[jira] Commented: (MASSEMBLY-300) Regression: outputFileNameMapping variable resolution

["Benjamin Bentmann (JIRA)" <ji...@codehaus.org>]

    [ http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MASSEMBLY-300?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_127521 ] 

Benjamin Bentmann commented on MASSEMBLY-300:
---------------------------------------------

This might be by intention: See the latest doc about the [assembly descriptor|http://maven.apache.org/plugins/maven-assembly-plugin/assembly.html#class_dependencySet]. Prefixing the expressions with "artifact." should give you back the desired behavior.

> Regression: outputFileNameMapping variable resolution
> -----------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: MASSEMBLY-300
>                 URL: http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MASSEMBLY-300
>             Project: Maven 2.x Assembly Plugin
>          Issue Type: Bug
>    Affects Versions: 2.2-beta-2
>            Reporter: Daniel Spilker
>
> I am using
>             <outputFileNameMapping>${artifactId}.${extension}</outputFileNameMapping>
> in a dependencySet with multiple includes.
> In 2.2-beta-1 the included artifactes where named by their artifactId and extension as specified by the outputFileNameMapping. In 2.2-beta-2 the files are named by the current project's artifactId and ${extension} is not resolved.

-- 
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators: http://jira.codehaus.org/secure/Administrators.jspa
-
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira