then woden
| |>>>> can pick up xmlschema/axiom and make their release. Then we cut
| |>> Axis2
| |>>>> 1.4 FINAL.
| |>>>>
| |>>>> Sounds like a plan?
| |>>>>
| |>>> +1, sounds like a plan. I'll grab the latest and kick some tires.
| |>>>
| |>>> --Glen
| |>>>
| |>>>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
| |>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: commons-dev-unsubscribe@ws.apache.org
| |>>> For additional commands, e-mail: commons-dev-help@ws.apache.org
| |>>>
| |>>>
| |>
| |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (Cygwin)
iD8DBQFIBM+9gNg6eWEDv1kRAh9NAKDICXnH5zWmsGbC44kA7IQLtGzRzgCgqj4l
CDAzDLsrhptW4dZqSIm1HEs=
=PTHx
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: commons-dev-unsubscribe@ws.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: commons-dev-help@ws.apache.org
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: woden-dev-unsubscribe@ws.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: woden-dev-help@ws.apache.org
Re: [Axis2] Common VOTE for XmlSchema/Axiom/Neethi
Posted by Lawrence Mandel <lm...@ca.ibm.com>.
Sounds good Dims. Thanks for the quick turnaround.
Lawrence
Davanum Srinivas <da...@gmail.com>
04/15/2008 11:54 AM
Please respond to
commons-dev@ws.apache.org
To
axis-dev@ws.apache.org
cc
commons-dev@ws.apache.org, woden-dev@ws.apache.org
Subject
Re: [Axis2] Common VOTE for XmlSchema/Axiom/Neethi
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Team,
Once John confirms this works, i will post a XmlSchema 1.4.2 jar for VOTE
and Woden folks can recut another M8 candidate
with that jar and start their VOTE.
Sounds like a plan?
thanks,
dims
Davanum Srinivas wrote:
| John,
|
| Please check this revision
|
| http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=rev&revision=648283
|
| and see if it works for you.
|
| -- dims
|
| John Kaputin (gmail) wrote:
| | Sorry, forgot to provide a test case:
| |
| |
|
http://dev.w3.org/2002/ws/desc/test-suite/documents/good/Chameleon-1G/getBalance.wsdl
|
| |
| | The inlined schema in this WSDL2 doc includes another schema that has
no
| | target namespace. In 1.3.1 this missing TNS was represented by a null.
In
| | 1.4.1 it's an empty string.
| |
| | regards,
| | John Kaputin.
| |
| |
| | On 4/15/08, John Kaputin (gmail) <ja...@gmail.com> wrote:
| |> With XmlSchema 1.4.1 we are seeing a regression in the Woden test
| results
| |> for the W3C WSDL 2.0 test suite. We see 4 test cases fail which
passed
| |> successfully when Woden was last tested with XmlSchema 1.3.1. It
| seems to
| |> be related to chameleon includes (including a schema that has no
| TNS). In
| |> 1.3.1, no target namespace was represented in the XmlSchema object by
a
| |> null. In 1.4.1 no target namespace is represented by the empty string
| "".
| |> This change in the representation of a missing target namespace is
| causing
| |> the regression in Woden. I think the 1.3.1 behaviour was correct. I
| don't
| |> think a missing TNS should be represented as an empty string. Can any
| |> XmlSchema devs shed more light on this?
| |>
| |> thanks,
| |> John Kaputin.
| |>
| |> On 4/10/08, Eran Chinthaka <ch...@opensource.lk> wrote:
| |>
| |>> +1 from me too.
| |>>
| |>> Thanks,
| |>> Eran
| |>>
| |>> On Thu, Apr 10, 2008 at 9:42 AM, Glen Daniels
<gl...@thoughtcraft.com>
| |>> wrote:
| |>>
| |>>> Hi dims:
| |>>>
| |>>> Davanum Srinivas wrote:
| |>>>
| |>>>> In the interest of time, i propose we make a joint vote for all 3
| |>>>> commons projects (XmlSchema/Axiom/Neethi). Then woden
| |>>>> can pick up xmlschema/axiom and make their release. Then we cut
| |>> Axis2
| |>>>> 1.4 FINAL.
| |>>>>
| |>>>> Sounds like a plan?
| |>>>>
| |>>> +1, sounds like a plan. I'll grab the latest and kick some tires.
| |>>>
| |>>> --Glen
| |>>>
| |>>>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
| |>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: commons-dev-unsubscribe@ws.apache.org
| |>>> For additional commands, e-mail: commons-dev-help@ws.apache.org
| |>>>
| |>>>
| |>
| |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (Cygwin)
iD8DBQFIBM+9gNg6eWEDv1kRAh9NAKDICXnH5zWmsGbC44kA7IQLtGzRzgCgqj4l
CDAzDLsrhptW4dZqSIm1HEs=
=PTHx
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: commons-dev-unsubscribe@ws.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: commons-dev-help@ws.apache.org
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: axis-dev-unsubscribe@ws.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: axis-dev-help@ws.apache.org
Re: [Axis2] Common VOTE for XmlSchema/Axiom/Neethi
Posted by Davanum Srinivas <da...@gmail.com>.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Team,
Once John confirms this works, i will post a XmlSchema 1.4.2 jar for VOTE and Woden folks can recut another M8 candidate
with that jar and start their VOTE.
Sounds like a plan?
thanks,
dims
Davanum Srinivas wrote:
| John,
|
| Please check this revision
|
| http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=rev&revision=648283
|
| and see if it works for you.
|
| -- dims
|
| John Kaputin (gmail) wrote:
| | Sorry, forgot to provide a test case:
| |
| |
| http://dev.w3.org/2002/ws/desc/test-suite/documents/good/Chameleon-1G/getBalance.wsdl
|
| |
| | The inlined schema in this WSDL2 doc includes another schema that has no
| | target namespace. In 1.3.1 this missing TNS was represented by a null. In
| | 1.4.1 it's an empty string.
| |
| | regards,
| | John Kaputin.
| |
| |
| | On 4/15/08, John Kaputin (gmail) <ja...@gmail.com> wrote:
| |> With XmlSchema 1.4.1 we are seeing a regression in the Woden test
| results
| |> for the W3C WSDL 2.0 test suite. We see 4 test cases fail which passed
| |> successfully when Woden was last tested with XmlSchema 1.3.1. It
| seems to
| |> be related to chameleon includes (including a schema that has no
| TNS). In
| |> 1.3.1, no target namespace was represented in the XmlSchema object by a
| |> null. In 1.4.1 no target namespace is represented by the empty string
| "".
| |> This change in the representation of a missing target namespace is
| causing
| |> the regression in Woden. I think the 1.3.1 behaviour was correct. I
| don't
| |> think a missing TNS should be represented as an empty string. Can any
| |> XmlSchema devs shed more light on this?
