You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to user@struts.apache.org by Erez Efrati <er...@netmedia.net.il> on 2004/03/20 12:14:31 UTC
version 1.2
Hi, I am currently working with the 1.1, is there a good reason to move
to 1.2? Is it going to be released sometime soon?
Thanks,
Erez
RE: version 1.2
Posted by Erez Efrati <er...@netmedia.net.il>.
Ted,
Thanks a lot for clearing this issue.
Erez
-----Original Message-----
From: Ted Husted [mailto:husted@apache.org]
Sent: Sunday, March 21, 2004 1:22 AM
To: Struts Users Mailing List
Subject: RE: version 1.2
As Joe mentioned, we no longer use the "beta-beta-beta-final" versioning
scheme.
We now use an "immutable" versioning scheme, like that used by the
Apache HTTPD project, Jakata Tomcat, and many others.
Each release is a "point" release, meaning it's a three part number:
major-minor-point. The most recent Struts point release is 1.2.0. The
next will be 1.2.1. Each number is an integer, so there can be any
number of point releases.
Each point release is created exactly once. After the release is
created, we vote as to whether to change its status from "alpha" to
"beta" and/or "general availability".
We may also vote to demote a release, if we discover problems later.
At this time, Struts 1.1 is the best available release. Struts 1.2.0 is
also available, but still considered "alpha" quality.
** We encourage everyone to try running your applications against 1.2.0
and report any problems. **
Right now, there are a handful of problem tickets against 1.2.0. As soon
as those are resolved, we will issue 1.2.1. Hopefully, that release will
make "GA" status. Either way, the next 1.2.x release after 1.2.1 will be
1.2.2.
-Ted.
On Sat, 20 Mar 2004 23:20:39 +0200, Erez Efrati wrote:
> Yes, I here so much of this version so I wondered if it was
> released or the CVS head version is stable enough for production.
>
> Erez
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Zsolt Koppany [mailto:zkoppanylist@intland.com] Sent:
> Saturday, March 20, 2004 10:58 PM To: Struts Users Mailing List
> Subject: RE: version 1.2
>
> Hi,
>
>
> do you mean struts-1.2 final? I cannot find that at:
> http://jakarta.apache.org/site/binindex.cgi
>
> Zsolt
>
>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Joe Germuska [mailto:Joe@Germuska.com]
>> Sent: Saturday, March 20, 2004 3:20 PM
>> To: Struts Users Mailing List
>> Subject: Re: version 1.2
>>
>>
>> At 1:14 PM +0200 3/20/04, Erez Efrati wrote:
>>> Hi, I am currently working with the 1.1, is there a good reason
>>> to
>>>
> move
>>> to 1.2? Is it going to be released sometime soon?
>>>
>>
>> Struts 1.2.0 was released a few weeks ago using the new Tomcat-
>> style version numbering. That means that a numbered release may
>> or may not be considered a production quality release. There has
>> not been a formal vote on the status of 1.2.0, but I think we'd
>> cut another release rather than vote 1.2.0 as production-quality.
>>
>> If you're satisfied with Struts 1.1, you may as well stick with
>> it. If you like to keep up with Struts while its evolving, you
>> might be just as well off building from CVS Head as using Struts
>> 1.2.0. That way you'd roll in recent bug fixes and be in a
>> position to fix other bugs yourself if you find them (or just
>> update from CVS and apply fixes and changes as they come in.)
>>
>> There aren't anywhere near the number of structural changes
>> between 1.1 and 1.2 that there were between 1.0 and 1.1. Many
>> deprecated members from 1.1 have been removed, so if you were
>> ignoring the deprecation warnings all this time, you'll finally
>> have to catch up. Also, if I recall correctly, there are some
>> changes in the JSP tag libraries that may be hard to find until
>> you compile the JSPs.
