You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.

Posted to dev@uima.apache.org by Marshall Schor <ms...@schor.com> on 2008/02/26 00:12:08 UTC

should the uimaj-distr pom "packaging" be changed from "jar" to "pom"?

The uimaj-distr packaging is currently "Jar".

This causes an empty jar to be built when running the mvn 
assembly:assembly goal. This jar is not used anywhere. 

Would it be better to have the packaging of this POM be set to "pom"?  
Is there a reason it was set to "Jar"?

-Marshall

Re: should the uimaj-distr pom "packaging" be changed from "jar" to "pom"?

Posted by Marshall Schor <ms...@schor.com>.

OK - we'll leave it as is.  -Marshall

Adam Lally wrote:
>> The uimaj-distr packaging is currently "Jar".
>>
>>  This causes an empty jar to be built when running the mvn
>>  assembly:assembly goal. This jar is not used anywhere.
>>
>>  Would it be better to have the packaging of this POM be set to "pom"?
>>  Is there a reason it was set to "Jar"?
>>
>>     
>
> I vaguely recall that something didn't work when I set it to "pom" -
> maybe building the javadocs?  Sorry I don't exactly remember the
> details.
>
>   -Adam
>
>
>

Re: should the uimaj-distr pom "packaging" be changed from "jar" to "pom"?

Posted by Adam Lally <al...@alum.rpi.edu>.

> The uimaj-distr packaging is currently "Jar".
>
>  This causes an empty jar to be built when running the mvn
>  assembly:assembly goal. This jar is not used anywhere.
>
>  Would it be better to have the packaging of this POM be set to "pom"?
>  Is there a reason it was set to "Jar"?
>

I vaguely recall that something didn't work when I set it to "pom" -
maybe building the javadocs?  Sorry I don't exactly remember the
details.

  -Adam