| |>
| |> thanks,
| |> John Kaputin.
| |>
| |> On 4/10/08, Eran Chinthaka <ch...@opensource.lk> wrote:
| |>
| |>> +1 from me too.
| |>>
| |>> Thanks,
| |>> Eran
| |>>
| |>> On Thu, Apr 10, 2008 at 9:42 AM, Glen Daniels <gl...@thoughtcraft.com>
| |>> wrote:
| |>>
| |>>> Hi dims:
| |>>>
| |>>> Davanum Srinivas wrote:
| |>>>
| |>>>> In the interest of time, i propose we make a joint vote for all 3
| |>>>> commons projects (XmlSchema/Axiom/Neethi). Then woden
| |>>>> can pick up xmlschema/axiom and make their release. Then we cut
| |>> Axis2
| |>>>> 1.4 FINAL.
| |>>>>
| |>>>> Sounds like a plan?
| |>>>>
| |>>> +1, sounds like a plan. I'll grab the latest and kick some tires.
| |>>>
| |>>> --Glen
| |>>>
| |>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
| |>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: commons-dev-unsubscribe@ws.apache.org
| |>>> For additional commands, e-mail: commons-dev-help@ws.apache.org
| |>>>
| |>>>
| |>
| |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (Cygwin)
iD8DBQFIBM+9gNg6eWEDv1kRAh9NAKDICXnH5zWmsGbC44kA7IQLtGzRzgCgqj4l
CDAzDLsrhptW4dZqSIm1HEs=
=PTHx
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: woden-dev-unsubscribe@ws.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: woden-dev-help@ws.apache.org
Re: [Axis2] Common VOTE for XmlSchema/Axiom/Neethi
Posted by Davanum Srinivas <da...@gmail.com>.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Team,
Once John confirms this works, i will post a XmlSchema 1.4.2 jar for VOTE and Woden folks can recut another M8 candidate
with that jar and start their VOTE.
Sounds like a plan?
thanks,
dims
Davanum Srinivas wrote:
| John,
|
| Please check this revision
|
| http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=rev&revision=648283
|
| and see if it works for you.
|
| -- dims
|
| John Kaputin (gmail) wrote:
| | Sorry, forgot to provide a test case:
| |
| |
| http://dev.w3.org/2002/ws/desc/test-suite/documents/good/Chameleon-1G/getBalance.wsdl
|
| |
| | The inlined schema in this WSDL2 doc includes another schema that has no
| | target namespace. In 1.3.1 this missing TNS was represented by a null. In
| | 1.4.1 it's an empty string.
| |
| | regards,
| | John Kaputin.
| |
| |
| | On 4/15/08, John Kaputin (gmail) <ja...@gmail.com> wrote:
| |> With XmlSchema 1.4.1 we are seeing a regression in the Woden test
| results
| |> for the W3C WSDL 2.0 test suite. We see 4 test cases fail which passed
| |> successfully when Woden was last tested with XmlSchema 1.3.1. It
| seems to
| |> be related to chameleon includes (including a schema that has no
| TNS). In
| |> 1.3.1, no target namespace was represented in the XmlSchema object by a
| |> null. In 1.4.1 no target namespace is represented by the empty string
| "".
| |> This change in the representation of a missing target namespace is
| causing
| |> the regression in Woden. I think the 1.3.1 behaviour was correct. I
| don't
| |> think a missing TNS should be represented as an empty string. Can any
| |> XmlSchema devs shed more light on this?
| |>
| |> thanks,
| |> John Kaputin.
| |>
| |> On 4/10/08, Eran Chinthaka <ch...@opensource.lk> wrote:
| |>
| |>> +1 from me too.
| |>>
| |>> Thanks,
| |>> Eran
| |>>
| |>> On Thu, Apr 10, 2008 at 9:42 AM, Glen Daniels <gl...@thoughtcraft.com>
| |>> wrote:
| |>>
| |>>> Hi dims:
| |>>>
| |>>> Davanum Srinivas wrote:
| |>>>
| |>>>> In the interest of time, i propose we make a joint vote for all 3
| |>>>> commons projects (XmlSchema/Axiom/Neethi). Then woden
| |>>>> can pick up xmlschema/axiom and make their release. Then we cut
| |>> Axis2
| |>>>> 1.4 FINAL.
| |>>>>
| |>>>> Sounds like a plan?
| |>>>>
| |>>> +1, sounds like a plan. I'll grab the latest and kick some tires.
| |>>>
| |>>> --Glen
| |>>>
| |>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
| |>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: commons-dev-unsubscribe@ws.apache.org
| |>>> For additional commands, e-mail: commons-dev-help@ws.apache.org
| |>>>
| |>>>
| |>
| |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (Cygwin)
iD8DBQFIBM+9gNg6eWEDv1kRAh9NAKDICXnH5zWmsGbC44kA7IQLtGzRzgCgqj4l
CDAzDLsrhptW4dZqSIm1HEs=
=PTHx
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: commons-dev-unsubscribe@ws.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: commons-dev-help@ws.apache.org
Re: [Axis2] Common VOTE for XmlSchema/Axiom/Neethi
Posted by Davanum Srinivas <da...@gmail.com>.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Team,
Once John confirms this works, i will post a XmlSchema 1.4.2 jar for VOTE and Woden folks can recut another M8 candidate
with that jar and start their VOTE.
Sounds like a plan?
thanks,
dims
Davanum Srinivas wrote:
| John,
|
| Please check this revision
|
| http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=rev&revision=648283
|
| and see if it works for you.
|
| -- dims
|
| John Kaputin (gmail) wrote:
| | Sorry, forgot to provide a test case:
| |
| |
| http://dev.w3.org/2002/ws/desc/test-suite/documents/good/Chameleon-1G/getBalance.wsdl
|
| |
| | The inlined schema in this WSDL2 doc includes another schema that has no
| | target namespace. In 1.3.1 this missing TNS was represented by a null. In
| | 1.4.1 it's an empty string.
| |
| | regards,
| | John Kaputin.
| |
| |
| | On 4/15/08, John Kaputin (gmail) <ja...@gmail.com> wrote:
| |> With XmlSchema 1.4.1 we are seeing a regression in the Woden test
| results
| |> for the W3C WSDL 2.0 test suite. We see 4 test cases fail which passed
| |> successfully when Woden was last tested with XmlSchema 1.3.1. It
| seems to
| |> be related to chameleon includes (including a schema that has no
| TNS). In
| |> 1.3.1, no target namespace was represented in the XmlSchema object by a
| |> null. In 1.4.1 no target namespace is represented by the empty string
| "".
| |> This change in the representation of a missing target namespace is
| causing
| |> the regression in Woden. I think the 1.3.1 behaviour was correct. I
| don't
| |> think a missing TNS should be represented as an empty string. Can any
| |> XmlSchema devs shed more light on this?