>>
>> Hope that helps,
>> Joe
>>
>>
>> --
>> Joe Germuska
>> Joe@Germuska.com
>> http://blog.germuska.com
>> "Imagine if every Thursday your shoes exploded if you tied them
>> the usual way. This happens to us all the time with computers,
>> and nobody thinks of complaining." -- Jef Raskin
>>
>> ------------------------------------------------------------------
>> --- To unsubscribe, e-mail: struts-user-
>> unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail:
>> struts-user-help@jakarta.apache.org
>
>
> --------------------------------------------------------------------
> - To unsubscribe, e-mail: struts-user-
> unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail:
> struts-user-help@jakarta.apache.org
>
>
> --------------------------------------------------------------------
> - To unsubscribe, e-mail: struts-user-
> unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail:
> struts-user-help@jakarta.apache.org
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: struts-user-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: struts-user-help@jakarta.apache.org
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: struts-user-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: struts-user-help@jakarta.apache.org
RE: version 1.2
Posted by Ted Husted <hu...@apache.org>.
As Joe mentioned, we no longer use the "beta-beta-beta-final" versioning scheme.
We now use an "immutable" versioning scheme, like that used by the Apache HTTPD project, Jakata Tomcat, and many others.
Each release is a "point" release, meaning it's a three part number: major-minor-point. The most recent Struts point release is 1.2.0. The next will be 1.2.1. Each number is an integer, so there can be any number of point releases.
Each point release is created exactly once. After the release is created, we vote as to whether to change its status from "alpha" to "beta" and/or "general availability".
We may also vote to demote a release, if we discover problems later.
At this time, Struts 1.1 is the best available release. Struts 1.2.0 is also available, but still considered "alpha" quality.
** We encourage everyone to try running your applications against 1.2.0 and report any problems. **
Right now, there are a handful of problem tickets against 1.2.0. As soon as those are resolved, we will issue 1.2.1. Hopefully, that release will make "GA" status. Either way, the next 1.2.x release after 1.2.1 will be 1.2.2.
-Ted.
On Sat, 20 Mar 2004 23:20:39 +0200, Erez Efrati wrote:
> Yes, I here so much of this version so I wondered if it was
> released or the CVS head version is stable enough for production.
>
> Erez
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Zsolt Koppany [mailto:zkoppanylist@intland.com] Sent:
> Saturday, March 20, 2004 10:58 PM To: Struts Users Mailing List
> Subject: RE: version 1.2
>
> Hi,
>
>
> do you mean struts-1.2 final? I cannot find that at:
> http://jakarta.apache.org/site/binindex.cgi
>
> Zsolt
>
>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Joe Germuska [mailto:Joe@Germuska.com]
>> Sent: Saturday, March 20, 2004 3:20 PM
>> To: Struts Users Mailing List
>> Subject: Re: version 1.2
>>
>>
>> At 1:14 PM +0200 3/20/04, Erez Efrati wrote:
>>> Hi, I am currently working with the 1.1, is there a good reason
>>> to
>>>
> move
>>> to 1.2? Is it going to be released sometime soon?
>>>
>>
>> Struts 1.2.0 was released a few weeks ago using the new Tomcat-
>> style version numbering. That means that a numbered release may
>> or may not be considered a production quality release. There has
>> not been a formal vote on the status of 1.2.0, but I think we'd
>> cut another release rather than vote 1.2.0 as production-quality.
>>
>> If you're satisfied with Struts 1.1, you may as well stick with
>> it. If you like to keep up with Struts while its evolving, you
>> might be just as well off building from CVS Head as using Struts
>> 1.2.0. That way you'd roll in recent bug fixes and be in a
>> position to fix other bugs yourself if you find them (or just
>> update from CVS and apply fixes and changes as they come in.)
>>
>> There aren't anywhere near the number of structural changes
>> between 1.1 and 1.2 that there were between 1.0 and 1.1. Many
>> deprecated members from 1.1 have been removed, so if you were
>> ignoring the deprecation warnings all this time, you'll finally
>> have to catch up. Also, if I recall correctly, there are some
>> changes in the JSP tag libraries that may be hard to find until
>> you compile the JSPs.
