You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@mina.apache.org by Michael Bauroth <mi...@falcom.de> on 2006/04/12 11:30:02 UTC
Exception while using slf4j-log4j13 ???
Hi,
I figured out an exception while calling CharsetUtil.getDefaultCharset.
It took me a while until I found out, that the call of
LoggerFactory.getLogger( CharsetUtil.class ) failed. I've used the jar
slf4j-log4j13. After replacing it with slf4j-simple all works fine.
Now my question: What is the difference?
Regards
Michael
Re: [slf4j-user] Re: Exception while using slf4j-log4j13 ???
Posted by Michael Bauroth <mi...@falcom.de>.
Hi,
I don't use nothing of it. My problem was, that one of the facades
throwed an exception, the other one didn't. How I learned later (that's
why read the f*** manual ;) this jar's are only facades to underlying
logging frameworks. Because I didn't use up to this point no logging
framework, the exception was thrown inside the facade. After adding the
log4 jar to my project, the issue was solved.
Regards
Michael
Ceki Gülcü wrote:
>
> Hello Trustin,
>
> Michael asks about the difference between the two cases. I really can't
> think of any. Is he using Tomcat version 5.5.14 or 5.5.15 by any chance?
>
> At 11:31 AM 4/12/2006, Trustin Lee wrote:
>
>> On 4/12/06, Michael Bauroth
>> <<m...@falcom.de> wrote:
>>
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> I figured out an exception while calling CharsetUtil.getDefaultCharset.
>>> It took me a while until I found out, that the call of
>>> LoggerFactory.getLogger( CharsetUtil.class ) failed. I've used the jar
>>> slf4j-log4j13. After replacing it with slf4j-simple all works fine.
>>> Now my question: What is the difference?
>>
>>
>> Could you please give us a stack trace?
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Trustin
>> --
>
>
--
_____ Falcom Wireless Communications GmbH ______________________________
Dipl.-Ing. Michael Bauroth
Manager Software Department
Phone: +49 3677 8042 332
Fax: +49 3677 8042 215
E-mail: michael.bauroth@falcom.de
Address: Gewerbering 6, 98704 Langewiesen, Germany
______________________________ www.falcom.de ___________________________
This e-mail and any files transmitted are the property of FALCOM and/or
its affiliates, are confidential, and are intended solely for the use of
the individual or entity to whom this e-mail is addressed. If you are
not one of the named recipients or otherwise have reason to believe that
you have received this e-mail in error, please notify the sender and
delete this message immediately from your computer. Any other use,
retention, dissemination, forwarding, printing or copying of this e-mail
is strictly prohibited.
Re: [slf4j-user] Re: Exception while using slf4j-log4j13 ???
Posted by Ceki Gülcü <li...@qos.ch>.
Hello Trustin,
Michael asks about the difference between the two cases. I really can't
think of any. Is he using Tomcat version 5.5.14 or 5.5.15 by any chance?
At 11:31 AM 4/12/2006, Trustin Lee wrote:
>On 4/12/06, Michael Bauroth
><<m...@falcom.de> wrote:
>>Hi,
>>
>>I figured out an exception while calling CharsetUtil.getDefaultCharset.
>>It took me a while until I found out, that the call of
>>LoggerFactory.getLogger( CharsetUtil.class ) failed. I've used the jar
>>slf4j-log4j13. After replacing it with slf4j-simple all works fine.
>>Now my question: What is the difference?
>
>Could you please give us a stack trace?
>
>Thanks,
>Trustin
>--
--
Ceki Gülcü
Re: Exception while using slf4j-log4j13 ???
Posted by Michael Bauroth <mi...@falcom.de>.
Sorry, was my mistake. After changing the try-catch block for catching
Throwables instead Exceptions, I've found out, that I missed the
log4j-1.3 package itself :(
Michael
Trustin Lee wrote:
> On 4/12/06, Michael Bauroth <mi...@falcom.de> wrote:
>
>>Hi,
>>
>>I figured out an exception while calling CharsetUtil.getDefaultCharset.
>>It took me a while until I found out, that the call of
>>LoggerFactory.getLogger( CharsetUtil.class ) failed. I've used the jar
>>slf4j-log4j13. After replacing it with slf4j-simple all works fine.
>>Now my question: What is the difference?
>
>
>
> Could you please give us a stack trace?
>
> Thanks,
> Trustin
> --
> what we call human nature is actually human habit
> --
> http://gleamynode.net/
> --
> PGP key fingerprints:
> * E167 E6AF E73A CBCE EE41 4A29 544D DE48 FE95 4E7E
> * B693 628E 6047 4F8F CFA4 455E 1C62 A7DC 0255 ECA6
>
--
_____ Falcom Wireless Communications GmbH ______________________________
Dipl.-Ing. Michael Bauroth
Manager Software Department
Phone: +49 3677 8042 332
Fax: +49 3677 8042 215
E-mail: michael.bauroth@falcom.de
Address: Gewerbering 6, 98704 Langewiesen, Germany
______________________________ www.falcom.de ___________________________
This e-mail and any files transmitted are the property of FALCOM and/or
its affiliates, are confidential, and are intended solely for the use of
the individual or entity to whom this e-mail is addressed. If you are
not one of the named recipients or otherwise have reason to believe that
you have received this e-mail in error, please notify the sender and
delete this message immediately from your computer. Any other use,
retention, dissemination, forwarding, printing or copying of this e-mail
is strictly prohibited.
Re: Exception while using slf4j-log4j13 ???
Posted by Trustin Lee <tr...@gmail.com>.
On 4/12/06, Michael Bauroth <mi...@falcom.de> wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> I figured out an exception while calling CharsetUtil.getDefaultCharset.
> It took me a while until I found out, that the call of
> LoggerFactory.getLogger( CharsetUtil.class ) failed. I've used the jar
> slf4j-log4j13. After replacing it with slf4j-simple all works fine.
> Now my question: What is the difference?
Could you please give us a stack trace?
Thanks,
Trustin
--
what we call human nature is actually human habit
--
http://gleamynode.net/
--
PGP key fingerprints:
* E167 E6AF E73A CBCE EE41 4A29 544D DE48 FE95 4E7E
* B693 628E 6047 4F8F CFA4 455E 1C62 A7DC 0255 ECA6