| |>
| |> thanks,
| |> John Kaputin.
| |>
| |> On 4/10/08, Eran Chinthaka <ch...@opensource.lk> wrote:
| |>
| |>> +1 from me too.
| |>>
| |>> Thanks,
| |>> Eran
| |>>
| |>> On Thu, Apr 10, 2008 at 9:42 AM, Glen Daniels <gl...@thoughtcraft.com>
| |>> wrote:
| |>>
| |>>> Hi dims:
| |>>>
| |>>> Davanum Srinivas wrote:
| |>>>
| |>>>> In the interest of time, i propose we make a joint vote for all 3
| |>>>> commons projects (XmlSchema/Axiom/Neethi). Then woden
| |>>>> can pick up xmlschema/axiom and make their release. Then we cut
| |>> Axis2
| |>>>> 1.4 FINAL.
| |>>>>
| |>>>> Sounds like a plan?
| |>>>>
| |>>> +1, sounds like a plan. I'll grab the latest and kick some tires.
| |>>>
| |>>> --Glen
| |>>>
| |>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
| |>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: commons-dev-unsubscribe@ws.apache.org
| |>>> For additional commands, e-mail: commons-dev-help@ws.apache.org
| |>>>
| |>>>
| |>
| |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (Cygwin)
iD8DBQFIBM+9gNg6eWEDv1kRAh9NAKDICXnH5zWmsGbC44kA7IQLtGzRzgCgqj4l
CDAzDLsrhptW4dZqSIm1HEs=
=PTHx
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: axis-dev-unsubscribe@ws.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: axis-dev-help@ws.apache.org
Re: [Axis2] Common VOTE for XmlSchema/Axiom/Neethi
Posted by Davanum Srinivas <da...@gmail.com>.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
John,
Please check this revision
http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=rev&revision=648283
and see if it works for you.
- -- dims
John Kaputin (gmail) wrote:
| Sorry, forgot to provide a test case:
|
| http://dev.w3.org/2002/ws/desc/test-suite/documents/good/Chameleon-1G/getBalance.wsdl
|
| The inlined schema in this WSDL2 doc includes another schema that has no
| target namespace. In 1.3.1 this missing TNS was represented by a null. In
| 1.4.1 it's an empty string.
|
| regards,
| John Kaputin.
|
|
| On 4/15/08, John Kaputin (gmail) <ja...@gmail.com> wrote:
|> With XmlSchema 1.4.1 we are seeing a regression in the Woden test results
|> for the W3C WSDL 2.0 test suite. We see 4 test cases fail which passed
|> successfully when Woden was last tested with XmlSchema 1.3.1. It seems to
|> be related to chameleon includes (including a schema that has no TNS). In
|> 1.3.1, no target namespace was represented in the XmlSchema object by a
|> null. In 1.4.1 no target namespace is represented by the empty string "".
|> This change in the representation of a missing target namespace is causing
|> the regression in Woden. I think the 1.3.1 behaviour was correct. I don't
|> think a missing TNS should be represented as an empty string. Can any
|> XmlSchema devs shed more light on this?
|>
|> thanks,
|> John Kaputin.
|>
|> On 4/10/08, Eran Chinthaka <ch...@opensource.lk> wrote:
|>
|>> +1 from me too.
|>>
|>> Thanks,
|>> Eran
|>>
|>> On Thu, Apr 10, 2008 at 9:42 AM, Glen Daniels <gl...@thoughtcraft.com>
|>> wrote:
|>>
|>>> Hi dims:
|>>>
|>>> Davanum Srinivas wrote:
|>>>
|>>>> In the interest of time, i propose we make a joint vote for all 3
|>>>> commons projects (XmlSchema/Axiom/Neethi). Then woden
|>>>> can pick up xmlschema/axiom and make their release. Then we cut
|>> Axis2
|>>>> 1.4 FINAL.
|>>>>
|>>>> Sounds like a plan?
|>>>>
|>>> +1, sounds like a plan. I'll grab the latest and kick some tires.
|>>>
|>>> --Glen
|>>>
|>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
|>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: commons-dev-unsubscribe@ws.apache.org
|>>> For additional commands, e-mail: commons-dev-help@ws.apache.org
|>>>
|>>>
|>
|
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (Cygwin)
iD8DBQFIBMvwgNg6eWEDv1kRAr1AAKDsw+wh0m1q2bbO0rOnHD7iX5i4XgCg1QoN
jA2kbou+u761TRXmHxcAAI8=
=sj8F
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: woden-dev-unsubscribe@ws.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: woden-dev-help@ws.apache.org
Re: [Axis2] Common VOTE for XmlSchema/Axiom/Neethi
Posted by Davanum Srinivas <da...@gmail.com>.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
John,
Please check this revision
http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=rev&revision=648283
and see if it works for you.
- -- dims
John Kaputin (gmail) wrote:
| Sorry, forgot to provide a test case:
|
| http://dev.w3.org/2002/ws/desc/test-suite/documents/good/Chameleon-1G/getBalance.wsdl
|
| The inlined schema in this WSDL2 doc includes another schema that has no
| target namespace. In 1.3.1 this missing TNS was represented by a null. In
| 1.4.1 it's an empty string.
|
| regards,
| John Kaputin.
|
|
| On 4/15/08, John Kaputin (gmail) <ja...@gmail.com> wrote:
|> With XmlSchema 1.4.1 we are seeing a regression in the Woden test results
|> for the W3C WSDL 2.0 test suite. We see 4 test cases fail which passed
|> successfully when Woden was last tested with XmlSchema 1.3.1. It seems to
|> be related to chameleon includes (including a schema that has no TNS). In
|> 1.3.1, no target namespace was represented in the XmlSchema object by a
|> null. In 1.4.1 no target namespace is represented by the empty string "".
|> This change in the representation of a missing target namespace is causing
|> the regression in Woden. I think the 1.3.1 behaviour was correct. I don't
|> think a missing TNS should be represented as an empty string. Can any
|> XmlSchema devs shed more light on this?
|>
|> thanks,
|> John Kaputin.
|>
|> On 4/10/08, Eran Chinthaka <ch...@opensource.lk> wrote:
|>
|>> +1 from me too.
|>>
|>> Thanks,
|>> Eran
|>>
|>> On Thu, Apr 10, 2008 at 9:42 AM, Glen Daniels <gl...@thoughtcraft.com>
|>> wrote:
|>>
|>>> Hi dims:
|>>>
|>>> Davanum Srinivas wrote:
|>>>
|>>>> In the interest of time, i propose we make a joint vote for all 3
|>>>> commons projects (XmlSchema/Axiom/Neethi). Then woden
|>>>> can pick up xmlschema/axiom and make their release. Then we cut
|>> Axis2
|>>>> 1.4 FINAL.
|>>>>
|>>>> Sounds like a plan?
|>>>>
|>>> +1, sounds like a plan. I'll grab the latest and kick some tires.
|>>>
|>>> --Glen
|>>>
|>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
|>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: commons-dev-unsubscribe@ws.apache.org
|>>> For additional commands, e-mail: commons-dev-help@ws.apache.org
|>>>
|>>>
|>
|
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (Cygwin)
iD8DBQFIBMvwgNg6eWEDv1kRAr1AAKDsw+wh0m1q2bbO0rOnHD7iX5i4XgCg1QoN
jA2kbou+u761TRXmHxcAAI8=
=sj8F
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: axis-dev-unsubscribe@ws.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: axis-dev-help@ws.apache.org
Re: [Axis2] Common VOTE for XmlSchema/Axiom/Neethi
Posted by Davanum Srinivas <da...@gmail.com>.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
John,
Please check this revision
http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=rev&revision=648283
and see if it works for you.