>>
>> Hope that helps,
>> Joe
>>
>>
>> --
>> Joe Germuska
>> Joe@Germuska.com
>> http://blog.germuska.com
>> "Imagine if every Thursday your shoes exploded if you tied them
>> the usual way. This happens to us all the time with computers,
>> and nobody thinks of complaining." -- Jef Raskin
>>
>> ------------------------------------------------------------------
>> --- To unsubscribe, e-mail: struts-user-
>> unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail:
>> struts-user-help@jakarta.apache.org
>
>
> --------------------------------------------------------------------
> - To unsubscribe, e-mail: struts-user-
> unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail:
> struts-user-help@jakarta.apache.org
>
>
> --------------------------------------------------------------------
> - To unsubscribe, e-mail: struts-user-
> unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail:
> struts-user-help@jakarta.apache.org
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: struts-user-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: struts-user-help@jakarta.apache.org
RE: version 1.2
Posted by Erez Efrati <er...@netmedia.net.il>.
Yes, I here so much of this version so I wondered if it was released or
the CVS head version is stable enough for production.
Erez
-----Original Message-----
From: Zsolt Koppany [mailto:zkoppanylist@intland.com]
Sent: Saturday, March 20, 2004 10:58 PM
To: Struts Users Mailing List
Subject: RE: version 1.2
Hi,
do you mean struts-1.2 final? I cannot find that at:
http://jakarta.apache.org/site/binindex.cgi
Zsolt
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Joe Germuska [mailto:Joe@Germuska.com]
> Sent: Saturday, March 20, 2004 3:20 PM
> To: Struts Users Mailing List
> Subject: Re: version 1.2
>
>
> At 1:14 PM +0200 3/20/04, Erez Efrati wrote:
> >Hi, I am currently working with the 1.1, is there a good reason to
move
> >to 1.2? Is it going to be released sometime soon?
>
> Struts 1.2.0 was released a few weeks ago using the new Tomcat-style
> version numbering. That means that a numbered release may or may not
> be considered a production quality release. There has not been a
> formal vote on the status of 1.2.0, but I think we'd cut another
> release rather than vote 1.2.0 as production-quality.
>
> If you're satisfied with Struts 1.1, you may as well stick with it.
> If you like to keep up with Struts while its evolving, you might be
> just as well off building from CVS Head as using Struts 1.2.0. That
> way you'd roll in recent bug fixes and be in a position to fix other
> bugs yourself if you find them (or just update from CVS and apply
> fixes and changes as they come in.)
>
> There aren't anywhere near the number of structural changes between
> 1.1 and 1.2 that there were between 1.0 and 1.1. Many deprecated
> members from 1.1 have been removed, so if you were ignoring the
> deprecation warnings all this time, you'll finally have to catch up.
> Also, if I recall correctly, there are some changes in the JSP tag
> libraries that may be hard to find until you compile the JSPs.
>
> Hope that helps,
> Joe
>
> --
> Joe Germuska
> Joe@Germuska.com
> http://blog.germuska.com
> "Imagine if every Thursday your shoes exploded if you tied them
> the usual way. This happens to us all the time with computers, and
> nobody thinks of complaining."
> -- Jef Raskin
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: struts-user-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: struts-user-help@jakarta.apache.org
>
>
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: struts-user-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: struts-user-help@jakarta.apache.org
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: struts-user-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: struts-user-help@jakarta.apache.org
RE: version 1.2
Posted by Zsolt Koppany <zk...@intland.com>.
Hi,
do you mean struts-1.2 final? I cannot find that at:
http://jakarta.apache.org/site/binindex.cgi
Zsolt
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Joe Germuska [mailto:Joe@Germuska.com]
> Sent: Saturday, March 20, 2004 3:20 PM
> To: Struts Users Mailing List
> Subject: Re: version 1.2
>
>
> At 1:14 PM +0200 3/20/04, Erez Efrati wrote:
> >Hi, I am currently working with the 1.1, is there a good reason to move
> >to 1.2? Is it going to be released sometime soon?