- -- dims
John Kaputin (gmail) wrote:
| Sorry, forgot to provide a test case:
|
| http://dev.w3.org/2002/ws/desc/test-suite/documents/good/Chameleon-1G/getBalance.wsdl
|
| The inlined schema in this WSDL2 doc includes another schema that has no
| target namespace. In 1.3.1 this missing TNS was represented by a null. In
| 1.4.1 it's an empty string.
|
| regards,
| John Kaputin.
|
|
| On 4/15/08, John Kaputin (gmail) <ja...@gmail.com> wrote:
|> With XmlSchema 1.4.1 we are seeing a regression in the Woden test results
|> for the W3C WSDL 2.0 test suite. We see 4 test cases fail which passed
|> successfully when Woden was last tested with XmlSchema 1.3.1. It seems to
|> be related to chameleon includes (including a schema that has no TNS). In
|> 1.3.1, no target namespace was represented in the XmlSchema object by a
|> null. In 1.4.1 no target namespace is represented by the empty string "".
|> This change in the representation of a missing target namespace is causing
|> the regression in Woden. I think the 1.3.1 behaviour was correct. I don't
|> think a missing TNS should be represented as an empty string. Can any
|> XmlSchema devs shed more light on this?
|>
|> thanks,
|> John Kaputin.
|>
|> On 4/10/08, Eran Chinthaka <ch...@opensource.lk> wrote:
|>
|>> +1 from me too.
|>>
|>> Thanks,
|>> Eran
|>>
|>> On Thu, Apr 10, 2008 at 9:42 AM, Glen Daniels <gl...@thoughtcraft.com>
|>> wrote:
|>>
|>>> Hi dims:
|>>>
|>>> Davanum Srinivas wrote:
|>>>
|>>>> In the interest of time, i propose we make a joint vote for all 3
|>>>> commons projects (XmlSchema/Axiom/Neethi). Then woden
|>>>> can pick up xmlschema/axiom and make their release. Then we cut
|>> Axis2
|>>>> 1.4 FINAL.
|>>>>
|>>>> Sounds like a plan?
|>>>>
|>>> +1, sounds like a plan. I'll grab the latest and kick some tires.
|>>>
|>>> --Glen
|>>>
|>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
|>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: commons-dev-unsubscribe@ws.apache.org
|>>> For additional commands, e-mail: commons-dev-help@ws.apache.org
|>>>
|>>>
|>
|
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (Cygwin)
iD8DBQFIBMvwgNg6eWEDv1kRAr1AAKDsw+wh0m1q2bbO0rOnHD7iX5i4XgCg1QoN
jA2kbou+u761TRXmHxcAAI8=
=sj8F
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: commons-dev-unsubscribe@ws.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: commons-dev-help@ws.apache.org
Re: [Axis2] Common VOTE for XmlSchema/Axiom/Neethi
Posted by "John Kaputin (gmail)" <ja...@gmail.com>.
Sorry, forgot to provide a test case:
http://dev.w3.org/2002/ws/desc/test-suite/documents/good/Chameleon-1G/getBalance.wsdl
The inlined schema in this WSDL2 doc includes another schema that has no
target namespace. In 1.3.1 this missing TNS was represented by a null. In
1.4.1 it's an empty string.
regards,
John Kaputin.
On 4/15/08, John Kaputin (gmail) <ja...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> With XmlSchema 1.4.1 we are seeing a regression in the Woden test results
> for the W3C WSDL 2.0 test suite. We see 4 test cases fail which passed
> successfully when Woden was last tested with XmlSchema 1.3.1. It seems to
> be related to chameleon includes (including a schema that has no TNS). In
> 1.3.1, no target namespace was represented in the XmlSchema object by a
> null. In 1.4.1 no target namespace is represented by the empty string "".
> This change in the representation of a missing target namespace is causing
> the regression in Woden. I think the 1.3.1 behaviour was correct. I don't
> think a missing TNS should be represented as an empty string. Can any
> XmlSchema devs shed more light on this?
>
> thanks,
> John Kaputin.
>
> On 4/10/08, Eran Chinthaka <ch...@opensource.lk> wrote:
>
> > +1 from me too.
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Eran
> >
> > On Thu, Apr 10, 2008 at 9:42 AM, Glen Daniels <gl...@thoughtcraft.com>
> > wrote:
> >
> > > Hi dims:
> > >
> > > Davanum Srinivas wrote:
> > >
> > > > In the interest of time, i propose we make a joint vote for all 3
> > > > commons projects (XmlSchema/Axiom/Neethi). Then woden
> > > > can pick up xmlschema/axiom and make their release. Then we cut
> > Axis2
> > > > 1.4 FINAL.
> > > >
> > > > Sounds like a plan?
> > > >
> > >
> > > +1, sounds like a plan. I'll grab the latest and kick some tires.
> > >
> > > --Glen
> > >
> > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: commons-dev-unsubscribe@ws.apache.org
> > > For additional commands, e-mail: commons-dev-help@ws.apache.org
> > >
> > >
> >
>
>
Re: [Axis2] Common VOTE for XmlSchema/Axiom/Neethi
Posted by "John Kaputin (gmail)" <ja...@gmail.com>.
Sorry, forgot to provide a test case:
http://dev.w3.org/2002/ws/desc/test-suite/documents/good/Chameleon-1G/getBalance.wsdl
The inlined schema in this WSDL2 doc includes another schema that has no
target namespace. In 1.3.1 this missing TNS was represented by a null. In
1.4.1 it's an empty string.
regards,
John Kaputin.
On 4/15/08, John Kaputin (gmail) <ja...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> With XmlSchema 1.4.1 we are seeing a regression in the Woden test results
> for the W3C WSDL 2.0 test suite. We see 4 test cases fail which passed
> successfully when Woden was last tested with XmlSchema 1.3.1. It seems to
> be related to chameleon includes (including a schema that has no TNS). In
> 1.3.1, no target namespace was represented in the XmlSchema object by a
> null. In 1.4.1 no target namespace is represented by the empty string "".
> This change in the representation of a missing target namespace is causing
> the regression in Woden. I think the 1.3.1 behaviour was correct. I don't
> think a missing TNS should be represented as an empty string. Can any
> XmlSchema devs shed more light on this?
>
> thanks,
> John Kaputin.
>
> On 4/10/08, Eran Chinthaka <ch...@opensource.lk> wrote:
>
> > +1 from me too.
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Eran
> >
> > On Thu, Apr 10, 2008 at 9:42 AM, Glen Daniels <gl...@thoughtcraft.com>
> > wrote:
> >
> > > Hi dims:
> > >
> > > Davanum Srinivas wrote:
> > >
> > > > In the interest of time, i propose we make a joint vote for all 3
> > > > commons projects (XmlSchema/Axiom/Neethi). Then woden
> > > > can pick up xmlschema/axiom and make their release. Then we cut
> > Axis2
> > > > 1.4 FINAL.
> > > >
> > > > Sounds like a plan?
> > > >
> > >
> > > +1, sounds like a plan. I'll grab the latest and kick some tires.
> > >
> > > --Glen
> > >
> > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: commons-dev-unsubscribe@ws.apache.org
> > > For additional commands, e-mail: commons-dev-help@ws.apache.org
> > >
> > >
> >
>
>
Re: [Axis2] Common VOTE for XmlSchema/Axiom/Neethi
Posted by Davanum Srinivas <da...@gmail.com>.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
John,
Which tests fail?
- -- dims
John Kaputin (gmail) wrote:
| With XmlSchema 1.4.1 we are seeing a regression in the Woden test results
| for the W3C WSDL 2.0 test suite. We see 4 test cases fail which passed
| successfully when Woden was last tested with XmlSchema 1.3.1. It seems to
| be related to chameleon includes (including a schema that has no TNS). In
| 1.3.1, no target namespace was represented in the XmlSchema object by a
| null. In 1.4.1 no target namespace is represented by the empty string "".
| This change in the representation of a missing target namespace is causing
| the regression in Woden. I think the 1.3.1 behaviour was correct. I don't
| think a missing TNS should be represented as an empty string. Can any
| XmlSchema devs shed more light on this?
|
| thanks,
| John Kaputin.
|
| On 4/10/08, Eran Chinthaka <ch...@opensource.lk> wrote:
|
|> +1 from me too.
|>
|> Thanks,
|> Eran
|>
|> On Thu, Apr 10, 2008 at 9:42 AM, Glen Daniels <gl...@thoughtcraft.com>
|> wrote:
|>
|>> Hi dims:
|>>
|>> Davanum Srinivas wrote:
|>>
|>>> In the interest of time, i propose we make a joint vote for all 3
|>>> commons projects (XmlSchema/Axiom/Neethi). Then woden
|>>> can pick up xmlschema/axiom and make their release. Then we cut Axis2
|>>> 1.4 FINAL.
|>>>
|>>> Sounds like a plan?
|>>>
|>> +1, sounds like a plan. I'll grab the latest and kick some tires.
|>>
|>> --Glen
|>>
|>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
|>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: commons-dev-unsubscribe@ws.apache.org
|>> For additional commands, e-mail: commons-dev-help@ws.apache.org
|>>
|>>
|
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (Cygwin)
iD8DBQFIBLUqgNg6eWEDv1kRAtbDAJ93rhDBchyw8moPsz+Js6qR2pRCPACfTt9K
C0D/1bsFqHwlKCIiwRD1VY4=
=RF6F
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: axis-dev-unsubscribe@ws.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: axis-dev-help@ws.apache.org
Re: [Axis2] Common VOTE for XmlSchema/Axiom/Neethi
Posted by "John Kaputin (gmail)" <ja...@gmail.com>.
Sorry, forgot to provide a test case:
http://dev.w3.org/2002/ws/desc/test-suite/documents/good/Chameleon-1G/getBalance.wsdl
The inlined schema in this WSDL2 doc includes another schema that has no
target namespace. In 1.3.1 this missing TNS was represented by a null. In
1.4.1 it's an empty string.
regards,
John Kaputin.
On 4/15/08, John Kaputin (gmail) <ja...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> With XmlSchema 1.4.1 we are seeing a regression in the Woden test results
> for the W3C WSDL 2.0 test suite. We see 4 test cases fail which passed
> successfully when Woden was last tested with XmlSchema 1.3.1. It seems to
> be related to chameleon includes (including a schema that has no TNS). In
> 1.3.1, no target namespace was represented in the XmlSchema object by a
> null. In 1.4.1 no target namespace is represented by the empty string "".
> This change in the representation of a missing target namespace is causing
> the regression in Woden. I think the 1.3.1 behaviour was correct. I don't
> think a missing TNS should be represented as an empty string. Can any
> XmlSchema devs shed more light on this?
>
> thanks,
> John Kaputin.
>
> On 4/10/08, Eran Chinthaka <ch...@opensource.lk> wrote:
>
> > +1 from me too.
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Eran
> >
> > On Thu, Apr 10, 2008 at 9:42 AM, Glen Daniels <gl...@thoughtcraft.com>
> > wrote:
> >
> > > Hi dims:
> > >
> > > Davanum Srinivas wrote:
> > >
> > > > In the interest of time, i propose we make a joint vote for all 3
> > > > commons projects (XmlSchema/Axiom/Neethi). Then woden
> > > > can pick up xmlschema/axiom and make their release. Then we cut
> > Axis2
> > > > 1.4 FINAL.
> > > >
> > > > Sounds like a plan?
> > > >
> > >
> > > +1, sounds like a plan. I'll grab the latest and kick some tires.
> > >
> > > --Glen
> > >
> > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: commons-dev-unsubscribe@ws.apache.org
> > > For additional commands, e-mail: commons-dev-help@ws.apache.org
> > >
> > >
> >
>
>
Re: [Axis2] Common VOTE for XmlSchema/Axiom/Neethi
Posted by Davanum Srinivas <da...@gmail.com>.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
John,
Which tests fail?