>
> Struts 1.2.0 was released a few weeks ago using the new Tomcat-style
> version numbering. That means that a numbered release may or may not
> be considered a production quality release. There has not been a
> formal vote on the status of 1.2.0, but I think we'd cut another
> release rather than vote 1.2.0 as production-quality.
>
> If you're satisfied with Struts 1.1, you may as well stick with it.
> If you like to keep up with Struts while its evolving, you might be
> just as well off building from CVS Head as using Struts 1.2.0. That
> way you'd roll in recent bug fixes and be in a position to fix other
> bugs yourself if you find them (or just update from CVS and apply
> fixes and changes as they come in.)
>
> There aren't anywhere near the number of structural changes between
> 1.1 and 1.2 that there were between 1.0 and 1.1. Many deprecated
> members from 1.1 have been removed, so if you were ignoring the
> deprecation warnings all this time, you'll finally have to catch up.
> Also, if I recall correctly, there are some changes in the JSP tag
> libraries that may be hard to find until you compile the JSPs.
>
> Hope that helps,
> Joe
>
> --
> Joe Germuska
> Joe@Germuska.com
> http://blog.germuska.com
> "Imagine if every Thursday your shoes exploded if you tied them
> the usual way. This happens to us all the time with computers, and
> nobody thinks of complaining."
> -- Jef Raskin
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: struts-user-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: struts-user-help@jakarta.apache.org
>
>
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: struts-user-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: struts-user-help@jakarta.apache.org
Re: version 1.2
Posted by Joe Germuska <Jo...@Germuska.com>.
At 1:14 PM +0200 3/20/04, Erez Efrati wrote:
>Hi, I am currently working with the 1.1, is there a good reason to move
>to 1.2? Is it going to be released sometime soon?
Struts 1.2.0 was released a few weeks ago using the new Tomcat-style
version numbering. That means that a numbered release may or may not
be considered a production quality release. There has not been a
formal vote on the status of 1.2.0, but I think we'd cut another
release rather than vote 1.2.0 as production-quality.
If you're satisfied with Struts 1.1, you may as well stick with it.
If you like to keep up with Struts while its evolving, you might be
just as well off building from CVS Head as using Struts 1.2.0. That
way you'd roll in recent bug fixes and be in a position to fix other
bugs yourself if you find them (or just update from CVS and apply
fixes and changes as they come in.)
There aren't anywhere near the number of structural changes between
1.1 and 1.2 that there were between 1.0 and 1.1. Many deprecated
members from 1.1 have been removed, so if you were ignoring the
deprecation warnings all this time, you'll finally have to catch up.
Also, if I recall correctly, there are some changes in the JSP tag
libraries that may be hard to find until you compile the JSPs.
Hope that helps,
Joe
--
Joe Germuska
Joe@Germuska.com
http://blog.germuska.com
"Imagine if every Thursday your shoes exploded if you tied them
the usual way. This happens to us all the time with computers, and
nobody thinks of complaining."
-- Jef Raskin
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: struts-user-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: struts-user-help@jakarta.apache.org
Job Posting
Posted by Jignesh Patel <jp...@bangracing.com>.
We are looking for Project Manager, Sr. Software Engineers and Graphic
Designers for our Cochin operation. We will be providing best compansation of
the industry.
Project Manager Eligibility:
7-10 Years experience in which atleast 3 years pure project management
experience,
Fluency in communication,
Well aware of different software life cycles,
Able to handle around 25 people team with various projects.
Working knowledge of UML Tools(ie. Rational Rose)
Sound analyzing skill
Sr. Software Engineer Eligibility:
3-6 Years of experience in J2EE technology and Java Script
Well versed in Struts framework,
Working experience of Weblogic or atleast one application server,
Having exposure of Eclipse tool,
Posses good knowledge of Oracle database
Web Graphic Designer:
Possess innovative nature,
Working knowledge of Flash MX,
Exposure to DHTML
Interested candidate please apply to careers@bangracing.com.Interview will be
scheduled soon.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: struts-user-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: struts-user-help@jakarta.apache.org