- -- dims
John Kaputin (gmail) wrote:
| With XmlSchema 1.4.1 we are seeing a regression in the Woden test results
| for the W3C WSDL 2.0 test suite. We see 4 test cases fail which passed
| successfully when Woden was last tested with XmlSchema 1.3.1. It seems to
| be related to chameleon includes (including a schema that has no TNS). In
| 1.3.1, no target namespace was represented in the XmlSchema object by a
| null. In 1.4.1 no target namespace is represented by the empty string "".
| This change in the representation of a missing target namespace is causing
| the regression in Woden. I think the 1.3.1 behaviour was correct. I don't
| think a missing TNS should be represented as an empty string. Can any
| XmlSchema devs shed more light on this?
|
| thanks,
| John Kaputin.
|
| On 4/10/08, Eran Chinthaka <ch...@opensource.lk> wrote:
|
|> +1 from me too.
|>
|> Thanks,
|> Eran
|>
|> On Thu, Apr 10, 2008 at 9:42 AM, Glen Daniels <gl...@thoughtcraft.com>
|> wrote:
|>
|>> Hi dims:
|>>
|>> Davanum Srinivas wrote:
|>>
|>>> In the interest of time, i propose we make a joint vote for all 3
|>>> commons projects (XmlSchema/Axiom/Neethi). Then woden
|>>> can pick up xmlschema/axiom and make their release. Then we cut Axis2
|>>> 1.4 FINAL.
|>>>
|>>> Sounds like a plan?
|>>>
|>> +1, sounds like a plan. I'll grab the latest and kick some tires.
|>>
|>> --Glen
|>>
|>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
|>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: commons-dev-unsubscribe@ws.apache.org
|>> For additional commands, e-mail: commons-dev-help@ws.apache.org
|>>
|>>
|
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (Cygwin)
iD8DBQFIBLUqgNg6eWEDv1kRAtbDAJ93rhDBchyw8moPsz+Js6qR2pRCPACfTt9K
C0D/1bsFqHwlKCIiwRD1VY4=
=RF6F
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: commons-dev-unsubscribe@ws.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: commons-dev-help@ws.apache.org
Re: [Axis2] Common VOTE for XmlSchema/Axiom/Neethi
Posted by "John Kaputin (gmail)" <ja...@gmail.com>.
With XmlSchema 1.4.1 we are seeing a regression in the Woden test results
for the W3C WSDL 2.0 test suite. We see 4 test cases fail which passed
successfully when Woden was last tested with XmlSchema 1.3.1. It seems to
be related to chameleon includes (including a schema that has no TNS). In
1.3.1, no target namespace was represented in the XmlSchema object by a
null. In 1.4.1 no target namespace is represented by the empty string "".
This change in the representation of a missing target namespace is causing
the regression in Woden. I think the 1.3.1 behaviour was correct. I don't
think a missing TNS should be represented as an empty string. Can any
XmlSchema devs shed more light on this?
thanks,
John Kaputin.
On 4/10/08, Eran Chinthaka <ch...@opensource.lk> wrote:
> +1 from me too.
>
> Thanks,
> Eran
>
> On Thu, Apr 10, 2008 at 9:42 AM, Glen Daniels <gl...@thoughtcraft.com>
> wrote:
>
> > Hi dims:
> >
> > Davanum Srinivas wrote:
> >
> > > In the interest of time, i propose we make a joint vote for all 3
> > > commons projects (XmlSchema/Axiom/Neethi). Then woden
> > > can pick up xmlschema/axiom and make their release. Then we cut Axis2
> > > 1.4 FINAL.
> > >
> > > Sounds like a plan?
> > >
> >
> > +1, sounds like a plan. I'll grab the latest and kick some tires.
> >
> > --Glen
> >
> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: commons-dev-unsubscribe@ws.apache.org
> > For additional commands, e-mail: commons-dev-help@ws.apache.org
> >
> >
>
Re: [Axis2] Common VOTE for XmlSchema/Axiom/Neethi
Posted by "John Kaputin (gmail)" <ja...@gmail.com>.
With XmlSchema 1.4.1 we are seeing a regression in the Woden test results
for the W3C WSDL 2.0 test suite. We see 4 test cases fail which passed
successfully when Woden was last tested with XmlSchema 1.3.1. It seems to
be related to chameleon includes (including a schema that has no TNS). In
1.3.1, no target namespace was represented in the XmlSchema object by a
null. In 1.4.1 no target namespace is represented by the empty string "".
This change in the representation of a missing target namespace is causing
the regression in Woden. I think the 1.3.1 behaviour was correct. I don't
think a missing TNS should be represented as an empty string. Can any
XmlSchema devs shed more light on this?
thanks,
John Kaputin.
On 4/10/08, Eran Chinthaka <ch...@opensource.lk> wrote:
> +1 from me too.
>
> Thanks,
> Eran
>
> On Thu, Apr 10, 2008 at 9:42 AM, Glen Daniels <gl...@thoughtcraft.com>
> wrote:
>
> > Hi dims:
> >
> > Davanum Srinivas wrote:
> >
> > > In the interest of time, i propose we make a joint vote for all 3
> > > commons projects (XmlSchema/Axiom/Neethi). Then woden
> > > can pick up xmlschema/axiom and make their release. Then we cut Axis2
> > > 1.4 FINAL.
> > >
> > > Sounds like a plan?
> > >
> >
> > +1, sounds like a plan. I'll grab the latest and kick some tires.
> >
> > --Glen
> >
> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: commons-dev-unsubscribe@ws.apache.org
> > For additional commands, e-mail: commons-dev-help@ws.apache.org
> >
> >
>
Re: [Axis2] Common VOTE for XmlSchema/Axiom/Neethi
Posted by "John Kaputin (gmail)" <ja...@gmail.com>.
With XmlSchema 1.4.1 we are seeing a regression in the Woden test results
for the W3C WSDL 2.0 test suite. We see 4 test cases fail which passed
successfully when Woden was last tested with XmlSchema 1.3.1. It seems to
be related to chameleon includes (including a schema that has no TNS). In
1.3.1, no target namespace was represented in the XmlSchema object by a
null. In 1.4.1 no target namespace is represented by the empty string "".
This change in the representation of a missing target namespace is causing
the regression in Woden. I think the 1.3.1 behaviour was correct. I don't
think a missing TNS should be represented as an empty string. Can any
XmlSchema devs shed more light on this?
thanks,
John Kaputin.
On 4/10/08, Eran Chinthaka <ch...@opensource.lk> wrote:
> +1 from me too.
>
> Thanks,
> Eran
>
> On Thu, Apr 10, 2008 at 9:42 AM, Glen Daniels <gl...@thoughtcraft.com>
> wrote:
>
> > Hi dims:
> >
> > Davanum Srinivas wrote:
> >
> > > In the interest of time, i propose we make a joint vote for all 3
> > > commons projects (XmlSchema/Axiom/Neethi). Then woden
> > > can pick up xmlschema/axiom and make their release. Then we cut Axis2
> > > 1.4 FINAL.
> > >
> > > Sounds like a plan?
> > >
> >
> > +1, sounds like a plan. I'll grab the latest and kick some tires.
> >
> > --Glen
> >
> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: commons-dev-unsubscribe@ws.apache.org
> > For additional commands, e-mail: commons-dev-help@ws.apache.org
> >
> >
>
Re: [Axis2] Common VOTE for XmlSchema/Axiom/Neethi
Posted by Eran Chinthaka <ch...@opensource.lk>.
+1 from me too.
Thanks,
Eran
On Thu, Apr 10, 2008 at 9:42 AM, Glen Daniels <gl...@thoughtcraft.com> wrote:
> Hi dims:
>
> Davanum Srinivas wrote:
>
> > In the interest of time, i propose we make a joint vote for all 3
> > commons projects (XmlSchema/Axiom/Neethi). Then woden
> > can pick up xmlschema/axiom and make their release. Then we cut Axis2
> > 1.4 FINAL.
> >
> > Sounds like a plan?
> >
>
> +1, sounds like a plan. I'll grab the latest and kick some tires.
>
> --Glen
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: commons-dev-unsubscribe@ws.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: commons-dev-help@ws.apache.org
>
>
Re: [Axis2] Common VOTE for XmlSchema/Axiom/Neethi
Posted by Eran Chinthaka <ch...@apache.org>.
+1 from me.
On Thu, Apr 10, 2008 at 9:42 AM, Glen Daniels <gl...@thoughtcraft.com> wrote:
> Hi dims:
>
> Davanum Srinivas wrote:
>
> > In the interest of time, i propose we make a joint vote for all 3
> > commons projects (XmlSchema/Axiom/Neethi). Then woden
> > can pick up xmlschema/axiom and make their release. Then we cut Axis2
> > 1.4 FINAL.
> >
> > Sounds like a plan?
> >
>
> +1, sounds like a plan. I'll grab the latest and kick some tires.
>
> --Glen
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: commons-dev-unsubscribe@ws.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: commons-dev-help@ws.apache.org
>
>
Re: [Axis2] Common VOTE for XmlSchema/Axiom/Neethi
Posted by Eran Chinthaka <ch...@apache.org>.
+1 from me.
On Thu, Apr 10, 2008 at 9:42 AM, Glen Daniels <gl...@thoughtcraft.com> wrote:
> Hi dims:
>
> Davanum Srinivas wrote:
>
> > In the interest of time, i propose we make a joint vote for all 3
> > commons projects (XmlSchema/Axiom/Neethi). Then woden
> > can pick up xmlschema/axiom and make their release. Then we cut Axis2
> > 1.4 FINAL.
> >
> > Sounds like a plan?
> >
>
> +1, sounds like a plan. I'll grab the latest and kick some tires.
>
> --Glen
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: commons-dev-unsubscribe@ws.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: commons-dev-help@ws.apache.org
>
>
Re: [Axis2] Common VOTE for XmlSchema/Axiom/Neethi
Posted by Glen Daniels <gl...@thoughtcraft.com>.
Hi dims:
Davanum Srinivas wrote:
> In the interest of time, i propose we make a joint vote for all 3
> commons projects (XmlSchema/Axiom/Neethi). Then woden
> can pick up xmlschema/axiom and make their release. Then we cut Axis2
> 1.4 FINAL.
>
> Sounds like a plan?
+1, sounds like a plan. I'll grab the latest and kick some tires.
--Glen
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: woden-dev-unsubscribe@ws.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: woden-dev-help@ws.apache.org
Re: [Axis2] Common VOTE for XmlSchema/Axiom/Neethi
Posted by Glen Daniels <gl...@thoughtcraft.com>.
Hi dims:
Davanum Srinivas wrote:
> In the interest of time, i propose we make a joint vote for all 3
> commons projects (XmlSchema/Axiom/Neethi). Then woden
> can pick up xmlschema/axiom and make their release. Then we cut Axis2
> 1.4 FINAL.
>
> Sounds like a plan?
+1, sounds like a plan. I'll grab the latest and kick some tires.
--Glen
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: axis-dev-unsubscribe@ws.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: axis-dev-help@ws.apache.org
Re: [Axis2] Common VOTE for XmlSchema/Axiom/Neethi
Posted by Glen Daniels <gl...@thoughtcraft.com>.
Hi dims:
Davanum Srinivas wrote:
> In the interest of time, i propose we make a joint vote for all 3
> commons projects (XmlSchema/Axiom/Neethi). Then woden
> can pick up xmlschema/axiom and make their release. Then we cut Axis2
> 1.4 FINAL.
>
> Sounds like a plan?
+1, sounds like a plan. I'll grab the latest and kick some tires.
--Glen
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: commons-dev-unsubscribe@ws.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: commons-dev-help@ws.apache.org
Re: [Axis2] Common VOTE for XmlSchema/Axiom/Neethi
Posted by Ajith Ranabahu <aj...@gmail.com>.
Hi
+1 for all
On Wed, Apr 9, 2008 at 12:18 PM, Lawrence Mandel <lm...@ca.ibm.com> wrote:
> Sounds good Dims. I'll pick up the release candidates and test in Woden.
>
> Lawrence
>
>
>
>
>
> Davanum Srinivas <da...@gmail.com>
> 04/09/2008 11:18 AM
> Please respond to
> axis-dev@ws.apache.org
>
>
> To
> Axis developer list <ax...@ws.apache.org>, commons-dev@ws.apache.org,
> woden-dev@ws.apache.org
> cc
>
> Subject
> [Axis2] Common VOTE for XmlSchema/Axiom/Neethi
>
>
>
>
>
>
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Folks,
>
> In the interest of time, i propose we make a joint vote for all 3 commons
> projects (XmlSchema/Axiom/Neethi). Then woden
> can pick up xmlschema/axiom and make their release. Then we cut Axis2 1.4
> FINAL.
>
> Sounds like a plan?
>
> thanks,
> dims
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
> Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (Cygwin)
>
> iD8DBQFH/N5FgNg6eWEDv1kRAnQuAJ451uaLzmeN0DI+nhrUu61UgyWQiACgjohI
> IAtgVSq7D8fXem03FW7XVk0=
> =GgCd
> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: axis-dev-unsubscribe@ws.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: axis-dev-help@ws.apache.org
>
>
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: woden-dev-unsubscribe@ws.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: woden-dev-help@ws.apache.org
>
>
--
Ajith Ranabahu
Reading, after a certain age, diverts the mind too much from its creative
pursuits. Any man who reads too much and uses his own brain too little falls
into lazy habits of thinking - Albert Einstein
Re: [Axis2] Common VOTE for XmlSchema/Axiom/Neethi
Posted by Ajith Ranabahu <aj...@gmail.com>.
Hi
+1 for all
On Wed, Apr 9, 2008 at 12:18 PM, Lawrence Mandel <lm...@ca.ibm.com> wrote:
> Sounds good Dims. I'll pick up the release candidates and test in Woden.
>
> Lawrence
>
>
>
>
>
> Davanum Srinivas <da...@gmail.com>
> 04/09/2008 11:18 AM
> Please respond to
> axis-dev@ws.apache.org
>
>
> To
> Axis developer list <ax...@ws.apache.org>, commons-dev@ws.apache.org,
> woden-dev@ws.apache.org
> cc
>
> Subject
> [Axis2] Common VOTE for XmlSchema/Axiom/Neethi
>
>
>
>
>
>
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Folks,
>
> In the interest of time, i propose we make a joint vote for all 3 commons
> projects (XmlSchema/Axiom/Neethi). Then woden
> can pick up xmlschema/axiom and make their release. Then we cut Axis2 1.4
> FINAL.
>
> Sounds like a plan?
>
> thanks,
> dims
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
> Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (Cygwin)
>
> iD8DBQFH/N5FgNg6eWEDv1kRAnQuAJ451uaLzmeN0DI+nhrUu61UgyWQiACgjohI
> IAtgVSq7D8fXem03FW7XVk0=
> =GgCd
> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: axis-dev-unsubscribe@ws.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: axis-dev-help@ws.apache.org
>
>
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: woden-dev-unsubscribe@ws.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: woden-dev-help@ws.apache.org
>
>
--
Ajith Ranabahu
Reading, after a certain age, diverts the mind too much from its creative
pursuits. Any man who reads too much and uses his own brain too little falls
into lazy habits of thinking - Albert Einstein
Re: [Axis2] Common VOTE for XmlSchema/Axiom/Neethi
Posted by Ajith Ranabahu <aj...@gmail.com>.
Hi
+1 for all
On Wed, Apr 9, 2008 at 12:18 PM, Lawrence Mandel <lm...@ca.ibm.com> wrote:
> Sounds good Dims. I'll pick up the release candidates and test in Woden.
>
> Lawrence
>
>
>
>
>
> Davanum Srinivas <da...@gmail.com>
> 04/09/2008 11:18 AM
> Please respond to
> axis-dev@ws.apache.org
>
>
> To
> Axis developer list <ax...@ws.apache.org>, commons-dev@ws.apache.org,
> woden-dev@ws.apache.org
> cc
>
> Subject
> [Axis2] Common VOTE for XmlSchema/Axiom/Neethi
>
>
>
>
>
>
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Folks,
>
> In the interest of time, i propose we make a joint vote for all 3 commons
> projects (XmlSchema/Axiom/Neethi). Then woden
> can pick up xmlschema/axiom and make their release. Then we cut Axis2 1.4
> FINAL.
>
> Sounds like a plan?
>
> thanks,
> dims
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
> Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (Cygwin)
>
> iD8DBQFH/N5FgNg6eWEDv1kRAnQuAJ451uaLzmeN0DI+nhrUu61UgyWQiACgjohI
> IAtgVSq7D8fXem03FW7XVk0=
> =GgCd
> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: axis-dev-unsubscribe@ws.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: axis-dev-help@ws.apache.org
>
>
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: woden-dev-unsubscribe@ws.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: woden-dev-help@ws.apache.org
>
>
--
Ajith Ranabahu
Reading, after a certain age, diverts the mind too much from its creative
pursuits. Any man who reads too much and uses his own brain too little falls
into lazy habits of thinking - Albert Einstein
Re: [Axis2] Common VOTE for XmlSchema/Axiom/Neethi
Posted by Lawrence Mandel <lm...@ca.ibm.com>.
Sounds good Dims. I'll pick up the release candidates and test in Woden.
Lawrence
Davanum Srinivas <da...@gmail.com>
04/09/2008 11:18 AM
Please respond to
axis-dev@ws.apache.org
To
Axis developer list <ax...@ws.apache.org>, commons-dev@ws.apache.org,
woden-dev@ws.apache.org
cc
Subject
[Axis2] Common VOTE for XmlSchema/Axiom/Neethi
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Folks,
In the interest of time, i propose we make a joint vote for all 3 commons
projects (XmlSchema/Axiom/Neethi). Then woden
can pick up xmlschema/axiom and make their release. Then we cut Axis2 1.4
FINAL.
Sounds like a plan?
thanks,
dims
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (Cygwin)
iD8DBQFH/N5FgNg6eWEDv1kRAnQuAJ451uaLzmeN0DI+nhrUu61UgyWQiACgjohI
IAtgVSq7D8fXem03FW7XVk0=
=GgCd
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: axis-dev-unsubscribe@ws.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: axis-dev-help@ws.apache.org
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: commons-dev-unsubscribe@ws.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: commons-dev-help@ws.apache.org
Re: [Axis2] Common VOTE for XmlSchema/Axiom/Neethi
Posted by Lawrence Mandel <lm...@ca.ibm.com>.
Sounds good Dims. I'll pick up the release candidates and test in Woden.
Lawrence
Davanum Srinivas <da...@gmail.com>
04/09/2008 11:18 AM
Please respond to
axis-dev@ws.apache.org
To
Axis developer list <ax...@ws.apache.org>, commons-dev@ws.apache.org,
woden-dev@ws.apache.org
cc
Subject
[Axis2] Common VOTE for XmlSchema/Axiom/Neethi
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Folks,
In the interest of time, i propose we make a joint vote for all 3 commons
projects (XmlSchema/Axiom/Neethi). Then woden
can pick up xmlschema/axiom and make their release. Then we cut Axis2 1.4
FINAL.
Sounds like a plan?
thanks,
dims
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (Cygwin)
iD8DBQFH/N5FgNg6eWEDv1kRAnQuAJ451uaLzmeN0DI+nhrUu61UgyWQiACgjohI
IAtgVSq7D8fXem03FW7XVk0=
=GgCd
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: axis-dev-unsubscribe@ws.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: axis-dev-help@ws.apache.org
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: axis-dev-unsubscribe@ws.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: axis-dev-help@ws.apache.org
Re: [Axis2] Common VOTE for XmlSchema/Axiom/Neethi
Posted by Lawrence Mandel <lm...@ca.ibm.com>.
Sounds good Dims. I'll pick up the release candidates and test in Woden.
Lawrence
Davanum Srinivas <da...@gmail.com>
04/09/2008 11:18 AM
Please respond to
axis-dev@ws.apache.org
To
Axis developer list <ax...@ws.apache.org>, commons-dev@ws.apache.org,
woden-dev@ws.apache.org
cc
Subject
[Axis2] Common VOTE for XmlSchema/Axiom/Neethi
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Folks,
In the interest of time, i propose we make a joint vote for all 3 commons
projects (XmlSchema/Axiom/Neethi). Then woden
can pick up xmlschema/axiom and make their release. Then we cut Axis2 1.4
FINAL.
Sounds like a plan?
thanks,
dims
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (Cygwin)
iD8DBQFH/N5FgNg6eWEDv1kRAnQuAJ451uaLzmeN0DI+nhrUu61UgyWQiACgjohI
IAtgVSq7D8fXem03FW7XVk0=
=GgCd
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: axis-dev-unsubscribe@ws.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: axis-dev-help@ws.apache.org
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: woden-dev-unsubscribe@ws.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: woden-dev-help@ws.apache.org